Resumo A presente revisão resume os achados dos estudos histológicos avaliando o impacto de diferentes superfícies de implantes sobre os tecidos peri-implantares humanos nos últimos 20 anos na Universidade Guarulhos (UnG), Brasil. Sete diferentes superfícies de implantes foram avaliadas em 90 indivíduos utilizando um total de 123 micro-implantes. Parâmetros histométricos incluindo contato osso-implante (BIC%), área óssea entre as espiras (BA%), e densidade óssea (BD%) foram avaliados após 8 semanas de cicatrização. Microscopia eletrônica de varredura (SEM) e difração de raios X (XRD) também foram realizados. Os resultados mostraram que independente do tipo de tratamento de superfície, os parâmetros histométricos foram consistentemente melhores que os achados nas superfícies lisas. Superfícies anodizadas e as tratadas com jatos de partículas abrasivas seguidos por ácidos, exibiram maiores índices de BIC% que superfícies lisas em pacientes fumantes. O fumo reduziu o percentual de BIC% ao redor de implantes anodizados. A presença de células inflamatórias foi observada adjacente aos tecidos moles peri-implantares de algumas superfícies. Em suma, a topografia de implantes aumentou significantemente a resposta precoce da osseointegração sob condições de ausência de carga oclusal, promovendo melhores resultados quando comparados a superfície lisa. Entretanto o fumo influenciou negativamente a cicatrização óssea, enfatizando a importância de cessar o fumo para uma melhor osseointegração. periimplantares peri implantares 2 UnG, UnG , (UnG) Brasil 9 12 microimplantes. microimplantes micro implantes. micro-implantes ossoimplante osso implante BIC%, BIC (BIC%) BA%, BA BA% (BA%) BD% BD (BD% SEM (SEM XRD (XRD realizados ácidos fumantes anodizados suma oclusal lisa (UnG 1 (BIC% (BA% (BD (BIC (BA

Abstract The present review summarizes the findings from human histological studies conducted over the past 20 years at the University of Guarulhos, Brazil, examining the impact of various implant surface topographies and smoking on peri-implant bone response. Seven different implant surfaces were evaluated in 90 partially or completely edentulous individuals using a total of 123 micro-implants. Histometric parameters, including bone-implant contact (BIC%), bone area within the threads (BA%), and bone density (BD), were assessed after an 8-week healing period. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were also performed. Results showed that treated surfaces, regardless of the treatment type, consistently demonstrated better histometric outcomes compared to machined surfaces. Anodized surfaces and those subjected to airborne particle abrasion, followed by acid etching, exhibited higher BIC% values than machined surfaces in smoker patients. Smoking reduced BIC% around anodized implants. The presence of inflammatory cells was observed adjacent to the peri-implant soft tissue on some treated surfaces. In conclusion, implant surface topography significantly influences early bone response under unloaded conditions, with treated surfaces promoting better human bone tissue response than machined surfaces. However, smoking negatively impacts peri-implant bone healing, emphasizing the importance of smoking cessation for optimal osseointegration. 2 Guarulhos Brazil periimplant peri 9 12 microimplants. microimplants micro implants micro-implants parameters boneimplant BIC%, BIC , (BIC%) BA%, BA BA% (BA%) BD, BD (BD) 8week week 8 period SEM (SEM Xray X ray XRD (XRD performed type abrasion etching patients conclusion conditions However osseointegration 1 (BIC% (BA% (BD (BIC (BA

Abstract When periodontal disease is diagnosed, it is difficult to predict the clinical response of treatment of a tooth over time because the result of treatment is affected by several factors and will depend on the maintenance and support of periodontal treatment. Rehabilitation with removable dental prostheses, fixed prostheses, and dental implants makes it possible to restore the function and esthetics of patients with tooth loss due to periodontal disease. The predictive factors of tooth loss in periodontitis patients should be assessed by dentists to inform their clinical decision-making during dental treatment planning. This will provide detailed individualized information and level of risk of patients considered suitable for dental rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this article was to review the subject of “Impact of tooth loss due to periodontal disease on the prognosis of rehabilitation” and the effect of fixed, removable, and implant-supported prostheses in periodontal patients.

