ABSTRACT Introduction: Flow cytometry has become an increasingly important tool in the clinical laboratory for the diagnosis and monitoring of many hematopoietic neoplasms. This method is ideal for immunophenotypic identification of cellular subpopulations in complex samples, such as bone marrow and peripheral blood. In general, 4-color panels appear to be adequate, depending on the assay. In acute leukemias (ALs), it is necessary identify and characterize the population of abnormal cells in order to recognize the compromised lineage and classify leukemia according to the WHO criteria. Although the use of eightto ten-color immunophenotyping panels is wellestablished, many laboratories do not have access to this technology. Objective and Method: In 2015, the Brazilian Group of Flow Cytometry (Grupo Brasileiro de Citometria de Fluxo, GBCFLUX) proposed antibody panels designed to allow the precise diagnosis and characterization of AL within available resources. As many Brazilian flow cytometry laboratories use four-color immunophenotyping, the GBCFLUX has updated that document, according to current leukemia knowledge and after a forum of discussion and validation of antibody panels. Results: Recommendations for morphological analysis of bone marrow smears and performing screening panel for lineage (s) identification of AL were maintained from the previous publication. The lineage-oriented proposed panels for B and T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were constructed for an appropriate leukemia classification. Conclusion: Three levels of recommendations (i.e., mandatory, recommended, and optional) were established to enable an accurate diagnosis with some flexibility, considering local laboratory resources and patient-specific needs.

ABSTRACT Background: Cytokines are key immune mediators in physiological and disease processes, whose increased levels have been associated with the physiopathology of hematopoietic malignancies, such as myeloproliferative neoplasms. Methods: This study examined the plasma cytokine profiles of patients with essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and of healthy subjects, and analyzed correlations with JAK2 V617F status and clinical-hematological parameters. Results: The proinflammatory cytokine levels were increased in myeloproliferative neoplasm patients, and the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation was associated with high IP-10 levels in primary myelofibrosis patients. Conclusions: Essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, and polycythemia vera patients exhibited different patterns of cytokine production, as revealed by cytokine network correlations. Together, these findings suggest that augmented cytokine levels are associated with the physiopathology of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

ABSTRACT Minimal residual disease is the most powerful predictor of outcome in acute leukemia and is useful in therapeutic stratification for acute lymphoblastic leukemia protocols. Nowadays, the most reliable methods for studying minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia are multiparametric flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction. Both provide similar results at a minimal residual disease level of 0.01% of normal cells, that is, detection of one leukemic cell in up to 10,000 normal nucleated cells. Currently, therapeutic protocols establish the minimal residual disease threshold value at the most informative time points according to the appropriate methodology employed. The expertise of the laboratory in a cancer center or a cooperative group could be the most important factor in determining which method should be used. In Brazil, multiparametric flow cytometry laboratories are available in most leukemia treatment centers, but multiparametric flow cytometry processes must be standardized for minimal residual disease investigations in order to offer reliable and reproducible results that ensure quality in the clinical application of the method. The Minimal Residual Disease Working Group of the Brazilian Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation (SBTMO) was created with that aim. This paper presents recommendations for the detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on the literature and expertise of the laboratories who participated in this consensus, including pre-analytical and analytical methods. This paper also recommends that both multiparametric flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction are complementary methods, and so more laboratories with expertise in immunoglobulin/T cell receptor (Ig/TCR) gene assays are necessary in Brazil.

A desregulação da apoptose parece participar da fisiopatologia da policitemia vera (PV). Este estudo avaliou a expressão das moléculas da família Bcl-2 em células hematopoéticas CD34 + e leucócitos de 12 pacientes com PV. Foram realizados: a quantificação da expressão gênica por PCR em tempo real utilizando kit Sybrgreen Quantitect, avaliação da expressão de proteínas por western-blot e detecção da mutação JAK2 V617F segundo Baxter et al. (2005). Células CD34 + dos pacientes com PV apresentaram maior expressão de A1 e Mcl-1 (mediana: 22,6 e 5,2, respectivamente) em comparação com controles (0,9 e 0,5, p = 0,004 e p = 0,020) e expressão de Bcl-2 e Bcl-xL diminuída nestes pacientes (0,18 e 1,19) em relação aos controles (1,39 e 2,01, p = 0,006 e p = 0,020). Células CD34 + dos pacientes com PV mostraram expressão elevada de bid (14,4) em comparação aos controles (1,0; p = 0,002). Leucócitos dos pacientes mostraram aumento de A1 (7,41, p = 0,001) e expressão reduzida do Bax (0,19; p = 0,04) e Bad (0,2; p = 0,030). Não houve correlação entre percentagem de alelos JAK2 V617F mutados e expressão molecular. Pacientes com PV apresentaram alterações na expressão de moléculas Bcl-2 que podem interferir no controle da apoptose e contribuir para a patogênese da doença.

