Resumo Fundamentos Poucos estudos avaliaram pacientes idosos com Arterite de Takayasu (AT). Objetivo Avaliar o progresso de AT em diferentes grupos etários em seus possíveis efeitos sobre o tratamento medicamentoso e atividade da doença. Métodos este estudo transversal, retrospectivo, do tipo coorte incluiu 66 pacientes com AT. Os pacientes foram entrevistados, e dados dos 12 meses anteriores foram coletados dos prontuários médicos eletrônicos. Os pacientes foram divididos em quatro quartis de acordo com idade atual, e comparados quanto aos dados clínicos e laboratoriais, tratamento, comorbidades, status da doença, e status funcional. Um p<0,05 foi estabelecido como estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Os grupos foram definidos como Q1(22-36 anos, n=16), Q2(37-42 anos, n=18), Q3(43-49 anos, n=17), e Q4(51-66 anos, n=15). A frequência de pacientes com atividade da doença, fadiga, comorbidades e comprometimentos vasculares, e o índice de extensão da doença (DEI. Tak) foram comparáveis entre os grupos. Pacientes com idade mais avançada apresentaram maior duração da doença (p=0,001) e maior comprometimento do status funcional (Q2 versus Q3, p=0,003); menos pacientes usaram prednisona (Q1:43,8%; Q2:33,3%; Q3:11,8%; e Q4:6,7%; p=0,049) e agentes imunossupressores [Q1:100,0%; Q2:66,7%; Q3:58,8% e Q4:46,7%; Q1 versus Q3 (p=0,043) e Q1 versus Q4 (p=0,005) nas análises post-hoc]. Além disso, os níveis de danos da doença, sintomas de uma nova ocorrência de AT, e complicações nos 12 meses precedentes não foram diferentes entre os grupos. Conclusão Pacientes com AT e idade mais avançada requerem mínima intervenção medicamentosa e apresentam maior comprometimento no status funcional, o que pode ser atribuído a fatores relacionados ao envelhecimento. . (AT) transversal retrospectivo 6 entrevistados 1 eletrônicos atual laboratoriais p005 p 0 05 p<0,0 significativo Q12236 Q 22 36 Q1(22-3 anos n=16, n16 n n=16 , 16 n=16) Q23742 Q2 37 42 Q2(37-4 n=18, n18 n=18 18 n=18) Q34349 43 49 Q3(43-4 n=17, n17 n=17 17 n=17) Q45166 51 Q4(51-6 n=15. n15 n=15 15 n=15) fadiga vasculares DEI. DEI (DEI Tak p=0,001 p0001 001 (p=0,001 (Q p=0,003 p0003 003 p=0,003) Q143,8% Q1438 43,8% 8 (Q1:43,8% Q233,3% Q2333 33,3% 33 3 Q2:33,3% Q311,8% Q3118 11,8% 11 Q3:11,8% Q46,7% Q467 6,7% 7 Q4:6,7% p=0,049 p0049 049 Q1100,0% Q11000 100,0% 100 [Q1:100,0% Q266,7% Q2667 66,7% Q2:66,7% Q358,8% Q3588 58,8% 58 Q3:58,8 Q446,7% Q4467 46,7% 46 Q4:46,7% p=0,043 p0043 043 (p=0,043 p=0,005 p0005 005 (p=0,005 posthoc. posthoc post hoc post-hoc] disso envelhecimento (AT p00 p<0, Q1223 2 Q1(22- n1 n=1 Q2374 4 Q2(37- Q3434 Q3(43- Q4516 5 Q4(51- p=0,00 p000 00 (p=0,00 Q143 Q143,8 438 43,8 (Q1:43,8 Q233 Q233,3 333 33,3 Q2:33,3 Q311 Q311,8 118 11,8 Q3:11,8 Q46 Q46,7 67 6,7 Q4:6,7 p=0,04 p004 04 Q1100 Q1100,0 1000 100,0 10 [Q1:100,0 Q266 Q266,7 667 66,7 Q2:66,7 Q358 Q358,8 588 58,8 Q3:58, Q446 Q446,7 467 46,7 Q4:46,7 (p=0,04 post-hoc p0 p<0 Q122 Q1(22 n= Q237 Q2(37 Q343 Q3(43 Q451 Q4(51 p=0,0 (p=0,0 Q14 Q143, 43, (Q1:43, Q23 Q233, 33, Q2:33, Q31 Q311, 11, Q3:11, Q46, 6, Q4:6, Q110 Q1100, 100, [Q1:100, Q26 Q266, 66, Q2:66, Q35 Q358, 58, Q3:58 Q44 Q446, 46, Q4:46, p< Q12 Q1(2 Q2(3 Q34 Q3(4 Q45 Q4(5 p=0, (p=0, (Q1:43 Q2:33 Q3:11 Q4:6 Q11 [Q1:100 Q2:66 Q3:5 Q4:46 Q1( Q2( Q3( Q4( p=0 (p=0 (Q1:4 Q2:3 Q3:1 Q4: [Q1:10 Q2:6 Q3: Q4:4 p= (p= (Q1: Q2: [Q1:1 (p (Q1 [Q1: [Q1 [Q
