RESUMO: Introdução: A mielopatia cervical degenerativa é a principal causa não traumática de disfunção medular em adultos. São utilizadas escalas e escores para avaliação neurológica baseada na funcionalidade, como a escala de Nurick e a Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA). O objetivo deste estudo é traduzir, validar transculturalmente e avaliar a reprodutibilidade da escala de Nurick para o português brasileiro em pacientes com mielopatia degenerativa cervical. Material e Métodos: O presente estudo foi dividido em duas fases: primeira, tradução, retradução, avaliação da versão final e avaliação da prova de aplicação. No total foram avaliados 70 indivíduos, 36 pertenciam ao grupo de pacientes com mielopatia cervical e 34, ao grupo controle. Tanto a versão traduzida do Nurick-BR quanto o mJOABR-17, previamente foram aplicados em ambos os grupos e os dados foram coletados. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de testes de Mann-Whitney e testes de correlação de Spearman. As análises foram realizadas utilizando o pacote estatístico R e o nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. Resultados: A partir dos testes de comparação de Mann-Whitney que verificaram as diferenças entre os grupos controle e pacientes. Foram encontradas diferenças significativas na escala NURICK-BR entre os grupos. A correlação entre as escalas NURICK-BRASIL e mJOABR-17 foi medida através do coeficiente de correlação de Spearman que apresentou forte correlação negativa. Esses resultados sugerem que a escala Nurick adaptada para o português brasileiro (NURICK-BRASIL) pode ser validada para avaliação de pacientes com mielopatia cervical degenerativa. Conclusão: A tradução, adaptação e validação da versão original da escala Nurick para o português brasileiro (NURICK-BR) mostrou similaridade, aplicabilidade, boa compreensão e grande potencial de universalização desta valiosa ferramenta para avaliação clínica e científica de pacientes com mielopatia cervical. Nível de evidência III; Estudo de caso-controle. RESUMO Introdução adultos funcionalidade JOA. JOA . (JOA) traduzir Métodos fases primeira tradução retradução aplicação 7 indivíduos 3 34 NurickBR BR mJOABR17, mJOABR17 mJOABR 17, 17 coletados MannWhitney Mann Whitney 5 5% Resultados NURICKBR NURICK NURICKBRASIL BRASIL mJOABR-1 negativa (NURICK-BRASIL Conclusão (NURICK-BR similaridade aplicabilidade III casocontrole. casocontrole caso caso-controle (JOA mJOABR1 1 mJOABR-

ABSTRACT Introduction: Degenerative cervical myelopathy stands as the primary non-traumatic cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults. Neurological assessment tools rooted in functionality, such as the Nurick scale and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA), are commonly employed. The latter was revised and culturally adapted to Western norms by Chiles et al. in 1999, resulting in the modified JOA score (mJOA). This study aims to translate, cross-culturally validate, and assess the reproducibility of the Nurick scale into Brazilian Portuguese among patients with cervical degenerative myelopathy. Material And Methods: This study comprised two phases: initial translation, back-translation, final version assessment, and application test evaluation. A total of 70 individuals were evaluated, with 36 in the cervical myelopathy group and 34 in the control group. Subsequently, both groups underwent assessment using the mJOA and the NURICK-BRAZIL version, with data collection following. Data analysis employed Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman’s correlation tests. Analyses were executed using the statistical package R, with a significance level set at 5%. Results: Mann-Whitney comparison tests revealed significant differences in the NURICK-BRAZIL scale between the control and patient groups. Spearman’s correlation coefficient indicated a robust negative correlation between the NURICK-BRAZIL and mJOA scales. These findings suggest that the adapted Nurick scale in Brazilian Portuguese (NURICK-BRAZIL) holds potential for validation in evaluating patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Conclusion: The translation, adaptation, and validation of the original Nurick scale in Brazilian Portuguese (NURICK-BRAZIL) demonstrate similarity, applicability, good comprehension, and significant potential for widespread utilization as a valuable clinical and scientific evaluation tool for cervical myelopathy patients. Level of evidence III; Case-control study. Introduction nontraumatic non traumatic adults functionality JOA, , (JOA) al 1999 mJOA. . (mJOA) translate crossculturally cross validate Methods phases translation backtranslation, backtranslation back back-translation 7 evaluated 3 Subsequently NURICKBRAZIL NURICK BRAZIL following MannWhitney Mann Whitney Spearmans Spearman s R 5 5% Results scales (NURICK-BRAZIL Conclusion adaptation similarity applicability comprehension III Casecontrol Case (JOA 199 (mJOA 19 1

