ABSTRACT Background: Aortic aneurysms, particularly of the abdominal aorta, are still common. Since 1990, conventional surgery is no longer the only treatment option due to advances in endovascular devices and techniques. We present our results in the management of aortic aneurysms with a minimally invasive endovascular technique. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the 30-day outcomes of endograft implantation in the thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta using a minimally invasive approach. Methods: Between March 2012 and April 2019, 395 consecutive endografts were implanted in the aorta, and 264 (67%) were performed using a minimally invasive approach (MIN-A). Among this group, 240 (90.9%) corresponded to abdominal endo-vascular aortic repair (EVAR) and 24 (9.1%) to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Results: Technical success (TS) of the implant was achieved in 99.6% of the 264 patients and clinical success (CS) in 97.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.1% due to pneumonia, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were no cases of myocardial infarction, stroke or need for conversion to urgent surgical repair. Mean duration of the procedure was 62 minutes (SD ± 17). Some patients required conversion to surgical closure of the access site [20 (7%) during the first 100 cases and 7 (3%) in the final 164 patients, p = 0.05]. Three (1.1%) patients presented major bleeding requiring transfusion. Mean time to ambulation was 18 hours (SD ± 10) that significantly decreased to 13 hours after the first 100 patients (SD ± 2.9; p= 0.05). Mean length of hospital stay was 1.4 days (SD ± 1.14) with 5 patients discharged on the same day of the procedure. Conclusions: Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using a minimally invasive strategy was feasible and safe, turning this procedure into a percutaneous approach, with low access site-related complications, shorter operative time, rapid ambulation and shorter length of hospital stay, without modifying overall safety of the procedure. The learning curve resulted in reduced rate of conversion to surgery and earlier ambulation.

RESUMEN Introducción: Los aneurismas de aorta siguen siendo una patología frecuente, en especial aquellos localizados en la aorta abdominal. Desde 1990, gracias al avance en los dispositivos y las técnicas endovasculares, la cirugía convencional ha dejado de ser la única opción de tratamiento. Presentamos nuestros resultados en el manejo del aneurisma de aorta con técnica endovascular mínimamente invasiva. Objetivos: Analizar los resultados a 30 días del implante de endoprótesis en la aorta torácica y abdominal con una estrategia mínimamente invasiva. Material y métodos: Entre marzo de 2012 y abril de 2019 se realizaron 395 implantes consecutivos de endoprótesis de aorta; en 264 (67%) de los cuales se utilizó una técnica mínimamente invasiva (MIN-A). De este grupo 240 procedimientos (90,9%) fueron llevados a cabo para reparar la aorta abdominal (EVAR) y 24 (9,1%) la aorta torácica (TEVAR). Resultados: De 264 pacientes se logró éxito técnico (ET) del implante en el 99,6% y éxito clínico (EC) en el 97,7%. La mortalidad a 30 días fue del 1,1% dado por neumonía, insuficiencia cardíaca y EPOC. Ningún paciente presentó IAM, ACV o necesitó de conversión a reparación quirúrgica de urgencia. El tiempo promedio del procedimiento fue de 62 minutos (SD ± 17). Algunos pacientes requirieron conversión a cierre quirúrgico del acceso [20 (7%) durante los primeros 100 casos, y 7 (3%) en los últimos 164 pacientes p = 0,05)]. El sangrado mayor que requirió transfusión fue del 1,1%. El tiempo promedio para la deambulación fue de 18 horas (SD ± 10), que luego de los primeros 100 pacientes disminuyó en forma significativa a 13 horas (SD ± 2,9 p = 0,05). La estadía hospitalaria en promedio fue de 1,4 días (SD ± 1,14) con 5 casos externados el mismo día del procedimiento. Conclusiones: Los procedimientos de reparación endovascular de aneurismas de la aorta con una estrategia miniinvasiva fueron factibles y seguros, ya que permitieron convertir estos procedimientos en abordajes percutáneos, con bajas tasas de complicaciones asociadas al acceso, menor tiempo quirúrgico, rápida deambulación y menor estadía hospitalaria, sin modificar la seguridad global del procedimiento. La curva de aprendizaje permitió bajar la tasa de conversiones a cirugía, así como los tiempos de deambulación.

Abstract Severe aortic stenosis is a common disease whose prevalence is steadily growing with population ageing. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has been the only effective alternative until the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR or TAVI). This procedure was initially used for non-surgical candidate patients where two randomized clinical trials and several registries showed superiority over conservative medical treatment. Furthermore, two additional clinical trials including high surgical risk patients proved the non-inferiority of TAVR versus surgical replacement. Similar findings regarding effectiveness were observed in other clinical trials including intermediate and low risk patients. Technical and procedural improvements, including learning curve and the current minimally invasive strategy have decreased periprocedural and mid-term complications such as those related with vascular access, stroke, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak. All things considered, durability is a pending question to establish which would be the role of TAVR in current and future practice.

