ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) intention and associated variables among women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: The data were collected with a questionnaire for the pregnant women (n=653), from December/2018 to November/2019. They answered the Infant Feeding Intentions (IFI) scale, translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese, and a questionnaire on sociodemographic, biological, family, pregnancy, breastfeeding, health care, and habits variables. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with a 5% significance level, following a multilevel hierarchical model that estimated the association between the dependent and independent variables. The outcome EBF intention measured by the IFI score was dichotomized by the median (<16 or =16). Results: Mean±standard deviation score for the IFI scale was 14.4±2.6 (score 0: very strong intention to not breastfeed at all; score 16: very strong EBF intention up to six months). The results from the regression analysis showed that pregnant women who had no intention to bottle feed (OR=4.33; 95%CI 2.79-6.72) or did not know (OR=1.85; 95%CI 1.21–2.82), those who planned the pregnancy (OR=1.52; 95%CI 1.09–2.12), those who believed they would have help to care for the baby (OR=3.60; 95%CI 1.51–8.56) or did not know (OR=3.97; 95%CI 1.26–12.51), and those who reported knowing the World Health Organization recommendations on breastfeeding (OR=1.73; 95%CI 1.13–2.64) were more likely to show a very strong EBF intention. Conclusions: Pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy presented a strong EBF intention. The higher EBF intention score was significantly associated with the structural, setting, and individual determinants. Objective (EBF Methods n=653, n653 n n=653 , 653 (n=653) December2018 December 2018 December/201 November2019 November 2019 November/2019 (IFI Portuguese sociodemographic biological family 5 level <16 16 (<1 =16. =16 . =16) Results Meanstandard Mean standard 14426 14 4 2 6 14.4±2. 0 all months. months months) OR=4.33 OR433 OR 33 (OR=4.33 95CI CI 95 2.796.72 279672 2.79 6.72 79 72 2.79-6.72 OR=1.85 OR185 1 85 (OR=1.85 1.21–2.82, 121282 1.21–2.82 21 82 1.21–2.82) OR=1.52 OR152 52 (OR=1.52 1.09–2.12, 109212 1.09–2.12 09 12 1.09–2.12) OR=3.60 OR360 3 60 (OR=3.60 1.51–8.56 151856 51 8 56 OR=3.97 OR397 97 (OR=3.97 1.26–12.51, 1261251 1.26–12.51 26 1.26–12.51) OR=1.73 OR173 73 (OR=1.73 1.13–2.64 113264 13 64 Conclusions structural setting determinants n65 n=65 65 (n=653 December201 201 December/20 November201 November/201 <1 (< =1 1442 14.4±2 OR=4.3 OR43 (OR=4.3 9 796 2.796.7 27967 279 2.7 672 6.7 7 2.79-6.7 OR=1.8 OR18 (OR=1.8 12128 1.21–2.8 OR=1.5 OR15 (OR=1.5 10921 1.09–2.1 OR=3.6 OR36 (OR=3.6 1.51–8.5 15185 OR=3.9 OR39 (OR=3.9 126125 1.26–12.5 OR=1.7 OR17 (OR=1.7 1.13–2.6 11326 n6 n=6 (n=65 December20 20 December/2 November20 November/20 < ( = 144 14.4± OR=4. OR4 (OR=4. 2.796. 2796 27 2. 67 6. 2.79-6. OR=1. OR1 (OR=1. 1212 1.21–2. 1092 1.09–2. OR=3. OR3 (OR=3. 1.51–8. 1518 12612 1.26–12. 1.13–2. 1132 n= (n=6 December2 December/ November2 November/2 14.4 OR=4 (OR=4 2.796 2.79-6 OR=1 (OR=1 121 1.21–2 109 1.09–2 OR=3 (OR=3 1.51–8 151 1261 1.26–12 1.13–2 113 (n= November/ 14. OR= (OR= 2.79- 1.21– 10 1.09– 1.51– 15 126 1.26–1 1.13– 11 (n (OR 1.21 1.09 1.51 1.26– 1.13 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.26 1.1 1.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a intenção materna de amamentar exclusivamente (IMA) e variáveis associadas entre as mulheres no terceiro trimestre de gravidez. Métodos: A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de entrevista e questionário semiestruturado e autoadministrado, entre dezembro/2018 e novembro/2019. As gestantes (n=653) responderam à escala Infant Feeding Intentions (IFI) testada, traduzida e adaptada para o português do Brasil e ao questionário contendo perguntas sobre variáveis sociodemográficas, biológicas e familiares, bem como relacionadas à gestação, ao aleitamento materno, à assistência à saúde e a hábitos. Foram realizadas análises estatísticas descritivas e de regressão logística múltipla hierarquizada, com nível de significância de 5%, para estimar a associação entre as variáveis independentes e o desfecho. A IMA, medida pela escala IFI, foi dicotomizada pela mediana (<16 ou =16). Resultados: A pontuação média±desvio padrão para a escala IFI foi de 14,4±2,6. Os resultados da análise de regressão mostraram que as gestantes que não tinham intenção de oferecer mamadeira (OR=4,33; IC95% 2,79-6,72) ou não sabiam (OR=1,85; IC95% 1,21–2,82), que planejaram a gestação (OR=1,52; IC95% 1,09–2,12), aquelas que acreditavam que teriam ajuda nos cuidados com o bebê (OR=3,60; IC95% 1,51–8,56) ou que não sabiam (OR=3,97; IC95% 1,26–12,51), bem como aquelas que relataram conhecer as recomendações da Organização Mundial de Saúde sobre amamentação (OR=1,73; IC95% 1.13–2.64) tinham mais chances de mostrar uma IMA muito forte. Conclusões: As gestantes no terceiro trimestre de gestação apresentaram forte IMA. A maior IMA esteve significativamente associada aos determinantes estruturais, contextuais e individuais. Objetivo (IMA gravidez Métodos autoadministrado dezembro2018 dezembro 2018 dezembro/201 novembro2019 novembro 2019 novembro/2019 n=653 n653 n 653 (n=653 (IFI testada sociodemográficas familiares materno hábitos hierarquizada 5 5% desfecho <16 16 (<1 =16. =16 . =16) Resultados médiadesvio média desvio 14426 14 4 2 6 14,4±2,6 OR=4,33 OR433 OR 33 (OR=4,33 IC95 IC 2,796,72 279672 2,79 6,72 79 72 2,79-6,72 OR=1,85 OR185 1 85 (OR=1,85 1,21–2,82, 121282 1,21–2,82 , 21 82 1,21–2,82) OR=1,52 OR152 52 (OR=1,52 1,09–2,12, 109212 1,09–2,12 09 12 1,09–2,12) OR=3,60 OR360 3 60 (OR=3,60 1,51–8,56 151856 51 8 56 OR=3,97 OR397 97 (OR=3,97 1,26–12,51, 1261251 1,26–12,51 26 1,26–12,51) OR=1,73 OR173 73 (OR=1,73 1.13–2.64 113264 13 64 Conclusões estruturais individuais dezembro201 201 dezembro/20 novembro201 novembro/201 n=65 n65 65 (n=65 <1 (< =1 1442 14,4±2, OR=4,3 OR43 (OR=4,3 IC9 796 2,796,7 27967 279 2,7 672 6,7 7 2,79-6,7 OR=1,8 OR18 (OR=1,8 12128 1,21–2,8 OR=1,5 OR15 (OR=1,5 10921 1,09–2,1 0 OR=3,6 OR36 (OR=3,6 1,51–8,5 15185 OR=3,9 OR39 9 (OR=3,9 126125 1,26–12,5 OR=1,7 OR17 (OR=1,7 1.13–2.6 11326 dezembro20 20 dezembro/2 novembro20 novembro/20 n=6 n6 (n=6 < ( = 144 14,4±2 OR=4, OR4 (OR=4, 2,796, 2796 27 2, 67 6, 2,79-6, OR=1, OR1 (OR=1, 1212 1,21–2, 1092 1,09–2, OR=3, OR3 (OR=3, 1,51–8, 1518 12612 1,26–12, 1.13–2. 1132 dezembro2 dezembro/ novembro2 novembro/2 n= (n= 14,4± OR=4 (OR=4 2,796 2,79-6 OR=1 (OR=1 121 1,21–2 109 1,09–2 OR=3 (OR=3 1,51–8 151 1261 1,26–12 1.13–2 113 novembro/ (n 14,4 OR= (OR= 2,79- 1,21– 10 1,09– 1,51– 15 126 1,26–1 1.13– 11 14, (OR 1,21 1,09 1,51 1,26– 1.13 1,2 1,0 1,5 1,26 1.1 1, 1.

