Abstract Background: Pneumonia occurs in about 20% of trauma patients with pulmonary contusions. This study aims to evaluate the association between empirical antibiotic therapy and nosocomial pneumonia in this population. Methods: Retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted to a trauma-surgical ICU. The Antibiotic Therapy Group (ATG) was defined by intravenous antibiotic use for more than 48 h starting on hospital admission, while the Conservative Group (CG) was determined by antibiotic use no longer than 48 h. Primary outcome was microbiologically documented nosocomial pneumonia within 14 days after hospital admission. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between group allocation and primary outcome. Exploratory analyses evaluating the association between resistant strains in pneumonia and antibiotic use were performed. Results: The study included 177 patients with chest trauma and pulmonary contusion on CTscan. ATG were more severely ill than CG, as shown by higher Injury Severity Score, SAPS3, SOFA score, higher rates, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation. In the multivariate analysis, ATG was associated with a lower incidence of primary outcome (OR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.64; p < 0.01). Similar results were found in the sensitivity analysis with another set of variables. However, each day of antibiotic use was associated with an increased risk of pneumonia by resistant bacteria (OR = 1.18 per day, 95% CI 1.05-1.36; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Empiric antibiotic therapy was independently associated with lower incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients with pulmonary contusion. However, each day of antibiotic use was associated with increased resistant strains in infected patients. Background 20 contusions population Methods traumasurgical surgical ICU (ATG 4 admission CG (CG 1 performed Results 17 CTscan Score SAPS3 SAPS score rates ventilation OR 025 0 25 0.25 95 0.090.64 009064 0.09 0.64 09 64 0.09-0.64 0.01. 001 0.01 . 01 0.01) variables However 118 18 1.1 1.051.36 105136 1.05 1.36 05 36 1.05-1.36 Conclusions 2 02 0.2 9 090 0.090.6 00906 009 0.0 064 0.6 6 0.09-0.6 00 11 1. 051 1.051.3 10513 105 1.0 136 1.3 3 1.05-1.3 0. 0.090. 0090 06 0.09-0. 1.051. 1051 10 13 1.05-1. 0.090 0.09-0 1.051 1.05-1 0.09- 1.05-

RESUMO O papel dos protetores de ferida operatória em cirurgias laparoscópicas é bastante controverso na literatura. Alguns estudos demonstram seu benefício na redução da taxa de infeções de sítio cirúrgico, porém esses resultados não são reprodutíveis em todos os procedimentos. Além da proteção da ferida operatória, esses dispositivos podem ser utilizados nos sítios de extração de peças cirúrgicas em procedimentos laparoscópicos. Há vários dispositivos comercialmente disponíveis para esse fim, entretanto são pouco disponíveis nos serviços com menos recursos. Um dos motivos dessa limitação é o custo do dispositivo. Nesta nota, buscamos oferecer uma opção barata que utiliza materiais amplamente disponíveis no centro cirúrgico e cuja confecção é simples. literatura laparoscópicos fim recursos dispositivo nota simples

ABSTRACT The role of wound protectors in laparoscopic surgeries is highly controversial in the literature. Some studies demonstrate their benefit in reducing the rate of surgical site infections; however, these results are not reproducible across all procedures. In addition to protecting the operative wound, these devices can be used at sites of surgical specimen extraction in laparoscopic procedures. Several commercially available devices serve this purpose but are scarcely available in resource-limited settings. One of the reasons for this limitation is the cost of the device. In this technical note, we aim to provide a cost-effective option utilizing materials readily available in the operating room and with a simple fabrication process. literature infections however procedures resourcelimited resource limited settings device note costeffective effective process

ABSTRACT Background: the barriers to implement emergency laparoscopy in public teaching hospitals involve issues such as resident learning curves and resource costs and availability. This study was designed to describe the issues facing the implementation of laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis over 15 years in a single academic center in Brazil. Materials and Methods: retrospective study of patients undergoing emergency appendectomy from 2004 to 2018. Clinical data were compared to four major actions implemented in the emergency surgical service: minimally invasive surgery training for residents (2007), laparoscopic stump closure using metal clips (2008), 24/7 availability of laparoscopic instruments for emergency surgeries (2010), and third-party contract for maintenance of the laparoscopic instruments and implementation of polymeric clips for stump closure (2013). We evaluated the increase in laparoscopic appendectomy after the implementation of those major changes. Results: we identified 1168 appendectomies during the study period, of which 691 (59%), 465 (40%), and 12 (1%) were open, laparoscopic, and converted, respectively. The implementation of the major changes since 2004 resulted in an increase of laparoscopic appendectomies from 11% in 2007 to 80% in 2016. These actions were decisive in the widespread use of laparoscopy for acute appendicitis (p<0.001). The standardization of the hem-o-lok clip in the treatment of the appendiceal stump made the procedure more feasible, reducing the surgical time using laparoscopic access and increasing the team’s adherence, so that this became the route of choice in about 85% of cases in the period from 2014 to 2018, 80% performed by 3rd year resident physicians. No intraoperative complications were noted related to laparoscopic access, even in more complicated appendicitis. There was no mortality reported, no reoperations or readmissions to hospital during a 30-day postoperative period. Conclusion: the development of a feasible, reproducible, and safe technical standardization, associated with continuous cost optimization, are the cornerstones for a consistent and viable change in the current practice for appendectomies in middle and lower-income countries. Background 1 Brazil Methods 200 2018 service 2007, , (2007) 2008, 2008 (2008) 247 24 7 24/ 2010, 2010 (2010) thirdparty third party 2013. 2013 . (2013) Results 116 69 59%, 59 59% (59%) 46 40%, 40 40% (40%) 1% (1% open converted respectively 11 80 2016 p<0.001. p0001 p p<0.001 0 001 (p<0.001) hemolok hem o lok feasible teams team s adherence 85 201 rd physicians reported 30day day 30 Conclusion reproducible optimization lowerincome lower income countries 20 (2007 (2008 2 (2010 (2013 6 5 (59% 4 (40% (1 8 p000 p<0.00 00 (p<0.001 3 (200 (201 (59 (40 ( p00 p<0.0 (p<0.00 (20 (5 (4 p0 p<0. (p<0.0 (2 p<0 (p<0. p< (p<0 (p< (p

