Abstract Background Obtaining an adequate image of the needle by ultrasound reduces complications resulting from punctures, increasing patient safety and reducing hospitalization costs. Objectives To verify human perception in relation to number of pixels, while also identifying the best puncture angle and which needle should be used, and to evaluate whether there is a difference if needle visualization software is used. Methods 20 images were analyzed by 103 students who classified them as being sufficient or insufficient and were compared with the quality observed using photoshop. We evaluated whether there were differences between puncture angles of less than 45º and more than 45º, between IV catheter and introducer needles, and between images obtained with and without visualization software. Results There was a higher percentage of sufficient ratings for images those that had more than 60 pixels and when the puncture angle was less than 45º, with significant associations between students’ evaluations and each of these groups (p < 0.001). The percentages of images classified as sufficient were higher for images in which a IV catheter was used and also higher for those using the needle visualization software, with significant associations between the results for students’ classifications and each of these groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions The human eye classifies an image as sufficient according to higher numbers of pixels. Images of punctures at angles smaller than 45º in relation to the surface, of punctures performed with a IV catheter, and when using specific visualization software are also better detected by the human eye. costs 2 10 photoshop º needles 6 p 0.001. 0001 0.001 . 0 001 0.001) surface 1 000 0.00 00 0.0 0.

Resumo Contexto A obtenção de uma imagem adequada da agulha pelo ultrassom diminui complicações decorrentes de punções, trazendo segurança para os pacientes e diminuindo custos com hospitalização. Objetivos Verificar a percepção do olho humano em relação aos pixels, identificar qual o melhor ângulo da punção e qual agulha deve ser utilizada e avaliar se há diferença com o uso de software de visualização de agulha. Métodos Vinte imagens foram analisadas por 103 alunos, que as classificaram como sendo suficientes ou insuficientes, e comparadas com a qualidade observada pelo photoshop. Avaliou-se se havia diferença entre punções com menos de 45º e mais de 45º, entre cateter EV e agulha introdutora e entre imagens obtidas com e sem software de visualização. Resultados Houve um percentual mais elevado de imagens suficientes entre aquelas que tinham mais de 60 pixels e quando o ângulo era menor que 45º, com associação significativa entre a classificação das avaliações pelos alunos e cada um desses grupos (p < 0,001). O percentual de imagens suficientes foi maior nas imagens realizadas com cateter EV e naquelas que utilizaram o software de visualização da agulha, ocorrendo associação significativa entre os resultados da classificação pelos alunos e cada um desses grupos (p < 0,001). Conclusões O olho humano classifica a imagem como sendo suficiente de acordo com a maior quantidade de pixels. Imagens puncionadas com ângulos menores que 45º em relação à superfície, realizadas com cateter EV e utilizando software específico de visualização também são mais bem detectadas pelo olho humano. hospitalização 10 insuficientes photoshop Avaliouse Avaliou º 6 p 0,001. 0001 0,001 . 0 001 0,001) superfície 1 000 0,00 00 0,0 0,

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the karyotype test and myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing findings in patients with myelofibrosis, and to compare transplant characteristics in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation. Methods Retrospective, single-center study with patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis treated at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein between 2010 and 2020. Results A total of 104 patients with myelofibrosis were examined. Patients who had not been submitted to tests in our service were excluded. The final sample comprised 69 patients. Of these 69, 56 were submitted to karyotyping and 22 to myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing. Karyotype was normal in 60% of the patients and altered in 40%. The prevalence of high-risk molecular mutations was higher in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation (100% versus 50%). The median follow-up of transplant patients was 2.4 years and the overall survival at 2 years was 80% (95%CI: 62-100%). Conclusion The molecular analysis enables estimating the patient’s risk and thus instituting more aggressive treatment such as bone marrow transplant for patients at higher risk, being a relevant tool to guide therapy. Given the significance of molecular analysis for therapeutic decision-making in myelofibrosis, collection and disclosure of data on the prevalence of cytogenetic changes and findings of next-generation sequencing in affected patients is important. nextgeneration next generation Retrospective singlecenter single center 201 2020 10 examined excluded 6 5 60 40 40% highrisk high 100% 100 (100 50%. 50 50% . 50%) followup follow up 24 4 2. 80 95%CI 95CI CI 95 (95%CI 62100%. 62100 62 62-100%) patient s therapy decisionmaking decision making important 20 202 1 (10 8 9 62100% 6210 62-100% (1 621 62-100 ( 62-10 62-1 62-