RESUMEN Objetivo: El objetivo principal de este estudio fue comparar los niveles de estrés y ansiedad en niños sometidos a procedimientos quirúrgicos con o sin presencia de los padres en la inducción de la anestesia mediante la medición de los niveles de cortisol salival y la aplicación del mYPAS. Método: Ensayo cuasi-aleatorio con niños de 5 a 12 años, con estado físico ASA I, II o III, sometidos a cirugía electiva. Según la disposición de los padres, se definieron como grupo acompañado o no acompañado. Se utilizaron pruebas de chi-cuadrado, exacta de Fisher, t de Student, Mann-Whitney, Hodges-Lehman y Spearman para los análisis estadísticos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 46 niños; el 63% eran niños en edad preescolar, en su mayoría acompañados por sus madres (80%). La puntuación mYPAS mediana fue de 37,5 (rango intercuartílico, 23,4–51,6) en niños no acompañados y de 55,0 (rango intercuartílico, 27,9–65,0) en niños acompañados, con una diferencia mediana estimada de +11,8 (IC del 95% de 0 a 23,4; p = 0,044). No hubo diferencias significativas en los niveles medios de cortisol salival. Conclusión: El nivel de ansiedad fue mayor en los niños acompañados. No hubo diferencias en los niveles de cortisol salival entre ambos grupos. Registro Brasileño de Ensayos Clínicos (ReBEC):RBR-9wj4qvy. Objetivo Método cuasialeatorio cuasi aleatorio 1 años I III electiva chicuadrado, chicuadrado chi cuadrado, cuadrado chi-cuadrado Fisher Student MannWhitney, MannWhitney Mann Whitney, Whitney Mann-Whitney HodgesLehman Hodges Lehman estadísticos Resultados 4 63 preescolar 80%. 80 80% . (80%) 375 37 37, rango intercuartílico 23,4–51,6 234516 23 51 6 550 55 55, 27,9–65,0 279650 27 9 65 118 11 8 +11, IC 95 23,4 234 0,044. 0044 0,044 044 0,044) Conclusión grupos ReBECRBR9wj4qvy. ReBECRBR9wj4qvy ReBECRBRwjqvy ReBEC RBR 9wj4qvy. 9wj4qvy wj qvy (ReBEC):RBR-9wj4qvy (80% 3 23,4–51, 23451 2 27,9–65, 27965 +11 23, 004 0,04 04 ReBECRBR wjqvy (80 23,4–51 2345 27,9–65 2796 +1 00 0,0 (8 23,4–5 27,9–6 279 + 0, ( 23,4– 27,9– 27,9 27,

ABSTRACT Objective: The main objective of this study was to compare stress and anxiety levels in children undergoing surgical procedures with or without parental presence at induction of anesthesia by measuring salivary cortisol levels and applying the mYPAS. Method: Quasi-randomized trial with children aged 5–12 year, with ASA physical status I, II, or III, undergoing elective surgery. According to parents’ willingness, the pair were defined as accompanied or unaccompanied group. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, Student’s t test, Mann-Whitney, Hodges-Lehman and Spearman’s tests were used for statistical analyzes. Results: We included 46 children; 63% were preschool children mostly accompanied by their mothers (80%). The median mYPAS score was 37.5 (quartile range, 23.4–51.6) in unaccompanied children, and 55.0 (quartile range, 27.9–65.0) in accompanied children, with an estimated median difference of +11.8 (95% CI of 0 to 23.4; p = 0.044). There were no significant differences in the mean salivary cortisol levels. Conclusion: The level of anxiety was higher in accompanied children. There were no differences in salivary cortisol levels between both groups. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC):RBR-9wj4qvy. Objective Method Quasirandomized Quasi randomized 512 5 12 5–1 year I II III surgery parents willingness group Chisquare, Chisquare Chi square, square Chi-square Fishers Fisher s Students Student test MannWhitney, MannWhitney Mann Whitney, Whitney Mann-Whitney HodgesLehman Hodges Lehman Spearmans Spearman analyzes Results 4 63 80%. 80 80% . (80%) 375 37 37. quartile range 23.4–51.6 234516 23 51 6 550 55 55. 27.9–65.0 279650 27 9 65 118 11 8 +11. 95% 95 (95 23.4 234 0.044. 0044 0.044 044 0.044) Conclusion groups ReBECRBR9wj4qvy. ReBECRBR9wj4qvy ReBECRBRwjqvy ReBEC RBR 9wj4qvy. 9wj4qvy wj qvy (ReBEC):RBR-9wj4qvy 1 5– (80% 3 23.4–51. 23451 2 27.9–65. 27965 +11 (9 23. 004 0.04 04 ReBECRBR wjqvy (80 23.4–51 2345 27.9–65 2796 +1 ( 00 0.0 (8 23.4–5 27.9–6 279 + 0. 23.4– 27.9– 27.9 27.