Abstract Objective: This study assessed maternal mortality (MM) and related factors in a large-sized municipality in the Southeastern region of Brazil (Campinas, São Paulo) during the period 2000-2015. Methods: This study consisted of two phases: 1. An analytical nested case-control phase that assessed the impact of individual and contextual variables on MM; and 2. an ecological phase designed to contextualize maternal deaths by means of spatial analysis. The case group consisted of all maternal deaths (n = 87) and the control group consisted of 348 women who gave birth during the same period. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, association, and multiple logistic regression (MLR) tests at p < 0.05 as well as spatial analysis. Results: Maternal Mortality Ratio was 37 deaths per 100.000 live births. Deaths were dispersed throughout the urban territory and no formation of cluster was observed. MLR showed that pregnant women aged > 35 years old (OR = 2.63) or those with cesarean delivery (OR = 2.51) were more prone to maternal death. Conclusion: Maternal deaths were distributed dispersedly among the different socioeconomic levels and more prone to occur among older women or those undergoing cesarean deliveries. Objective MM (MM largesized large sized Campinas, Campinas (Campinas Paulo 20002015. 20002015 2000 2015. 2015 2000-2015 Methods phases 1 casecontrol 2 n 87 34 statistics association (MLR 005 0 05 0.0 Results 3 100000 100 000 100.00 births observed OR 2.63 263 63 2.51 251 51 death Conclusion deliveries 2000201 200 201 2000-201 8 00 0. 10000 10 100.0 2.6 26 6 2.5 25 5 200020 20 2000-20 1000 100. 20002 2000-2 2000-