RESUMEN: Introducción: La mielopatía cervical degenerativa es la principal causa no traumática de disfunción medular en adultos. Se utilizan escalas y puntajes para la evaluación neurológica basada en la funcionalidad, como la escala de Nurick y la Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA). El objetivo de este estudio es traducir, validar transculturalmente y evaluar la reproducibilidad de la escala de Nurick al portugués brasileño en pacientes con mielopatía degenerativa cervical. Materiales y Métodos: El estudio se dividió en dos fases: primero, traducción, retrotraducción, evaluación de la versión final y evaluación de la prueba de aplicación. En total, se evaluaron 70 individuos, 36 pertenecían al grupo de pacientes con mielopatía cervical y 34 al grupo de control. Tanto la versión traducida de Nurick-BR como el mJOABR-17 previamente se aplicaron en ambos grupos y se recopilaron los datos. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante pruebas de Mann-Whitney y pruebas de correlación de Spearman. Los análisis se llevaron a cabo utilizando el paquete estadístico R y el nivel de significancia adoptado fue del 5%. Resultados: A partir de las pruebas de comparación de Mann-Whitney que verificaron las diferencias entre los grupos de control y los pacientes, se encontraron diferencias significativas en la escala NURICK-BR entre los grupos. La correlación entre las escalas NURICK-BRASIL y mJOABR-17 se midió a través del coeficiente de correlación de Spearman, que mostró una correlación negativa fuerte. Estos resultados sugieren que la escala de Nurick adaptada al portugués brasileño (NURICK-BRASIL) puede ser validada para la evaluación de pacientes con mielopatía cervical degenerativa. Conclusión: La traducción, adaptación y validación de la versión original de la escala de Nurick al portugués brasileño (NURICK-BR) mostró similitud, aplicabilidad, buena comprensión y gran potencial de universalización de esta valiosa herramienta para la evaluación clínica y científica de pacientes con mielopatía cervical. Nivel de evidencia III; Estudio de casos y controles. RESUMEN Introducción adultos funcionalidad JOA. JOA . (JOA) traducir Métodos fases primero traducción retrotraducción aplicación total 7 individuos 3 NurickBR BR mJOABR17 mJOABR 17 mJOABR-1 MannWhitney Mann Whitney Spearman 5 5% Resultados NURICKBR NURICK NURICKBRASIL BRASIL fuerte (NURICK-BRASIL Conclusión (NURICK-BR similitud aplicabilidad III controles (JOA mJOABR1 1 mJOABR-

ABSTRACT Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes in patients who underwent surgical treatment for rotator cuff tears using open and arthroscopic techniques, and to evaluate the direct costs involved. Methods Retrospective cohort study with analysis of the data of patients who were referred to two private hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil for surgical repair of the rotator cuff from January 2018 to September 2019. Clinical outcomes were assessed using functional scores (SPADI and QuickDASH) and a quality of life questionnaire (EuroQoL). Procedure costs were calculated relative to each hospital’s costliest procedure. Results Data from 362 patients were analyzed. The mean patient age was 57 years (SD= 10.46), with a slight male predominance (53.9%). Arthroscopic procedures were more common than open procedures (95.6% versus 4.4%). Significant clinical improvement was reported in 84.8% of the patients. The factors associated with increased surgery costs were arthroscopic technique (increase of 29.2%), age (increase of 0.6% per year), and length of stay (increase of 18.9% per day of hospitalization). Conclusion Rotator cuff repair surgery is a highly effective procedure, associated with favorable clinical outcomes and improvement in life quality, and low rates of complications. Arthroscopic surgery tends to be costlier than open surgery. techniques involved Paulo 201 2019 SPADI QuickDASH EuroQoL. EuroQoL . (EuroQoL) hospital s procedure 36 analyzed 5 SD= SD (SD 10.46, 1046 10.46 , 10 46 10.46) 53.9%. 539 53.9% 53 9 (53.9%) 95.6% 956 95 6 (95.6 4.4%. 44 4.4% 4 4.4%) 848 84 8 84.8 increase 29.2%, 292 29.2% 29 2 29.2%) 06 0 0.6 year, year year) 189 18 18.9 hospitalization. hospitalization hospitalization) complications 20 (EuroQoL 3 104 10.4 1 53.9 (53.9% 95.6 (95. 4.4 84. 29.2 0. 18. 10. 53. (53.9 95. (95 4. 29. (53. (9 (53 ( (5

