ABSTRACT We aimed to evaluate the effects of the addition of oregano (Origanum vulgare) or green tea (Camellia sinensis L.) extracts (separately and associated) on feed intake, milk production, and hematological and antioxidant profiles of dairy cows. For that purpose, 16 Holstein and 16 Holstein-Gyr cows with 526.3±10.2 kg and within the first third of lactation were distributed according to a complete block design with measurements repeated in time. Treatments were control (CON), addition of 0.056% of oregano extract (OR), addition of 0.028% of green tea extract (GT), addition of a mixture of OR and GT extract (0.056% each) in the diet (MIX). Hematological and antioxidant profiles were monitored. Data were subjected to ANOVA, with block, treatment, days, and their interactions considered as fixed effects and animal and the residue as random effects. In Holstein cows, GT increased feed intake and milk yield compared with CON; in Holstein-Gyr crossbred cows, OR showed increased intake and GT increased milk yield compared with CON. Compared with CON, GT and OR decreased eosinophils concentration; OR showed the highest neutrophils concentration and neutrophils to leukocyte ratio. Compared with CON, OR presented increased catalase (CAT) activity, while GT increased the reduced glutathione concentration. The MIX treatment reduced CAT activity compared with OR, presented the lowest concentration of oxidized dichlorofluorescein in the erythrocytes (DCFER) and plasma (DCFPLA), and increased eosinophils concentration compared with GT and OR. Extracts differently affected feed intake and milk yield depending on genetic group. Feeding green tea and oregano extracts separately or associated distinctly affects the antioxidant indicators of lactating dairy cows.

OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o efeito do cimento α-TCP combinado com PRP sobre a osteogênese, comparando os resultados com PRP utilizado isoladamente. MÉTODOS: Foi confeccionado defeito bilateral no fêmur de ratos e preenchido com um dos dois tipos de tratamentos (PRP ou α-TCP+PRP), sendo avaliado em quatro e oito semanas. As imagens radiográficas forneceram valores da área da lesão, e a histologia (coloração Picrosirius) indicou a área de neoformação óssea. RESULTADOS: As médias referentes à área de lesão do grupo α-TCP+PRP (2,64mm² ± 2,07 e 1,91mm² ± 0,93; quatro e oito semanas, respectivamente) demonstraram numericamente melhores resultados, porém não significativos (p > 0,05), em comparação com aqueles observados no grupo PRP (5,59mm² ± 2,69 e 3,23mm² ± 1,46; quatro e oito semanas, respectivamente). As médias de neoformação óssea foram de 62,7% ± 12,1% e 79,01% ± 6,25 no grupo PRP, e 73,3% ± 12,7 e 85,86% ± 10,45 no grupo α-TCP+PRP, em quatro e oito semanas, respectivamente (p > 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: Os dados deste estudo sugerem que o tratamento com cimento α-TCP combinado com PRP não demonstra diferença significativa quando comparado ao PRP isolado. Entretanto, há um possível efeito precoce sobre a regeneração óssea quando os dois biomateriais são aplicados em conjunto.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of alpha-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on osteogenesis, and to compare the results with use of PRP alone. METHODS: A bilateral defect was produced in rat femurs and was filled with one of two types of treatments (PRP or α-TCP + PRP). The outcomes were evaluated after four and eight weeks. Radiographic images provided values for the lesion area, and histology (picrosirius staining) indicated the area of new bone formation. RESULTS: The means relating to the lesion area of the α-TCP + PRP group (2.64 ± 2.07 and 1.91 ± 0.93 mm², after four and eight weeks, respectively) showed numerically better but non-significant results (p > 0.05) than those seen in the PRP group (5.59 mm ² ± 2.69 and 3.23 ± 1.46 mm ², after four and eight weeks, respectively). The mean new bone formation rates were 62.7% ± 12.1 and 79.01% ± 6.25 in the PRP group, and 73.3% ± 12.7 and 85.86% ± 10.45 in α-TCP + PRP group, after four and eight weeks, respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The data from this study suggest that treatment with α-TCP cement combined with PRP does not show any significant difference in comparison with PRP alone. However, there is a possible early effect on bone regeneration when the two biomaterials are applied together.