ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the cumulative incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with Cushing's disease (CD). Subjects and methods: In all, 60 patients with CD following up in our outpatient clinic answered via phone interview a questionnaire about the occurrence of COVID-19 infection documented by RT-PCR (including the diagnosis date and clinical outcome) and vaccination status. Clinical and biochemical data on disease activity (hypercortisolism) and comorbidities (obesity, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension) were obtained from the patients' electronic medical records. Risk ratios (RRs) of risk factors were obtained using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in patients with CD during the observation period was 31.7%, which was higher than that in the general reference population (9.5%). The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was significantly higher in patients with hypercortisolism (57% versus 17% in those without hypercortisolism, p = 0.012) and obesity (54% versus 9% in those without obesity, p < 0.001) but not in patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus. On multivariate analysis, hypercortisolism and obesity were each independent risk factors for COVID-19 (RR 2.18, 95% CI 1.06-4.46, p = 0.033 and RR 5.19, 95% CI 1.61-16.74, p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19 in patients with CD was associated with hypercortisolism, as expected, and obesity, a novel and unexpected finding. Thus, correction of hypercortisolism and obesity should be implemented in patients with CD during the current and future COVID-19 outbreaks. Objective COVID19 COVID 19 COVID-1 Cushings Cushing s CD. . (CD) methods all 6 RTPCR RT PCR including outcome status (hypercortisolism (obesity mellitus records RRs (RRs analyses Results 317 31 7 31.7% 9.5%. 95 9.5% 9 5 (9.5%) 57% 57 (57 17 0.012 0012 0 012 54% 54 (54 0.001 0001 001 analysis 218 2 18 2.18 1.064.46, 106446 1.06 4.46, 1 06 4 46 1.06-4.46 0033 033 0.03 519 5.19 1.6116.74, 1611674 1.61 16.74, 61 16 74 1.61-16.74 0006 006 0.006 respectively. respectively respectively) Conclusion expected finding Thus outbreaks COVID1 COVID- (CD 3 31.7 9.5 (9.5% (5 0.01 01 0.00 000 00 21 2.1 064 1.064.46 10644 106 1.0 446 4.46 1.06-4.4 003 03 0.0 51 5.1 6116 1.6116.74 161167 161 1.6 1674 16.74 1.61-16.7 31. 9. (9.5 ( 2. 1.064.4 1064 10 1. 44 4.4 1.06-4. 0. 5. 611 1.6116.7 16116 167 16.7 1.61-16. (9. 1.064. 4. 1.06-4 1.6116. 1611 16. 1.61-16 (9 1.064 1.06- 1.6116 1.61-1 1.611 1.61-

A secreção do hormônio de crescimento (GH) é modulada pelo hormônio liberador de hormônio de crescimento (GHRH) e pela somatostatina. Na última década foi descoberto um terceiro mecanismo de controle, envolvendo os secretagogos de GH (GHS). A ghrelina, o ligante endógeno do receptor dos GHS, é um peptídeo acilado produzido no estômago, que também é sintetizado no hipotálamo. Este peptídeo é capaz de liberar GH, além de aumentar a ingesta alimentar. A ghrelina endógena parece amplificar o padrão básico de secreção de GH, ampliando a resposta do somatotrofo ao GHRH, estimulando múltiplas vias intracelulares interdependentes. Entretanto, seu local de atuação predominante é o hipotálamo. Neste trabalho, será apresentada revisão sobre a descoberta da ghrelina, os mecanismos de ação e o possível papel fisiológico dos GHS e da ghrelina na secreção de GH e, finalmente, as possíveis aplicações terapêuticas destes compostos.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin modulate growth hormone (GH) secretion. A third mechanism was discovered in the last decade, involving the action of growth hormone secretagogues (GHS). Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the GHS-receptor, is an acylated peptide mainly produced by the stomach, but also synthesized in the hypothalamus. This compound increases both GH release and food intake. Endogenous ghrelin might amplify the basic pattern of GH secretion, optimizing somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH, activating multiple interdependent intracellular pathways. However, its main site of action is the hypothalamus. In the current paper it is reviewed the available data on the discovery of this peptide, the mechanisms of action and possible physiological roles of the GHS and ghrelin on GH secretion, and finally, the possible therapeutic applications of these compounds.

Na doença de Cushing (DC), as respostas do GH à ghrelina, ao GHRP-6 e ao GHRH estão diminuídas. Não existem dados sobre o efeito da redução dos níveis de cortisol, após cetoconazol, na secreção de GH na DC. Nessa situação, os níveis de ACTH são variáveis. Os objetivos do estudo são comparar as respostas do GH à administração de ghrelina, GHRP-6 e GHRH, e de ACTH e cortisol à ghrelina e ao GHRP-6 antes e após um mês de tratamento com cetoconazol em 6 pacientes com DC não tratados. Antes do tratamento, o pico de GH (mg/L; média ± EPM) após a administração de ghrelina, GHRP-6 e GHRH foi de 10,0 ± 4,5; 3,8 ± 1,6 e 0,6 ± 0,2, respectivamente. Após um mês de cetoconazol, ocorreu diminuição significante do cortisol urinário (redução média: 75%), mas as respostas de GH permaneceram inalteradas (7,0 ± 2,0; 3,1 ± 0,8; 0,9 ± 0,2, respectivamente). Após o tratamento, houve redução da resposta de cortisol (mg/dL) à ghrelina (antes: 30,6 ± 5,2; após: 24,2 ± 5,1), mas não ocorreram mudanças nas respostas de ACTH (pg/mL) (ghrelina antes: 210,9 ± 69,9; após: 159,7 ± 40,3; GHRP-6 antes: 199,8 ± 88,8; após: 227 ± 127,2). Assim, o tratamento a curto prazo com cetoconazol não modificou as respostas de GH ou ACTH, apesar da redução do cortisol. Para a recuperação da função hipofisária deve ser necessário um período de tratamento maior.

GH responses to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH in Cushing’s disease (CD) are markedly blunted. There is no data about the effect of reduction of cortisol levels with steroidogenesis inhibitors, like ketoconazole, on GH secretion in CD. ACTH levels during ketoconazole treatment are controversial. The aims of this study were to compare the GH response to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH, and the ACTH and cortisol responses to ghrelin and GHRP-6 before and after one month of ketoconazole treatment in 6 untreated patients with CD. Before treatment peak GH (mg/L; mean ± SEM) after ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH administration was 10.0 ± 4.5; 3.8 ± 1.6, and 0.6 ± 0.2, respectively. After one month of ketoconazole there was a significant decrease in urinary cortisol values (mean reduction: 75%), but GH responses did not change (7.0 ± 2.0; 3.1 ± 0.8; 0.9 ± 0.2, respectively). After treatment, there was a significant reduction in cortisol (mg/dL) responses to ghrelin (before: 30.6 ± 5.2; after: 24.2 ± 5.1). No significant changes in ACTH (pg/mL) responses before (ghrelin: 210.9 ± 69.9; GHRP-6: 199.8 ± 88.8) and after treatment (ghrelin: 159.7 ± 40.3; GHRP-6: 227 ± 127.2) were observed. In conclusion, after short-term ketoconazole treatment there are no changes in GH or ACTH responses, despite a major decrease of cortisol levels. A longer period of treatment might be necessary for the recovery of pituitary function.