RESUMO Introdução: Anosognosia, i.e. a perda da consciência dos próprios sintomas, é um achado muito comum em pacientes com demência e está relacionada a sintomas neuropsiquiátricos e a pior prognóstico. Embora a doença por Corpos de Lewy (DCL) seja a segunda demência degenerativa mais comum, há pouca evidência sobre anosognosia nessa doença. Objetivos: Este artigo teve como objetivo revisar a evidência disponível sobre anosognosia em pacientes com DCL, incluindo sua prevalência em comparação a outras condições neurológicas, gravidade e correlações anatômicas. Métodos: Foram feitas buscas nos bancos de dados PubMed, Web of Knowledge e PsycINFO por artigos que avaliassem anosognosia na DCL. Um total de 243 estudos foi encontrado, mas apenas 6 foram incluídos nesta revisão. Resultados: Potenciais riscos de viés de seleção, comparação ou resultado foram encontrados em todos os estudos selecionados. A maior parte dos estudos utilizou questionários de memória preenchidos pelo próprio paciente e os comparou a resultados de instrumentos preenchidos por informantes ou à performance cognitiva em tarefas neuropsicológicas. Indivíduos com DCL têm pior consciencia de memória do que idosos saudáveis, mas os resultados tocantes à diferença de anosognosia entre DCL e doença de Alzheimer (DA) são inconsistentes entre estudos. A presença de achados patológicos e de neuroimagem de DA parece aumentar a prevalência de anosognosia entre pacientes com DCL. Conclusão: Anosognosia é uma manifestação comum da DCL, mas não é possível afirmar como sua prevalência e gravidade se comparam à DA. A coexistência de achados patológicos de DA parece influenciar a consciência de déficits de memória na DCL.

ABSTRACT Background: Anosognosia, i.e. lack of awareness of one’s own symptoms, is a very common finding in patients with dementia and is related to neuropsychiatric symptoms and worse prognosis. Although dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common form of degenerative dementia, literature on anosognosia in this disease is scarce. Objectives: This paper aimed to review the current evidence on anosognosia in patients with DLB, including its prevalence in comparison with other neurological conditions, its severity and anatomical correlations. Methods: Database searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge and PsycINFO for articles assessing anosognosia in DLB. A total of 243 studies were retrieved, but only six were included in the review. Results: Potential risk of selection, comparison or outcome biases were detected in relation to all the studies selected. Most of the studies used self-report memory questionnaires to assess cognitive complaints and compared their results to scores from informant-based instruments or to participants’ cognitive performance in neuropsychological tasks. Subjects with DLB had worse awareness regarding memory than healthy older controls, but the results concerning differences in anosognosia between DLB and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients were inconsistent across studies. Presence of AD pathology and neuroimaging biomarkers appeared to increase the prevalence of anosognosia in individuals with DLB. Conclusion: Anosognosia is a common manifestation of DLB, but it is not clear how its prevalence and severity compare with AD. Co-existence of AD pathology seems to play a role in memory deficit awareness in DLB.

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used instrument for the screening of older adults with suspected cognitive impairment; the MMSE has been translated and validated in numerous languages and countries. The cultural and sociodemographic characteristics of the sample can influence performance on the test; therefore, applying the MMSE in different populations usually requires adjustments of those variables. From this perspective, the present study aims to review the normative data for the MMSE in the Brazilian older population, including those adaptations to the original test. Database searches were performed in Medline, Web of Knowledge, Scielo and Pepsic for articles assessing healthy elderly Brazilian samples using the MMSE. Heterogeneity across and within the studies was analyzed. Of a total of 1,085 retrieved articles, 14 were included. Significant differences across studies were identified for the characteristics of the samples, the presence of alterations to the MMSE subtests and the presentation of the results. The risk of biases was relevant for all the studies. Considering the large methodological heterogeneity among studies, the generalization of the available normative data for the MMSE may not be appropriate for the general elderly Brazilian population.