Abstract Agenesis of lateral incisors, besides the functional issues, represents a great esthetic drawback. The selection of an appropriate treatment is a complex decision, which should consider the stability of the clinical outcomes over time. The aim of the present study was a histological and clinical comparison of two-stage split crest technique (SCT), with bone chips alone or mixed with porcine bone in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral agenesis of the upper lateral incisors. Eleven patients were enrolled, and randomly assigned to receive a treatment with autologous bone chips (group 1) or autologous bone chips mixed 1:1 to porcine-derived xenogenic bone (group 2). After a 2-month healing period, implants were placed and biopsies harvested for histomorphometrical evaluation. Clinical assessment, according to ICOI PISA health scale, and radiographic marginal bone loss evaluation at 12- and 24-month follow-ups were conducted. The histomorphometry showed significantly greater new bone formation (p > 0.0229) in group 2. At 12- and 24-month follow-ups, all the evaluated implants, regardless of the group they were allocated, could be categorized as “success” in the ICOI Pisa Health Scale for Dental Implants, and did not show significant difference in crestal bone loss. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first histological and clinical outcomes indicating that the use of bone chips mixed 1:1 to porcine bone in SCT could be a promising technique for the rehabilitation of patients with agenesis of the upper lateral incisors, although studies with a larger number of patients and implants, and a longer follow up are needed.

Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging process for biomaterials and medical devices. Direct Laser Metal Sintering (DLMS) is an AM technique used to fabricate Ti–6Al–4V implant materials with enhanced surface-related properties compared with wrought samples; thus, this technique could influence microbial adsorption and colonization. Therefore, this in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the impact of different implant production processes on microbial adhesion of periodontal pathogens. Titanium discs produced using two different processes—conventional and AM—were divided into three groups: conventional titanium discs with machined surface (G1), AM titanium discs with chemical treatment (G2) and AM titanium discs without chemical treatment (G3). Subgingival biofilm composed of 32 species was formed on the titanium discs, and positioned vertically in 96-well plates, for 7 days. The proportions of microbial complexes and the microbial profiles were analyzed using a DNA–DNA hybridization technique, and data were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunnett tests (p < 0.05). Lower proportions of the red complex species were observed in the biofilm formed in G2 compared with that in G1 (p < 0.05). Moreover, the proportions of the microbial complexes were similar between G2 and G3 (p > 0.05). Compared with G1, G2 showed reduced levels of Porphyromonas gingvalis , Actinomyces gerencseriae, and Streptococcus intermedius , and increased levels of Parvimonas micra , Actinomyces odontolyticus, and Eikenella corrodens (p < 0.05). The microbial profile of G3 did not differ from G1 and G2 (p > 0.05). The results of this in vitro study showed that titanium discs produced via AM could alter the microbial profile of the biofilm formed around them. Further clinical studies should be conducted to confirm these findings.

A fixação biológica entre as superfícies de implante e os ossos maxilares deve ser considerada como um pré-requisito para o sucesso em longo prazo de próteses implanto-suportadas. Neste contexto, as modificações nas superfícies de implante ganharam um lugar importante e decisivo na pesquisa em Implantodontia nos últimos anos. Sendo o tópico mais estudado, colaboraram para o melhoramento de modalidades de tratamento dental, assim como para a expansão de uso dos implantes dentais. Hoje, um grande número de diferentes implantes com uma grande variedade de propriedades de superfícies, entre outras características, está comercialmente disponível e isto deve ser tratado com cuidado. Apesar das modificações nas superfícies terem melhorado a osseointegração em tempos precoces de implantação, por exemplo, o clínico deve procurar evidências científicas antes de selecionar um implante dental para uso específico. Este artigo fará uma revisão da literatura sobre superfícies de implantes osseointegráveis, analisando estudos in vitro e in vivo, a fim de mostrar uma perspectiva atual do desenvolvimento dos implantes. Esta abordagem englobará os resultados obtidos com micro e nano topografias, em termos quantitativos e qualitativos, avaliando a interface osso-implante. Além disso, discutirá também as perspectivas da incorporação de substâncias biomiméticas (como peptídeos e proteínas morfogenéticas) à superfície dos implantes e seus efeitos na modulação da neoformação óssea periimplantar.

The biological fixation between the dental implant surfaces and jaw bones should be considered a prerequisite for the long-term success of implant-supported prostheses. In this context, the implant surface modifications gained an important and decisive place in implant research over the last years. As the most investigated topic in, it aided the development of enhanced dental treatment modalities and the expansion of dental implant use. Nowadays, a large number of implant types with a great variety of surface properties and other features are commercially available and have to be treated with caution. Although surface modifications have been shown to enhance osseointegration at early implantation times, for example, the clinician should look for research evidence before selecting a dental implant for a specific use. This paper reviews the literature on dental implant surfaces by assessing in vitro and in vivo studies to show the current perspective of implant development. The review comprises quantitative and qualitative results on the analysis of bone-implant interface using micro and nano implant surface topographies. Furthermore, the perspective of incorporating biomimetic molecules (e.g.: peptides and bone morphogenetic proteins) to the implant surface and their effects on bone formation and remodeling around implants are discussed.