ABSTRACT Introduction: Diffuse interstitial lung disease does not tolerate exercise, due to the sensation of dyspnea and fatigue during low-intensity exertion. Heart rate recovery is related to performance in the six-minute walk test. Objective: To determine sociodemographic differences in lung function and capacity in patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease, based on heart rate recovery during the 6-minute walk test. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed. Heart rate recovery was calculated from the difference between the end of the test and the five minutes of the test. Two comparison groups were formed, abnormal versus normal, in sociodemographic variables of pulmonary function and functional capacity. Results: 38 patients were included in the normal group and 26 in the abnormal group. In the normal group, age was 62.26 ± 15.82 and men were predominant (52.6 %); while in the abnormal group, age averaged 58.77 ± 13.23 and women were predominant (61.5 %). A p-value < 0.05 of the abnormal frequency recovery group was presented in the distance run, dyspnea at the end, fatigue at the end, 1 minute and at 5 minutes after the culmination of the test. Conclusions: Patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease with abnormal heart rate recovery had worse results in distance run, oxygen volume, metabolic equivalents, dyspnea and lower limb fatigue.

RESUMEN Introducción: La enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa no soporta el ejercicio, debido a la sensación de disnea y fatiga durante el esfuerzo de baja intensidad. La recuperación de la frecuencia cardíaca se relaciona con el desempeño en el test de caminata de los seis minutos. Objetivo: Determinar las diferencias sociodemográficas de la función y la capacidad pulmonar en pacientes con enfermedad intersticial difusa, a partir de la recuperación de la frecuencia cardíaca durante el test de caminata de los seis minutos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Se calculó la recuperación de la frecuencia cardíaca a partir de la diferencia entre el final del test y los cinco minutos de la prueba. Se conformaron dos grupos de comparación, anormal versus normal, en variables sociodemográficas de la función pulmonar y la capacidad funcional. Resultados: Se vincularon 38 pacientes en el grupo normal y en el anormal 26. En el primero predominaron la edad de 62,26 ± 15,82 y los hombres (52,6 %); mientras que en el grupo anormal los años promediaron entre 58,77 ± 13,23 y sobresalieron las mujeres (61,5 %). Se presentó un valor p < 0,05 del grupo recuperación de la frecuencia anormal en la distancia recorrida, disnea y fatiga al final, un minuto y a los cinco minutos de culminar el test. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa con una recuperación de la frecuencia cardíaca anormal presentaron peores resultados en la distancia recorrida, volumen de oxígeno, los equivalentes metabólicos, disnea y fatiga de los miembros inferiores.