RESUMO Objetivo: O principal objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os níveis de estresse e ansiedade em crianças submetidas a procedimentos cirúrgicos com ou sem presença dos pais na indução da anestesia, medindo os níveis de cortisol salivar e aplicando o mYPAS. Método: Ensaio quaserandomizado com crianças de 5 a 12 anos, com estado físico ASA I, II ou III, submetidas a cirurgia eletiva. De acordo com a disposição dos pais, o par foi definido como grupo acompanhado ou não acompanhado. Foram utilizados testes de qui-quadrado, exato de Fisher, t de Student, Mann-Whitney, Hodges-Lehman e Spearman para as análises estatísticas. Resultados: Foram incluídas 46 crianças; 63% delas em idade préescolar, principalmente acompanhadas por suas mães (80%). A pontuação mYPAS mediana foi de 37,5 (intervalo interquartil, 23,4–51,6) em crianças não acompanhadas e de 55,0 (intervalo interquartil, 27,9–65,0) em crianças acompanhadas, com uma diferença mediana estimada de +11,8 (IC de 95% de 0 a 23,4; p = 0,044). Não houve diferenças significativas nos níveis médios de cortisol salivar. Conclusão: O nível de ansiedade foi maior em crianças acompanhadas. Não houve diferenças nos níveis de cortisol salivar entre os dois grupos. Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC):RBR-9wj4qvy. Objetivo anestesia Método 1 anos I III eletiva quiquadrado, quiquadrado qui quadrado, quadrado qui-quadrado Fisher Student MannWhitney, MannWhitney Mann Whitney, Whitney Mann-Whitney HodgesLehman Hodges Lehman estatísticas Resultados 4 63 préescolar 80%. 80 80% . (80%) 375 37 37, intervalo interquartil 23,4–51,6 234516 23 51 6 550 55 55, 27,9–65,0 279650 27 9 65 118 11 8 +11, IC 95 23,4 234 0,044. 0044 0,044 044 0,044) Conclusão grupos ReBECRBR9wj4qvy. ReBECRBR9wj4qvy ReBECRBRwjqvy ReBEC RBR 9wj4qvy. 9wj4qvy wj qvy (ReBEC):RBR-9wj4qvy (80% 3 23,4–51, 23451 2 27,9–65, 27965 +11 23, 004 0,04 04 ReBECRBR wjqvy (80 23,4–51 2345 27,9–65 2796 +1 00 0,0 (8 23,4–5 27,9–6 279 + 0, ( 23,4– 27,9– 27,9 27,

Abstract Difficult airway management in pediatrics during anesthesia represents a major challenge, requiring a careful approach, advanced technical expertise, and accurate protocols. The task force of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) presents a report containing updated recommendations for the management of difficult airways in children and neonates. These recommendations have been developed based on the consensus of a panel of experts, with the objective of offering strategies to overcome challenges during airway management in pediatric patients. Grounded in evidence published in international guidelines and expert opinions, the report highlights crucial steps for the appropriate management of difficult airways in pediatrics, encompassing assessment, preparation, positioning, pre-oxygenation, minimizing trauma, and, paramountly, the maintenance of arterial oxygenation. The report also delves into additional strategies involving the use of advanced tools, such as video laryngoscopy, flexible intubating bronchoscopy, and supraglottic devices. Emphasis is placed on the simplicity of implementing the outlined recommendations, with a focus on the significance of continuous education, training through realistic simulations, and familiarity with the latest available technologies. These practices are deemed essential to ensure procedural safety and contribute to the enhancement of anesthesia outcomes in pediatrics. challenge approach expertise protocols SBA (SBA neonates experts patients opinions assessment preparation positioning preoxygenation, preoxygenation pre oxygenation, oxygenation pre-oxygenation trauma paramountly tools laryngoscopy bronchoscopy devices education simulations technologies

Abstract The International Association for the Study of Pain chose pain prevention as the theme for the 2020 Global Year. Chronic postoperative pain is one the many types of pain that can be potentially prevented. It develops or increases in severity after a surgery, persists for at least three months, even after ruling out all other possible causes of pain. To perform the present narrative review, the authors searched the PubMed database using the following keywords “postoperative pain” OR “postsurgical pain” AND “chronic” OR “persistent”. The present review focused on the incidence, pain development and chronification, and predisposing factors. It also discusses prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic postoperative pain. Awareness of occurrence of chronic postoperative pain and recognizing risk factors is crucial for the day-to-day practice of the anesthesiologist. Hence, numerous surgical patients can have their outcome improved by preventing chronic postoperative pain, a condition scarcely identified and without a well-established treatment.