Abstract Background Few studies have assessed elderly patients with Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK). Objectives To evaluate the progression of TAK in different age groups and its possible effects on drug treatment and disease activity. Methods This cross-sectional and retrospective cohort study included 66 TAK patients. Patients were interviewed and data of the 12 preceding months were collected from electronic medical records. The patients were divided into four quartiles according to current age and compared for clinical and laboratory data, treatment, comorbidities, disease status, and functional status. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results The groups were Q1(22-36 years, n=16), Q2(37-42 years, n=18), Q3(43-49 years, n=17), and Q4(51-66 years, n=15). The frequency of patients with disease activity, fatigue, comorbidities and vascular impairments, and the TAK disease extent index were also comparable between the groups. With age, disease duration was longer (p=0.001), fewer patients used prednisone (Q1:43.8%, Q2:33.3%, Q3:11.8%, and Q4:6.7%; p=0.049) and immunosuppressive drugs [Q1:100.0%, Q2:66.7%, Q3:58.8%, and Q4:46.7%; Q1 versus Q3 (p=0.043), and Q1 versus Q4 (p=0.005) in post-hoc analyses], and patients had greater functional status impairment (Q2 versus Q3, p=0.003). In addition, the levels of disease damage, new TAK symptoms, and complications in the preceding 12 months were not different between the groups. Conclusions Older patients with TAK require minimal drug treatment, and have greater impairment of functional status, which may be attributed to aging-related factors. Takayasus Takayasu s TAK. . (TAK) activity crosssectional cross sectional 6 1 records p005 p 0 05 p<0.05 Q12236 Q 22 36 Q1(22-3 years n=16, n16 n n=16 , 16 n=16) Q23742 Q2 37 42 Q2(37-4 n=18, n18 n=18 18 n=18) Q34349 43 49 Q3(43-4 n=17, n17 n=17 17 n=17) Q45166 51 Q4(51-6 n=15. n15 n=15 15 n=15) fatigue impairments p=0.001, p0001 p=0.001 001 (p=0.001) Q143.8%, Q1438 43.8%, 8 (Q1:43.8% Q233.3%, Q2333 33.3%, 33 3 Q2:33.3% Q311.8%, Q3118 11.8%, 11 Q3:11.8% Q46.7% Q467 6.7% 7 Q4:6.7% p=0.049 p0049 049 Q1100.0%, Q11000 100.0%, 100 [Q1:100.0% Q266.7%, Q2667 66.7%, Q2:66.7% Q358.8%, Q3588 58.8%, 58 Q3:58.8% Q446.7% Q4467 46.7% 46 Q4:46.7% p=0.043, p0043 p=0.043 043 (p=0.043) p=0.005 p0005 005 (p=0.005 posthoc post hoc analyses, analyses analyses] (Q p=0.003. p0003 p=0.003 003 p=0.003) addition damage symptoms agingrelated aging related factors (TAK p00 p<0.0 Q1223 2 Q1(22- n1 n=1 Q2374 4 Q2(37- Q3434 Q3(43- Q4516 5 Q4(51- p000 p=0.00 00 (p=0.001 Q143 Q143.8% 438 43.8% (Q1:43.8 Q233 Q233.3% 333 33.3% Q2:33.3 Q311 Q311.8% 118 11.8% Q3:11.8 Q46 Q46.7 67 6.7 Q4:6.7 p=0.04 p004 04 Q1100 Q1100.0% 1000 100.0% 10 [Q1:100.0 Q266 Q266.7% 667 66.7% Q2:66.7 Q358 Q358.8% 588 58.8% Q3:58.8 Q446 Q446.7 467 46.7 Q4:46.7 (p=0.043 (p=0.00 p0 p<0. Q122 Q1(22 n= Q237 Q2(37 Q343 Q3(43 Q451 Q4(51 p=0.0 Q14 Q143.8 43.8 (Q1:43. Q23 Q233.3 33.3 Q2:33. Q31 Q311.8 11.8 Q3:11. Q46. 6. Q4:6. Q110 Q1100.0 100.0 [Q1:100. Q26 Q266.7 66.7 Q2:66. Q35 Q358.8 58.8 Q3:58. Q44 Q446. 46. Q4:46. (p=0.04 (p=0.0 p<0 Q12 Q1(2 Q2(3 Q34 Q3(4 Q45 Q4(5 p=0. Q143. 43. (Q1:43 Q233. 33. Q2:33 Q311. 11. Q3:11 Q4:6 Q11 Q1100. 100. [Q1:100 Q266. 66. Q2:66 Q358. 58. Q3:58 Q4:46 (p=0. p< Q1( Q2( Q3( Q4( p=0 (Q1:4 Q2:3 Q3:1 Q4: [Q1:10 Q2:6 Q3:5 Q4:4 (p=0 p= (Q1: Q2: Q3: [Q1:1 (p= (Q1 [Q1: (p [Q1 [Q