ABSTRACT Objective We performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (January 2019 to March 2021) for patients aged 18 years or older, who had COVID-19 and were treated with hydroxychloroquine versus placebo or standard of care. We also searched the WHO Clinical Trials Registry for ongoing and recently completed studies, and the reference lists of selected articles and reviews for possible relevant studies, with no restrictions regarding language or publication status. Random-effects models were used to obtain pooled mean differences of treatment effect on mortality, and serious adverse effects between hydroxychloroquine and the Control Group (standard of care or placebo); heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and the Cochran´s Q statistic. Results Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between patients treated with hydroxychloroquine compared to standard of care or placebo (16.7% versus 18.5%; pooled risk ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.19). Also, the rate of serious adverse effects was similar between both Groups, Hydroxychloroquine and Control (3.7% versus 2.9%; pooled risk ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.96). Conclusion Hydroxychloroquine is not efficacious in reducing mortality of COVID-19 patients. Prospero database registration (www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) under number CRD42020197070.

RESUMO No Brasil, não há registros da prevalência do tipo de fixação da artroplastia total de quadril (ATQ). Objetivo: (i) Descrever perfil demográfico de pacientes submetidos à ATQ no Sistema Único de Saúde de São Paulo durante os últimos doze anos; e (ii) comparar as técnicas de fixação de ATQ quanto aos custos, tempo de internação (TI) e taxa de óbito. Métodos: Estudo ecológico, com dados disponíveis na TabNet do DATASUS. Dados públicos de procedimentos de ATQ eletivos realizados em São Paulo de 2008 a 2019 foram extraídos. Foram analisados: sexo, idade, região municipal, método de fixação em ATQ, número de cirurgias, custo, tempo de internação e óbitos. Resultados: Foram analisadas 7.673 ATQs, sendo 6.220 (81%) não-cimentada/híbridas e 1.453 (19%) cimentadas. A fixação não-cimentada/híbrida teve custo maior em US$ 495,27 do que a cimentada (p < 0,001). Entretanto, TI foi 0,87 dia mais longo na fixação cimentada. Não houve diferença significativa nas taxas de óbito entre os métodos de fixação. Conclusão: A fixação não-cimentada/híbrida na ATQ é prevalente em São Paulo, e apresentou maior custo total, porém menor tempo de internação do que a fixação cimentada. Não houve diferença entre o método de fixação em ATQ e a taxa de óbito. Nível de Evidência IV, Série de Casos.

ABSTRACT Brazil lacks registries on the prevalence of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) fixation methods. Objective: (i) to describe the demographic profile of patients who underwent THA in the public health system of the municipality of São Paulo during the last 12 years and (ii) to compare fixation methods regarding costs, hospital stay length, and death rates. Methods: This is an ecological study conducted with data available on TabNet, a platform belonging to DATASUS. Public data (from the government health system) on THA procedures performed in São Paulo from 2008 to 2019 were extracted. Gender, age, city region, THA fixation method, number of surgeries, costs, hospital stay length, and death rates were analyzed. Results: We analyzed 7,673 THA, of which 6220 (81%) were performed via cementless/hybrid fixation and 1453 (19%), via the cemented technique. Cementless/hybrid fixation had a higher cost (US$ 495.27) than the cemented one (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, hospital stay length was 0.87 days longer for cemented fixation than the cementless/hybrid one. We found no significant difference in death rates between THA fixation methods. Conclusion: THA cementless/hybrid fixation is prevalent in the municipality of São Paulo, which had higher total costs and shorter hospitalizations than cemented fixation. We found no difference between THA fixation methods and death rates. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the technical specificities and feasibility of simulation of minimally invasive spine surgery in live pigs, as well as similarities and differences in comparison to surgery in humans. Methods A total of 22 Large White class swine models, weighing between 60 and 80kg, were submitted to surgical simulations, performed during theoretical-practical courses for training surgical techniques (microsurgical and endoscopic lumbar decompression; percutaneous pedicular instrumentation; lateral access to the thoracic spine, and anterior and retroperitoneal to the lumbar spine, and management of complications) by 86 spine surgeons. For each surgical technique, porcine anatomy (similarities and differences in relation to human anatomy), access route, and dimensions of the instruments and implants used were evaluated. Thus, the authors describe the feasibility of each operative simulation, as well as suggestions to optimize training. Study results are descriptive, with figures and drawings. Results Neural decompression surgeries (microsurgeries and endoscopic) and pedicular instrumentation presented higher similarities to surgery on humans. On the other hand, intradiscal procedures had limitations due to the narrow disc space in swines. We were able to simulate situations of surgical trauma in surgical complication scenarios, such as cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and excessive bleeding, with comparable realism to surgery on humans. Conclusion A porcine model for simulation of minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques had similarities with surgery on humans, and is therefore feasible for surgeon training.

