O guia alimentar brasileiro é baseado parcialmente nas recomendações americanas a despeito das críticas e problemas identificados no documento dos Estados Unidos. Neste artigo, as recomendações alimentares para o Brasil são resumidas e discutidas em comparação com as recomendações estadunidenses. Os guias alimentares brasileiro e americano são bastante similares em diversos aspectos, particularmente aqueles relacionados com a variação da dieta, a importância da atividade física e o gerenciamento do peso. Diferentemente dos Estados Unidos, o guia brasileiro estimula o consumo de alimentos frescos, aconselha o uso de fontes saudáveis de gorduras, a limitação do consumo de gordura trans, o consumo de boas fontes de proteínas, mas não indica o consumo de grãos integrais. Além dos desafios relacionados com a sua implantação, os indicadores para a avaliação da eficácia dos guias alimentares devem ser estabelecidos desde sua implantação, particularmente, os relacionados a mudanças nos hábitos alimentares e à prevalência da obesidade.

The Brazilian dietary guidelines are based in part on mainstream United States' recommendations, in spite of the criticisms and shortcomings of the American guidelines. In this paper, Brazilian food guidelines are summarized and discussed in comparison with the USA recommendations. American and Brazilian dietary recommendations are quite similar in many aspects, particularly those related to variety in the diet, the importance of physical activity and weight management. Different to American guidelines, those from Brazil advise people to choose fresh foods, to prefer healthier types of fat, to limit trans fat intake and to eat good sources of protein, but does not recommend the consumption of whole grains. Besides the challenges related to their implementation, indicators for the evaluation of the effectiveness of these guidelines should be established from the beginning, particularly those related to changes in dietary habits and the prevalence of obesity.

O guia alimentar brasileiro é baseado parcialmente nas recomendações americanas a despeito das críticas e problemas identificados no documento dos Estados Unidos. Neste artigo, as recomendações alimentares para o Brasil são resumidas e discutidas em comparação com as recomendações estadunidenses. Os guias alimentares brasileiro e americano são bastante similares em diversos aspectos, particularmente aqueles relacionados com a variação da dieta, a importância da atividade física e o gerenciamento do peso. Diferentemente dos Estados Unidos, o guia brasileiro estimula o consumo de alimentos frescos, aconselha o uso de fontes saudáveis de gorduras, a limitação do consumo de gordura trans, o consumo de boas fontes de proteínas, mas não indica o consumo de grãos integrais. Além dos desafios relacionados com a sua implantação, os indicadores para a avaliação da eficácia dos guias alimentares devem ser estabelecidos desde sua implantação, particularmente, os relacionados a mudanças nos hábitos alimentares e à prevalência da obesidade.

The Brazilian dietary guidelines are based in part on mainstream United States' recommendations, in spite of the criticisms and shortcomings of the American guidelines. In this paper, Brazilian food guidelines are summarized and discussed in comparison with the USA recommendations. American and Brazilian dietary recommendations are quite similar in many aspects, particularly those related to variety in the diet, the importance of physical activity and weight management. Different to American guidelines, those from Brazil advise people to choose fresh foods, to prefer healthier types of fat, to limit trans fat intake and to eat good sources of protein, but does not recommend the consumption of whole grains. Besides the challenges related to their implementation, indicators for the evaluation of the effectiveness of these guidelines should be established from the beginning, particularly those related to changes in dietary habits and the prevalence of obesity.

