Resumen:
En
|
Texto:
En
|
PDF:
En
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate associations/correlations between bone alterations and vitamin D status in children through data mining analyses based on observational studies. Material and Methods: Searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were performed to recover studies, published until October 2022, with healthy children, which investigated the vitamin D status, related or not to undesirable bone alterations linked to bone quality (bone mineral density and bone mineral content), fracture or anthropometry. Country, study design, area of expertise (medicine, nutrition, dentistry, others), bone outcome, 25-hydroxyvitamin D data (serum or intake levels), the exams for bone diagnosis, and the results were analyzed in the VantagePointTM software. Results: Of 20,583 studies, 27 were included. The USA (n=9; 33.3%) had the highest number of publications. Cross-sectional (n=11; 40.7%), case-control (n=9; 33.3%), and cohort studies (n=7; 25.9%) contemplated the medicine and nutritional areas without any study in dentistry. Studies about bone quality (n=21; 77.8%), analyzed through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; n=14; 51.8%), with association (n=16; 59.2%) between the low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and undesirable bone alterations (n=14; 51.8%) were the most prevalent. Conclusion: Most studies were conducted in the medical area and showed an association between low bone quality and low levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, verified through DXA. Objective associationscorrelations associations correlations Methods PubMed Scopus Science 2022 content, content , content) anthropometry Country design medicine, (medicine nutrition dentistry others, others others) outcome 25hydroxyvitamin hydroxyvitamin 25 levels, levels) diagnosis software Results 20583 20 583 20,58 2 included n=9 n9 n 9 (n=9 33.3% 333 33 3 publications Crosssectional Cross sectional n=11 n11 11 (n=11 40.7%, 407 40.7% 40 7 40.7%) casecontrol case control 33.3%, n=7 n7 (n=7 25.9% 259 n=21 n21 21 (n=21 77.8%, 778 77.8% 77 8 77.8%) dualenergy dual energy Xray X ray DXA (DXA n=14 n14 14 51.8%, 518 51.8% 51 n=16 n16 16 (n=16 59.2% 592 59 (n=14 prevalent Conclusion 202 2058 58 20,5 n= (n= 33.3 n=1 n1 1 (n=1 40.7 4 25.9 n=2 n2 (n=2 77.8 51.8 5 59.2 205 20, (n 33. 40. 25. 77. 51. 59.