Abstract Objective: To assess the predictive value of selected growth phenotypes for neonatal morbidity and mortality in preterm infants < 30 weeks and to compare them with INTERGROWTH-21st (IG21). Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from the Brazilian Neonatal Research Network (BNRN) database for very low birth weight (VLBW) at 20 public tertiary-care university hospitals. Outcome: the composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (CNMM) consisted of in-hospital death, oxygen use at 36 weeks, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, and Bell stage 2 or 3 necrotizing enterocolitis. Selected growth phenotypes: small-for-gestational-age (SGA) defined as being < 3rd (SGA3) or 10th (SGA10) percentiles of BW, and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) as being > 97th percentile of BW. Stunting as being < 3rd percentile of the length and wasting as being < 3rd percentile of BMI. Single and multiple log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate the relative risks of CNMM, comparing them to IG21. Results: 4,072 infants were included. The adjusted relative risks of CNMM associated with selected growth phenotypes were (BNRN/IG21): 1.45 (0.92–2.31)/1.60 (1.27–2.02) for SGA; 0.90 (0.55–1.47)/1.05 (0.55–1.99) for LGA; 1.65 (1.08–2.51)/1.58 (1.28–1.96) for stunting; and 1.48 (1.02–2.17) for wasting. Agreement between the two references was variable. The growth phenotypes had good specificity (>95%) and positive predictive value (70-90%), with poor sensitivity and low negative predictive value. Conclusion: The BNRN phenotypes at birth differed markedly from the IG21 standard and showed poor accuracy in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes. Objective INTERGROWTH21st INTERGROWTHst INTERGROWTH 21st st IG . (IG21) Methods (BNRN VLBW (VLBW tertiarycare tertiary care hospitals Outcome (CNMM inhospital hospital death 4 enterocolitis smallforgestationalage small gestational age SGA (SGA rd SGA3 (SGA3 th SGA10 (SGA10 BW largeforgestationalage large LGA (LGA BMI logbinomial log binomial Results 4072 072 4,07 included BNRN/IG21 BNRNIG21 BNRNIG (BNRN/IG21) 145 1 45 1.4 0.92–2.31/1.60 092231160 0.92–2.31 /1.60 0 92 31 60 (0.92–2.31)/1.6 1.27–2.02 127202 27 02 (1.27–2.02 090 90 0.9 0.55–1.47/1.05 055147105 0.55–1.47 /1.05 55 47 05 (0.55–1.47)/1.0 0.55–1.99 055199 99 (0.55–1.99 165 65 1.6 1.08–2.51/1.58 108251158 1.08–2.51 /1.58 08 51 58 (1.08–2.51)/1.5 1.28–1.96 128196 28 96 (1.28–1.96 stunting 148 48 1.02–2.17 102217 17 (1.02–2.17 variable >95% 95 (>95% 7090%, 7090 70 90% , (70-90%) Conclusion IG2 outcomes (IG21 SGA1 (SGA1 407 07 4,0 BNRN/IG2 BNRNIG2 (BNRN/IG21 14 1. 0.92–2.31/1.6 09223116 092231 0.92–2.3 160 /1.6 9 6 (0.92–2.31)/1. 1.27–2.0 12720 (1.27–2.0 09 0. 0.55–1.47/1.0 05514710 055147 0.55–1.4 105 /1.0 5 (0.55–1.47)/1. 0.55–1.9 05519 (0.55–1.9 16 1.08–2.51/1.5 10825115 108251 1.08–2.5 158 /1.5 (1.08–2.51)/1. 1.28–1.9 12819 (1.28–1.9 1.02–2.1 10221 (1.02–2.1 >95 (>95 7090% 709 7 (70-90% (IG2 40 BNRN/IG (BNRN/IG2 0.92–2.31/1. 0922311 09223 0.92–2. /1. (0.92–2.31)/1 1.27–2. 1272 (1.27–2. 0.55–1.47/1. 0551471 05514 0.55–1. 10 (0.55–1.47)/1 0551 (0.55–1. 1.08–2.51/1. 1082511 10825 1.08–2. 15 (1.08–2.51)/1 1.28–1. 1281 (1.28–1. 1.02–2. 1022 (1.02–2. >9 (>9 (70-90 (IG (BNRN/IG 0.92–2.31/1 0922 0.92–2 /1 (0.92–2.31)/ 1.27–2 127 (1.27–2 0.55–1.47/1 0.55–1 (0.55–1.47)/ 055 (0.55–1 1.08–2.51/1 1082 1.08–2 (1.08–2.51)/ 1.28–1 128 (1.28–1 1.02–2 102 (1.02–2 (> (70-9 0.92–2.31/ 092 0.92– / (0.92–2.31) 1.27– 12 (1.27– 0.55–1.47/ 0.55– (0.55–1.47) (0.55– 1.08–2.51/ 108 1.08– (1.08–2.51) 1.28– (1.28– 1.02– (1.02– ( (70- 0.92 (0.92–2.31 1.27 (1.27 0.55 (0.55–1.47 (0.55 1.08 (1.08–2.51 1.28 (1.28 1.02 (1.02 (70 (0.92–2.3 1.2 (1.2 0.5 (0.55–1.4 (0.5 1.0 (1.08–2.5 (1.0 (7 (0.92–2. (1. (0. (1.08–2. (0.92–2 (1 (0 (1.08–2 (0.92– (1.08– (0.92 (1.08 (0.9

The Guidelines Project, an initiative of the Brazilian Medical Association, aims to combine information from the medical field in order to standardize producers to assist the reasoning and decision-making of doctors. The information provided through this project must be assessed and criticized by the physician responsible for the conduct that will be adopted, depending on the conditions and the clinical status of each patient.

