Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the cavity preparation and ceramic type on the stress distribution, tooth strain, fracture resistance and fracture mode of human molar teeth restored with onlays. Material and Methods Forty-eight molars were divided into four groups (n=12) with assorted combinations of two study factors: BL- conventional onlay preparation with boxes made from leucite ceramic (IPS-Empress CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent); NBL- conservative onlay preparation without boxes made from leucite ceramic; BD- conventional onlay preparation with boxes made from lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent); NBL- conservative onlay preparation with boxes made from lithium disilicate glass ceramic cuspal deformation (µS) was measured at 100 N and at maximum fracture load using strain gauge. Fracture resistance (N) was measured using a compression test, and the fracture mode was recorded. Finite element analysis was used to evaluate the stress distribution by modified von Mises stress criteria. The tooth strain and fracture resistance data were analyzed using the Tukey test and two-way ANOVA, and the fracture mode was analyzed by the chi-square test (α=0.05). Results The leucite ceramic resulted in higher tooth deformation at 100 N and lower tooth deformation at the maximum fracture load than the lithium disilicate ceramic (P<0.001). The lithium disilicate ceramic exhibited higher fracture resistance than the leucite ceramic (P<0.001). The conservative onlay resulted in higher fracture strength for lithium disilicate ceramic. Finite element analysis results showed the conventional cavity preparation resulted in higher stress concentration in the ceramic restoration and remaining tooth than the conservative onlay preparation. The conservative onlays exhibited increased fracture resistance, reduced stress concentration and more favorable fracture modes. Conclusion Molars restored with lithium disilicate CAD-CAM ceramic onlays exhibited higher fracture resistance than molars restored with leucite CAD-CAM ceramic onlays.

Resumo O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar o grau de conversão, estabilidade de cor, composição química e resistência de união de um cimento resinoso fotoativado contaminado com três soluções hemostáticas diferentes. Foram preparadas amostras para o grupo controle (cimento não contaminado) e grupos experimentais (cimento contaminado com uma das soluções hemostáticas) de acordo com os testes. Para o grau de conversão e análise de cor (n=10), as amostras (3 mm de diâmetro e 2 mm de espessura) foram avaliadas por espectroscopia de infravermelho com transformação de Fourier (FTIR) e espectrofotometria CIELAB (L*, A*, B*), respectivamente. Para a análise química elementar (n=1), os espécimes (2 mm de espessura e 6 mm de diâmetro) foram avaliados por espectroscopia de energia dispersiva de raios-x (EDS). As resistências de união dos grupos foram avaliadas pelo ensaio de microcisalhamento (n=20) em um substrato cerâmico de vidro reforçado com leucita, seguida da análise de modo de falha por microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV). Os valores médios, com exceção da avaliação química e do modo de falha, foram avaliados por ANOVA e pelo teste de Tukey. A estabilidade de cor foi influenciada pelo tempo de armazenagem (p<0,001) e interação entre a contaminação e o tempo (p<0,001). A contaminação pelo Hemostop e Viscostat Clear não influenciaram no GC, porém a contaminação com Viscostat aumentou o GC. A resistência de união do cimento a cerâmica foi negativamente afetada pelos contaminantes (p<0,001). A contaminação por agentes hemostáticos afetou a resistência de união, o grau de conversão e a estabilidade de cor do cimento resinoso fotoativado testado.

