RESUMO Objetivo Adaptar e validar uma versão abreviada do Mindful Eating Questionnaire para a língua turca para uma população turca adulta. Métodos Este estudo transversal incluiu 709 participantes com idades compreendidas entre os 18 e os 65 anos, residentes na província de Elazig. Os dados foram recolhidos através de um inquérito presencial voluntário. O questionário incluía as suas caraterísticas gerais e o Mindful Eating Questionnaire-18 e o Eating Attitude Test-26. Foi utilizada a análise fatorial confirmatória para testar a validade do Mindful Eating Questionnaire-18. As análises estatísticas foram efectuadas utilizando o programa R-Project e o IBM®SPSS® versão 26.0. Resultados O índice geral de validade de conteúdo foi de 0,93. Uma análise fatorial confirmatória foi realizada para as duas subescalas e reduziu a abreviação do Mindful Eating Questionnaire para 18 itens. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach foi de 0,718 para os escores de fatores totais do Mindful Eating Questionnaire-18 e os valores alfa de Cronbach para consciência e desinibição foram 0,843 e 0,789, respectivamente. A discrepância mínima por grau de liberdade = 4,914 e o modelo geralmente se ajustam bem à estrutura (RMSEA=0,074, CFI=0,934, SRMR=0,079, TLI=0,925, GFI=0,968, AGFI=0,959). Conclusão Os resultados do estudo mostraram que as propriedades psicométricas do Mindful Eating Questionnaire abreviado adaptado para o turco eram aceitáveis por meio da confiabilidade de construção e consistência interna. adulta 70 1 6 anos Elazig voluntário Questionnaire18 Questionnaire-1 Test26. Test26 Test 26. 26 Test-26 Questionnaire18. 18. RProject R Project IBMSPSS IBM SPSS IBM®SPSS 260 0 26.0 093 93 0,93 itens 0718 718 0,71 0843 843 0,84 0789 789 0,789 respectivamente 4914 4 914 4,91 RMSEA=0,074, RMSEA0074 RMSEA 074 (RMSEA=0,074 CFI0934 CFI 934 CFI=0,934 SRMR0079 SRMR 079 SRMR=0,079 TLI0925 TLI 925 TLI=0,925 GFI0968 GFI 968 GFI=0,968 AGFI=0,959. AGFI0959 AGFI AGFI=0,959 . 959 AGFI=0,959) interna 7 Questionnaire1 Questionnaire- Test2 2 Test-2 09 9 0,9 071 71 0,7 084 84 0,8 078 78 0,78 491 91 4,9 RMSEA=0,074 RMSEA007 07 (RMSEA=0,07 CFI093 CFI=0,93 SRMR007 SRMR=0,07 TLI092 92 TLI=0,92 GFI096 96 GFI=0,96 AGFI095 AGFI=0,95 95 Test- 0, 08 8 49 4, RMSEA=0,07 RMSEA00 (RMSEA=0,0 CFI09 CFI=0,9 SRMR00 SRMR=0,0 TLI09 TLI=0,9 GFI09 GFI=0,9 AGFI09 AGFI=0,9 RMSEA=0,0 RMSEA0 (RMSEA=0, CFI0 CFI=0, SRMR0 SRMR=0, TLI0 TLI=0, GFI0 GFI=0, AGFI0 AGFI=0, RMSEA=0, (RMSEA=0 CFI=0 SRMR=0 TLI=0 GFI=0 AGFI=0 RMSEA=0 (RMSEA= CFI= SRMR= TLI= GFI= AGFI= RMSEA= (RMSEA

ABSTRACT Objective To adapt the abbreviated version of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire to Turkish for the Turkish adult population. Methods This cross-sectional study includes 709 participants aged between 18-65 years living in the province of Elazig. The data was collected through a voluntary face-to-face survey. The questionnaire was included their general characteristics and the Mindful Eating Questionnaire -18 and Eating Attitude Test-26. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the validity of the Mindful Eating Questionnaire -18. Statistical analyzes were conducted using the R-Project program and IBM®SPSS® version 26.0. Results The overall content validity index was 0.93. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for the two sub-scales and reduced the abbreviated of Mindful Eating Questionnaire to 18 items. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.718 for the Mindful Eating Questionnaire-18 total factor scores and Cronbach alpha values for awareness, and disinhibition were found to be 0,843 and 0,789, respectively. The minimum discrepancy per degree of freedom=4.914 and the fit indices were at an acceptable level (RMSEA=0.074, CFI=0.934, SRMR=0.079, TLI=0.925, GFI=0.968, AGFI=0.959). Conclusion The findings of study showed that the psychometric properties of the abbreviated Mindful Eating Questionnaire adapted into Turkish were acceptable through construct and internal consistency reliability for adults. population crosssectional cross sectional 70 1865 65 18-6 Elazig facetoface face survey -1 Test26. Test26 Test 26. 26 Test-26 18. RProject R Project IBMSPSS IBM SPSS IBM®SPSS 260 0 26.0 093 93 0.93 subscales sub scales 1 items Cronbachs s 0718 718 0.71 Questionnaire18 Questionnaire-1 awareness 0843 843 0,84 0789 789 0,789 respectively freedom4914 freedom 4 914 freedom=4.91 RMSEA=0.074, RMSEA0074 RMSEA 074 (RMSEA=0.074 CFI0934 CFI 934 CFI=0.934 SRMR0079 SRMR 079 SRMR=0.079 TLI0925 TLI 925 TLI=0.925 GFI0968 GFI 968 GFI=0.968 AGFI=0.959. AGFI0959 AGFI AGFI=0.959 . 959 AGFI=0.959) adults 7 186 6 18- - Test2 2 Test-2 09 9 0.9 071 71 0.7 Questionnaire1 Questionnaire- 084 84 0,8 078 78 0,78 freedom491 91 freedom=4.9 RMSEA=0.074 RMSEA007 07 (RMSEA=0.07 CFI093 CFI=0.93 SRMR007 SRMR=0.07 TLI092 92 TLI=0.92 GFI096 96 GFI=0.96 AGFI095 AGFI=0.95 95 Test- 0. 08 8 0, 0,7 freedom49 freedom=4. RMSEA=0.07 RMSEA00 (RMSEA=0.0 CFI09 CFI=0.9 SRMR00 SRMR=0.0 TLI09 TLI=0.9 GFI09 GFI=0.9 AGFI09 AGFI=0.9 freedom4 freedom=4 RMSEA=0.0 RMSEA0 (RMSEA=0. CFI0 CFI=0. SRMR0 SRMR=0. TLI0 TLI=0. GFI0 GFI=0. AGFI0 AGFI=0. freedom= RMSEA=0. (RMSEA=0 CFI=0 SRMR=0 TLI=0 GFI=0 AGFI=0 RMSEA=0 (RMSEA= CFI= SRMR= TLI= GFI= AGFI= RMSEA= (RMSEA

Abstract In this review, we aimed to explain general information about sugary kefir, microbial diversity, production process and potential health effects. Although sugary kefir has been known for many years, it has not been studied much. Studies have shown that sugary kefir has a similar microbial diversity compared to traditional milk kefir and therefore may be an alternative source of probiotics. However, sugary kefir has been shown to contain probiotic properties such as adhesion to the mucosa by reaching the lumen of the mucosa, colonization of the pathogens to the mucosa. In this way, potential health effects such as antimicrobial activity, suppression of inflammation agents, reduction of oxidative stress, immunomodulation, anticancer, and anti-obesity have been demonstrated by clinical studies. However, studies on whether or not these effects are present on humans are very limited. Therefore, randomized double blind placebo controlled studies are needed to investigate potential health effects on humans.