Resumen La estenosis aórtica grave es una enfermedad común cuya prevalencia crece con el envejecimiento de la población. El reemplazo valvular aórtico quirúrgico (SAVR) ha sido la única alternativa efectiva hasta la aparición del reemplazo valvular aórtico por cateterismo (TAVR o TAVI). Este procedimiento se usó inicialmente para pacientes inoperables en quienes dos ensayos clínicos aleatorios y varios registros mostraron su superioridad sobre el tratamiento médico conservador. Dos ensayos clínicos adicionales en pacientes que, a pesar de ser considerados operables, tenían alto riesgo quirúrgico, demostraron la no inferioridad de TAVR versus reemplazo quirúrgico. Investigaciones posteriores probaron también su efectividad en pacientes de riesgo intermedio y bajo. Algunas complicaciones, como las relacionadas al acceso vascular, el accidente cerebro vascular, la necesidad de marcapasos definitivo y la regurgitación periprotésica, han ido disminuyendo con la mejoría de la tecnología, la curva de aprendizaje y la estrategia mínimamente invasiva actual. Queda pendiente determinar la durabilidad para establecer cuál será el papel de TAVR en la práctica clínica.

Objective To describe the initial experience with aortic valve implantation via a direct approach using a self-expanding CoreValveTM aortic valve prosthesis in a tertiary care center from Argentina. Material and methods From May to December 2010, 21 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS) and high surgical risk undergoing percutaneous aortic valve replacement with CoreValveTM prosthesis were included. The inclusion criteria were the following: aortic valve area <1 cm2 (<0.6 cm2/m2); aortic annulus diameter of 20-27 mm; diameter of the ascending aorta at the level of the sinotubular junction ≤ 40 (small prosthesis) or ≤ 43 mm (large prosthesis), and femoral artery diameter >6 mm. Results Mean age was 79±8 years, mean aortic valve area was 0.7±0.2 cm2 and mean logistic EuroSCORE was 26±15% (50% with logistic EuroSCORE ³ 20%). After valve implantation, peak transaortic pressure gradient measured by echocardiography decreased from 80±22 to 14±5 mm Hg. Two patients developed severe aortic regurgitation which improved with post-dilation. The success rate of the procedure was of 95% as a patient died immediately after valve implant. A definite pacemaker was implanted to six patients due to atrioventricular block. Cumulative survival was 75% after a mean follow-up of 5±2.8 months. Conclusion Our initial experience suggests that direct implantation of CoreValveTM prosthesis is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for patients with SAS and high surgical risk.

Objetivo Describir la experiencia inicial con el implante directo de la prótesis aórtica autoexpandible CoreValve® en un centro argentino de alta complejidad cardiovascular. Material y métodos Desde mayo a diciembre de 2010 se incluyeron en forma consecutiva pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave (EAG) de alto riesgo sometidos a implante directo de prótesis CoreValve® (n = 21). Los criterios de inclusión fueron: área de la válvula aórtica < 1 cm2 (< 0,6 cm2/m2), anillo valvular aórtico de entre 20 y 27 mm, diámetro de la aorta ascendente a nivel de la unión sinotubular ≤ 40 (prótesis pequeña) o ≤ 43 mm (prótesis grande) y diámetro de la arteria femoral > 6 mm. Resultados La edad fue de 79 ± 8 años, el área valvular aórtica fue de 0,7 ± 0,2 cm2 y el EuroSCORE logístico fue del 26% ± 15% (50% con EuroSCORE logístico ≥ 20%). Tras el implante, el gradiente transaórtico máximo por ecocardiograma descendió de 80 ± 22 mm Hg a 14 ± 5 mm Hg. Dos pacientes presentaron insuficiencia aórtica de grado grave, que mejoraron luego de la posdilatación. La tasa de éxito del procedimiento fue del 95%, ya que un paciente falleció luego del implante valvular. Se implantó un marcapasos definitivo por bloqueo auriculoventricular en 6 pacientes. La sobrevida acumulada (media de seguimiento 5 ± 2,8 meses) fue del 75%. Conclusión Nuestra experiencia inicial sugiere que el implante directo de la prótesis CoreValve® es una opción terapéutica segura y factible para los pacientes con EAG de alto riesgo quirúrgico.