ABSTRACT Objective Phase 1 clinical trial to determine feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new advanced cell therapy product for treatment of knee articular cartilage injuries. Methods Three participants with knee focal chondral lesions were included, with no signs of osteoarthritis. Chondrocytes were obtained through knee arthroscopy, cultured in collagen membrane for 3 weeks at the laboratory, subjected to tests to release the cell therapy product, and implanted. All patients underwent a specific 3-month rehabilitation protocol, followed by assessments using functional and imaging scales. The main outcome was the incidence of severe adverse events. Results Three participants were included and completed the 2-year follow-up. There was one severe adverse event, venous thrombosis of distal leg veins, which was no associated with therapy, was treated and left no sequelae. The clinical and radiological scales showed improvement in the three cases. Conclusion The preliminary results, obtained with the described methodology, allow concluding that this product of advanced cell therapy is safe and feasible. ReBEC platform registration number: RBR-6fgy76

ABSTRACT Objective To gather all systematic reviews of surgical treatment of degenerative cervical diseases and assess their quality, conclusions and outcomes. Methods A literature search for systematic reviews of surgical treatment of degenerative cervical diseases was conducted. Studies should have at least one surgical procedure as an intervention. Included studies were assessed for quality through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) questionnaires. Quality of studies was rated accordingly to their final score as very poor (<30%), poor (30%-50%), fair (50%-70%), good (70%-90%), and excellent (>90%). If an article reported a conclusion addressing its primary objective with supportive statistical evidence for it, they were deemed to have an evidence-based conclusion. Results A total of 65 systematic reviews were included. According to AMSTAR and PRISMA, 1.5% to 6.2% of studies were rated as excellent, while good studies counted for 21.5% to 47.7%. According to AMSTAR, most studies were of fair quality (46.2%), and 6.2% of very poor quality. Mean PRISMA score was 70.2%, meaning studies of good quality. For both tools, performing a meta-analysis significantly increased studies scores and quality. Cervical spondylosis studies reached highest scores among diseases analyzed. Authors stated conclusions for interventions compared in 70.7% of studies, and only two of them were not supported by statistical evidence. Conclusion Systematic reviews of surgical treatment of cervical degenerative diseases present “fair” to “good” quality in their majority, and most of the reported conclusions are supported by statistical evidence. Including a meta-analysis significantly increases the quality of a systematic review.

ABSTRACT Objective To systematically review the effects (benefits and harms) of different types of physical exercise on insomnia outcomes in adult populations with no mood disorders. Objective and subjective sleep outcomes and related mismatches were analyzed. Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis. Quality of evidence was also examined. Results Six studies including 295 participants with insomnia diagnosis were selected. Yoga, Tai Chi, resistance exercise and aerobic exercise were used in protocols with different duration, intensity and frequency. Studies involved different populations, including inactive or sedentary individuals, older adults and postmenopausal women. Physical exercise improved subjective sleep quality (very low quality of evidence) and reduced insomnia severity (high quality of evidence). Conclusion Findings suggest individualized physical exercise must be addressed to design optimal protocols, with standardized type, duration, intensity, and frequency. For the time being, physical exercise may be considered an alternative and/or ancillary therapeutic modality for patients diagnosed with insomnia. Physical exercise can be used to improve subjective complaints, but not objective sleep outcomes.

