Abstract The first case of cerebral venous thrombosis, described in the past century, was identified in obstetric patients in 1825. The clinical manifestations represent a real diagnostic challenge due to the few recorded cases, the wide variety of possible clinical symptoms, and the diversity of medical conditions that cause it. In the past century, the etiology was mainly associated with septic processes; however, due to the widespread use of antibiotics, this cause has been considerably reduced. In the context of the puerperium, several conditions make this group of patients more vulnerable, such as dehydration, hypercoagulable state, iron deficiency, puerperal sepsis, and preeclampsia, the latter is particularly known for an endothelial lesion with different degrees of associated severity, according to the clinical phenotype present. This review aims to highlight the most relevant aspects of cerebral thrombosis in the context of a puerperal patient. It will also present clinical cases reports treated successfully in this health unit.

ABSTRACT In the present work, we will determine the fundamental aspects of Laclau’s thought by considering the central role that the subject and the other have in it, both in the individual and in the collective or political sphere. Although the difference is a condition for unfolding consciousness, we will show that Laclau’s conception of the subject presents certain insufficiencies. They become especially relevant when addressing the political sphere. It is pertinent to warn, as Laclau does, regarding the limits of a political conception whose base is a sovereign individual and collective identity. However, one must pay attention to the unitary meaning that also defines individual and collective existence. To consider the relationship between identity and difference, we will resort to discussions of high significance on this matter, which take place in the context of German idealism and romanticism (in particular, we will attend to Kant Fichte, Hölderlin and Schelling). Having made the caveat about the difficulty mentioned above, we will show in what sense Laclau’s antagonistic political conception is adequate for a non-reductionist understanding of the indeterminacy and otherness that are part of the political sphere and that make its strict reduction to rational parameters impossible and undesirable. work Laclaus s it consciousness insufficiencies warn does However existence matter particular Fichte Schelling. Schelling . Schelling) above nonreductionist non reductionist undesirable

RESUMEN En el presente trabajo se intentará determinar los aspectos fundamentales del pensamiento de Laclau a partir de la consideración del papel central que tienen en él el sujeto y lo otro, tanto en el ámbito individual como en el colectivo o político. Si bien las diferencias son condición de la actualización de la consciencia, se mostrará que la concepción del sujeto de Laclau presenta ciertas insuficiencias, las cuales se vuelven especialmente relevantes al momento de abordar lo político. Es pertinente advertir, como hace Laclau, respecto de los límites de una concepción política cuya base es una identidad individual y colectiva soberana. Sin embargo, se ha de reparar en el significado unitario que también define la existencia individual y colectiva. Para la consideración de la relación de identidad y diferencia, se acudirá a discusiones de alta significación en este asunto, y que tienen lugar en el contexto del idealismo y el romanticismo alemán (en particular a Kant Fichte, Hölderlin y Schelling). Hecha la salvedad sobre la dificultad indicada, se tratará de mostrar en qué sentido la concepción política antagonística de Laclau es adecuada para una comprensión no reduccionista de la indeterminación y alteridad que constan con lo político, y que vuelven imposible e indeseable su reducción, sin resguardos suficientes, según parámetros racionales. otro político consciencia insuficiencias advertir soberana embargo diferencia asunto Fichte Schelling. Schelling . Schelling) indicada reducción suficientes racionales

Abstract Liver rupture secondary to preeclampsia represents a complication that, if is not recognized early, can be fatal. Its presentation is rare, but very complex to treat, having options that are not clearly protocolized and usually derive from the experience of the surgeon who faces it. We present a case of liver rupture of a patient from Toluca, State of Mexico who was admitted by emergency air transfer with immediate puerperium complicated by severe preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, liver rupture with hemodynamic instability, it was necessary to intervene surgically for a total of seven occasions to control the hemorrhage, as well as pharmacological, medical measures and multiple transfusions; however, she died on the eighteenth day of his hospitalization for septic shock.

Abstract: In the present work, I intend to show that Carl Schmitt’s thought is eminently philosophical, more precisely, that a theory of understanding lies at its ground. Peculiar to this theory is the fact that it is developed on the basis of a theory of juridical comprehension, although it extends, in his work, to human understanding in general.

Resumen: En el presente trabajo pretendo mostrar que el pensamiento de Carl Schmitt tiene un carácter marcadamente filosófico. Más precisamente: que en la base de él se halla una teoría de la comprensión. Esa teoría de la comprensión tiene la particularidad de que se desarrolla a partir de una teoría de la comprensión jurídica, pero se extiende, en su obra, a la comprensión en general.

Resumen El articulo propone una lectura de El can de Kant y del modo como están en juego la filosofía y la literatura a la luz del problema de la relación entre identidad y diferencia, tal como está abordada en el criticismo kantiano. Se concentra en dos modos en los que esa relación y tensión entre identidad y diferencia se expresa y es considerada: (a) la unidad conceptual y la multiplicidad sensible; (b) la identidad del yo y la temporalidad.

Abstract This article proposes a reading of Kant’s Dog and the way that philosophy and literature are at stake in this book under the light of the problem of the relationship between identity and difference as addressed in Kantian criticism. It focuses on two particular ways that this relationship and tension between identity and difference is expressed and considered in Kant’s Can: a) conceptual unity and sensible multiplicity; b) the identity of the self and temporality.

Abstract: In this article, I intend to prove that at the foundation of Francisco Antonio Encina’s thought there is a reflection on human understanding. This reflection, unlike what some authors have argued, has a philosophical scope. In it are exposed, in a relevant manner: the poles between which understanding is made; the extremes toward which comprehensive activity can lean; and the basic conditions that must be met by an understanding of human affairs that can be qualified as pertinent, adequate or correct.

Resumen: En este artículo pretendo probar que en el pensamiento de Francisco Antonio Encina existe una reflexión acerca de la comprensión. Esa reflexión, a diferencia de lo que han sostenido algunos autores, tiene un talante filosófico, en el sentido de que en ella se exponen pertinentemente los polos entre los que se realiza la comprensión, los extremos hacia los que puede inclinarse la actividad comprensiva y las condiciones básicas que ha de reunir una comprensión de los asuntos humanos calificable como pertinente, adecuada o correcta.