Objective: In schizophrenia, scores reflecting deficits in different cognitive processes are strongly correlated, making it difficult to establish a solid relationship between different cognitive mechanisms and other features of this disorder. The objective of this study was to explore whether three frequently postulated executive functions (updating, shifting, and inhibition) could be compared between groups and considered independently in terms of their respective roles in functional outcome. Methods: This study relied on confirmatory factor analysis of schizophrenia patients (n=141) and healthy controls (n=119). The main analyses examined the degree to which three executive functions (updating, set-shifting, and inhibition) could be separated in schizophrenia and compared this model among groups. Structural equation modeling analysis was also performed to examine the extent to which executive function components contribute to functional outcome in schizophrenia. Results: Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis with unconstrained model parameters indicated that the full three-factor model may fit the data in both groups (χ2 = 61.48, degrees of freedom = 34, p < 0.001, comparative fit index = 0.95; standardized root mean square residual = 0.037; root mean square error of approximation = 0.04; Akaike’s information criteria = 169.49; normed fit index = 0.90), although there was also a good data fit for the patient group with a two-factor model. In the patient group, structural equation modeling suggested that shifting and (principally) updating were associated with the general measure of functional outcome (regression path coefficients: 0.34, p < 0.005; 0.39, p < 0.005, respectively), although when combined the mechanisms fail to contribute. Conclusion: This data suggests that the factor structure may be similar but not identical between groups, and both updating and shifting may play an important role in functional outcome in schizophrenia.

Objetivo O estudo descreve o desenvolvimento de duas medidas de atualização da memória de trabalho (MT): Teste de Atualização de Letras (TAL) e Teste de Atualização de Palavras (TAP). Métodos Na etapa 1 foram criados itens e os instrumentos foram analisados por experts e leigos. Na etapa 2, os testes foram aplicados em 15 pacientes com esquizofrenia e 15 controles pareados. Todos foram capazes de compreender e responder aos instrumentos. Na etapa 3, participaram 141 pacientes com esquizofrenia e 119 controles saudáveis com idades entre 18 e 60 anos, avaliados em MT, velocidade de processamento (VP) e funcionalidade. Resultados Os resultados revelaram bons índices de consistência interna para ambas as medidas desenvolvidas, tanto para a amostra total como para cada grupo separadamente, bem como evidências de validade convergente com medidas de MT, validade discriminante com medidas de VP e sensibilidade para discriminar o desempenho entre os grupos. Análise de componentes principais revelou que os testes de atualização apresentaram altas cargas e um fator separado das medidas de VP. Relações positivas, significativas, porém baixas, foram encontradas com medidas de funcionalidade. Conclusão Esses resultados fornecem bons parâmetros psicométricos para as medidas desenvolvidas, aplicáveis em contextos de pesquisa cognitiva da esquizofrenia.

Objective This study describes the development of two updating measures of working memory (WM): Letter Updating Test (LUT) and Word Updating Test (WUT). Methods In stage 1, items were created and the instruments were assessed by experts and laymen. In stage 2, tests were given to 15 patients with schizophrenia and 15 paired controls. All were able to understand and respond to the instruments. In stage 3, 141 patients with schizophrenia and 119 healthy controls aged 18 to 60 took part; they were assessed on WM, processing speed (PS) and functional outcome. Results The results showed adequate rates of internal consistency for both measures developed, for both the total sample and each group separately, as well as evidence of convergent validity, discriminant validity and sensitivity to differentiate performance among the groups. Principal component analysis yielded two components, one for updating tests and other for PS measures, indicating factorial validity. Positive and significant, yet low, correlations were found with functionality measures. Conclusion These results provide adequate psychometric parameters for the measures developed, applicable to cognitive research settings in schizophrenia.