Resumen Este trabajo tiene como punto de partida la tesis de que las ideas de Hegel sobre el amor y el honor, así como la noción hegeliana de reconoci miento, resultan hoy un insumo fundamental para la teoría política feminista. Para demostrarlo, recurriremos al método de la “doble mirada”: por un lado, ofrece remos un panorama acerca del lugar de las mujeres en la obra de Hegel; por el otro, procuraremos demostrar la productividad política de muchas de sus ideas en el pensamiento feminista contemporáneo.

Abstract The starting point of this work is the thesis that Hegel’s ideas about love and honor, as well as the Hegelian notion of recognition, are today a fundamental supply for feminist political theory. To demonstrate that idea, we will take the “double look” method: on the one hand, we will offer an overview of the place of women in Hegel’s work; on the other, we will seek to demonstrate the political productivity of many of his ideas in contemporary feminist thought.

ABSTRACT Following on some of the ideas proposed by Georges Didi-Huberman in an exhibition at the Jeu de Paume in Paris, this article offers reflections on uprising as a repetitive, sovereign, and collective gesture of a search for freedom. First, we define this idea of the uprising based on a series of recent works by authors such as Judith Butler, Elsa Dorlin, and Jacques Rancière. We will try to think about the relation between revolt, revolution and crisis, emphasizing the temporary characteristics of these terms. Following that, we specifically address the relationship between uprisings and the suspension of historical time that has been clearly proposed by the Italian historian Furio Jesi in Spartakus. This leads us to a review of the same notion of suspension from Walter Benjamin’s perspective, while also considering proposals made by Giorgio Agamben and Aby Warburg as fundamental interlocutors. Finally, we will discuss the current state of the concept through the lenses of some recent occurrences in Latin America. DidiHuberman Didi Huberman Paris repetitive sovereign freedom First Butler Dorlin Rancière revolt crisis terms Spartakus Benjamins Benjamin s perspective interlocutors Finally America

Abstract: The present work aims to restore the problem of the Warburg’s method. First, we will analyse the influence of Jacob Burckhardt and Robert Vischer in the Warburguian proposal of a psychology for the approach of cultural phenomena. Then, we will discover that Warburg moves from this approach towards a new concern for the way in which impersonal forces produce historical-cultural senses. As we propose here, on the one hand, this movement is mediated by the configuration of a critique towards aestheticism and historicism (made explicit in 1900 through a famous epistolary exchange with André Jolles); on the other hand, it allows a better understanding of the notion of surviving pathos as well as the Warburguian interest for developing a theory of social memory, influenced by Richard Semon.

Resumen: El presente estudio teórico se propone restituir un aspecto del método Warburg. Analizaremos la influencia de autores como Robert Vischer y Jacob Burckhardt en la propuesta warburguiana de una “psicología” para el abordaje de los fenómenos culturales. Descubriremos más tarde que Warburg se desplazó desde este enfoque hacia la preocupación por el modo en que las “fuerzas impersonales” producen sentidos histórico-culturales. Proponemos aquí que este desplazamiento, por un lado, estuvo mediado por la configuración de una mirada crítica -por parte de Warburg- hacia el esteticismo y el historicismo (explicitada en 1900 a través de un célebre intercambio epistolar con André Jolles); por el otro, permite iluminar mejor la noción de pathos superviviente, así como el interés warburguiano por desarrollar una teoría de la memoria social (influenciada por Richard Semon).