Resumo: Objetivo: Relacionar a taxa de fusão radiográfica e os resultados cirúrgicos nos pacientes submetidos a artrodese posterolateral com instrumentação da coluna lombar para tratamento de afecções degenerativas. Método: Estudo observacional retrospectivo descritivo, tipo série de casos, com base em prontuários médicos e exames de imagem de 76 pacientes maiores de 18 anos (39 a 88 anos), submetidos a artrodese lombar posterolateral. Dados relacionados a presença de comorbidades foram compilados e os desfechos clínicos mensurados por meio de questionários específicos coletados no pré-cirúrgico e após um ano pós-cirúrgico. A qualidade da fusão, conforme descrita por Christensen, foi avaliada a partir de imagens radiográficas por dois examinadores. Os questionários de EVA, EQ-5D e Roland Morris foram utilizados no pré-cirúrgico e um ano pós-cirúrgico para avaliar dor, qualidade de vida e função, respectivamente. Resultado: Observou se melhora na dor, função e qualidade de vida após um ano pós-cirúrgico. A dor, mensurada pelo EVA teve uma redução de 7,92 para 3,16 (p-valor <0,001), a função avaliada pelo escore Roland Morris, também apresentou redução de 14,90 para 7,06 (p-valor <0,001). Culminando com a melhora na qualidade de vida, mensurada pelo EQ-5D, onde observou-se um aumento mediano escore de 0,5672 para 0,7002 (p-valor = 0,002). Conclusão: A ausência de fusão radiográfica não tem correlação direta com piores resultados nos desfechos clínicos em um ano de pós-cirúrgico. Maioritariamente, os pacientes apresentaram melhora clínica sem diferença estatística em relação aos casos em que foi obtido fusão óssea. Nível de evidência IV; Observacional retrospectivo.

ABSTRACT Objective: To relate the radiographic fusion rate and the surgical results in patients undergoing posterolateral arthrodesis with instrumentation of the lumbar spine for the treatment of degenerative disorders. Method: A descriptive, retrospective, case series, observational study, based on medical records and imaging studies of 76 patients over 18 years of age (39 to 88 years) who underwent posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis. Data related to the presence of comorbidities were compiled and clinical outcomes were measured using specific questionnaires collected pre-surgical and 1 year after surgery. Fusion quality, as described by Christensen, was assessed from radiographic images by two examiners. The VAS, EQ-5D and Roland Morris questionnaires were used preoperatively and 1 year after surgery to assess pain, quality of life and function, respectively. Result: It was observed improvement in pain, function and quality of life after 1 year post-surgical. Pain, measured by VAS, had a reduction from 7.92 to 3.16 (p-value <0.001), the function evaluated by the Roland Morris score, also showed a reduction from 14.90 to 7.06 (p-value <0.001) . Culminating with the improvement in quality of life, measured by the EQ-5D, where there was a median increase in the score from 0.5672 to 0.7002 (p-value = 0.002). Conclusion: The absence of radiographic fusion has no direct correlation with worse results in clinical outcomes at 01 year after surgery. Most patients showed clinical improvement with no statistical difference in relation to cases in which bone fusion was obtained. Level of evidence IV; retrospective observation.

Resumen: Objetivo: Relacionar ei índice de fusión radiográfica y los resultados quirúrgicos en pacientes sometidos a artrodesis posterolateral con instrumentación de columna lumbar para el tratamiento de trastornos degenerativos. Método: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, serie de casos, observacional, basado en historias clínicas y estudios de imagen de 76 pacientes may ores de 18 anos (39 a 88 anos) a quienes se les realizó artrodesis lumbar posterolateral. Se recopilaron datos relacionados con la presencia de comorbilidades y se midieron los resultados clínicos mediante cuestionarios específicos recogidos antes de la cirugía y al año de la cirugía. La calidad de la fusión, según lo descrito por Christensen, fue evaluada a partir de imágenes radiográficas por dos examinadores. Los cuestionarios VAS, EQ-5D y Roland Morris se utilizaron en el preoperatorio y 1 año después de la cirugía para evaluar el dolor, la calidad de vida y la función, respectivamente. Resultado: Se observó mejoría en el dolor, función y calidad de vida después de 1 año posquirúrgico. El dolor, medido por EVA, tuvo una reducción de 7,92 a 3,16 (p-valor <0,001), la función evaluada por el puntaje de Roland Morris, también mostró una reducción de 14,90 a 7,06 (p-valor <0,001). Culminando con la mejora en la calidad de vida, medida por el EQ-5D, donde hubo un aumento mediano en el puntaje de 0,5672 a 0,7002 (p-valor = 0,002). Conclusión: La ausencia de fusión radiográfica no tiene correlación directa con peores resultados en los resultados clínicos al 01 año de la cirugía. La mayoría de los pacientes presentaron mejoría clínica sin diferencia estadística en relación a los casos en los que se obtuvo fusión ósea. Nivel de evidencia IV; observación retrospectiva.