RESUMO Introdução: o presente estudo tem como objetivo avaliar as medidas que permitiram a implementação de cirurgias laparoscópicas de urgência em hospital de ensino médico ao longo de 15 anos. Método: foi realizado estudo clínico retrospectivo de pacientes submetidos a Apendicectomia aberta ou Laparoscópica no período de 15 anos (2004 a 2018). Os dados clínicos foram confrontados com as ações implementadas: 1) Treinamento dos médicos residentes em cirurgia minimamente invasiva (2007); 2) Uso do endoclip para tratamento do coto apendicular (2008); 3) Disponibilidade do set de laparoscopia em tempo integral para o Pronto Socorro (2010); e, 4) Terceirização do serviço de manutenção do set e materiais de vídeo e uso do endoclip Hem-o-lok® para tratamento do coto apendicular (2013). Resultados: foram realizadas 1.168 cirurgias, das quais 691 abertas (59%), 465 laparoscopias (40%) e 12 convertidas (1%). O treinamento da equipe levou à realização de 11% de laparoscopia (2007) e o uso do endoclip para tratamento do coto apendicular para 16% (2008). Com a disponibilização do set de vídeo em tempo integral para o Pronto Socorro a partir de 2011, houve aumento de laparoscopias para 26% (2012). A padronização do endoclip Hem-o-lok® no tratamento do coto apendicular aumentou para 85% e a partir de 2016 foi realizado em todos os casos, sem complicação relacionada ao seu uso, mesmo em apendicites complicadas. Conclusão: o emprego da laparoscopia no serviço de urgência envolve além do treinamento da equipe cirúrgica, investimento tecnológico contínuo e uso de técnicas que sejam factíveis, viáveis e seguras. Introdução 1 Método 2004 (200 2018. 2018 . 2018) implementadas 2007 2 2008 (2008) 3 2010 (2010) 4 Hemolok® Hemolok Hem lok® lok Hem-o-lok 2013. 2013 (2013) Resultados 1168 168 1.16 69 59%, 59 59% , (59%) 46 40% 40 (40% 1%. 1% (1%) 11 (2007 16 2008. 2011 26 2012. 2012 (2012) 85 201 casos complicadas Conclusão cirúrgica factíveis seguras 200 (20 (2008 (2010 (2013 116 1.1 6 5 (59% (40 (1% (2012 8 20 (2 (201 1. (59 (4 (1 ( (5

RESUMO A traqueostomia percutânea tem sido considerada o método padrão atualmente, sendo a técnica guiada por broncoscopia a mais realizada. Uma alternativa segura é a traqueostomia percutânea guiada por ultrassonografia, que pode ser feita pelo próprio cirurgião, evitando-se as dificuldades logísticas de disponibilidade de um especialista em broncoscopia. Estudos comprovam que a eficácia e a segurança da técnica guiada por ultrassonografia, comparada à guiada por broncoscopia, são semelhantes. Assim, é de suma importância que os cirurgiões tenham a traqueostomia percutânea guiada por ultrassonografia como alternativa viável e benéfica em relação ao procedimento aberto. Neste artigo, descrevemos oito passos principais da realização da traqueostomia percutânea ecoguiada, destacando pontos técnicos essenciais que podem reduzir o risco de complicações do procedimento. Ainda, detalhamos alguns cuidados que devem ser observados, com o intuito de reduzir o risco de aerolização e contaminação da equipe, quando a traqueostomia percutânea é indicada no paciente com COVID-19.

ABSTRACT Percutaneous tracheostomy has been considered the standard method today, the bronchoscopy-guided technique being the most frequently performed. A safe alternative is ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy, which can be carried out by the surgeon, avoiding the logistical difficulties of having a specialist in bronchoscopy. Studies prove that the efficacy and safety of the ultrasound-guided technique are similar when compared to the bronchoscopy-guided one. Thus, it is of paramount importance that surgeons have ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy as a viable and beneficial alternative to the open procedure. In this article, we describe eight main steps in performing ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheostomy, highlighting essential technical points that can reduce the risk of complications from the procedure. Furthermore, we detail some precautions that one must observe to reduce the risk of aerosolization and contamination of the team when percutaneous tracheostomy is indicated in patients with COVID-19.