The Expert Committee in charge of developing the Beverage Consumption Recommendations for the Mexican Population was convened by the Secretary of Health for the purpose of developing evidence-based guidelines for consumers, health professionals, and government officials. The prevalence of over-weight, obesity and diabetes have dramatically increased in México; beverages contribute a fifth of all calories consumed by Mexicans. Extensive research has found that caloric beverages increase the risk of obesity. Taking into consideration multiple factors, including the health benefits, risks, and nutritional implications associated with beverage consumption, as well as consumption patterns in México, the committee classified beverages into 6 levels. Classifications were made based on caloric content, nutritional value, and health risks associated with the consumption of each type of beverage and range from the healthier (level 1) to least healthy (level 6) options, as follows: Level 1: water; Level 2: skim or low fat (1%) milk and sugar free soy beverages; Level 3: coffee and tea without sugar; Level 4: non-caloric beverages with artificial sweeteners; Level 5: beverages with high caloric content and limited health benefits (fruit juices, whole milk, and fruit smoothies with sugar or honey; alcoholic and sports drinks), and Level 6: beverages high in sugar and with low nutritional value (soft drinks and other beverages with significant amounts of added sugar like juices, flavored waters, coffee and tea). The committee recommends the consumption of water as a first choice, followed by no or low-calorie drinks, and skim milk. These beverages should be favored over beverages with high caloric value or sweetened beverages, including those containing artificial sweeteners. Portion size recommendations are included for each beverage category and healthy consumption patterns for men and women are illustrated.

El Secretario de Salud convocó al Comité de Expertos para la elaboración de las ''Recomendaciones sobre el consumo de bebidas para la población mexicana''; la finalidad fue desarrollar lineamientos basados en evidencia científica para los consumidores, los profesionales de la salud y el sector gubernamental. Las prevalencias de sobrepeso, obesidad y diabetes han aumentado con rapidez en México y las bebidas representan la quinta parte de la energía que consumen los mexicanos. La evidencia señala que las bebidas con aporte energético incrementan el riesgo de obesidad. Considerando los beneficios y riesgos para la salud y nutrición, así como el patrón de consumo de las bebidas en México, el Comité clasificó las bebidas en seis categorías de acuerdo con su contenido energético, valor nutricio y riesgos a la salud en una escala que clasifica las bebidas de lamas (nivel 1) a la menos (nivel 6) saludable. Nivel 1: agua potable; nivel 2: leche baja en grasa (1%) y sin grasa y bebidas de soya sin azúcar; nivel 3: café y té sin azúcar; nivel 4: bebidas no calóricas con edulcorantes artificiales; nivel 5: bebidas con alto valor calórico y beneficios a la salud limitados (jugos de fruta, leche entera, licuados de fruta con azúcar o miel, bebidas alcohólicas y bebidas deportivas); y nivel 6: bebidas con azúcar y bajo contenido de nutrimentos (refrescos y otras bebidas con altas cantidades de azúcares agregadas como jugos, aguas frescas, café y té). El Comité recomienda el consumo de agua en primer lugar, seguido de bebidas sin o con bajo aporte energético y leche descremada. Éstas deben tener prioridad sobre las de mayor aporte energético o endulzadas, incluso con edulcorantes artificiales. Se presentan cantidades recomendadas para cada categoría de bebidas y se ilustran patrones de consumo saludable para adultos de ambos sexos.

The Expert Committee in charge of developing the Beverage Consumption Recommendations for the Mexican Population was convened by the Secretary of Health for the purpose of developing evidence-based guidelines for consumers, health professionals, and government officials. The prevalence of overweight, obesity and diabetes have dramatically increased in Mexico; beverages contribute a fifth of all calories consumed by Mexicans. Extensive research has found that caloric beverages increase the risk of obesity. Taking into consideration multiple factors, including the health benefits, risks, and nutritional implications associated with beverage consumption, as well as consumption patterns in Mexico, the committee classified beverages into six levels. Classifications were made based on caloric content, nutritional value, and health risks associated with the consumption of each type of beverage and range from the healthier (level 1) to least healthy (level 6) options, as follows: Level 1: water; Level 2: skim or low fat (1%) milk and sugar free soy beverages; Level 3: coffee and tea without sugar; Level 4: non-caloric beverages with artificial sweeteners; Level 5: beverages with high caloric content and limited health benefits (fruit juices, whole milk, and fruit smoothies with sugar or honey; alcoholic and sports drinks), and Level 6: beverages high in sugar and with low nutritional value (soft drinks and other beverages with significant amounts of added sugar like juices, flavored waters, coffee and tea). The committee recommends the consumption of water as a first choice, followed by no or low-calorie drinks, and skim milk. These beverages should be favored over beverages with high caloric value or sweetened beverages, including those containing artificial sweeteners. Portion size recommendations are included for each beverage category and healthy consumption patterns for men and women are illustrated.