FUNDAMENTOS: Lesões carotídeas estão presentes em 8% a 14% dos candidatos a cirurgia cardiovascular e aumentam o risco de acidente vascular cerebral perioperatório. Esse problema é particularmente importante em pacientes com doença coronária e/ou valvar grave que não são candidatos a procedimentos de revascularização em momentos diferentes. Avaliamos os resultados de uma estratégia híbrida de tratamento, na qual angioplastia carotídea e cirurgia cardiovascular foram realizadas de forma sequencial, com intervalo de algumas horas. MÉTODO: Foram tratadas lesões carotídeas > 70% em pacientes sintomáticos e > 80% nos assintomáticos. Ácido acetilsalicílico foi administrado antes da angioplastia carotídea e heparina, no momento do procedimento. Finalizada a intervenção percutânea, os pacientes foram transferidos para a sala de cirurgia para realização do procedimento cardiovascular. Clopidogrel foi administrado habitualmente 8 horas após o término da cirurgia. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 43 pacientes consecutivos tratados com a estratégia híbrida. Predominaram pacientes do sexo masculino (81%), com média de idade de 70,5 ± 8,5 anos, sendo 25,6% diabéticos. Foi utilizado sistema de proteção cerebral em 42 pacientes e implantado stent em todos. Cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica (CRM) foi realizada em 20 pacientes, CRM + substituição de valva aórtica (SVA) em 18, CRM + cirurgia da aorta ascendente em 1, CRM + plástica da valva mitral em 1, CRM + substituição de valva mitral (SVM) em 1, SVA em 1, e SVM em 1. Os resultados hospitalares demonstraram 4 óbitos (2 por falência de múltiplos órgãos, 1 por insuficiência cardíaca e 1 por sangramento), 1 caso de infarto agudo do miocárdio perioperatório e nenhum caso de acidente vascular cerebral. Acompanhamento tardio foi realizado em todos os pacientes aos 25 ± 15 meses. Após a alta hospitalar, ocorreram duas mortes, não relacionadas aos procedimentos percutâneo ou cirúrgico, e nenhum evento neurológico. CONCLUSÃO: A estratégia híbrida combinando angioplastia carotídea e cirurgia cardiovascular é factível e segura, com taxa de complicações aceitável. Pode ser válida em pacientes clinicamente instáveis, sendo necessária, entretanto, a realização de estudos com maior número de doentes para reproduzir nossos achados.

BACKGROUND: Carotid lesions are observed in 8% to 14% of cardiovascular surgery candidates and increase the risk of perioperative stroke. This is particularly important in patients with coronary disease and/or severe valve disease who are not candidate to revascularization procedures at different time points. We assessed the results of a hybrid strategy, where carotid angioplasty and cardiovascular surgery were performed sequentially with an interval of a few hours. METHOD: Carotid lesions > 70% in symptomatic patients and > 80% in asymptomatic patients were treated. Acetylsalicylic acid was administered prior to carotid stenting and heparin was administered at the time of the procedure. Once the percutaneous intervention was over, patients were transferred to the surgery room to carry out the cardiovascular procedure. Clopidogrel was administered 8 hours after the end of the surgery. RESULTS: Forty-three consecutive patients were included and treated with the hybrid strategy. Male patients (81%) were prevalent, with mean age of 70.5 ± 8.5 years, and 25.6% were diabetic. A cerebral protection system was used in 42 patients and stents were implanted in all of them. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was performed in 20 patients, CABG + aortic valve replacement (AVR) in 18, CABG + ascending aorta repair in 1, CABG + mitral valve annuloplasty in 1, CABG + mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 1, AVR in 1 and MVR in 1. Hospital results showed 4 deaths (2 due to multiple organ failure, 1 due to heart failure and 1 to bleeding), 1 case of perioperative acute myocardial infarction and no strokes. Late follow-up was performed in all of the patients at 25 ± 15 months. After hospital discharge, there were two deaths not related to the percutaneous or surgical procedures and no neurological events. CONCLUSION: A hybrid strategy combining carotid stenting and cardiovascular surgery is feasible and safe with an acceptable complication rate. It may be a good option in clinically unstable patients, however, further studies with a large number of patients are required to reproduce our findings.

Work objective To present our ductal stenting experience in congenital heart disease with duct-dependent circulation. Methods and results Four stents were implanted without complications in three patients with pulmonary atresia aged between 2 and 9 days. Mean follow-up was 411 days (123 to 721 days). Two stents were successfully redilated. One patient underwent surgery, another was followed-up to the fourth month and another is awaiting surgery. The mean oxygen saturation level increased from 61% to 80%. Conclusion In patients with duct-dependent congenital heart disease, ductal stenting was a feasible and effective procedure at early and mid-term follow-up.

Objetivo Presentar nuestra experiencia con el empleo de stent para mantener la permeabilidad ductal en cardiopatías congénitas dependientes del ductus. Método y resultados En tres pacientes de entre 2 y 9 días de vida con atresia pulmonar se colocaron cuatro stents por cateterismo, sin complicaciones. El tiempo de seguimiento promedio fue de 411 días (123 a 721 días). Dos stents se redilataron exitosamente. Un paciente fue sometido a cirugía, uno interrumpió sus controles cuatro meses después y otro espera cirugía. La saturación promedio aumentó del 61% al 80%. Conclusiones En pacientes con cardiopatías cuya circulación depende del ductus arterioso, el implante del stent fue factible y efectivo a corto y mediano plazos.