Resumo Objetivo: Esse estudo avaliou a mortalidade materna (MM) e fatores relacionados em um município de grande porte da região sudeste do Brasil (Campinas, São Paulo) no período de 2000-2015. Métodos: Esse estudo consistiu de duas fases: 1. Uma fase analítica de caso-controle que avaliou o impacto de variáveis individuais e contextuais na MM; 2. Uma fase ecológica delineada para contextualizar as mortes maternas por meio de análise espacial. O grupo caso consistiu de 87 mortes maternas e o grupo controle de 348 mulheres que tiveram bebês durante o mesmo período. Os dados foram analisados por estatística descritiva, testes de associação e regressão logística múltipla (RLM) (p < 0,05) assim como análise espacial. Resultados: A taxa de mortalidade materna foi de 37 mortes para cada 100.000 nascidos vivos. As mortes foram dispersas por todo o território urbano e não se observou formação de clusters. Na RLM observou-se que mulheres grávidas com idade > 35 anos (OR = 2,63) ou aquelas que passaram por cesárea (OR = 2,51) foram mais propensas à morte materna. Conclusão: As mortes maternas foram distribuídas dispersamente entre os diferentes níveis socioeconômicos e mais propensas a ocorrer entre mulheres > 35 anos de idade ou que passaram por cesárea. Objetivo MM (MM Campinas, Campinas (Campinas Paulo 20002015. 20002015 2000 2015. 2015 2000-2015 Métodos fases 1 casocontrole 2 espacial 8 34 descritiva (RLM p 0,05 005 0 05 Resultados 3 100000 100 000 100.00 vivos clusters observouse OR 2,63 263 63 2,51 251 51 Conclusão 2000201 200 201 2000-201 0,0 00 10000 10 100.0 2,6 26 6 2,5 25 5 200020 20 2000-20 0, 1000 100. 2, 20002 2000-2 2000-

Dental trauma is a public health problem because of its high prevalence rates and treatment costs and for affecting mainly younger individuals. Aim This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the variables associated with dental trauma and its influence on oral health-related quality of life among 7th-grade students of public elementary schools. Methods The data was collected with semi-structured and self-administered questionnaires and an intraoral clinical examination (n = 204). The variables collected regarded dental trauma, lip coverage, overjet, oral health-related quality of life (Child Perceptions Questionnaire - CPQ11-14 ISF: 8), and sociodemographic profile. Association tests and the Mann-Whitney test were performed at a 5% significance level. Results Dental trauma occurred in 12.3% of students, 94.6% had adequate lip coverage, and the mean overjet was 2.7 mm (±2.0). Sex was the only variable with a statistically significant association with dental trauma (p = 0.021). There was no statistically significant difference in the CPQ11-14 ISF: 8 score between students with and without dental trauma (p = 0.136). Conclusions Dental trauma was significantly associated with sex and did not impact the oral health-related quality of life of the students. individuals crosssectional cross sectional healthrelated related 7thgrade thgrade 7th grade th schools semistructured semi structured selfadministered self administered n 204. 204 . 204) coverage Child CPQ1114 CPQ CPQ11 14 CPQ11-1 ISF 8, , 8) profile MannWhitney Mann Whitney 5 level 123 12 3 12.3 946 94 6 94.6 27 2 7 2. ±2.0. 20 ±2.0 0 (±2.0) p 0.021. 0021 0.021 021 0.021) 0.136. 0136 0.136 136 0.136) CPQ111 CPQ1 1 CPQ11- 12. 9 94. ±2. (±2.0 002 0.02 02 013 0.13 13 ±2 (±2. 00 0.0 01 0.1 ± (±2 0. (± (

ABSTRACT Little is known about how Brazilian dentists’ treatment decisions for proximal carious lesions are compared to current evidence-based recommendations, so better understanding is needed to close any potential evidence-practice gap. Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to quantify the evidence-practice gap about proximal carious lesions treatment and identify dentist factors associated with this evidence-practice gap. Methods: Brazilian dentists (n=214) from Araraquara, São Paulo State, “completed a questionnaire about their dentist and practice characteristics and a translated version of the “Assessment of Caries Diagnosis and Caries Treatment” from the U.S. National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Five radiographic images of proximal carious lesions in low-risk and high-risk patient scenarios were used. Associations between treatment recommendations and lesion, dentist, and practice characteristics were tested for statistical significance (p<0.05). Results: Lesions confined to the enamel would be restored by 35% and 71% of dentists in the low-risk and high-risk patient scenarios, respectively, suggesting a substantial evidence-practice gap given that surgical intervention of enamel lesions is not consistent with current evidence. The lesion depth threshold to recommend a permanent restoration differed between the low-risk and high-risk patient scenarios (p<0.001). Specific dentist/practice characteristics (dentist gender, graduate of a public dental school, postgraduate training, use of caries risk assessment) were significantly associated with the evidence-practice gap, but the magnitude of these differences was not major Conclusion: A substantial evidence-practice gap in treatment of proximal carious lesions was found for the sample overall, even when clinical scenarios presented low-risk patients. Global strategies are needed to close this substantial evidence-practice gap. evidencebased evidence based evidencepractice Objectives crosssectional cross sectional Methods n=214 n214 n 214 (n=214 Araraquara State completed Assessment Treatment US U S U.S PracticeBased Practice Based Network lowrisk low highrisk high used p<0.05. p005 p p<0.05 . 0 05 (p<0.05) Results 35 71 respectively p<0.001. p0001 p<0.001 001 (p<0.001) dentistpractice gender school training assessment Conclusion overall patients n=21 n21 21 (n=21 p00 p<0.0 (p<0.05 3 7 p000 p<0.00 00 (p<0.001 n=2 n2 2 (n=2 p0 p<0. (p<0.0 (p<0.00 n= (n= p<0 (p<0. (n p< (p<0 (p< (p