El secretario de Salud convocó al Comité de Expertos para la elaboración de las "Recomendaciones sobre el consumo de bebidas para la población mexicana"; la finalidad fue desarrollar lineamientos basados en evidencia científica para los consumidores, los profesionales de la salud y el sector gubernamental. Las prevalencias de sobrepeso, obesidad y diabetes han aumentado con rapidez en México y las bebidas representan la quinta parte de la energía que consumen los mexicanos. La evidencia señala que las bebidas con aporte energético incrementan el riesgo de obesidad. Considerando los beneficios y riesgos para la salud y nutrición, así como el patrón de consumo de las bebidas en México, el Comité clasificó las bebidas en seis categorías de acuerdo con su contenido energético, valor nutricio y riesgos a la salud en una escala que clasifica las bebidas de la más (nivel 1) a la menos (nivel 6) saludable. Nivel 1: agua potable; nivel 2: leche baja en grasa (1%) y sin grasa y bebidas de soya sin azúcar; nivel 3: café y té sin azúcar; nivel 4: bebidas no calóricas con edulcorantes artificiales; nivel 5: bebidas con alto valor calórico y beneficios a la salud limitados (jugos de fruta, leche entera, licuados de fruta con azúcar o miel, bebidas alcohólicas y bebidas deportivas); y nivel 6: bebidas con azúcar y bajo contenido de nutrimentos (refrescos y otras bebidas con altas cantidades de azúcares agregadas como jugos, aguas frescas, café y té). El Comité recomienda el consumo de agua en primer lugar, seguido de bebidas sin o con bajo aporte energético y leche descremada. Éstas deben tener prioridad sobre las de mayor aporte energético o endulzadas, incluso con edulcorantes artificiales. Se presentan cantidades recomendadas para cada categoría de bebidas y se ilustran patrones de consumo saludable para adultos de ambos sexos.

The Expert Committee in charge of developing the Beverage Consumption Recommendations for the Mexican Population was convened by the Secretary of Health for the purpose of developing evidence-based guidelines for consumers, health professionals, and government officials. The prevalence of overweight, obesity and diabetes have dramatically increased in Mexico; beverages contribute a fifth of all calories consumed by Mexicans. Extensive research has found that caloric beverages increase the risk of obesity. Taking into consideration multiple factors, including the health benefits, risks, and nutritional implications associated with beverage consumption, as well as consumption patterns in Mexico, the committee classified beverages into six levels. Classifications were made based on caloric content, nutritional value, and health risks associated with the consumption of each type of beverage and range from the healthier (level 1) to least healthy (level 6) options, as follows: Level 1: water; Level 2: skim or low fat (1%) milk and sugar free soy beverages; Level 3: coffee and tea without sugar; Level 4: non-caloric beverages with artificial sweeteners; Level 5: beverages with high caloric content and limited health benefits (fruit juices, whole milk, and fruit smoothies with sugar or honey; alcoholic and sports drinks), and Level 6: beverages high in sugar and with low nutritional value (soft drinks and other beverages with significant amounts of added sugar like juices, flavored waters, coffee and tea). The committee recommends the consumption of water as a first choice, followed by no or low-calorie drinks, and skim milk. These beverages should be favored over beverages with high caloric value or sweetened beverages, including those containing artificial sweeteners. Portion size recommendations are included for each beverage category and healthy consumption patterns for men and women are illustrated.