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze pain, functional capacity, quality of life, anxiety and depression outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery following use of the Second Opinion Program, and to present disagreements regarding diagnoses and therapeutic indications between the first and second opinions. Methods A prospective, observational cohort study with 100 patients enrolled in the Second Opinion Program who underwent lumbar spine surgery. Questionnaires addressing pain intensity, level of disability, quality of life, anxiety and depression were applied prior to and within 1, 3, 6 and 12 months of surgery. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed. The following clinical outcomes were analyzed: pain intensity, level of disability, quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Results In this sample, 88% and 12% out of 100 patients were submitted to lumbar decompression and arthrodesis, respectively. Patients reported improvements in function, pain intensity, and quality of life factors following surgery and were able to attain the minimal clinically important difference relative to the preoperative period. Agreement between the first and second opinions was observed in 44% of diagnoses, and in 27% of therapeutic indications. Conclusion Patients had favorable postoperative outcomes regarding pain, disability, and quality of life. These findings and the high rates of diagnostic and therapeutic indication disagreements corroborate the need of a second opinion in cases of spine disease with surgical indications.

Resumo Objetivo Comparar a dor, a função, a qualidade de vida e os eventos adversos da descompressão lombar e da fusão espinhal em pacientes com patologias degenerativas da coluna vertebral que participaram de um programa de segunda opinião para cirurgias de coluna com acompanhamento de 36 meses. Métodos Os dados desta coorte retrospectiva foram obtidos de um sistema de saúde privado entre junho de 2011 e janeiro de 2014. A amostra do estudo foi composta por 71 pacientes encaminhados para cirurgia de coluna lombar. Os desfechos para comparações entre a descompressão lombar e a fusão espinhal foram qualidade de vida (avaliada pelo questionário EuroQoL 5D), dor (medida pela Escala Numérica de Classificação de Dor) e função (avaliada pelo Questionário de Incapacidade de Roland Morris) no início do estudo e aos 12 e 36 meses de acompanhamento pós-cirúrgico. As definições de recuperação foram estabelecidas pela diferença mínima clinicamente importante (DMCI). As diferenças basais entre os grupos foram analisadas por teste t não pareado, e as diferenças nas pontuações dos instrumentos entre os momentos, por modelos mistos generalizados. Os resultados foram apresentados como valores médios ajustados pelos modelos e intervalos de confiança de 95%. Resultados No total, 22 pacientes foram submetidos à artrodese, e 49 pacientes, à descompressão lombar. Quanto às comparações de achados antes e depois das intervenções cirúrgicas, a DMCI foi alcançada em todos os desfechos de qualidade de vida, dor e função nos dois pontos de acompanhamento em relação aos escores basais Em relação às complicações, apenas a descompressão lombar apresentou 4% (n = 3) de taxa cirúrgica de recidiva da hérnia de disco lombar. Conclusão Pacientes com patologias espinhais degenerativas apresentam melhoras nos desfechos de dor, função e qualidade de vida em longo prazo que são clinicamente significativas e independentes da intervenção cirúrgica.