Abstract Background and aims: Rocuronium may provide excellent onset time, but high doses are required for effective action. Several strategies have managed to shorten rocuronium onset time, including the use of Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4). Methods: One hundred and eighty patients were randomized into six groups according to rocuronium dose received (0.3, 0.6 or 1.2 mg.kg-1) and the administration of saline or MgSO4 (60 mg.kg-1). Correlations between tissue perfusion and rocuronium onset time was determined by variations in perfusion index. Results: Median (quartiles) rocuronium onset times were 85.5 (74.0–92.0); 76.0 (52.0–87.0) and 50.0 (41.0–59.5) seconds for 0.3, 0.6 mg.kg-1 and 1.2 mg.kg-1 doses, respectively. MgSO4 decreased rocuronium onset at doses of 0.3 mg.kg-1 (60.0 [48.0–74.3] seconds) and 0.6 mg.kg-1 (44.0 [39.0–49.0] seconds) but not at 1.2 mg.kg-1 (38.0 [33.5–56.3] seconds) (p< 0.001). Perfusion index variations in groups that received MgSO4 were greater than in controls. A negative correlation between shorten onset and increased perfusion index was observed in rocuronium doses of 0.3 mg.kg-1 (r = -0.50; p < 0.001) and 0.6 mg.kg-1 (r = -0.424; p< 0.001), but not for 1.2 mg.kg-1 dose (r = -0.25; p = 0.07). Conclusion: MgSO4 reduces rocuronium onset time at doses of 0.3 mg.kg-1 and 0.6 mg.kg-1 being that the latter has a similar effect when compared to the dose of 1.2 mg.kg-1, with or without the use of MgSO4.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Os avanços da medicina, incluindo a anestesiologia e reanimação, têm tornado cada vez mais rara a ocorrência da morte natural. Como consequência, as práticas de distanásia se tornaram habituais em uma realidade que não mais se justifica. Este estudo objetiva avaliar o conhecimento de anestesiologistas brasileiros dos institutos da distanásia e ortotanásia. Para tal, investigamos as preferências de condutas desses profissionais, dentre aquelas práticas, bem como a contribuição da graduação médica na abordagem das questões relacionadas à morte. Método: Coorte prospectivo, descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, com a inclusão de 150 anestesiologistas inscritos na Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia e que foram convidados a participar por mensagem de e-mail. Aplicou-se questionário online, contendo 38 questões, elaborado pelos pesquisadores. A pesquisa foi aprovada pela Comissão de Ética em Pesquisa instrucional. Resultados: Os anestesiologistas, embora afirmem conhecer a distanásia e a ortotanásia, em sua maioria adquiriram esse conhecimento fora da graduação. Diante da terminalidade do próprio entrevistado, do seu paciente ou de um ente querido, prefere a ortotanásia, a morte em casa, priorizando a dignidade. Entretanto, esses especialistas afirmam já terem praticado, contrariados, a distanásia, mesmo quando a ortotanásia era a melhor conduta, o que lhes gerou sentimentos negativos. Quase a integralidade dos entrevistados afirmou não ter tido, na graduação, treinamento prático de conduta frente à terminalidade, embora se sinta capaz de identificá-la. A maioria não conhece a Resolução do Conselho Federal de Medicina 1.805/06 que viabiliza a prática da ortotanásia. Não há influência da religião e da região político-administrativa de residência do anestesiologista sobre as suas preferências. Conclusões: Os anestesiologistas afirmam ter conhecimento sobre distanásia e ortotanásia e preferem, diante da terminalidade, praticar a ortotanásia, embora a distanásia seja habitual, o que resulta em frustração e indignação. O ensino da graduação médica é deficitário em questões relacionadas à morte.

