Resumo O estudo tem como objetivo investigar as intervenções educativas para a prevenção e conduta dos eventos adversos pós-vacinação. Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática realizada por meio da análise de estudos observacionais sem restrição de idioma e ano com registro no PROSPERO pelo identificador CRD42022313144 e busca nas bases de dados MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, CINAHL e Scopus. Dois pesquisadores selecionaram os estudos, extraíram os dados e avaliaram o risco de viés, as discordâncias foram resolvidas por um terceiro pesquisador. Atenderam os critérios de inclusão da revisão sistemática um total de seis artigos e os estudos apresentaram melhoras significativas pós-intervenção na conduta dos profissionais em relação à imunização. Conclui-se que o fornecimento de estratégias educativas de educação permanente no âmbito vacinal da atenção primária é eficaz para reduzir e/ou erradicar os erros de imunização e eventos adversos pós-vacinação.

Abstract This study investigated educational interventions for the prevention and management of adverse events following immunisation. This a systematic review was conducted by examining observational studies, with no restriction as to language or year, registered in PROSPERO with the identifier CRD42022313144 and by searching the MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus databases. Two researchers selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of study bias; disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. A total of six articles met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review and the studies reported significant post-intervention improvements in staff conduct in relation to immunisation. It was concluded that educational strategies that lead to continued professional development in relation to vaccination in primary care were effective in reducing and/or eradicating immunisation errors and adverse events following immunisation.

Resumo O estudo tem como objetivo investigar as intervenções educativas para a prevenção e conduta dos eventos adversos pós-vacinação. Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática realizada por meio da análise de estudos observacionais sem restrição de idioma e ano com registro no PROSPERO pelo identificador CRD42022313144 e busca nas bases de dados MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, CINAHL e Scopus. Dois pesquisadores selecionaram os estudos, extraíram os dados e avaliaram o risco de viés, as discordâncias foram resolvidas por um terceiro pesquisador. Atenderam os critérios de inclusão da revisão sistemática um total de seis artigos e os estudos apresentaram melhoras significativas pós-intervenção na conduta dos profissionais em relação à imunização. Conclui-se que o fornecimento de estratégias educativas de educação permanente no âmbito vacinal da atenção primária é eficaz para reduzir e/ou erradicar os erros de imunização e eventos adversos pós-vacinação. pósvacinação. pósvacinação pós vacinação. vacinação pós-vacinação Tratase Trata se CRD CRD4202231314 MEDLINE LILACS Embase Scopus viés pesquisador pósintervenção intervenção Concluise Conclui eou ou CRD420223131 CRD42022313 CRD4202231 CRD420223 CRD42022 CRD4202 CRD420 CRD42 CRD4

Abstract This study investigated educational interventions for the prevention and management of adverse events following immunisation. This a systematic review was conducted by examining observational studies, with no restriction as to language or year, registered in PROSPERO with the identifier CRD42022313144 and by searching the MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus databases. Two researchers selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of study bias; disagreements were resolved by a third researcher. A total of six articles met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review and the studies reported significant post-intervention improvements in staff conduct in relation to immunisation. It was concluded that educational strategies that lead to continued professional development in relation to vaccination in primary care were effective in reducing and/or eradicating immunisation errors and adverse events following immunisation. year CRD CRD4202231314 MEDLINE LILACS Embase databases bias researcher postintervention post intervention andor CRD420223131 CRD42022313 CRD4202231 CRD420223 CRD42022 CRD4202 CRD420 CRD42 CRD4

Abstract This study explored the effects of L-PRF on pain, soft tissue healing, periodontal condition, and post-extraction bone repair of mandibular third molars (3Ms). A randomized, prospective, triple-blind, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted with 34 volunteers. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into two treatments: G1 (without L-PRF), G2 (alveoli filled with L-PRF), in which the removal of bilateral 3Ms was performed at the same surgical time. Outcomes were assessed according to a visual analogue scale (pain), soft tissue scoring system (wound healing), periodontal probing of mandibular second molar. Bone repair was determined by volumetric analysis (ITK-SNAP software) and fractal analysis (ImageJ software). An intention-to-treat approach to Statistical analysis was used. L-PRF reduced pain in the 7-day postoperative follow-up (p = 0.019) and not only improved soft tissue healing after 1 month of follow-up (p = 0.021), but also probing depth (distal face) in 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.011). Significant alveolar reduction occurred in 3 months after surgery in both treatments (p < 0.05), however, this was more significant in G1 (p = 0.016). The fractal dimension showed no statistical differences. L-PRF improved postoperative clinical parameters of pain, soft tissue healing, and periodontal condition, suggesting that it has a beneficial effect on preserving the alveolar ridge and accelerating the initial repair process. LPRF L PRF condition postextraction post extraction 3Ms. Ms . (3Ms) randomized prospective tripleblind, tripleblind triple blind, blind triple-blind splitmouth split mouth volunteers G without LPRF, , L-PRF) alveoli time (pain) wound healing) molar ITKSNAP ITK SNAP software ImageJ software. intentiontotreat intention treat used 7day day 7 followup follow up p 0.019 0019 0 019 0.021, 0021 0.021 021 0.021) distal face 0.011. 0011 0.011 011 0.011) 0.05, 005 0.05 05 0.05) however 0.016. 0016 0.016 016 0.016) differences process (3Ms (pain 0.01 001 01 002 0.02 02 00 0.0 0.