Abstract Objective To compare pain, function, quality of life and adverse events of lumbar decompression and spinal fusion in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies who participated in a second opinion program for spinal surgeries with a 36-month followup. Methods The data for this retrospective cohort were withdrawn from a private healthcare system between June 2011 and January 2014. The study sample consisted of 71 patients with a lumbar spine surgical referral. The outcomes for the comparisons between lumbar decompression and spinal fusion were quality of life (evaluated through the EuroQoL 5D), pain (measured by the Numerical Rating Scale) and function (assessed through the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire) measured at baseline, and at 12 and 36 months after the surgical procedures. The definitions of recovery were established by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The baseline differences between the groups were analyzed by non-paired t-test, and the differences in instrument scores between time points, by generalized mixed models. The results were presented as mean values adjusted by the models and 95% confidence intervals. Results Concerning the surgical techniques, 22 patients were submitted to spinal fusion and 49 patients, to lumbar decompression. As for the comparisons of the findings before and after the surgical interventions, the MCID was achieved in all outcomes regarding quality of life, pain and function at both time points when compared to baseline scores Moreover, concerning the complication rates, only lumbar decompression presented a surgical rate of 4% (n = 3) for recurrence of lumbar disc hernia. Conclusion Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies present improvements in long-term outcomes of pain, function and quality of life which are clinically significant, no matter the surgical intervention.

RESUMO Objetivo Determinar a prática clínica atual na América Latina para o tratamento das fraturas do terço médio da clavícula, incluindo abordagens cirúrgicas e não cirúrgicas. Métodos Estudo transversal com aplicação de questionário descritivo. Cirurgiões de ombro e cotovelo da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo e da Sociedade Latino-Americana de Ombro e Cotovelo foram contatados e convidados a completar um breve questionário (SurveyMonkey®) sobre o manejo das fraturas do terço médio da clavícula. Foram excluídas as respostas incompletas ou inconsistentes. Resultados O tipo de classificação radiográfica utilizada de preferência esteve de acordo com a descrição da morfologia da fratura, representando 41% do total dos participantes. Em segundo lugar, apareceu a classificação de Allman, que foi utilizada por 24,1% dos participantes. Nas indicações de tratamento cirúrgico, as indicações com encurtamento e iminência de exposição da pele foram estatisticamente significativas. Tratamento conservador foi prescrito em caso de contato entre as corticais. Como método de imobilização, a tipoia simples foi a preferência, e o tempo de tratamento foi de 4 a 6 semanas. Apesar do resultado sem significância estatística, a placa bloqueada foi a opção preferencial nos casos cirúrgicos. Conclusão A metodologia de tratamento das fraturas do terço médio da clavícula nos países da América Latina é semelhante, assim como com a literatura atual.

ABSTRACT Objective To determine the current clinical practice in Latin America for treating midshaft clavicle fractures, including surgical and non-surgical approaches. Methods A cross-sectional study using a descriptive questionnaire. Shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and from the Latin American Society of Shoulder and Elbow were contacted and asked to complete a short questionnaire (SurveyMonkey®) on the management of midshaft fractures of the clavicle. Incomplete or inconsistent answers were excluded. Results The type of radiographic classification preferably used was related to description of fracture morphology, according to 41% of participants. Allman classification ranked second and was used by 24.1% of participants. As to indications for surgical treatment, only the indications with shortening and imminence of skin exposure were statistically significant. Conservative treatment was chosen in cortical contact. Regarding immobilization method, the simple sling was preferred, and treatment lasted from 4 to 6 weeks. Although the result was not statistically significant, the blocked plate was the preferred option in surgical cases. Conclusion The treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in Latin America is in accordance with the current literature.

RESUMO A hemofilia do tipo B afeta normalmente pacientes com história familiar positiva para a doença e se apresenta com quadro clínico típico. No presente caso, no entanto, o diagnóstico se deu em um paciente fora da idade típica, sem histórico familiar de doenças hematológicas e quadro clínico diferente do habitual.

ABSTRACT Type B hemophilia usually affects patients with a family history of this disease and has a typical clinical picture. However, in the present case it appeared in a patient outside the typical age with no family history of hematologic malignancies and with an unusual clinical picture.