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of conversion, color stability, chemical composition, and bond strength of a light-cured resin cement contaminated with three different hemostatic solutions. Specimens were prepared for the control (uncontaminated resin cement) and experimental groups (resin cement contaminated with one of the hemostatic solutions) according to the tests. For degree of conversion, DC (n = 5) and color analyses (n = 10), specimens (3 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) were evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and CIELAB spectrophotometry (L*, a*, b*), respectively. For elemental chemical analysis (n = 1), specimens (2 mm thick and 6 mm in diameter) were evaluated by x-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The bond strengths of the groups were assessed by the microshear test (n = 20) in a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic substrate, followed by failure mode analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mean values, except for the elemental chemical evaluation and failure mode, were evaluated by ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test. The color stability was influenced by storage time (p<0.001) and interaction between contamination and storage time (p<0.001). Hemostop and Viscostat Clear contamination did not affect the DC, however Viscostat increased the DC. Bond strength of the resin cement to ceramic was negatively affected by the contaminants (p<0.001). Contamination by hemostatic agents affected the bond strength, degree of conversion, and color stability of the light-cured resin cement tested.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resistência adesiva por meio do teste de microtração (µTBS) entre dois substratos (esmalte e dentina) considerando dois fatores em estudo: Tipo de resina [metacrilato (Filtek Supreme) ou silorano (Filtek LS)] e tempo de envelhecimento (24 horas ou 3 meses). Vinte molares humanos foram selecionados e divididos em dois grupos (n=10) considerando dois substratos dentários, esmalte e dentina. O esmalte e a dentina de cada dente foram divididos em duas metades, por meio de uma lamínula. Cada dente foi restaurado usando ambas as resinas testadas, seguindo instruções do fabricante. As amostras foram seccionadas, resultando em quatro palitos para cada tipo de resina. Metade dos palitos foi testada após 24h e o restante após três meses. O ensaio de microtração (µTBS) foi conduzido numa velocidade de 0,05 mm/s. Os dados foram analisados usando three-way ANOVA e teste de Tukey HSD (α= 0,05). Diferença significante foi encontrada para o fator resina e substratos (p<0,05), porém não houve influência do tempo de envelhecimento e interações entre fatores estudados. A resina à base de metacrilato apresentou maior resistência adesiva do que a silorano. A adesão em esmalte foi significativamente maior do que em dentina, independente da resina e do tempo de envelhecimento. Três meses de armazenamento não foram suficientes para causar degradação da interação adesiva, para ambas as resinas compostas, no esmalte e na dentina.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two substrates (enamel and dentin) considering two study factors: type of composite resin [methacrylate-based (Filtek Supreme) or silorane-based (Filtek LS)] and aging time (24 h or 3 months). Twenty human molars were selected and divided into 2 groups (n=10) considering two dental substrates, enamel or dentin. The enamel and dentin of each tooth was divided into two halves separated by a glass plate. Each tooth was restored using both tested composite resins following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were sectioned, producing 4 sticks for each composite resin. Half of them were tested after 24 h and half after 3 months. µTBS testing was carried out at 0.05 mm/s. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests at α=0.05. Significant differences between composite resins and substrates were found (p<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found for aging time and interactions among study factors. The methacrylate-based resin showed higher µTBS than the silorane-based resin. The µTBS for enamel was significantly higher than for dentin, irrespective of the composite resin and storage time. Three months of storage was not sufficient time to cause degradation of the bonding interaction of either of the composite resins to enamel and dentin.

The esthetic and functional rehabilitation of patients with multiple missing teeth can be performed with several techniques and materials. Ceramic restorations provide reliable masticatory function and good esthetics. However, fracture can occur in some cases due to their brittle behavior. In some cases, the replacement of an extensive prosthesis is a problem due to the high treatment cost. In this paper, two cases are presented, in which fractures occurred in extensive metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures, and their replacement was not possible. Ceramic repair was chosen and the sequences of treatment with and without presence of the ceramic fragment are also discussed. The cases illustrate that, in some situations, fractured metal-ceramic partial dentures can be successfully repaired when prosthetic replacement is not a choice. Prosthodontists must use alternatives that allow a reliable repair to extensive metal-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Surface preparation of the ceramic with hydrofluoric acid in conjunction with a silane coupling agent is essential for a predictable bonding of composite resin. The repair performed with composite resin is an esthetic and functional alternative when extensive fixed partial dentures cannot be replaced.

Noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are considered to be of multifactorial origin, normally associated with inadequate brushing. This study assessed the influence in vitro of simulated brushing on NCCL formation. Fifteen human premolars were submitted to brushing in the cementoenamel junction region, using hard-, medium- and soft-bristled brushes associated with a toothpaste of medium abrasiveness under a 200 g load, at a speed of 356 rpm for 100 minutes. The surface topography of the region was analyzed before and after brushing, by means of a laser interferometer, using "cut-off" values of 0.25 and considering roughness values in mm. The initial roughness (mm) results for dentin (D / bristle consistency: 1 - soft, 2 - medium and 3 - hard) were as follows: (D1) 1.25 ± 0.45; (D2) 1.12 ± 0.44; (D3) 1.05 ± 0.41. For enamel (E / bristle consistency: 1 - soft, 2 - medium and 3 - hard), the initial results were: (E1) 1.18 ± 0.35; (E2) 1.32 ± 0.25; (E3) 1.50 ± 0.38. After brushing, the following were the values for dentin: (D1) 2.32 ± 1.99; (D2) 3.30 ± 0.96; (D3) Over 500. For enamel, the values after brushing were: (E1) 1.37 ± 0.31; (E2) 2.15 ± 0.90; (E3) 1.22 ± 0.47. Based on the results of the ANOVA and Tukey statistical analyses (a = .05) it was concluded that soft, medium and hard brushes are not capable of abrading enamel, whereas dentin showed changes in surface roughness by the action of medium- and hard-bristled brushes.