RESUMO Pouco se sabe se as decisões de tratamento dos dentistas brasileiros para lesões cariosas proximais são comparadas às recomendações atuais baseadas em evidências, portanto, é necessário um melhor entendimento para fechar qualquer potencial lacuna entre a evidência e a prática. Purpose: Este estudo transversal teve como objetivo quantificar a lacuna entre a evidência e a prática na decisão de tratamento das lesões cariosas proximais e identificar os fatores associados a essa lacuna entre a evidência e a prática. Methods: Cirurgiões-dentistas brasileiros (n=214) de Araraquara, Estado de São Paulo, preencheram um questionário sobre suas características odontológicas e clínicas e uma versão traduzida do “Assessment of Caries Diagnosis and Caries Treatment” da U.S. National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Cinco imagens radiográficas de lesões cariosas proximais em cenários de pacientes de baixo risco e alto risco foram usadas. Associações entre recomendações de tratamento e lesão, dentista e características da prática foram testadas (p<0,05). Results: As lesões confinadas ao esmalte seriam restauradas por 35% e 71% dos dentistas nos cenários de pacientes de baixo risco e alto risco, respectivamente, sugerindo uma lacuna entre a evidência e a prática substancial, dado que a intervenção cirúrgica das lesões do esmalte não é consistente com as evidências atuais. O limiar de profundidade da lesão para recomendar uma restauração permanente diferiu entre os cenários de pacientes de baixo risco e alto risco (p<0,001). Características específicas do dentista/prática (sexo do dentista, graduado em uma faculdade pública, pós-graduação, uso da avaliação de risco de cárie) foram significativamente associadas à lacuna entre a evidência e a prática, mas a magnitude dessas diferenças não foi importante. Conclusions: uma lacuna entre a evidência e a prática substancial na decisão de tratamento de lesões cariosas proximais foi encontrada para a amostra como um todo, mesmo quando os cenários clínicos apresentavam pacientes de baixo risco. Estratégias globais são necessárias para fechar essa lacuna entre a evidência e a prática. portanto Purpose Methods Cirurgiõesdentistas Cirurgiões n=214 n214 n 214 (n=214 Araraquara Paulo Assessment Treatment US U S U.S PracticeBased Practice Based Network usadas p<0,05. p005 p p<0,05 . 0 05 (p<0,05) Results 35 71 respectivamente p<0,001. p0001 p<0,001 001 (p<0,001) dentistaprática sexo pública pósgraduação, pósgraduação pós graduação, graduação pós-graduação cárie importante Conclusions todo n=21 n21 21 (n=21 p00 p<0,0 (p<0,05 3 7 p000 p<0,00 00 (p<0,001 n=2 n2 2 (n=2 p0 p<0, (p<0,0 (p<0,00 n= (n= p<0 (p<0, (n p< (p<0 (p< (p