El secretario de Salud convocó al Comité de Expertos para la elaboración de las "Recomendaciones sobre el consumo de bebidas para la población mexicana"; la finalidad fue desarrollar lineamientos basados en evidencia científica para los consumidores, los profesionales de la salud y el sector gubernamental. Las prevalencias de sobrepeso, obesidad y diabetes han aumentado con rapidez en México y las bebidas representan la quinta parte de la energía que consumen los mexicanos. La evidencia señala que las bebidas con aporte energético incrementan el riesgo de obesidad. Considerando los beneficios y riesgos para la salud y nutrición, así como el patrón de consumo de las bebidas en México, el Comité clasificó las bebidas en seis categorías de acuerdo con su contenido energético, valor nutricio y riesgos a la salud en una escala que clasifica las bebidas de la más (nivel 1) a la menos (nivel 6) saludable. Nivel 1: agua potable; nivel 2: leche baja en grasa (1%) y sin grasa y bebidas de soya sin azúcar; nivel 3: café y té sin azúcar; nivel 4: bebidas no calóricas con edulcorantes artificiales; nivel 5: bebidas con alto valor calórico y beneficios a la salud limitados (jugos de fruta, leche entera, licuados de fruta con azúcar o miel, bebidas alcohólicas y bebidas deportivas); y nivel 6: bebidas con azúcar y bajo contenido de nutrimentos (refrescos y otras bebidas con altas cantidades de azúcares agregadas como jugos, aguas frescas, café y té). El Comité recomienda el consumo de agua en primer lugar, seguido de bebidas sin o con bajo aporte energético y leche descremada. Éstas deben tener prioridad sobre las de mayor aporte energético o endulzadas, incluso con edulcorantes artificiales. Se presentan cantidades recomendadas para cada categoría de bebidas y se ilustran patrones de consumo saludable para adultos de ambos sexos.

Objective. To assess the reproducibility and validity of a 116 item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), designed to assess the relation between dietary intake and chronic diseases. Material and methods. To test the reproducibility of the FFQ questionnaire, the FFQ was administered twice to 134 women residing in Mexico City at an interval of approximately one year; to assess the validity we compared results obtained by the FFQs with those obtained by four 4-day 24-hour recalls at three month intervals. Validity and reproducibility were evaluated using regression analysis and Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients of log-e and calorie-adjusted nutrient scores. Results. Mean values for intake of most nutrients assessed by the two food frequency questionnaires were similar. However, means for the 24-hr recall were significantly lower. Intraclass correlation coefficients for nutrient intakes, assessed by questionnaires, administered one year apart, ranged from 0.38 for cholesterol to 0.54 for crude fiber. Correlation coefficients between energy-adjusted nutrient intakes, measured by diet recalls, and the first FFQ ranged from 0.12 for polyunsaturated fatty acids to 0.67 for saturated fatty acids. Regression coefficients between 24-hr recall and FFQ,s were all significant were significant for all nutrients, except for polyunsaturated fat, folic acid, vitamin E and Zinc. Conclusions. These data indicate that this semi-quantitative FFQ is reproducible and provides a useful estimate by which to categorize individuals by level of past nutrient intake. However, its application outside Mexico City or in different age and gender populations will require additional modifications and validation efforts.

