RESUMEN Introducción y objetivos: El tratamiento de los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) que requieren implante de stents coronarios es un desafío. El objetivo del estudio fue investigar si el cierre de la orejuela izquierda (COI) podría ser una opción posible y beneficiosa para estos pacientes. Para ello, se analiza el impacto del COI más tratamiento antiagregante plaquetario (AP) en comparación con la combinación de anticoagulantes orales (ACO), incluidos los ACO directos, y tratamiento AP en los resultados a largo plazo de estos pacientes Métodos: Se analizaron los resultados de 207 pacientes con FANV sometidos consecutivamente a implante de stents coronarios. Recibieron ACO 146 pacientes (74 acenocumarol, 71 ACO de acción directa) y en 61 se realizó COI. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 35 meses. Los pacientes también recibieron tratamiento AP por prescripción de su cardiólogo. El estudio recibió la debida supervisión ética. Resultados: La edad (media: 75,7 años) y el antecedente de accidente vascular cerebral fueron similares en ambos grupos, aunque el grupo de COI presentó más características desfavorables (antecedente de enfermedad de las arterias coronarias [CHA2DS2-VASc], antecedente de hemorragias significativas [BARC ≥ 2] y HAS-BLED). La aparición de acontecimientos adversos graves (muerte, accidente vascular cerebral, accidente isquémico transitorio, hemorragia grave) y cardiovasculares graves (muerte de causa cardiaca, accidente vascular cerebral, accidente isquémico transitorio, infarto de miocardio) fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de ACO que en el de COI: 19,75 frente a 9,06% (HR = 2,18; p = 0,008) y 6,37 frente a 1,91% (HR = 3,34; p = 0,037), respectivamente. Conclusiones: La combinación de COI y tratamiento AP en pacientes con FANV conlleva mejor pronóstico clínico a largo plazo que el tratamiento con ACO y terapia AP, a pesar de las características basales desfavorables del grupo de COI.

ABSTRACT Introduction and objectives: The treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who need coronary stenting is challenging. The objective of the study was to determine whether left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) could be a feasible option and benefit these patients. To this end, we studied the impact of LAAO plus antiplatelet drugs vs oral anticoagulants (OAC) (including direct OAC) plus antiplatelet drugs in these patients' long-term outcomes. Methods: The results of 207 consecutive patients with NVAF who underwent coronary stenting were analyzed. A total of 146 patients were treated with OAC (75 with acenocoumarol, 71 with direct OAC) while 61 underwent LAAO. The median follow-up was 35 months. Patients also received antiplatelet therapy as prescribed by their cardiologist. The study received the proper ethical oversight. Results: Age (mean 75.7 years), and the past medical history of stroke were similar in both groups. However, the LAAO group had more unfavorable characteristics (history of coronary artery disease [CHA2DS2-VASc], and significant bleeding [BARC ≥ 2] and HAS-BLED). The occurrence of major adverse events (death, stroke/transient ischemic events, major bleeding) and major cardiovascular events (cardiac death, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction) were significantly higher in the OAC group compared to the LAAO group: 19.75% vs 9.06% (HR, 2.18; P = .008) and 6.37% vs 1.91% (HR, 3.34; P = .037), respectively. Conclusions: In patients with NVAF undergoing coronary stenting, LAAO plus antiplatelet therapy produced better long-term outcomes compared to treatment with OAC plus antiplatelet therapy despite the unfavorable baseline characteristics of the LAAO group.

Resumo Fundamento: Implante transcateter de valva aórtica (TAVI) é um procedimento adotado em todo o mundo e suas práticas evoluem rapidamente. Variações regionais e temporais são esperadas. Objetivo: Comparar a prática de TAVI na América Latina com aquela no resto do mundo e avaliar suas mudanças na América Latina de 2015 a 2020. Método: A pesquisa foi realizada em centros de TAVI em todo o mundo entre março e setembro de 2015, e novamente nos centros latino-americanos entre julho de 2019 e janeiro de 2020. As seguintes questões foram abordadas: i) informação geral sobre os centros; ii) avaliação pré-TAVI; iii) técnicas do procedimento; iv) conduta pós-TAVI; v) seguimento. As respostas da pesquisa dos centros latino-americanos em 2015 (LATAM15) foram comparadas àquelas dos centros no resto do mundo (WORLD15) e ainda àquelas da pesquisa dos centros latino-americanos de 2020 (LATAM20). Adotou-se o nível de significância de 5% na análise estatística. Resultados: 250 centros participaram da pesquisa em 2015 (LATAM15=29; WORLD15=221) e 46 na avaliação LATAM20. No total, foram 73.707 procedimentos, sendo que os centros WORLD15 realizaram, em média, 6 e 3 vezes mais procedimentos do que os centros LATAM15 e LATAM20, respectivamente. Os centros latino-americanos realizaram menor número de TAVI minimalista do que os do restante do mundo, mas aumentaram significativamente os procedimentos menos invasivos após 5 anos. Quanto à assistência pós-procedimento, observaram-se menor tempo de telemetria e de manutenção do marca-passo temporário, além de menor uso de terapia dupla antiplaquetária nos centros LATAM20. Conclusão: A despeito do volume de procedimentos ainda significativamente menor, muitos aspectos da prática de TAVI nos centros latino-americanos evoluíram recentemente, acompanhando a tendência dos centros dos países desenvolvidos.