Resumo Objetivou-se analisar o tempo entre o diagnóstico e o início do tratamento e conhecer o perfil sociodemográfico e clínico de mulheres com 60 ou mais anos de idade, diagnosticadas com câncer de mama entre os anos de 2001 a 2006, no Hospital Pérola Byington, São Paulo. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, com dados secundários e amostra de 1299 casos. Coletou-se variáveis sociodemográficas, clínicas e temporais. Formou-se dois grupos de mulheres utilizando a variável tempo, sendo o tempo entre o diagnóstico e o início do tratamento: “até e maior que 60 dias”. A média do tempo entre o diagnóstico e o início do tratamento foi de 74,7 dias (DP = 212,6), e o tempo mediano de 45 dias. As idosas sem o diagnóstico e sem o tratamento anterior levaram menos tempo para dar início ao tratamento (p = 0,001), bem como as mulheres com estadiamento do tumor na fase inicial, in situ e I (p = 0,001). O tempo foi significante para os desfechos de recidiva (p = 0,004) e metástase (p = 0,038). O diagnóstico e o tratamento estabelecidos garantiu às idosas menor tempo para o início da assistência devida. Melhorar a estruturação e o funcionamento dos serviços de saúde constitui fator imprescindível para o atendimento dos casos da doença de forma eficiente, um importante desafio para o Sistema Único de Saúde.

Abstract This study compares waiting time from diagnosis of breast cancer to start of treatment with patients’ social-demographic and clinical profiles in women aged 60 or more at the PérolaByington Hospital, São Paulo, over the years 2001–2006.It is a descriptive study based on secondary data in a sample of 1,299 cases. Social-demographic, clinical and temporal variables were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: those with period between diagnosis and start of treatment less than 60 days, and greater than 60 days. The average time between diagnosis and start of treatment was 74.7 days (SD = 212.6), and the median time was 45 days. This waiting time was lower for subjects without diagnosis and without prior treatment (p = 0.001), and also for those with tumors at Stage 0, in situ or Stage I(p = 0.001). Time was significant for the outcomes of relapse (p = 0.004) and metastasis (p = 0.038). Having established diagnosis and treatment also resulted in lower time to start of the required care. Improvement to the structuring and functioning of the health service is an essential need, for dealing with the cases of the disease in an efficient manner, an important challenge for Brazil’s Unified Health System.

Este estudo analisou a prevalência e os fatores associados à realização da prevenção secundária do câncer de mama em mulheres de 40-69 anos do Município de Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. Realizou-se um estudo exploratório de corte transversal, tipo inquérito populacional, no Município de Maringá. A prevalência observada de realização do autoexame das mamas foi de 64,5%, do exame clínico das mamas, 71,5%, e de mamografia, 79%. Os fatores que influenciaram na realização dessas ações foram: idade, escolaridade, raça, classe econômica, religião e realização de terapia hormonal. A classe econômica e a escolaridade influenciaram significativamente na realização das práticas preventivas, ou seja, quanto maior o nível socioeconômico, maior a realização. A orientação e realização das práticas preventivas devem estar ao alcance de todas as mulheres na faixa etária de maior risco, diminuindo, dessa maneira, o diagnóstico tardio e mortes desnecessárias e aumentando as chances de cura do câncer de mama.

This study analyzed the prevalence of secondary breast cancer prevention and associated factors in women 40 to 69 years of age in Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil. Prevalence was 64.5% for breast self-examination, 71.5% for clinical examination, and 79% for mammography. The data suggest that age, schooling, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, religion, and prior hormone replacement therapy influenced the rates of the three types of examination. Preventive practices were significantly more common among women of higher socioeconomic status. Proper orientation and performance of preventive measures and tests should be at the reach of all women in the highest-risk age bracket, thereby decreasing late diagnosis and avoidable deaths and increasing the odds of curing breast cancer.