ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major cause of mortality worldwide. Renal dysfunction is an important risk factor for stroke. Brazilian studies on stroke knowledge are generally population based. Studies stratifying stroke knowledge according to comorbidities are rare. Scientific data are essential to guide the awareness of stroke. OBJECTIVE: To assess stroke knowledge in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analytical study of patients with CKD on hemodialysis in north-eastern Brazil. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire survey on stroke awareness was administered to patients with CKD on hemodialysis between April and November 2022. The chi-square test and other descriptive statistics were used. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients were included in the analysis. The Brazilian acronym for stroke was used by 53.5% of the participants. Less than 10.0% of the sample showed optimal decision-making ability regarding stroke. Of the participants, 29.9% knew at least one risk factor and one symptom; however, this was considered as having below the minimum capacity because they did not know the emergency service call number. In the analysis adjusted for income and education, females (odds ratio [OR], 0.40%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.82), older patients (OR, 0.24%; 95% CI, 0.09-0.63) and having at most one comorbidity (OR, 0.48%; 95% CI, 0.23-0.98) were factors for lower levels of knowledge or ideal decision-making capacity against stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on hemodialysis, especially women and older people, have little knowledge about stroke.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar os diferentes métodos de quantificação de insuficiência mitral (IM) ao ecocardiograma transesofágico (ETE) em pacientes com suspeita clínica de disfunção de prótese mitral. MÉTODOS: Foram estudados 15 pacientes, divididos em dois grupos, conforme a presença ou não de IM expressiva (grau importante) ao cateterismo cardíaco (Cate). A IM foi quantificada ao ETE pelos seguintes métodos, habitualmente empregados para IM de valvas nativas: avaliação subjetiva do jato regurgitante ao mapeamento de fluxo a cores, avaliação objetiva com base na área absoluta do jato regurgitante e na sua área relativa (área do jato/área do átrio esquerdo (AE)), e avaliação baseada na presença de fluxo sistólico reverso em veia pulmonar. RESULTADOS: A IM foi predominantemente de origem transprotética (14 pacientes) e de distribuição excêntrica (11 pacientes). Observou-se concordância estatisticamente significante (p<0,05) entre IM expressiva ao Cate (8 pacientes) e ao ETE pela avaliação subjetiva e presença de fluxo sistólico reverso em veia pulmonar. As avaliações pelas áreas absoluta (área de jato >7cm²) e relativa (área de jato >35% da área do AE) não mostraram concordância significante com o Cate, com nítida subestimação ao ETE pela área relativa. Houve, porém, concordância significante, quando considerado como IM expressiva, jato cuja área relativa foi >30% da área do AE. CONCLUSÃO: O ETE identificou adequadamente as IM protéticas angiograficamente expressivas, particularmente pelos métodos subjetivo e de fluxo sistólico reverso em veia pulmonar. É necessário cautela na utilização de critérios baseados na área do jato regurgitante, em virtude da subestimação da área na presença de jato excêntrico, freqüente em disfunção de prótese mitral.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the different methods for grading mitral regurgitation (MR) by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with clinical suspicion of mitral prosthesis dysfunction. METHODS: Cardiac catheterization (Cath) was performed in 15 patients for grading the severity of prosthetic MR, divided in two groups based on the presence or absence of severe MR. Prosthetic MR was quantified by TEE using methods commonly used for MR of native valves: subjective assessment by color Doppler, objective assessment based on absolute jet area and on its relative area (jet area/left atrial area) and assessment based on the presence of systolic flow reversal in pulmonary vein. RESULTS: Prosthetic MR was mostly transprosthetic (14 patients) and eccentric (11 patients). There was significant correlation (p<0.05) between Cath and TEE for identification of severe MR based on subjective assessment and on the presence of systolic flow reversal in pulmonary vein. Identification based on absolute (jet area >7cm²) and relative (jet area >35% of left atrial area) jet areas did not reveal significant correlation with the angiographic grade and showed clear underestimation by TEE when the last method was used. However, there was good correlation (p<0.05) if relative jet areas >30% were considered as cut point. CONCLUSION: TEE correctly identified angiographic severe mitral prosthesis regurgitation, mainly by the presence of systolic flow reversal in pulmonary vein and subjective assessment. The estimation of severity of the prosthetic MR by absolute or relative jet area seems to be limited and should be used with caution due to eccentricity of the regurgitant jet, frequently seen in mitral prosthesis dysfunction.