Abstract Introduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the anatomical deformations of the major vascular structures in the retrosternal area caused by adhesions following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included a total of 40 patients with a previous CABG who were admitted to our emergency unit for any reason and underwent a contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (patient group) and 40 patients without previous cardiac surgery (control group) between January 2018 and November 2019. The retrosternal area was compared between the groups using the statistical shape analysis method. The distance between the sternum and the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery was measured and anatomical deformations of the retrosternal area were examined. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the anatomical structures of the retrosternal area between the patient and control groups (P<0.001). The distance from the midsternal line to the highest point of the pulmonary artery was statistically significantly shorter in the patient group, compared to the control group (P=0.013). The distance from the sternum to the ascending aorta was also shorter in the patient group, although it did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusions: Our study results showed narrowing of the retrosternal area following CABG and a shorter distance from the sternum to the pulmonary artery than the ascending aorta. Based on these findings, surgeons should be cautious about possible injuries in patients requiring cardiac surgery with repeated median sternotomy.

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients developing ischemic stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: From March 2012 to January 2017, 5380 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary surgery were analyzed. Ninety-five patients who developed ischemic strokes after on-pump coronary surgery were included in the study, retrospectively. The cohort was divided into four subgroups [total anterior circulation infarction (TACI), partial anterior circulation infarction (PACI), posterior circulation infarction (POCI), and lacunar infarction (LACI)] according to the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, total mortality, and survival analysis over an average of 30 months of follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the extent of disability and dependency according to modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results: The incidence of stroke was 1.76% (n=95). The median age was 62.03±10.06 years and 68 (71.6%) patients were male. The groups were as follows: TACI (n=17, 17.9%), PACI (n=47, 49.5%), POCI (n=20, 21.1%), and LACI (n=11, 11.6%). Twenty-eight (29.5%) patients died in hospital and 34 (35.8%) deaths occurred. The overall mortality rate of the TACI group was significantly higher than that of the LACI group (64.7% vs. 27.3%, P=0.041). The mean mRS score of the TACI group was significantly higher than that of the other groups (P=0.003). Conclusion: Patients in the TACI group had higher in-hospital and cumulative mortality rates and higher mRS scores. We believe that use of the OCSP classification and the mRS may render it possible to predict the outcomes of stroke after coronary surgery.

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é comparar os resultados clínicos da abordagem septal superior com a atriotomia esquerda convencional em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia valvar mitral. Métodos: Entre janeiro de 2010 e novembro de 2012, foi incluído um total de 91 pacientes adultos consecutivos (intervalo de 16 a 82 anos, média 54,0±15,4 anos; 39 homens, 52 mulheres) submetidos à cirurgia valvar mitral no Serviço de Cirurgia Cardiovascular no Hospital Training Koşuyolu. Os pacientes foram randomizados para abordagem septal superior (n=47) ou atriotomia esquerda convencional (n=44). Foram registradas características demográficas dos pacientes, comorbidades, intervenções adicionais, dados intraoperatórios, achados do estudo eletrofisiológico pré e pós-operatório e complicações pós-operatórias. Resultados: Do total de pacientes, 86,7% (n=79) estavam na Classe III e 12 na Classe IV da New York Heart Association. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos à anuloplastia (42,9%) ou cirurgia de troca valvar (57,1%). Não houve diferença significativa nos resultados do eletrocardiograma pré e pós-operatórios entre os grupos. Mudança da linha de base no ritmo cardíaco foi estatisticamente significativa apenas no grupo abordagem septal superior (P<0,001). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na taxa de mortalidade entre os grupos. Marca-passo definitivo foi implantado em 10,6% dos pacientes no grupo abordagem septal superior e em 4,5% dos pacientes no grupo atriotomia esquerda convencional. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa no sangramento, tempo total de internação e de permanência na UTI, tendo sido observada síndrome de baixo débito cardíaco entre os grupos. Conclusão: Nossos resultados sugerem que a abordagem septal superior não leva a efeitos adversos graves ou fatais em função do nó sinusal ou vulnerabilidade atrial, em comparação com a abordagem convencional.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes of superior transseptal approach with the conventional left atriotomy in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Methods: Between January 2010 and November 2012, a total of 91 consecutive adult patients (39 males, 52 females; mean age: 54.0±15.4 years; range, 16 to 82 years) who underwent mitral valve surgery in the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery at Koşuyolu Training Hospital were included. The patients were randomized to either superior transseptal approach (n=47) or conventional left atriotomy (n=44). Demographic characteristics of the patients, comorbidities, additional interventions, intraoperational data, pre- and postoperative electrophysiological study findings, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: Of all patients, 86.7% (n=79) were in New York Heart Association Class III, while 12 were in New York Heart Association Class IV. All patients underwent annuloplasty (42.9%) or valve replacement surgery (57.1%). There was no significant difference in pre- and postoperative electrocardiogram findings between the groups. Change from baseline in the cardiac rhythm was statistically significant in superior transseptal approach group alone (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rate between the groups. Permanent pacemaker implantation was performed in 10.6% of the patients in superior transseptal approach group and 4.5% in the conventional left atriotomy group. No statistically significant difference in bleeding, total length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, the presence of low cardiac output syndrome was observed between the groups. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that superior transseptal approach does not lead to serious or fatal adverse effects on sinus node function or atrial vulnerability, compared to conventional approach.

Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar se a resistência de valor do Modelo de Avaliação da Homeostase da Resistência à Insulina (Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance - HOMA-IR) no pré-operatório é um preditor de revascularização do miocárdio para pacientes não diabéticos em combinação com a hemoglobina A1c, glicemia em jejum e insulina. Métodos: Oitenta e um pacientes que foram internados no serviço de Cirurgia Cardiovascular em nosso hospital entre agosto de 2012 e janeiro de 2013, com indicação para cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio indicação foram incluídos. Os pacientes não diabéticos com <6,3% de hemoglobina A1c foram divididos em dois grupos, incluindo os grupos de tratamento e controle de acordo com a resistência à insulina normal (HOMA-IR <2,5, Grupo A, n=41) e alta resistência à insulina (HOMA-IR> 2,5, Grupo B, n=40), respectivamente. Glicemia de jejum pré-operatório e insulina foram medidas e testes de química do soro foram realizados. Os valores de HOMA-IR foram calculados. A análise estatística foi realizada. Resultados: Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa em jejum de valores de glicose no sangue e HOMA-IR entre os grupos. Tempo de pinçamento e tempo de circulação extracorpórea foi maior no grupo B, em relação ao Grupo A (P=0,043 e P=0,031, respectivamente). A análise de regressão logística revelou que hemoglobina A1c não foi um fator determinante para a avaliação confiável sozinho glicometabólico pré-operatória de pacientes não diabéticos. Os fatores de risco de glicemia de jejum e tempo de circulação extracorpórea foram associados com altos níveis do HOMA-IR. Conclusão: Nossos resultados sugerem que a triagem pré-operatória de pacientes não diabéticos utilizando o HOMA-IR pode melhorar tanto o cronograma de acompanhamento quanto resultados de curto prazo, e pode ser útil na estratificação da população de alto risco para iminentes problemas de saúde.

Objective: This study aims to investigate whether pre-operative Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) value is a predictor in non-diabetic coronary artery bypass grafting patients in combination with hemoglobin A1c, fasting blood glucose and insulin levels. Methods: Eighty one patients who were admitted to Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic at our hospital between August 2012 and January 2013 with a coronary artery bypass grafting indication were included. Patients were non-diabetic with <6.3% hemoglobin A1c and were divided into two groups including treatment and control groups according to normal insulin resistance (HOMA-IR<2.5, Group A; n=41) and high insulin resistance (HOMA-IR>2.5, Group B; n=40), respectively. Pre-operative fasting blood glucose and insulin were measured and serum chemistry tests were performed. The Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance values were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in fasting blood glucose and HOMA-IR values between the groups. Cross-clamping time, and cardiopulmonary bypass time were longer in Group B, compared to Group A (P=0.043 and P=0.031, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that hemoglobin A1c was not a reliable determinant factor alone for pre-operative glucometabolic evaluation of non-diabetic patients. The risk factors of fasting blood glucose and cardiopulmonary bypass time were more associated with high Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance levels. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that preoperative screening of non-diabetic patients with Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance may improve both follow-up visit schedule and short-term outcomes, and may be useful in risk stratification of the high-risk population for impending health problems.