ABSTRACT Purpose: The baseline PSA has been proposed as a possible marker for prostate cancer. The PSA determination before 40 years seems interesting because it not suffers yet the drawbacks related to more advanced ages. Considering the scarcity of data on this topic, an analysis of PSA kinetics in this period seems interesting. Materials and Methods: A retrospective assay in a database of a private diagnostic center was performed from 2003 to 2016. All subjects with a PSA before 40 years were included. Results: 92995 patients performed PSA between the ages of 21 – 39. The mean value ranged from 0.66 ng / mL (at age 22) to 0.76 ng / mL (at age 39) and the overall mean was 0.73 ng / mL. As for outliers, 3783 individuals presented a baseline PSA > 1.6 ng / mL (p95). A linear regression model showed that each year there is a PSA increase of 0.0055 ng / mL (β = 0.0055; r2 = 0.0020; p < 0.001). A plateau in PSA between 23 and 32 years was found and there were only minimal variations among the ages regardless of the evaluated percentile. Conclusion: It was demonstrated that PSA kinetics before 40 years is a very slow and progressive phenomenon regardless of the assessed percentile. Considering our results, it could be suggested that any PSA performed in this period could represent the baseline value without significant distortions.

ABSTRACT A 41-year-old male presented at Emergency Department (ED) with right flank pain associated with hematuria for 3 days. Patient had a previous history of nephrolithiasis. The physical examination and blood tests were normal. Urine analyses showed haematuria > 1.000.000/μL. After clinical evaluation, a computer tomography (CT) showed right ureteral dilatation caused by a 5 mm proximal stone and a distal intraluminal mass of 8 cm in length. In this setting, an ureteroscopic biopsy was performed and revealed a large polypoid lesion histologically suggestive of fibroepithelial polyp. Due to technical difficulties (intraluminal mass length and technical issue for the passage of guidewire) and after discussing all available minimally invasive options, we opted for a laparoscopic approach. Instead of ureterectomy of the affected segment of the ureter, as classically performed, we proceeded with an ureterotomy, blunt dissection of the tumor and ureterolithotomy, with complete removal of the mass. This approach did not require ureteral anastomosis and the ureteral dilatation facilitated its primary closure. No complications occurred, even after 3 years of follow-up.

Racional : O tratamento habitual do carcinoma hepatocelular é o transplante hepático. Objetivo : Analisar o MELD, o tempo em lista de espera e a sobrevida em três meses e em um ano de pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático cadavérico e divididos em dois grupos: portadores e não portadores de carcinoma hepatocelular. Método : Estudo analítico, observacional e retrospectivo de 93 pacientes transplantados. Resultados : Os grupos foram similares em relação ao sexo e à idade. Os 28 pacientes com a neoplasia apresentaram maior frequência de vírus da hepatite C (57,1%) e da hepatite B (28,5%) em relação aos 65 não portadores, que foi de 27,7% e 4,6% respectivamente. O MELD fisiológico e corrigido dos portadores de carcinoma hepatocelular foi de 11,9 e 22,3 pontos, enquanto que o dos pacientes sem foi de 19,4 pontos, maior do que o MELD fisiológico e menor do que o MELD corrigido dos portadores. O tempo em lista de espera dos com a neoplasia foi de 96,2 dias, menor do que a dos sem a ela que foi de 165,6 dias. A sobrevida em três meses e em um ano dos pacientes acometidos pela neoplasia foi de 85,7% e 78,6%, igual à sobrevida dos não acometidos que foi de 77% e 75,4%. Conclusão : Os portadores de carcinoma hepatocelular apresentaram menor MELD fisiológico, menor tempo em lista e maior MELD corrigido em relação aos não portadores. A sobrevida em três meses e em um ano foi igual entre os grupos.

Background: Liver transplantation is the usual treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aim : To analyze the MELD score, waiting time and three month and one year survival for liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients affected by hepatocellular carcinoma or not. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational and analytical study of 93 patients submitted to liver transplantation. Results: There were 28 hepatocellular carcinoma and 65 non-hepatocellular carcinoma patients with no differences related to age and sex distribution. The main causes of cirrhosis on hepatocellular carcinoma were hepatitis C virus (57.1%) and hepatitis B virus (28.5%), more frequent than non-hepatocellular carcinoma patients, which presented 27.7% and 4.6% respectively. The physiological and exception MELD score on hepatocellular carcinoma were 11.9 and 22.3 points. On non-hepatocellular carcinoma, it was 19.4 points, higher than the physiological MELD and lower than the exception MELD on hepatocellular carcinoma. The waiting time for transplantation was 96.2 days for neoplasia, shorter than the waiting time for non-neoplasia patients, which was 165.6 days. Three month and one year survival were 85.7% and 78.6% for neoplasia patients, similar to non-neoplasia, which were 77% and 75.4%. Conclusion : Hepatocellular carcinoma patients presented lower physiological MELD score, higher exception MELD score and shorter waiting time for transplantation when compared to non-hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Three month and one year survival were the same between the groups.