Apoptosis deregulation might have a role in the pathophysiology of polycythemia vera (PV). This study evaluated Bcl-2 molecule expression in CD34+ cells and leukocytes in 12 PV patients. Gene expression was investigated by real time PCR using SybrGreen Quantitect kit and protein expression was evaluated by western-blotting. JAK2 V617F mutation was detected according to Baxter et al (2005). CD34+ cells from PV patients presented higher levels of A1 and Mcl-1 expression (median: 22.6 and 5.2, respectively) in comparison with controls (0.9 and 0.5, p=0.004 and p=0.020); while Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL expression decreased in PV patients (0.18 and 1.19) compared with controls (1.39 and 2.01, p=0.006 and p=0.020). CD34+ cells in PV patients showed an elevated Bid expression (14.4) in comparison with healthy subjects (1.0; p=0.002). Patients' leukocytes showed an A1 augmentation (7.41, p=0.001) and a reduced expression of Bax (0.19; p=0.040) and Bad (0.2; p=0.030). There was no correlation between JAK2 V617F allele burden and molecular expression. PV patients showed alterations in Bcl-2 members' expression, which may interfere with control of apoptotic machinery and contribute to disease pathogenesis.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar utilidades dos sistemas de escore de Cassano e Sanz e propor outro. DESENHO: Serie de Casos. LOCAL: Hospitais universitários: EPM-UNIFESP e Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. PARTICIPANTES: 59 pacientes diagnosticados entre 1979 e 1992. INTERVENÇÃO: Avaliação de parâmetros clínico-laboratoriais. MENSURAÇÃO: Comparação estatística, análise uni e multivariada e curva de sobrevida atuarial. RESULTADOS: O sistema de Cassano dividiu os pacientes em alto e baixo risco (p=0.0966) enquanto o de Sanz em alto, intermediário e baixo risco (p=0.0108). A análise univariada demonstrou que hemoglobina, contagem de GB, relação EM, aumento do fígado e % de blastos na medula (MO) eram estatisticamente significantes. A regressão multivariada demonstrou como sendo significantes a % de blastos da MO (p=0.004) e os níveis de Hb (p=0.050). O nosso sistema, considerando os parâmetros da análise univariada, dividiu os pacientes em alto, intermediário e baixo risco (p=0.0038). CONCLUSÕES: O sistema de Sanz foi mais prático que o de Cassano enquanto o nosso, demonstrou valor preditivo de sobrevida e uso fácil na prática clínica.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the score systems of Cassano and Sanz and suggest a new one. DESIGN: Case series. LOCATION: Teaching hospitals: EPM UNIFESP and Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. PARTICIPANTS: 59 patients diagnosed from 1979 to 1992. INTERVENTION: Evaluation of clinical-laboratorial data. MEASUREMENT: Statistical comparison, uni and multivariate analysis and actuarial survival curves. RESULTS: Cassano's system divided the patients into high and low risk (p=0.0966) while, Sanz's gave high, intermediate and low risk (p=0.0108). The univariate analysis showed hemoglobin, WBC count, E/M ratio, liver size and blast percentage in BM as statistically significant. The multivariate analysis showed blast percentage in BM (p=0.004) and Hb (p=0.050) as significant. Our system, considering the multivariate analysis data, divided the patients into high, intermediate and low risk (p=0.0038). CONCLUSIONS: Sanz's system was more functional than Cassano's, while ours showed predictive survival value and ease of use in clinical practice.

Avaliamos o valor prognóstico de diferentes fatores, ao diagnóstico, em 45 pacientes com LMC Ph1-positivos. A sobrevida mediana foi de 48 meses. A análise univariada identificou 5 fatores associados a pior prognóstico (sexo masculino, idade inferior a 45 anos, blastos na medula óssea maior ou igual a 10 percent, basófilos no sangue periférico maior ou igual a 6 percent e eosinófilos no sangue periférico maior ou igual a 6 percent), originando um sistema de estadiamento: estágio I com zero ou um fator e sobrevida de 100 percent em dois anos; estágio II com dois ou três fatores e sobrevida de 72,2 percent em dois anos; estágio III com 4 ou 5 fatores e sobrevida de 0 percent em dois anos (p = 0.00016). A análise multivariada demonstrou que a basofilia no sangue periférico e os blastos na medula óssea foram os fatores que melhor se correlacionaram com o tempo de sobrevida. Concluímos que a combinaçóo de fatores presentes no diagnóstico permite a identificação de diferentes grupos de risco na LMC, podendo ser útil na determinaçóo do prognóstico e na abordagem terapêutica.

The prognostic value of different factors upon diagnosis of CML was analysed in 45 Philadelphia (Ph1)-positive patients. The median survival was 48 months. Univariate analysis showed 5 poor prognostic factors (male sex, under 45 years-old, bone marrow blasts greater than or equal to 10 percent, blood basophils greater than or equal to 6 percent and blood eosinophils greater than or equal to 6 percent) which provided for the development of a clinical staging system: Stage I with none or one factor and a two-year survival rate of 100 percent; Stage II with two or three factors and two-year survival of 72.2 percent; and Stage III with four or five factors and two-year survival of 0 percent (p = 0.00016). Multivariate survival analysis showed that combination of blood basophilia and bone marrow blasts had the strongest predictive relationship to survival time. We conclude that a combination of pretreatment factors identifies different risk subcategories in CML patients and is helpful in assessing the overall prognosis and the treatment approach.