Abstract Background and objectives: Advances in medicine, including anesthesiology and resuscitation, have made natural death increasingly rare. As a consequence, dysthanasia has become usual in a scenario for which there is not rationale. The present study aimed to assess the level of knowledge of Brazilian anesthesiologists on the principles of dysthanasia and orthothanasia. Thence, we studied the management preferences of these professionals, vis-à-vis those practices, as well as how medical school contributed to addressing death-related issues. Method: Quantitative approach, prospective and descriptive cohort that included 150 anesthesiologists, members of the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology, and who were invited to participate by email. An online questionnaire containing 38 questions was prepared by the authors. The study was approved by the Instructional Research Ethics Committee. Results: Anesthesiologists, although claiming to know dysthanasia and orthothanasia, mostly acquired knowledge outside medical school. If faced with their own end of care, or of a patient or a loved one, they prefer orthothanasia, to die at home, prioritizing dignity. However, the specialists claimed to have already practiced dysthanasia, even when orthothanasia was the choice management, which caused them negative feelings. Almost all respondents stated that they did not have practical training in undergraduate school on how to face end-of-life issues, although they felt capable of identifying it. Most were not aware of the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine Resolution 1.805/06 that makes practicing orthothanasia feasible. Anesthesiologists’ religion or the political-administrative region of residence had no effect on their preferences. Conclusions: Anesthesiologists claim to have knowledge on dysthanasia and orthothanasia, but prefer, in the face of a terminally ill patient, to practice orthothanasia, although dysthanasia is usual, and results in frustration and indignation. The medical school curriculum is unsatisfactory in addressing death-related issues.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Há poucos dados na literatura que caracterizam o padrão de uso de analgésicos na América Latina e no Brasil. Também se sabe pouco sobre o subtratamento da dor e sua influência no hábito de automedicação analgésica. O objetivo desta pesquisa é definir o padrão de uso de analgésicos entre os portadores de dor crônica (DC) e a sua potencial associação à automedicação analgésica. Método: Estudo observacional transversal com amostra de população urbana. A dor crônica foi definida como aquela presente por pelo menos 90 dias. A pesquisa foi aprovada pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa institucional. Resultados: Foram incluídos 416 indivíduos; 45,7% (n = 190) portadores de dor crônica, sendo os do sexo feminino (72,3%; p = 0,04) os mais acometidos. A automedicação analgésica é praticada por 78,4% dos portadores de dor crônica. O tratamento analgésico vigente mais frequente é composto pelos anti-inflamatórios não esteroides (AINES), dipirona e paracetamol. Os opioides fracos são pouco usados e apenas 2,6% dos indivíduos com dor crônica fazem uso desses analgésicos. Nenhum dos indivíduos estava em uso de opioides potentes. Conclusões: A prática de automedicação analgésica é frequente entre os portadores de dor crônica, o que pode ser consequência da pouca prescrição de analgésicos mais potentes, como os opioides. Pode-se também dizer que, pelos dados apresentados, não ocorre uma crise de uso recreativo de opioides na população estudada.

Abstract Background and objectives: There are few data in the literature characterizing the pattern of analgesic use in Latin American countries, including Brazil. Little is known about the undertreatment of pain and its influence on the habit of self-medication with analgesics. The aim of this study is to define the pattern of analgesic use among chronic pain patients and its potential association with self-medication with analgesics. Method: Cross-sectional observational study with an urban population sample. Chronic pain was defined as a pain lasting for at least 90 days. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. Results: 416 subjects were included; 45.7 % (n = 190) had chronic pain, with females (72.3 %; p = 0.04) being the most affected. Self-medication with analgesics is practiced by 78.4% of patients with chronic pain. The most common current analgesic treatment consists of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (dipyrone and acetaminophen). Weak opioids are rarely used and only 2.6% of subjects with chronic pain were taking these analgesics. None of the subjects were taking potent opioids. Conclusions: The practice of self-medication with analgesics is frequent among patients with chronic pain, which may be due to the underprescription of more potent analgesics, such as opioids. It can also be said that, given the data presented, there is no crisis of recreational opioid use in the studied population.

Resumo Justificativa: A síndrome da dor miofascial é uma causa comum de dor musculoesquelética. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a potencial ação analgésica de 8% do creme de capsaicina para uso tópico em pacientes com síndrome da dor miofascial. Métodos: Inicialmente, as formulações de creme de PLA (Placebo) e CPS (Capsaicina 8%) foram desenvolvidas e aprovadas de acordo com os requisitos atuais da agência de autoridade de saúde. Os 40 pacientes participantes foram distribuídos aleatoriamente e de forma duplo-cega para os grupos PLA e CPS. Antes dos cremes serem administrados topicamente, de acordo com o grupo de alocação, o anestésico local foi usado por um período de 50 minutos diretamente na área de interesse. A administração ocorreu na área da pele sobre o ponto-gatilho, o qual apresentou a área dolorida à palpação, em uma quantidade de 10 g por 30 minutos em área circular com diâmetro de 24 mm. Posteriormente, o creme foi removido e os parâmetros de tolerabilidade à pele foram avaliados. A dor foi medida antes e durante a aplicação da formulação, bem como 1 hora, 7 dias, 30 dias e 60 dias após o procedimento avaliado pela escala numérica verbal (0 a 10, com zero sem dor e dez a pior dor imaginável). Resultados: Nenhum paciente no grupo PLA experimentou hiperemia ou sensação de queimação no local de aplicação do creme, enquanto 85% dos que experimentaram no grupo CPS apresentaram hiperemia ou sensação de queimação 15 minutos. Essas queixas desapareceram 24 horas após a remoção do creme. O escore de dor no grupo CPS diminui de forma sustentada até o 60° dia de avaliação (p < 0,0001). Conclusão: A administração das formulações não causou lesões cutâneas agudas ou crônicas macroscópicas nos pacientes e a formulação de 8% de capsaicina foi benéfica e bem tolerada.

