Abstract Cancer patients are exposed to more complications from COVID-19 than non-cancer patients. We report a cohort of 74 cancer patients (87.8% with solid neoplasia and 12.2% with hematological diseases) with COVID-19 infection admitted to a tertiary medical cancer center in Argentina. Pulmonary infiltrates were diagnosed at admission in 78.3% (N = 58) of the cases. COVID-19 infection was hospital-acquired in 20 (27.0%) patients. Thirty-nine patients (52.7%) received anticancer therapy within the 30 days prior to COVID-19 diagnosis; one was on radiation therapy. Twenty-four (32.4%) patients were admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 18 (75.0%) required mechanical ventilation. All cause in-hospital mortality was 32.4% (N = 24) and ICU mortality was 62.5% (N = 15). Mortality under me chanical ventilation was 72.2% (N = 13). In the univariate analysis age, neutrophil count, neutrophil/lymphocyte index, D-dimer, ferritin, smoking, and nosocomial acquired infection were associated with in-hospital mortality. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality related to disease stage for solid tumors, neither cancer treatment within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Age and smoking were associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis. The adjusted odds ratios (95 CI) for age ≥ 65 years and smoking were 8.87 (1.35-58.02) and 8.64 (1.32 - 56.64), respectively. Our experience can be useful for other institutions that assist cancer patients during the pandemic.

Resumen Los pacientes con cáncer y COVID-19 tienen más complicaciones que la población general. Comunicamos una cohorte de 74 pacientes con cáncer y COVID-19 internados en una institución on cológica. El 87.8% tenía diagnóstico de tumores sólidos y 12.2% oncohematológicos. Entre los tumores sólidos, el 61.5% presentó enfermedad metastásica. El 78.3% (N = 58) tenía infiltrados pulmonares al diagnóstico de COVID-19. La infección fue intrahospitalaria en 20 pacientes. Habían recibido tratamiento antineoplásico den tro de los 30 días anteriores al diagnóstico 39 pacientes (52.7%); uno se encontraba recibiendo radioterapia. Veinticuatro pacientes (32.4%) se derivaron a terapia intensiva (UTI) y 18 (75%) de ellos requirieron asistencia respiratoria mecánica (ARM). La mortalidad general durante la internación fue 32.4% (N = 24). La mortalidad en UTI fue 62.5% (N = 15). La mortalidad en ARM fue 72.2% (N = 13). La edad, recuento de neutrófilos, índice neutrófilo/linfocito, dímero D, ferritina, tabaquismo y haber adquirido la infección durante la internación resultaron estadísticamente significativos en el análisis univariado para mortalidad. No hallamos diferencias en mortalidad por estadio de enfermedad, en los pacientes con tumores sólidos, ni por haber recibido tratamiento antineoplá sico dentro de los 30 días del diagnóstico de COVID-19. En el análisis multivariado con el modelo de regresión logística, solo la edad y el tabaquismo fueron predictores de mortalidad. Los odds ratios (IC 95) ajustados para la edad ≥65 años y el tabaquismo fueron 8.87 (1.35-58.02) y 8.64 (1.32-56.64), respectivamente. Este trabajo puede resultar de utilidad para instituciones polivalentes que asistan pacientes oncológicos durante la pandemia.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods (MDR GNR) represent a growing threat for patients with cancer. Our objective was to determine the characteristics of and risk factors for MDR GNR bacteremia in patients with cancer and to develop a clinical score to predict MDR GNR bacteremia. Material and Methods: Multicenter prospective study analyzing initial episodes of MDR GNR bacteremia. Risk factors were evaluated using a multiple logistic regression (forward-stepwise selection) analysis including variables with a p < 0.10 in univariate analysis. Results: 394 episodes of GNR bacteremia were included, with 168 (42.6 %) being MDR GNR. Five variables were identified as independent risk factors: recent antibiotic use (OR = 2.8, 95 % CI 1.7-4.6, p = 0.001), recent intensive care unit admission (OR = 2.9, 95 % CI 1.1-7.8, p = 0.027), hospitalization ≥ 7 days prior to the episode of bacteremia (OR = 3.5, 95 % CI 2-6.2, p = 0.005), severe mucositis (OR = 5.3, 95 % CI 1.8-15.6, p = 0.002), and recent or previous colonization/infection with MDR GNR (OR = 2.3, 95 % CI 1.2-4.3, p = 0.028). Using a cut-off value of two points, the score had a sensitivity of 66.07 % (95 % CI 58.4-73.2 %), a specificity of 77.8 % (95 % CI 71.4-82.7 %), a positive predictive value of 68 % (95 % CI 61.9-73.4 %), and a negative predictive value of 75.9 % (95 % CI 71.6-79.7 %). The overall performance of the score was satisfactory (AUROC 0.78; 95 % CI 0.73-0.82). In the cases with one or none of the risk factors identified, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.18 and the post-test probability of having MDR GNR was 11.68 %. Conclusions: With the growing incidence of MDR GNR as etiologic agents of bacteremia in cancer patients, the development of this score could be a potential tool for clinicians.

