INTRODUÇÃO: O caráter familial do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC) já é bem estabelecido. Ele segue o modelo complexo de transmissão genética que envolve a influência de diversos genes de pequeno efeito em interação com o ambiente. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática de estudos de associação genética com o TOC por meio de busca de artigos publicados até 2012 nas bases de dados: PubMed, Embase e SciELO, usando os termos MeSH, seus associados ou sinônimos para "obsessive-compulsive disorder", "gene" e "genetic association studies". RESULTADOS: Foram selecionados 105 artigos cujos principais resultados foram agrupados em grupos de genes relacionados a serotonina, dopamina, glutamato, GABA, substância branca, hormônios, sistema imune e outros genes (MAO-A, BNDF, COMT). CONCLUSÃO: Há grande variabilidade nos achados de estudos de associação entre os diversos genes candidatos estudados e o TOC. Genes relacionados às vias glutamatérgicas são candidatos promissores, porém não há associação conclusiva entre nenhum dos genes candidatos estudados e o TOC. Estudos de associação com grande tamanho amostral, avaliação de subgrupos mais homogêneos do fenótipo e metanálises ainda são necessários.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) segregates in families. It follows a complex model of genetic transmission, which involves the influence of several small effect genes interacting with the environment. METHODS: A systematic review of genetic association studies in OCD was performed. Articles published until 2012 were searched in the databases PubMed, Embase and SciELO using the terms of MeSH and its associates or synonyms for "obsessive-compulsive disorder", "gene" and "genetic association studies". RESULTS: We selected 105 papers and described their main results grouped as genes related to: serotonin, dopamine, glutamate, GABA, white matter, immune system, hormones and other genes. CONCLUSION: There is high variability between findings of association studies among the several candidate genes studied in OCD. Glutamate-related genes are promising candidates for OCD, but there is no conclusive association between any of the candidate genes studied and OCD. Association studies with large sample size, evaluation of more homogeneous subgroups of phenotype and meta-analyses are still needed.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to compare the sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tools for delirium (the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet) in a mixed population of critically ill patients, and to validate the Brazilian Portuguese Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. METHODS: The study was conducted in four intensive care units in Brazil. Patients were screened for delirium by a psychiatrist or neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Patients were subsequently screened by an intensivist using Portuguese translations of the three tools. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients were evaluated and 38.6% were diagnosed with delirium by the reference rater. The Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet had a sensitivity of 72.5% and a specificity of 96.2%; the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist had a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 72.4%. There was strong agreement between the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units and the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units Flowsheet (kappa coefficient = 0.96) CONCLUSION: All three instruments are effective diagnostic tools in critically ill intensive care unit patients. In addition, the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of delirium among critically ill patients.