Resumo:
En
|
Texto:
En
|
PDF:
En
Abstract Background: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is an umbrella term encompassing various clinical complaints involving the temporomandibular joints, masticatory muscles, and/or associated orofacial structures. Myogenous TMDs are the most frequent cause of chronic orofacial pain. Musculoskeletal pain is commonly associated with myofascial trigger points (MTPs), for which dry needling (DN) is a routine treatment. Objective: To investigate muscle oxygenation and pain immediately after DN application on an MTP in the masseter muscle of patients with myogenous TMDs. Methodology: Masseter muscle oxygen tissue saturation indices (TSI%) were assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) pre- and post-interventions by a randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover DN/Sham clinical trial (primary outcome). Pain was investigated by the visual analog scale (VAS). In total, 32 individuals aged from 18 to 37 years who were diagnosed with myogenous TMD and myofascial trigger points in their masseter muscles participated in this study. Relative deltas for the studied variables were calculated. Data normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. According to their distribution, data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Student's t-, and Mann-Whitney tests. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism® 5.0 (GraphPad, USA). Results: We found a significant difference (2,108% vs. 0,142%) between masseter muscle TSI% deltas after the DN and Sham interventions, respectively (n=24). We only evaluated women since men refused to follow NIRS procedures. Pain increased immediately after DN (n=32, 8 men), in comparison to Sham delta VAS. Conclusion: These findings show an increase in tissue oxygen saturation in the evaluated sample immediately after the DN intervention on the MTP of patients’ masseter muscle. Pain may have increased immediately after DN due to the needling procedure. Background (TMD joints andor or structures MTPs, MTPs , (MTPs) (DN treatment Objective Methodology TSI (TSI% nearinfrared near infrared (NIRS pre postinterventions post interventions randomized controlled doubleblind, doubleblind double blind, blind double-blind DNSham primary outcome. outcome . outcome) VAS (VAS) total 3 1 study calculated ShapiroWilk Shapiro Wilk test distribution twoway two way Students Student s t, t t- MannWhitney Mann Whitney tests Prism 50 5 0 5. GraphPad, GraphPad (GraphPad USA. USA USA) Results 2,108% 2108 2 108 (2,108 vs 0,142% 0142 142 n=24. n24 n n=24 24 (n=24) procedures n=32, n32 (n=32 men, men) Conclusion procedure (MTPs (TSI (VAS 2,108 210 10 (2,10 0,142 014 14 n2 n=2 (n=24 n=32 n3 (n=3 2,10 21 (2,1 0,14 01 n= (n=2 n=3 (n= 2,1 (2, 0,1 (n 2, (2 0, (