Abstract Background Recently, a new heart failure (HF) classification was made considering the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) phenotype. Comprehensive assessments of the groups are required to guide patient management. Objective To determine the differences in sociodemographic, clinical, functional aerobic capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) variables in patients with HF classified with different LVEFs and to explore the correlations between the variables. Methods This work is a cross-sectional descriptive and correlational study. Three groups of patients with HF (LVEF≥50%, LVEF<40%, and LVEF40-49%) were compared. Sociodemographic, clinical variables and functional aerobic capacity with Sit to Stand (STS), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLFHQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) were considered. The Chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, and Spearman's correlation were used for statistical analysis. The statistical significance level was set at 5%. Results A total of 209 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of HF, with a more significant number of men. Marital status was a predominantly stable union in the HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) groups. A sedentary lifestyle was lower in the HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) group 59 (84.3%), p-value = 0.033, and the angina pectoris was higher in the HFpEF 30 (42.9%). Systolic blood pressure at the end of the 6MWT evidenced a higher score in HFpEF 132.0±17.25 concerning HFrEF 128.0±16.57, p-value=0.043. The fat percentage was higher in HFpEF 30.20±8.80 regarding the HFmrEF group 26.51±7.60, p-value = 0.028. Conclusion There were significant differences according to the LVEF classification in marital status, angina symptoms, fat percentage, and blood pressure at rest. Recently (HF (LVEF phenotype management sociodemographic healthrelated health related HRQOL (HRQOL crosssectional cross sectional study LVEF≥50%, LVEF50 50 (LVEF≥50% LVEF40 40 LVEF<40% LVEF4049% LVEF4049 49% 49 LVEF40-49% compared Sociodemographic STS, STS , (STS) 6minute minute 6 6MWT, MWT (6MWT) DASI, DASI (DASI) MLFHQ, MLFHQ (MLFHQ) PHQ9 PHQ (PHQ-9 considered Chisquare Chi square oneway one way ANOVA (ANOVA Spearmans Spearman s 5 5% 20 men (HFpEF midrange mid range (HFmrEF (HFrEF 84.3%, 843 84.3% 84 3 (84.3%) pvalue p value 0033 0 033 0.033 42.9%. 429 42.9% . 42 (42.9%) 13201725 132 17 25 132.0±17.2 12801657 128 16 57 128.0±16.57 pvalue=0.043. pvalue0043 value=0.043. 043 p-value=0.043 3020880 8 80 30.20±8.8 2651760 26 51 7 60 26.51±7.60 0028 028 0.028 symptoms rest LVEF≥50% LVEF5 (LVEF≥50 LVEF4 4 LVEF<40 LVEF404 LVEF40-49 (STS (6MWT (DASI (MLFHQ (PHQ- 2 84.3 (84.3% 003 03 0.03 42.9 (42.9% 1320172 13 1 132.0±17. 1280165 12 128.0±16.5 pvalue=0.043 pvalue004 value0043 value=0.043 04 p-value=0.04 302088 30.20±8. 265176 26.51±7.6 002 02 0.02 LVEF≥50 (LVEF≥5 LVEF<4 LVEF40-4 (PHQ 84. (84.3 00 0.0 42. (42.9 132017 132.0±17 128016 128.0±16. pvalue=0.04 pvalue00 value004 value=0.04 p-value=0.0 30208 30.20±8 26517 26.51±7. LVEF≥5 (LVEF≥ LVEF< LVEF40- (84. 0. (42. 13201 132.0±1 12801 128.0±16 pvalue=0.0 pvalue0 value00 value=0.0 p-value=0. 3020 30.20± 2651 26.51±7 LVEF≥ (84 (42 1320 132.0± 1280 128.0±1 pvalue=0. value0 value=0. p-value=0 302 30.20 265 26.51± (8 (4 132.0 128.0± pvalue=0 value=0 p-value= 30.2 26.51 ( 132. 128.0 pvalue= value= 30. 26.5 128. 26.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Diffuse interstitial lung disease is a group of diseases that cause a disorder of aerobic capacity and quality of life; in addition, they cause a high rate of morbidity and mortality for this population. The use of home oxygen therapy greater than 15 hours a day has benefits in chronic hypoxemic patients, however, little has been compared to patients who do not receive it. Objective: Describe the clinical characteristics, functional aerobic capacity and health-related quality of life of two groups of patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease, one with indication for home oxygen therapy and another group without indication. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study included 41 patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease who signed informed consent. In both groups, demographic and clinical characteristics, anxiety/depression, health quality of life related with the Saint George questionnaire, and functional aerobic capacity with the six-minute gait test were measured. The groups were compared with the student's t-test for independent samples. Results: The diffuse interstitial lung disease group with home oxygen therapy presented a higher percentage of smoking history (p = 0.041), a shorter distance walked in the six-minute gait test (304.1 ± 108.7 vs. 390.3 ± 95.6 p = 0.01), and a lower percentage of the predicted distance (58.37 ± 20.45 vs. 73.34 ± 22.90, p = 0.034) compared to the diffuse interstitial lung disease group without home oxygen therapy. Conclusions: Patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease with indication of home oxygen therapy have lower functional aerobic capacity compared to patients without indication.

RESUMEN Introducción: La enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa es un grupo de enfermedades que causan un trastorno de la capacidad aeróbica y calidad de vida, además, ocasionan una gran tasa de morbimortalidad para esta población. El uso de oxigenoterapia domiciliaria mayor a 15 horas diarias tiene beneficios en pacientes hipoxémicos crónicos, sin embargo, poco se ha comparado su uso con pacientes que no lo reciben. Objetivo: Describir las características clínicas, capacidad aeróbica funcional y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de dos grupos de pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa, uno con indicación de oxigenoterapia domiciliaria y otro grupo sin indicación. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal, que incluyó 41 pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa que firmaron consentimiento informado. En ambos grupos, características demográficas y clínicas, ansiedad/depresión, calidad de vida relacionada con la salud con el cuestionario Saint George y la capacidad aeróbica funcional con la prueba de marcha de seis minutos fueron medidas. Se compararon los grupos con la prueba t de student para muestras independientes. Resultados: El grupo enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa con oxigenoterapia domiciliaria presentó mayor porcentaje de antecedente de tabaquismo (p = 0,041), menor distancia caminada en la prueba de marcha de seis minutos (304,1 ± 108,7 vs. 390,3 ± 95,6 p = 0,01), y menor porcentaje de la distancia predicha (58,37 ± 20,45 vs. 73,34 ± 22,90, p = 0,034) frente al grupo enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa sin oxigenoterapia domiciliaria. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa con indicación de oxigenoterapia domiciliaria presentan menor capacidad aeróbica funcional comparada con pacientes sin indicación.