Abstract Background: Myofascial pain syndrome is a common cause of musculoskeletal pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential analgesic action of 8% capsaicin cream for topical use in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. Methods: Initially, cream formulations of PLA (Placebo) and CPS (Capsaicin 8%) were developed and approved according to the current requirements of the health authority agency. The 40 participating patients were randomly assigned to the PLA and CPS groups in a double-blind fashion. Before the creams were topically administered, according to the allocation group, the local anesthetic was used for a period of 50 minutes directly in the area of interest. The cream was applied to the area of the skin over the trigger point, represented by the area with pain at palpation, in an amount of 10 g for 30 minutes in a circular area of 24 mm diameter. Subsequently, the cream was removed and the skin tolerability parameters were evaluated. The pain was measured before and during the formulation application, as well as at 1 hour, 7 days, 30 days, and 60 days after the procedure, evaluated using a verbal numerical scale (from 0 to 10: with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable). Results: No patient in PLA Group had hyperemia or burning sensation at the site of application, while 85% of patients in CPS Group had hyperemia or burning sensation at 15 minutes. These complaints disappeared 24 hours after the cream was removed. The pain score in CPS Group decreased steadily up to the 60th day of evaluation (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Application of the formulations did not cause macroscopic acute or chronic skin lesions in patients, and the 8% capsaicin formulation was beneficial and well tolerated.

Resumo Objetivo: Existem inúmeros protocolos de comunicação de más notícias; porém, nenhum método na literatura nacional é culturalmente adequado à nossa realidade. Este estudo propõe um método de comunicação adaptado e avalia sua aceitação entre médicos e enfermeiros brasileiros. Método: Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo cujos dados foram coletados após treinamentos específicos de médicos e enfermeiros sobre as técnicas de comunicação de más notícias. Foi empregado instrumento mnemônico chamado Protocolo P-A-C-I-E-N-T-E. Esse instrumento, em concordância com a realidade brasileira, foi baseado no Protocolo SPIKES de comunicação. Resultados: Verificou-se, entre os profissionais da saúde, que a pior tarefa a ser executada durante a comunicação é "falar sobre a morte", seguida de "discutir o fim das tentativas de tratamento curativo" e o "diagnóstico" em si. Do total dos entrevistados, 48% relataram não terem recebido treinamento formal sobre comunicações. Verificou-se, ainda, que 52% dos participantes não utilizam qualquer abordagem sistematizada na prática diária ao se comunicarem com os pacientes, mas 97% consideraram o protocolo proposto útil e adequado. Conclusão: O Protocolo P-A-C-I-E-N-T-E, proposto como ferramenta para direcionar a comunicação, mostrou-se adequado à nossa realidade.

Summary Objective: There are plenty of published tools for breaking bad medical news; however, none of them is culturally appropriate to our reality or published in the Brazilian literature. This study proposes a genuinely Brazilian communication tool and evaluates its acceptance among doctors and nurses. Method: This was a prospective study. The data were collected after specific training of doctors and nurses on the bad news communication techniques based on the P-A-C-I-E-N-T-E ("patient," in Portuguese) Protocol. This instrument is in accordance with the Brazilian reality and was based on the SPIKES communication tool. Results: The worst task to be performed during communication is "talking about death" followed by "discussing the end of curative treatment attempts" and "diagnosis" itself. Among the respondents, 48% reported they did not receive formal training for communicating. Also, 52% of respondents do not use any systematic approach in their daily practice when communicating with patients, but 97% considered the proposed P-A-C-I-E-N-T-E Protocol as a useful and appropriate communication tool. Conclusion: The P-A-C-I-E-N-T-E Protocol proved to be suitable to the Brazilian context.