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the prevalence and analyze the variables associated with the use of pacifiers and/or bottles by infants up to 6 months of age. Material and Methods: Data on sociodemographic characteristics, intention to offer pacifier and bottle-feeding, pregnancy and breastfeeding (BF) variables were collected at baseline by interviews and a self-administered questionnaire among pregnant women in the 3rd trimester. After delivery, mother-baby binomials were followed by phone calls at the 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of the baby's life (n=467) to gather information on the type of delivery, baby’s gender, BF in the first hour of the newborn’s life, baby’s weight, mother’s return to work, and oral habits. Association analyses were performed using logistic regression models with a 5% significance level with the pacifier/bottle-feeding use as the outcome. Results: Most mothers (52.5%) reported their babies used bottle-feeding, 48.2% used pacifiers and 33.4% used both of them throughout the 6 months. Intention to offer pacifier and bottle-feeding was reported by 45.0% and 54.8% of the mothers at the 3rd trimester of the pregnancy, respectively. Not living in one’s own residence (OR=1.53; 95%CI: 1.05-2.24) and having the prenatal intention of offering a pacifier (OR=2.50; 95%CI: 1.63-3.83) to the baby were significantly associated with pacifier use. Variables significantly associated with bottle-feeding were mother’s return to work (OR=2.48; 95%CI: 1.54-3.97), baby’s lower birth weight (OR=1.58; IC95%: 1.07-2.33), and prenatal intention to offer bottle-feeding (OR=2.51; 95%CI 1.56-4.04). Conclusion: About half of the babies used pacifiers or were bottle-fed, which were associated with the mother’s prenatal intention to offer them to their babies and socioeconomic factors. Objective andor age Methods characteristics bottlefeeding, bottlefeeding bottle feeding, feeding (BF selfadministered self administered rd delivery motherbaby mother 1st st th babys s n=467 n467 n 467 (n=467 gender newborns newborn habits 5 pacifier/bottlefeeding pacifierbottlefeeding pacifier/bottle outcome Results 52.5% 525 52 (52.5% 482 48 2 48.2 334 33 4 33.4 450 45 0 45.0 548 54 8 54.8 respectively ones one OR=1.53 OR153 OR 1 53 (OR=1.53 95CI CI 95 1.052.24 105224 1.05 2.24 05 24 1.05-2.24 OR=2.50 OR250 50 (OR=2.50 1.633.83 163383 1.63 3.83 63 3 83 1.63-3.83 OR=2.48 OR248 (OR=2.48 1.543.97, 154397 1.54 3.97 , 97 1.54-3.97) OR=1.58 OR158 58 (OR=1.58 IC95% IC95 IC 1.072.33, 107233 1.07 2.33 07 1.07-2.33) OR=2.51 OR251 51 (OR=2.51 1.564.04. 156404 1.56 4.04 . 56 04 1.56-4.04) Conclusion bottlefed, bottlefed fed, fed bottle-fed factors n=46 n46 46 (n=46 pacifierbottle 52.5 (52.5 48. 33. 45. 54. OR=1.5 OR15 (OR=1.5 9 052 1.052.2 10522 105 1.0 224 2.2 1.05-2.2 OR=2.5 OR25 (OR=2.5 633 1.633.8 16338 163 1.6 383 3.8 1.63-3.8 OR=2.4 OR24 (OR=2.4 543 1.543.97 15439 154 1.5 397 3.9 1.54-3.97 IC9 072 1.072.33 10723 107 233 2.3 1.07-2.33 564 1.564.04 15640 156 404 4.0 1.56-4.04 n=4 n4 (n=4 52. (52. OR=1. OR1 (OR=1. 1.052. 1052 10 1. 22 2. 1.05-2. OR=2. OR2 (OR=2. 1.633. 1633 16 38 3. 1.63-3. 1.543.9 1543 15 39 1.54-3.9 1.072.3 1072 23 1.07-2.3 1.564.0 1564 40 4. 1.56-4.0 n= (n= (52 OR=1 (OR=1 1.052 1.05-2 OR=2 (OR=2 1.633 1.63-3 1.543. 1.54-3. 1.072. 1.07-2. 1.564. 1.56-4. (n (5 OR= (OR= 1.05- 1.63- 1.543 1.54-3 1.072 1.07-2 1.564 1.56-4 ( (OR 1.54- 1.07- 1.56-

Aim Better understanding of dentists’ decision-making about defective restorations is needed to close the evidence-practice gap (EPG). This study aimed to quantify the EPG about defective restorations and identify dentist factors associated with this EPG. Methods 216 dentists from São Paulo State, Brazil, completed a questionnaire about three clinical case scenarios involving defective composite restorations with cementum-dentin margins (case 1) and enamel margins (case 2), and an amalgam (case 3) restoration. Dentists were asked what treatment, if any, they would recommend, including preventive treatment, polishing, re-surfacing, or repairing the restoration, or replacing the entire restoration. Replacing the entire restoration in any of these three scenarios was classified as inconsistent with the evidence, comprising an EPG. Bivariate analyses using Chi-square, ANOVA, or multiple comparison tests were performed (p<.05). Results for defective composite restorations, 49% and 55% of dentists chose to replace the entire restoration for cases 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-nine percent of dentists chose to replace the entire amalgam restoration. Dentists were significantly more likely to choose to replace the defective amalgam restoration than the composite restoration with a defect at the cementum-dentin margins or the enamel margins (both at p < .001). Female dentists were more likely to choose a conservative treatment than male dentists for cases 1 (p=.034) and 2 (p=.009). Dentists with a higher percentage of patients interested in individualized caries prevention were also more conservative in case 1 (p=.045). Conclusion a substantial EPG regarding treatment decisions for defective restorations exists, especially for composite restorations. This study adds to the international evidence that an EPG exists in this clinical area and that global strategies need to be developed to close the gap. decisionmaking decision making evidencepractice practice . (EPG) 21 State Brazil cementumdentin cementum dentin , 2) 3 recommend polishing resurfacing, resurfacing re surfacing, surfacing re-surfacing Chisquare, Chisquare Chi square, square Chi-square ANOVA p<.05. p05 p<.05 05 (p<.05) 49 55 respectively Twentynine Twenty nine both .001. 001 .001 .001) p=.034 p034 034 (p=.034 p=.009. p009 p=.009 009 (p=.009) p=.045. p045 p=.045 045 (p=.045) (EPG p0 p<.0 0 (p<.05 4 5 00 .00 p=.03 p03 03 (p=.03 p00 p=.00 (p=.009 p04 p=.04 04 (p=.045 p<. (p<.0 .0 p=.0 (p=.0 (p=.00 (p=.04 p< (p<. p=. (p=. (p< p= (p= (p