RESUMO Objetivo: A doença degenerativa da coluna cervical é uma fonte frequente de dor cervical intermitente, na qual os sintomas predominantes são dor axial cervical. As indicações para cirurgia são reservadas para os casos de falha do tratamento conservador ou com sintomas neurológicos progressivos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os fatores prognósticos dos pacientes submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico da coluna cervical. Métodos: O estudo avaliou os pacientes submetidos à cirurgia da coluna cervical entre julho de 2011 e novembro de 2015 (n = 58). As variáveis de comparação avaliadas foram tabagismo, hipertensão, diabete, sobrepeso, técnica cirúrgica aplicada e número de níveis de artrodese. O desfecho primário foi definido como dor e os desfechos secundários foram qualidade de vida e disfunção. Resultados: Encontramos diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os escores de dor de base e aos 12 meses após a cirurgia, favorável aos pacientes sem hipertensão arterial sistêmica (p = 0,009) e aos submetidos à discectomia com instrumentação (p = 0,004). Também houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na avaliação da disfunção da coluna cervical: o resultado foi mais favorável para os pacientes sem diagnóstico prévio de hipertensão (p = 0,028) e para os pacientes com IMC menor do que 25 kg/m2(p = 0,005). Não se observou evidência de interação significativa entre os dados avaliados e os resultados do questionário de qualidade de vida. Conclusões: Os pacientes não hipertensos, com índice de massa corpórea menor do que 25 kg/cm2e submetidos à artrodese combinada à discectomia, são os mais beneficiados com o procedimento cirúrgico da doença degenerativa da coluna cervical.

ABSTRACT Objective: Degenerative disease of the cervical spine is a frequent source of intermittent neck pain, where the predominant symptom is axial neck pain. The indications for surgical treatment are reserved for the cases where the conservative treatment has not relieved the symptoms or the patient presents progressive neurological impairment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors involved in patients submitted to surgical treatment of the cervical spine, Methods: The study analyzed data from patients submitted to cervical spine surgery between July 2011 and November 2015 (n= 58). The evaluated data included smoking habits, hypertension, diabetes, overweight, surgical technique, and number of levels of fusion. The primary outcome was defined as pain and the secondary outcomes were quality of life and disability., Results: A statistically significant difference was found between baseline and the 12-month post-operative results regarding pain in favor of non-hypertensive patients (p= 0.009) and discectomy plus instrumentation (, p= 0.004). There was also significant difference between the results of neck disability in favor of non-hypertensive patients (p= 0.028) and patients with body mass index lower than 25, kg/m2 (p= 0.005). There was no significant interaction between any analyzed data and the quality of life score results. Conclusions: Non-hypertensive patients, those with body mass index lower than 25 kg/m2, and those submitted to discectomy combined with arthrodesis of the cervical spine are the most benefited by cervical degenerative disease surgery.

RESUMO Objetivo: Mensurar a reprodutibilidade interobservadores da avaliação radiográfica da instabilidade da coluna lombar. Métodos: Foram realizadas mensurações das radiografias dinâmicas de coluna lombar na incidência em perfil, avaliando-se a translação anterior e a angulação entre os corpos vertebrais. Os exames foram avaliados em workstations da própria instituição, por meio do sistema Vue RIS (PACS) da Carestream Health, versão 11.0.12.14 Inc. 2009©. Resultados: A proporção de concordância em detecção de casos de instabilidade radiográfica entre os observadores variou de 88,1 a 94,4%, e os coeficientes de concordância AC1 estiveram todos acima de 0,8, indicando concordância excelente. Conclusão: A análise interobservadores realizada entre médicos ortopedistas com diferentes níveis de treinamento em radiografias dinâmicas da coluna vertebral obteve elevada reprodutibilidade e concordância. No entanto, alguns fatores, como método manual de aferição e a presença de osteófitos vertebrais, podem ter gerado alguns resultados menos consistentes nessa avaliação comparativa de medidas.

ABSTRACT Objective: To measure the interobserver reproducibility of the radiographic evaluation of lumbar spine instability. Methods: Measurements of the dynamic radiographs of the lumbar spine in lateral view were performed, evaluating the anterior translation and the angulation among the vertebral bodies. The tests were evaluated at workstations of the organization, through the Carestream Health Vue RIS (PACS), version 11.0.12.14 Inc. 2009© system. Results: Agreement in detecting cases of radiographic instability among the observers varied from 88.1 to 94.4%, and the agreement coefficients AC1 were all above 0.8, indicating excellent agreement. Conclusion: The interobserver analysis performed among orthopedic surgeons with different levels of training in dynamic radiographs of the spine obtained high reproducibility and agreement. However, some factors, such as the manual method of measurement and the presence of vertebral osteophytes, might have generated a few less accurate results in this comparative evaluation of measurements.