Abstract Vitamin D is an immune modulator, in addition to being interrelated with calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism. Recent studies have associated vitamin D with inflammatory processes. C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been used to determine inflammation. There is no consensus on the use of these markers to determine an association between inflammation and vitamin D levels. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between inflammatory markers and vitamin D in the elderly. A cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed based on the analysis of vitamin D, CRP (quantitative determination of C-Reactive Protein by the ultra-sensitive method) and blood count of institutionalized elderly. In this study, 64% showed vitamin D deficiency, with mean value of 22 ng/mL. In the vitamin D deficient group, the mean values found were: CRP 4.5 mg/L; NLR 2.35 and PLR 119. In the group without vitamin D deficiency the mean values were: CRP 4 mg/L; NLR 1.87 and PLR 111 without statistical difference between the values of the analyzed parameters. The results point to a predominant profile of vitamin D deficiency in the evaluated individuals. No association was found between vitamin D values and the inflammatory markers analyzed.

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar, em relação ao uso de próteses, se a espuma de poliuretano apresenta maior reação de corpo estranho no organismo ao ser comparada com a espuma de silicone. Se há diferenças na vascularização das cápsulas formada ao redor das duas espumas implantadas. Se as cápsulas dos implantes de espuma de poliuretano apresentam quantidade maior de fibras colágenas ao serem comparadas com as da espuma de silicone. MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se 64 ratos albinos da linhagem Wistar, distribuídos em dois grupos de 34, grupo espuma de poliuretano e grupo espuma de silicone e receberam implantes discóides subcutâneos em seu dorso. Foram analisadas as cápsulas peri-implante com 28 dias, dois, três e seis meses após a introdução. A análise microscópica com H&E considerou as variáveis: inflamação aguda, inflamação crônica, reação de corpo estranho e neoformação vascular. A análise da coloração com picrosirius-red usando ImageProPlus considerou o número de vasos e colágeno tipo I e tipo III. RESULTADOS: Em relação à inflamação aguda e crônica, não foram encontradas diferenças estatísticas nos dois grupos. Todos os animais do grupo poliuretano, em todos os momentos, apresentaram reação de corpo estranho moderada ou intensa e foi encontrada diferença estatística significativa (p=0,046) ao serem comparados com o grupo silicone, cuja reação era ausente ou discreta aos dois meses. A neoformação vascular apresentou diferenças significativas nos dois grupos, aos 28 dias (p=0,0002); o grupo poliuretano com H&E apresentava quantidade maior de vasos neoformados e o mesmo ocorrendo com o picrosirius, cujo número de vasos era maior que no grupo silicone (p=0,001). A área de colágeno em todos os momentos foi maior no grupo poliuretano, sendo significativa com 28 dias (p=0,001) e com dois meses (p=0,030). CONCLUSÕES: A espuma de poliuretano apresentou maior reação de corpo estranho no organismo do que a espuma de silicone. A quantidade de vasos foi maior na cápsula da espuma de poliuretano com 28 dias após o implante. Aos 28 dias as cápsulas dos implantes de espuma de poliuretano apresentaram quantidade significativamente maior de colágeno do que as de espuma de silicone.

PURPOSES: To evaluate whether polyurethane foam leads more intense foreign-body reaction than silicone foam. To compare the vascularization of the capsules surrounding the foam implants. To investigate if the capsule of polyurethane foam implanted has greater amount of collagen than that of silicone foam. METHODS: Sixty-four young male Wistar rats were allocated into two groups: polyurethane foam and silicone foam. Subcutaneous discs were implanted into the dorsum of the animals in both groups. The capsules were assessed 28 days, two months, three months and six months postoperatively. Microscopic analysis with H&E stain was performed to evaluate the acute and chronic inflammatory process, foreign-body reaction and neovascularization. The analysis with picrosirius red was performed using the ImageProPlus software, to measure the number of vessels and collagen types I and III. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding the acute and chronic inflammatory processes. All rats from the polyurethane group, in all times, exhibited moderate or intense foreign-body reaction, with statistic significant difference (p=0.046) when compared with the silicone group, in which the reaction was either mild or nonexistent at two months. Vascular proliferation was significantly different between the groups at 28 days (p=0.0002), with the polyurethane group displaying greater neovascularization with H&E stain. Similar results were obtained with picrosirius red, which revealed in the polyurethane group a much greater number of vessels than in the silicone group (p=0.001). The collagen area was larger in the polyurethane group, significantly at 28 days (p=0.001) and at two months (p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Polyurethane foam elicited more intense foreign-body reaction when compared with silicone foam. The number of vessels was higher in the capsules of the polyurethane foam implants 28 days after the operation. The capsule of the polyurethane foam implants showed a greater amount of collagen than that of the silicone foam implants.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of Jaccoud arthropathy (JA) in a sample of local systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and its clinical and serological associations. METHODS: 308 SLE patients from a single university center for the last two years were interviewed and examined. The presence of JA was searched for according to the JA index. After this, charts were reviewed for clinical and serological profile. RESULTS: The studied sample was composed by 94.5% females and 5.5% males with mean age of 38.08 ± 12.04 years and mean disease duration of 29.68 ± 11.63 years. A JA prevalence of 6.1% was found in this sample. There was a positive association of JA presence with arthritis complaints (p = 0.001) and a negative association with renal involvement (p = 0.028). Patients with JA had higher positivity for anti-dsDNA (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Despite the positive association of JA with arthritis and anti-dsDNA, there was a negative association with nephritis. This could suggest that JA patients belong with a SLE subset with a better prognosis.