Pulmonary infiltrates remain as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in cancer patients. In order to evaluate the etiology, diagnostic methods used, Intensive Care Unit admission and in-hospital mortality, we conduced an observational, prospective study which included all patients with cancer and recent pulmonary infiltrates admitted to the Instituto Alexander Fleming between August 2003 and March 2006. Diagnostic methods were categorized in sequential steps of complexity: 1st step: radiological pattern of the pulmonary infiltrates, blood and sputum cultures, serological tests and empirical treatment response; 2nd step: bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), non bronchoscopic tracheal aspirate and mini-BAL; 3rd step: pulmonary or extrapulmonary biopsies. Pulmonary infiltrate etiology was classified as: infection, treatment complication, disease progression, cardiovascular or mixed. Diagnosis was classified as proved or probable. A total of 106 samples from 103 patients were included. The etiologies were infection in 61 cases, disease progression in 4, treatment complication in 6, cardiovascular in 6 and mixed in 7. Proved diagnosis was obtained in 33 cases and probable diagnosis in 51 while 22 cases could not be diagnosed. Nine of the 10 diagnoses of mycoses were in oncohematologic cases. Seventy cases did not go further than procedures included in the 1st step. Thirty two cases stopped after diagnostic procedures of the 2nd step and 4 required biopsies. Forty four cases required Intensive Care Unit admission. In-hospital mortality was 30.2%. In our study, infection was the most frequent etiology. Mycoses were more frequent in oncohematologic cases. A proved or probable diagnosis was obtained in 84 (79.2%) cases. In 53.7% of the cases only non-invasive diagnostic methods were required.

La aparición de infiltrados pulmonares en los pacientes con cáncer representa un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico. Con el objeto de evaluar la etiología, utilización de métodos diagnósticos, admisión en Terapia Intensiva (UTI) y letalidad intrahospitalaria de estos pacientes, realizamos un estudio prospectivo observacional donde se incluyeron todos los pacientes con cáncer y nuevos infiltrados pulmonares internados en el Instituto Alexander Fleming entre marzo 2003 y agosto 2006. Los métodos diagnósticos fueron categorizados en 3 etapas (1ª etapa: patrón radiológico de los infiltrados pulmonares, hemocultivos, cultivo de esputo, pruebas serológicas y respuesta al tratamiento empírico inicial; 2ª etapa: lavado broncoalveolar (LBA), aspirado traqueal y mini-LBA; 3ª etapa: biopsias pulmonares o extrapulmonares). La etiología de los infiltrados pulmonares se clasificó como infección, complicación del tratamiento, progresión de enfermedad, cardiovascular o mixta. Los diagnósticos fueron clasificados en diagnóstico de certeza o diagnóstico probable. Se incluyeron 106 casos en 103 pacientes. La etiología fue: infección en 61 casos, progresión de enfermedad en 4, complicación del tratamiento en 6, cardiovascular en 6 y mixta en 7. Se obtuvo diagnóstico de certeza en 33 casos y diagnóstico probable en 51. Se clasificaron como sin diagnóstico 22 casos. Nueve de las 10 micosis diagnosticadas fueron en pacientes oncohematológicos. Setenta casos se detuvieron en la 1ª etapa diagnóstica, 32 en la 2ª etapa y 4 necesitaron biopsias. Requirieron internación en UTI 44 casos. La letalidad intrahospitalaria fue 30.2%. En nuestro estudio, la infección fue la etiología más frecuente y las micosis fueron predominantes en los pacientes oncohematológicos. Se obtuvo diagnóstico de certeza o diagnóstico probable en 84 (79.2%) casos. En 53.7% de los casos no se requirieron métodos diagnósticos invasivos.