Resumo O achado de hipertensão pulmonar (HP) em avaliação ecocardiográfica é frequente e preocupante. No entanto, o ecocardiograma é apenas um exame sugestivo e não diagnóstico de HP. Quando se suspeita de acometimento direto da circulação pulmonar, está indicada medida hemodinâmica invasiva para estabelecer o diagnóstico. Essa avaliação permite, além da confirmação diagnóstica, a correta identificação do território vascular predominantemente acometido (arterial pulmonar ou pós-capilar). O tratamento com as medicações específicas de HP (inibidores da fosfodiestarese 5, antagonistas do receptor de endotelina, análogos da prostaciclina e estimulador da guanilil ciclase solúvel) é comprovadamente eficaz para pacientes com hipertensão arterial pulmonar, mas seu uso em pacientes com HP decorrente de doença cardíaca de câmaras esquerdas pode até mesmo ser prejudicial. Discutiremos nesta revisão o critério diagnóstico, a maneira de proceder a investigação etiológica, a classificação clínica e, finalmente, as recomendações terapêuticas na HP.

Abstract The finding of pulmonary hypertension (PH) by echocardiography is common and of concern. However, echocardiography is just a suggestive and non-diagnostic assessment of PH. When direct involvement of pulmonary circulation is suspected, invasive hemodynamic monitoring is recommended to establish the diagnosis. This assessent provides, in addition to the diagnostic confirmation, the correct identification of the vascular territory predominantly involved (arterial pulmonary or postcapillary). Treatment with specific medication for PH (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists and prostacyclin analogues) has been proven effective in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, but its use in patients with PH due to left heart disease can even be damaging. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis criteria, how etiological investigation should be carried out, the clinical classification and, finally, the therapeutic recommendations for PH.

ABSTRACT A necessidade de irrigar a cana-de-açúcar no Cerrado deve-se à escassez de chuvas durante o período de abril a setembro. Para o acúmulo eficiente de açúcar, a cultura necessita de estresse hídrico ou térmico na fase da maturação. Porém, quando o déficit hídrico é intenso nessa fase, ocorre a redução na produção da cultura. Assim, o objetivo do presente trabalho foi: (i) avaliar a qualidade da matériaprima da cana-de-açúcar em diferentes épocas de interrupção da irrigação antes da colheita; (ii) avaliar a influência do estresse térmico sobre a cultura. O experimento foi conduzido em Santo Antônio de Goiás (GO), Brasil, em Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo, com a variedade CTC4 no ciclo de cana-planta. Utilizou-se o delineamento de parcelas subdividas no tempo. Os tratamentos das parcelas foram cinco épocas de interrupção da irrigação (90, 60, 30, 15 e 0 dias antes da colheita) e, nas subparcelas, cinco épocas de avaliação da produção. A irrigação foi feita por gotejamento superficial, com déficit de 50%. Os melhores resultados da qualidade da matéria-prima ocorreram aos 30 dias antes da colheita, período em que a irrigação poderia ser interrompida. O déficit hídrico de 37,76 mm parece ser o limite crítico da falta de água no solo, a partir do qual a produtividade de colmos começa a ser reduzida. A concentração de açúcar no colmo foi mais influenciada pelas baixas temperaturas do ar que a produtividade de colmos.

ABSTRACT The need to irrigate sugarcane in the Brazilian Savanna is due to the lack of rain from April to September. For efficient sugar accumulation, the crop needs water stress or heat stress at the maturation stage. However, when the water deficit is intense at this stage, it occurs the reduction in crop production. The objective of this study was: (i) to assess the quality of the raw material of sugarcane in different drying-off seasons before harvest; (ii) to evaluate the influence of heat stress on the culture. The experiment was conducted in Santo Antônio de Goiás (GO), Brazil, in Oxisol, with CTC4 variety in cane-plant cycle. A randomized block design in a split-plot array in time was used. The treatments of the plots were five drying-off times (90, 60, 30, 15 and 0 days before harvest) and, in the subplots, five seasons of the yield evaluation. Irrigation was carried out by surface drip method, which provided 50% of crop water requirement. The best results for sugar yield occurred 30 days before harvest, period in which the crop irrigation could be interrupted. The water deficit of 37.76 mm appears to be the critical limit of water shortage in the soil, from which the sugarcane yield starts to be reduced. The sugar concentration in the stalk was more influenced by low air temperatures than sugarcane yield.