Abstract Objective: To investigate association between parental locus of control (belief of individuals about what or who has control of the events of their lives) and bottle feeding habits among children from 3 to 5 years of age. Methodology: Parental locus of control validated in Brazil, and semi-structured questionnaire to obtain sociodemographic, health, and oral habit behaviors was applied to mothers of 992 preschool children. Outcome variable “use of feeding bottle” was studied according to the time of its use (≤36 months and >36 months). Simple logistic regression models were adjusted and raw odds ratios were estimated for variables of distal blocks, which contemplated parental locus of control, socioeconomic characteristics of family, and maternal habits. In the intermediate block, the variables for conditions of the child's birth and place of health care attendance during the prenatal period and early childhood were included. In the proximal block, the time of breastfeeding and pacifier use were reported. Variables were analyzed from the distal to the proximal block, and the individual analyses that presented p ≤ 0.20 remained in each model; included in the subsequent block were the variables with p ≤ 0.10, because this was a study of prevention. Results: Longer time of feeding bottle use was associated with the internal parental locus of control, mothers older than 31 years of age, white race, premature children, who used pacifiers and are treated in the private health system. Conclusions: Children who maintained the habit of feeding bottle use for a longer time were those whose mother presented an internal locus of control.

Abstract Data on dental practices related to caries risk assessment (CRA) are scarce among Brazilian dentists. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CRA use by dentists and factors associated with its use, as well as to quantify dentists’ ratings of the importance of specific factors when treatment planning. Dentists registered at the Regional Council of Dentistry of São Paulo State – Araraquara region were sent two paper questionnaires that comprised: a) characteristics of dentists themselves, their practices, and their patients; and b) the translated version of the “Assessment of Caries Diagnosis and Caries Treatment” Questionnaire from the U.S. National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Participants were 206 dentists who currently practiced in Araraquara and treated dental caries. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were used for data analysis. Thirty-six percent of the dentists reported they perform CRA and, among them, 36% indicated they record the assessment on a special form that is kept in the patient chart. More years since dental school graduation (OR = 1.1, p = 0.002) and holding an advanced academic degree (OR=2.6, p=0.005) were associated with a higher likelihood of performing CRA, whereas exclusively using a private practice model (OR = 0.5, p = 0.016) was associated with a lower likelihood of performing CRA. The current oral hygiene and commitment to return for follow-up were the most important risk factors for treatment planning. In conclusion, CRA was not a routine procedure in daily practice among the majority of participating dentists. Specific demographic, practice and academic education characteristics were associated with performing CRA.

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the dental practice patterns related to caries prevention in children aged 6-18 years and associated factors. Material and Methods: Dentists (n=162) from Araraquara, Brazil, completed two paper questionnaires: (1) one about characteristics of their practice and their patient population; and (2) a translated version of the “Assessment of Caries Diagnosis and Caries Treatment” Questionnaire from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Regression analyses were used for data analysis (p<0.05). Results: Dentists reported using in-office fluoride (IOF) and dental sealants (DS) in 74.2% and 45.1% of their pediatric patients, respectively. Regression analysis showed that female dentists (p=0.035 for DS; p=0.044 for IOF; p=0.011 for non-prescription fluoride rinse), those with advanced degrees (p=0.032 for prescription of fluoride), those who graduated from a private dental school (p=0.018 for chlorhexidine rinse), those who provided caries prevention regimens (p<0.001 for DS; p=0.004 for IOF; p=0.013 for non-prescription fluoride rinse), those with a greater percentage of patients interested in a caries prevention regimen (p=0.007 for non-prescription fluoride rinse), those working in a private practice model (p=0.047 for prescription of fluoride) were more likely to recommend some type of preventive methods to their pediatric patients. Conclusion: Dentists reported recommending IOF to most of their pediatric patients. Certain dentists’, practices’, and patients’ characteristics were associated to some caries prevention regimens recommended by dentists.

Resumo Introdução Pouco se sabe sobre a influência do risco de cárie na retenção de selantes oclusais. Objetivo Avaliar as taxas de retenção de um cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina utilizado como selante oclusal em primeiros molares permanentes de escolares de 6-8 anos, e analisar a influência do risco de cárie na taxa de retenção do selante, durante um período de 24 meses. Material e método A aplicação do selante foi realizada em consultório odontológico no início do estudo, após as crianças serem alocados no grupo de alto risco (AR) ou baixo risco (BR) de cárie. Os exames foram realizados pelo mesmo dentista calibrado em 0, 6, 12, 18 e 24 meses. As taxas de retenção foram estimadas e o método de Kaplan-Meier foi utilizado para estimar as probabilidades de sobrevivência. A comparação entre os grupos AR e BR foi avaliada pelos testes de Wilcoxon e log-rank. Resultado Os resultados mostraram que 14% dos dentes selados apresentaram perda total (16% para AR e 12% para BR) e 46% apresentaram perda parcial durante o estudo (51% de AR e 41% para BR), em relação a amostra no início do estudo. Nenhuma diferença pode ser demonstrada pela análise de sobrevivência entre os grupos AR e BR (p> 0,05). Conclusão O risco de cárie não influenciou as taxas de retenção de um cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina usado como selante oclusal em escolares de 6-8 anos de idade.

