Resumen Antecedentes: Los ancianos tienen alta morbimortalidad asociada a trastornos respiratorios, además de la presencia de otros factores de riesgo de seguridad, como el uso de medicación potencialmente inapropiada y la ocurrencia de interacciones medicamentosas. Objetivo: Teniendo en cuenta el escenario pandémico actual, se pretendía identificar herramientas explícitas basadas en criterios que informaran interacciones farmacológicas entre medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados y trastornos del sistema respiratorio y posiblemente un peor pronóstico de la infección por COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática del alcance hasta febrero de 2020. Se extrajeron las características del estudio de las herramientas explícitas basadas en criterios y la medicación potencialmente inapropiada, las interacciones entre medicamentos y el manejo terapéutico. Resultados: Se incluyeron diecinueve herramientas explícitas basadas en criterios. Se identificaron diecinueve interacciones farmacológicas y 17 medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados con preocupaciones por tres trastornos respiratorios (asma, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica e insuficiencia respiratoria). Las clases farmacológicas más frecuentes comunicadas fueron las benzodiacepinas y los betabloqueantes. Para el manejo clínico, las herramientas recomiendan el uso de betabloqueantes cardioselectivos, bloqueadores de los canales de calcio, inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina y bloqueadores del receptor de angiotensina II tipo I y benzodiacepinas con una vida media corta o intermedia. Conclusión: Teniendo en cuenta el mayor riesgo de infección por COVID-19 en los ancianos, las interacciones farmacológicas y el uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropiados asociados con la aparición de eventos farmacológicos adversos en el sistema respiratorio también pueden empeorar la infección por COVID-19 en pacientes con trastornos respiratorios no controlados. Por tanto, es fundamental evaluar la farmacoterapia en uso, identificar los riesgos de seguridad y monitorizar a los ancianos en general y a aquellos con peor pronóstico en relación con el COVID-19, promoviendo la seguridad del paciente.

Abstract Background: The elderly people have high morbimortality associated with respiratory disorders, in addition to the presence of other safety risk factors, such as the use of potentially inappropriate medication and the occurrence of drug interactions. Objective: Considering the current pandemic scenario, it was intended to identify explicit criteria-based tools that reported drug interactions between potentially inappropriate medication and respiratory system disorders and possibly worse prognosis of COVID-19 infection. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted until February 2020. Study characteristics of explicit criteria-based tools, and potentially inappropriate medication, drug interactions, and therapeutic management, were extracted. Results: Nineteen explicit criteria-based tools were included. Nineteen drug interactions and 17 potentially inappropriate medications with concerns for three respiratory disorders (asthma, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, and respiratory failure) were identified. The most frequent pharmacological classes reported were benzodiazepines and beta-blockers. For clinical management, the tools recommend using cardioselective beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers and benzodiazepines with a short or intermediate half-life. Conclusion: Considering the increased risk of COVID-19 infection in the elderly, drug interactions and the use of potentially inappropriate medication associated with the occurrence of adverse drug events in the respiratory system may also worsening COVID-19 infection in patients with uncontrolled respiratory disorders. Thus, it is essential to assess drug therapy in use, to identify safety risks and monitor the elderly in general and those with a worse prognosis concerning COVID-19, promoting patient safety.

Resumen: Antecedentes: Hierbas medicinales son utilizadas empíricamente con la base en el conocimiento etnofarmacobotánico, los cuales tienen limitaciones. Los informes de los eventos adversos (EA) pueden contribuir a la seguridad, la calidad y la evaluación de la eficacia de estos productos. Objetivos: El objetivo del estudio fue desarrollar un formulario para permitir la detección y evaluación de la probabilidad causal de EA relacionado al uso de plantas medicinales e fitoterápicos. Métodos: Investigación cuantitativa, de desenvolvimiento se llevó a cabo con los profesionales sanitarios de atención primaria. Dos casos fueran distribuidos, en un intervalo de una semana, con el fin de ser llenado en el formulario propuesto. La fiabilidad inter-observadores del instrumento fue evaluada y los resultados fueran clasificados en satisfactorio, regular e insatisfactorio, según los datos esenciales, necesarios y recomendados que fueran rellenados en el formulario de notificación. Resultados: Cincuenta y siete profesionales fueran elegibles. Se observó alto grado de fiabilidad entre observadores para la mayoría de los campos esenciales, necesarios y recomendados. El formulario contribuyó para la evaluación de la asociación causal definitiva, una vez que los campos de duración de las reacciones; evolución, retirada y re- exposición tuvieran alta fiabilidad. La mayoría de los campos flacamente llenados estaban relacionados con defectos de calidad, tales como: nombre popular y apariencia. Conclusiones: Los datos sugieren que el formulario propuesto es adecuado para reportar EA derivados de hierbas medicinales. Por la información relativa a las características organolépticas, el instrumento es diferente de lo instrumento para notificación de medicamentos. Por lo tanto, se pretende mejorar los informes de EA relacionados con los productos naturales y contribuir para el uso apropiado.

Abstract: Background: The use of herbal medicines is justified empirically using ethnopharmacological knowledge, which has limitations. Reports of adverse events (AE) may contribute for safety, quality, and effectiveness assessment. Objectives: This study aimed to develop an instrument to allow detection and evaluation of the causal likelihood of AE related to herbal medicines. Methods: A quantitative methodological development research intervention was performed with primary care health professionals. Two cases were distributed in an interval of one week in order to allow for completion of the proposal form. The within-rater reliability was calculated and classified into satisfactory, regular, and unsatisfactory, according to essential, necessary, and recommended items reported. Results: Fifty-seven professionals were enrolled. A high degree of the within-rater reliability was observed for the most essential, necessary, and recommended fields. The instrument contributed to assessment of definite causal association, once the duration of reactions including evolution, withdrawal, and reposition items showed high reliability. Most fields poor and weak filled were related to quality defects, such as popular name and appearance. Conclusions: Data suggest the instrument is adequate to report AE arising from herbal medicines. Owing to information regarding to organoleptic characteristics, the instrument is different from drug instruments. Therefore, it is intended to improve AE reports related to herbal medicines and contribute for appropriate use.

OBJECTIVES: Drug safety problems can lead to hospital admission. In Brazil, the prevalence of hospitalization due to adverse drug events is unknown. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of hospitalization due to adverse drug events and to identify the drugs, the adverse drug events, and the risk factors associated with hospital admissions. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was performed in the internal medicine ward of a teaching hospital in São Paulo State, Brazil, from August to December 2008. All patients aged ≥18 years with a length of stay ≥24 hours were interviewed about the drugs used prior to hospital admission and their symptoms/complaints/causes of hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 248 patients were considered eligible. The prevalence of hospitalization due to potential adverse drug events in the ward was 46.4%. Overprescribed drugs and those indicated for prophylactic treatments were frequently associated with possible adverse drug events. Frequently reported symptoms were breathlessness (15.2%), fatigue (12.3%), and chest pain (9.0%). Polypharmacy was a risk factor for the occurrence of possible adverse drug events. CONCLUSION: Possible adverse drug events led to hospitalization in a high-complexity hospital, mainly in polymedicated patients. The clinical outcomes of adverse drug events are nonspecific, which delays treatment, hinders causality analysis, and contributes to the underreporting of cases.