Objetivo. Evaluar la reproducibilidad y validez de un cuestionario semicuantitativo de frecuencia de consumo de alimentos, para ser utilizado en estudios epidemiológicos sobre enfermedades crónicas. Material y métodos. Para evaluar la reproducibilidad del cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo se comparó el resultado obtenido al aplicar la encuesta a 134 mujeres en dos tiempos separados por 12 meses. Para evaluar la validez del cuestionario, comparamos los resultados obtenidos a partir de su aplicación, con el promedio de 16 recordatorios de 24-horas, los cuales se obtuvieron en el transcurso de 12 meses. Para estimar la validez utilizamos modelos de regresión y correlación de Pearson. Para evaluar la reproducibilidad estimamos la correlacion intraclase entre los cuestionarios de frecuencia de consumo. Resultados. Las ingestas promedio diarias estimadas por los cuestionarios de frecuencia de consumo fueron similares. Sin embargo, las medias estimadas mediante los recordatorios de 24 horas fueron significativamente menores. Las correlaciones intraclase entre los cuestionarios de frecuencia de consumo aplicados 12 meses aparte, variaron entre 0.38 para colesterol y 0.54 para fibra cruda. Las correlaciones ajustadas por calorías entre el primer cuestionario y la media de los recordatorios variaron entre 0.12 para ácidos grasos polinsaturados y 0.67 para ácidos grasos saturados. En el análisis de regresión observamos asociaciones estadísticamente significativas para casi todos los nutrientes, excepto para grasas polinsaturadas, ácido folico, vitamina E y zinc. Conclusiones. Los resultados indican que el cuestionario es útil para evaluar la ingesta dietética. Sin embargo, su utilización en poblaciones con diferente estructura de edad y género o ubicación geográfica requerirá de acciones adicionales para garantizar su validez y reproducibilidad.

Evidence from both animal and epidemiologic studies indicate that throughout life excessive energy intake in relation to requirements increases risk of human cancer. Rapid growth rates in childhood lead to earlier age at menarche, which in turn increases risk of breast cancer, and accumulation of body fat in adulthood in related to cancers of the colon, kidney, and endometrium as well as postmenopausal breast cancer. Higher intake of vegetables and fruits has been associated with lower risks of many cancers. The constituents responsible for these apparent protective effects remain uncertain, although evidence supports a contribution of folic acid. Recent evidence suggests that the percentage of energy from fat in the diet is not a major cause of cancers of the breast or colon. Higher intake of meat and dairy products has been associated with greater risk of prostate cancer, which may be related to their saturated fat content. Also, red meat consumption has been associated with risk of colon cancer in numerous studies, but this appears to be unrelated to its fat content. Excessive consumption of alcohol increases risks of upper gastrointestinal tract and even moderate intake appears to increase cancers of the breast and large bowel. Although many details remain to be learned, evidence is strong that remaining physically active and lean throughout life, consuming an abundance of fruits and vegetables, and avoiding high intakes of red meat, foods high in animal fat, and excessive alcohol will substantially reduce risk of human cancer.

La evidencia que proporcionan tanto los estudios en animales como los epidemiológicos, indica que el consumo excesivo de energía incrementa el riesgo de cáncer en los humanos. Las tasas de crecimiento rápidas durante la niñez pueden conducir a una menarquia temprana, lo que aumenta el riesgo de cáncer de mama, y la acumulación de grasa corporal en la madurez está relacionada con el cáncer de colon, riñón y endometrio, y con el de mama después de la menopausia. Un alto consumo de verduras y frutas se ha relacionado con riesgos más bajos de contraer varios tipos de cáncer. Sigue sin conocerse cuáles son los componentes responsables de estos efectos, aparentemente protectores, aunque se le atribuye un papel importante al ácido fólico. En la dieta, el porcentaje de energía que proviene de la grasa no constituye una causa importante del cáncer de mama o de colon. El consumo excesivo de carne y de productos lácteos se ha asociado con un riesgo mayor de cáncer de próstata; esto se puede relacionar con su contenido de grasa saturada. De igual forma, en numerosos estudios la ingesta de carne roja se ha asociado con un mayor riesgo de cáncer de colon, aunque esto parece no estar relacionado con su contenido de grasa. El consumo excesivo de alcohol aumenta los riesgos de cáncer del tracto gastrointestinal superior, e incluso parece que su consumo moderado incrementa el riesgo de cáncer de mama y del intestino grueso. Aunque falta conocer muchos detalles, la información muestra que el mantenerse físicamente activo y delgado, consumir frutas y verduras en abundancia, y evitar la ingesta excesiva de carne roja, de alimentos ricos en grasa animal y el no abusar del alcohol, puede reducir substancialmente el riesgo de cáncer en los seres humanos.