Abstract Introduction Little is known whether caries risk influence occlusal sealants retention. Objective To determine the retention rates (RR) of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement used as occlusal sealant in permanent first molars of 6-8-year old schoolchildren and to analyze the influence of caries risk at baseline on the RR of the sealant, over a 24-month period. Material and method The sealant application was performed in a dental office at the beginning of the study, after children being allocated into high caries risk group (HR) and low caries risk group (LR). The examinations were performed by the same calibrated dentist at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Retention rates were estimated, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival probabilities; and the comparison between HR and LR groups was evaluated by Wilcoxon and log-rank test. Result The results showed that 14% of sealed teeth showed total loss (16% for HR and 12% for LR) and 46% showed partial loss during the study (51% for HR and 41% for LR), in relation to the baseline sample. No difference could be demonstrated by the survival analysis between HR and LR groups (p>0.05). Conclusion Caries risk did not influence the retention rates of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used as occlusal sealant in 6-8-year old schoolchildren.

Comparar indicadores de saúde bucal (Rendimento, Atrição, Ênfase em Prevenção Modificado, Relação Restauração/Extração) e Relação 1ª Consulta/Urgência entre 15 Unidades de Saúde da Família e 11 Unidades Básicas de Saúde de município do interior paulista, de 2008 a 2011. Os dados foram coletados a partir do Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do SUS (SIA-SUS) e comparados os modelos de atenção por meio de série histórica, teste não paramétrico (Mann-Whitney) e estatística descritiva. Embora haja o processo de fortalecimento da Estratégia Saúde da Família o modelo assistencial representado pelas Unidades Básica de Saúde se mostra mais efetivo em alguns aspectos da saúde bucal no serviço público.

To compare four oral health indicators (Income, Attrition, Modified Prevention Emphasis, Restoration/Extraction) and the 1st Consultation/Urgency Relationship in 15 Family Health Units and 11 Basic Health Units, in an interior city of São Paulo State, 2008-2011. The data were collected from SIA-SUS and the indicators compared through historical series using the non-parametric test (Mann Whitney) and descriptive statistics. Although there is a strengthening process of the Family Health Strategy, the care model represented by the Basic Health Units still proves more effective in some aspects of oral health in public service.

Comparar indicadores de saúde bucal (Rendimento, Atrição, Ênfase em Prevenção Modificado, Relação Restauração/Extração) e Relação 1ª Consulta/Urgência entre 15 Unidades de Saúde da Família e 11 Unidades Básicas de Saúde de município do interior paulista, de 2008 a 2011. Os dados foram coletados a partir do Sistema de Informações Ambulatoriais do SUS (SIA-SUS) e comparados os modelos de atenção por meio de série histórica, teste não paramétrico (Mann-Whitney) e estatística descritiva. Embora haja o processo de fortalecimento da Estratégia Saúde da Família o modelo assistencial representado pelas Unidades Básica de Saúde se mostra mais efetivo em alguns aspectos da saúde bucal no serviço público.

To compare four oral health indicators (Income, Attrition, Modified Prevention Emphasis, Restoration/Extraction) and the 1st Consultation/Urgency Relationship in 15 Family Health Units and 11 Basic Health Units, in an interior city of São Paulo State, 2008-2011. The data were collected from SIA-SUS and the indicators compared through historical series using the non-parametric test (Mann Whitney) and descriptive statistics. Although there is a strengthening process of the Family Health Strategy, the care model represented by the Basic Health Units still proves more effective in some aspects of oral health in public service.

Resumo O estudo buscou refletir sobre os discursos dos adolescentes nas justificativas para a não adesão ao tratamento odontológico. Esta investigação qualitativa deriva de uma pesquisa quantitativa dirigida a adolescentes de 15 a 19 anos, de escolas estaduais que pertenciam à área de 34 Unidades de Saúde da Família em Piracicaba, SP, no ano de 2012. Os adolescentes foram avaliados, diagnosticados e encaminhados para tratamento odontológico. Um ano após esta intervenção e com a não adesão ao tratamento, utilizou-se do método qualitativo para compreender em profundidade este fenômeno. Foram realizadas 25 entre-vistas, com roteiro semiestruturado, dividido em três blocos: adotou ou não as condutas recomendadas; argumentos que justificaram a não adoção das condutas recomendadas; dimensões relacionadas à importância da saúde bucal. A análise de conteúdo temática foi adotada e a não adesão foi relacionada com alguns aspectos e agrupadas configurando em: não prioridade; prioridade e mudança de prioridade. Concluiu-se que as principais justificativas para a não adesão estão relacionadas com diferentes prioridades e o aparelho ortodôntico mostrou-se como potente estimulador do interesse e do estabelecimento de prioridades na atenção à saúde bucal entre os adolescentes.