Abstract Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a worldwide adopted procedure with rapidly evolving practices. Regional and temporal variations are expected to be found. Objective: To compare TAVR practice in Latin America with that around the world and to assess its changes in Latin America from 2015 to 2020. Methods: A survey was applied to global TAVR centers between March and September 2015, and again to Latin-American centers between July 2019 and January 2020. The survey consisted of questions addressing: i) center’s general information; ii) pre-TAVR evaluation; iii) procedural techniques; iv) post-TAVR management; v) follow-up. Answers from the 2015 survey of Latin-American centers (LATAM15) were compared with those of other centers around the world (WORLD15) and with the 2020 updated Latin-American survey (LATAM20). A 5% level of significance was adopted for statistical analysis. Results: 250 centers participated in the 2015 survey (LATAM15=29; WORLD15=221) and 46 in the LATAM20. Combined centers experience accounted for 73 707 procedures, with WORLD15 centers performing, on average, 6- and 3-times more procedures than LATAM15 and LATAM20 centers, respectively. LATAM centers performed less minimalistic TAVR than WORLD15 centers, but there was a significant increase in less invasive procedures after 5 years in Latin-American centers. For postprocedural care, a lower period of telemetry and maintenance of temporary pacing wire, along with less utilization of dual antiplatelet therapy was observed in LATAM20 centers. Conclusion: Despite still having a much lower number of procedures, many aspects of TAVR practice in Latin-American centers have evolved in recent years, followingthe trend observed in developed country centers.

Reintervention of a mitral degenerated bioprosthesis has a high surgical risk, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. We report a 74 years old female with two previous cardiac surgical procedures and a new structural mitral bioprosthesis deterioration with severe mitral regurgitation. Considering her high-surgical risk, a fully percutaneous treatment was performed with a balloon-expandable aortic valve in mitral position (valve-in-valve) through a transseptal approach with a favorable outcome. This technique is an attractive and effective option with a relatively low rate of complications that could solve this challenging and complex disease.

INTRODUÇÃO: Há poucos dados na literatura que avaliam a obstrução coronária após implante transcateter de válvula aórtica (TAVI, do inglês transcatheter aortic valve implantation) para o tratamento de disfunção de bioprótese aórtica (valve-in-valve - ViV). O presente estudo avaliou, por meio de revisão sistemática da literatura, as características clínicas, o manejo e os desfechos clínicos de pacientes com obstrução coronária após TAVI-ViV. MÉTODOS: Estudos publicados entre 2002 e 2013 avaliando a obstrução coronária como complicação de TAVI-ViV foram identificados por meio de busca eletrônica sistemática. Foram avaliados dados basais sobre as características clínicas e do procedimento, manejo da complicação e desfechos clínicos. RESULTADOS: Foram identificadas, no total, quatro publicações descrevendo sete pacientes. A maioria dos pacientes era do sexo feminino (71%), sendo a média de idade de 82 ± 5 anos, com STS-PROM de 9,4 ± 2,6%. As médias da altura do tronco da artéria coronária esquerda (TCE) e o diâmetro médio da raiz aórtica foram de 8,8 ± 1,5 mm e 28,0 ± 5,0 mm, respectivamente. A maioria dos pacientes apresentava biopróteses com suporte e folhetos montados externamente, ou eram próteses sem suporte (stentless) e o TCE foi envolvido em todos os casos. A intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) foi tentada em todos os pacientes, tendo sucesso em quatro deles (57%). A mortalidade intra-hospitalar foi 42,9% (três casos), todos após ICP sem sucesso. CONCLUSÕES: A obstrução coronária após TAVI-ViV ocorreu mais frequentemente em mulheres com bioprótese com suporte e folheto montado externamente ou com bioprótese sem suporte. O TCE foi envolvido em todos os casos e a ICP foi realizada com sucesso em 60% deles. Esforços contínuos poderão auxiliar na detecção dos fatores associados a essa complicação, no intuito de se implementarem medidas apropriadas para sua prevenção.

BACKGROUND: Very few data exist on coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for degenerative bioprosthetic valves (valve-in-valve - ViV). The present study evaluated, through a systematic review of the literature, the clinical characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of patients with coronary obstruction after ViV-TAVI. METHODS: Studies published between 2002 and 2013 evaluating coronary obstruction as a complication of ViV-TAVI were identified using a systematic electronic search. Data on the clinical and procedural characteristics, management of the complication, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of four publications describing seven patients were identified. Most patients (71%) were women, with mean age of 82 ± 5 years, and STS-PROM score of 9.4 ± 2.6%. Mean left coronary artery (LCA) ostium height and aortic root width were 8.8 ± 1.5 mm and 28.0 ± 5.0 mm, respectively. Most patients had stented bioprosthetic valves with externally mounted leaflets or stentless aortic bioprosthesis, and the LCA was involved in all patients. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was attempted in all patients and was successful in four (57%). In-hospital mortality was 42.9% (three cases), all of them after failed PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary obstruction following ViV-TAVI occurred more frequently in women with stented bioprosthetic valves with externally mounted leaflets or with stentless bioprosthesis. The LCA was involved in all cases and PCI was successful in 60% of them. Continued efforts may help identify the factors associated with this complication so that appropriate prevention measures may be implemented.