Abstract The study aimed to reflect on adolescents’ speeches regarding their justifications for non-adherence to dental treatment. This is a qualitative research derived from a quantitative research aimed at adolescents from 15 to 19 years of public schools belonging to the area of 34 Primary Health Units – Family Health, in Piracicaba, SP, in 2012. The adolescents were evaluated, diagnosed and referred for dental treatment. One year after this intervention and with non-adherence to treatment, we used a qualitative method to deeply understand this phenomenon. We conducted 25 interviews with a semi-structured script, divided into three blocks: adopted or did not adopt actions recommended; arguments justifying the non-adherence of recommended actions; dimensions related to oral health importance. We adopted the thematic analysis and non-adherence was related to some aspects and grouped in: no priority; priority and change of priority. We concluded that the main reasons for non-adherence are related to different priorities, and orthodontic brace was a potent stimulator of interest and establishment of priorities in oral health care among adolescents.

Resumo O estudo buscou refletir sobre os discursos dos adolescentes nas justificativas para a não adesão ao tratamento odontológico. Esta investigação qualitativa deriva de uma pesquisa quantitativa dirigida a adolescentes de 15 a 19 anos, de escolas estaduais que pertenciam à área de 34 Unidades de Saúde da Família em Piracicaba, SP, no ano de 2012. Os adolescentes foram avaliados, diagnosticados e encaminhados para tratamento odontológico. Um ano após esta intervenção e com a não adesão ao tratamento, utilizou-se do método qualitativo para compreender em profundidade este fenômeno. Foram realizadas 25 entre-vistas, com roteiro semiestruturado, dividido em três blocos: adotou ou não as condutas recomendadas; argumentos que justificaram a não adoção das condutas recomendadas; dimensões relacionadas à importância da saúde bucal. A análise de conteúdo temática foi adotada e a não adesão foi relacionada com alguns aspectos e agrupadas configurando em: não prioridade; prioridade e mudança de prioridade. Concluiu-se que as principais justificativas para a não adesão estão relacionadas com diferentes prioridades e o aparelho ortodôntico mostrou-se como potente estimulador do interesse e do estabelecimento de prioridades na atenção à saúde bucal entre os adolescentes.

Abstract The study aimed to reflect on adolescents’ speeches regarding their justifications for non-adherence to dental treatment. This is a qualitative research derived from a quantitative research aimed at adolescents from 15 to 19 years of public schools belonging to the area of 34 Primary Health Units – Family Health, in Piracicaba, SP, in 2012. The adolescents were evaluated, diagnosed and referred for dental treatment. One year after this intervention and with non-adherence to treatment, we used a qualitative method to deeply understand this phenomenon. We conducted 25 interviews with a semi-structured script, divided into three blocks: adopted or did not adopt actions recommended; arguments justifying the non-adherence of recommended actions; dimensions related to oral health importance. We adopted the thematic analysis and non-adherence was related to some aspects and grouped in: no priority; priority and change of priority. We concluded that the main reasons for non-adherence are related to different priorities, and orthodontic brace was a potent stimulator of interest and establishment of priorities in oral health care among adolescents.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a prevalência e a severidade da dor orofacial em gestantes. MÉTODOS: O estudo transversal foi realizado em uma amostra de gestantes em atendimento odontológico em uma faculdade de odontologia. Foi aplicado questionário estruturado com perguntas sobre a auto percepção das condições bucais e a presença e a severidade da dor orofacial sentida na boca ou dentes nos últimos 6 meses. RESULTADOS: Participaram do estudo 80 gestantes e, destas, 58,8% afirmaram ter algum problema nos dentes, 31,3% problema na gengiva, 61,3% gosto ruim na boca e 62,5% mau hálito. Apenas 22,5% não apresentaram nenhum tipo de dor orofacial. As dores mais relatadas foram: dor com líquidos quentes, frios ou doces (56,2%) e dor de dente espontânea (38,8%). Quanto à severidade, as dores de intensidade leve e moderada foram as mais frequentes, mas havia um grupo de 23,8% das gestantes com dores intensas ou muito intensas provocadas por líquidos frios ou quentes e 18,8% na mesma condição em relação à dor espontânea. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados do estudo mostraram que, apesar da alta prevalência de dor orofacial encontrada, a severidade foi baixa e relacionada a algumas situações específicas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and severity of oral pain in pregnant women. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of pregnant women who were receiving dental care at a Dental School. A structured questionnaire about self-perception of oral conditions and the presence and severity of orofacial pain in the mouth or teeth in the last 6 months was applied. RESULTS: 80 pregnant women participated in the study and, of these, 58.8% reported having a problem with their teeth, 31.3% periodontal problems, 61.3% bad taste in mouth and 62.5% bad breath. Only 22.5% of pregnant women did not exhibit any form of oral pain. The most frequently reported pains were: pain with hot/cold liquids or sweets (56.2%) and spontaneous toothache (38.8%). With regard to severity, mild and moderate pain were the most frequently reported, but there was a group of 23.8% of pregnant women with severe or very severe pain caused by hot or cold liquids and 18.8% in the same condition in relation to spontaneous pain. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that, despite the high prevalence of pain detected in the pregnant women, severity was low and referred to specific situations.