ABSTRACT: The present study evaluated the cryoprotectant efficacy of dimethylacetamide (DMA) and ethylene glycol in a one-step protocol to freeze boar sperm. The sperm-rich portion of the ejaculates from two boars were collected once a week, for 10 weeks. After collection, the ejaculates were diluted (1:1; v/v) in the cooling extender. After determining their spermatozoa concentration, the ejaculates were pooled with the same number of spermatozoa from each boar and stabilized at 20°C for 120 min. Distinct cryoprotectants were added to the cooling extender at 20 °C, at different concentrations, composing six treatments: 1.25% and 2.5% glycerol (control); 1.25% and 2.5% ethylene glycol; 2.5% and 5.0% DMA. The samples were stored in 0.25 mL straws, containing 35 × 106 spermatozoa. After 90 min at 20 °C, the straws were submitted to a cooling curve until 5 °C (0.3 to 0.5 °C/min) and kept at 5°C for 60 min. Freezing was conducted by placing the straws horizontally 5 cm above the liquid nitrogen for 10 min, followed by immersion on liquid nitrogen. After thawing at 37 °C for 30 seconds, sperm quality was evaluated through a computer-assisted semen analysis system and flow cytometry. Sperm motility was greater (P< 0.05) in treatments with 5.0% and 2.5% DMA (22.2 ± 2.6% and 20.0 ± 2.8%, respectively) than in treatment with 2.5% ethylene glycol (8.2 ± 1.0%). The integrity of the plasma membrane (P = 0.08) and mitochondrial membrane potential (P = 0.27) was similar among the treatments. The treatment with 2.5% ethylene glycol was the least efficient to maintain intact acrosome membrane (P< 0.01). Some kinetics parameters (DAP, DCL, DSL, VAP, VCL, VSL e ALH) were positively affected by 5.0% DMA. The one-step freezing protocol resulted in unsatisfactory boar sperm motility after thawing, regardless of the cryoprotectant.

RESUMO: O presente estudo objetivou avaliar a eficácia de um protocolo one-step de congelamento do sêmen suíno utilizando dimetilacetamida (DMA) e etilenoglicol como crioprotetores. Durante 10 semanas, a fração rica dos ejaculados de dois machos suínos foram coletados, uma vez por semana. Após a coleta, os ejaculados foram diluídos (1:1; v/v) no diluidor de resfriamento. Após a avaliação da concentração espermática, os ejaculados foram agrupados em um pool com o mesmo número de espermatozoides de cada macho e estabilizados a 20 °C por 120 min. Os criopropetores foram adicionados ao diluidor de congelamento a 20 °C, em diferentes concentrações, compondo seis tratamentos: glicerol (controle), 1,25% e 2,5%; etilenoglicol, 1,5% e 2,5%; e DMA, 2,5% e 5,0%. As amostras foram armazendadas em palhetas de 0,25 mL contendo 35 x 106 espermatozoides. Após 90 min a 20 °C as palhetas foram submetidas a uma curva de resfriamento até 5 °C (0,3 a 0,5 °C/mim) e mantidas a 5 °C por 60 min. O congelamento foi realizado a partir da colocação das palhetas horizontalmente a 5 cm acima do nitrogênio líquido por 10 min, com sua posterior imersão no nitrogênio líquido. Após o descongelamento a 37 °C por 30 segundos a qualidade espermática foi avaliada através de um sistema computadorizado e por citometria de fluxo. A motilidade espermática foi maior (P < 0,05) nos tratamentos com 5,0% e 2,5% DMA (22,2 ± 2,6% e 20,0 ± 2,8%, respectivamente) do que no tratamento com 2,5% etilenoglicol (8,2 ± 1,0%). A integridade da membrana plasmática (P = 0,08) e potencial de membrana mitocondrial (P = 0,27) foi similar entre os tratamentos. O tratamento com 2,5% de etilenoglicol foi menos eficiente em manter membrana acrossomal intacta (P< 0,01). Alguns parâmetros de cinética espermática (DAP, DCL, DSL, VAP, VCL, VSL e ALH) foram afetados positivamente pelo uso de DMA a 5.0%. O protocolo simplificado para congelamento de sêmen suíno resultou em motilidade espermática insatifatória após o descongelamento, independente do crioprotetor utilizado.

Abstract Among the different methods used for semen collection from domestic cats, the pharmacological collection by urethral catheterization becomes disruptive. Medetomidine is the elected α2-adrenoceptor agonist for that, but in several countries, it is not commercially available. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of detomidine compared to medetomidine in collecting semen by urethral catheterization in domestic cats. Urethral catheterization was performed on 13 mongrel cats using a disposable semi-rigid tomcat urinary catheter. Of the 19 semen collections performed with medetomidine induction, 94.7% were successful, while with detomidine induction, only 56.3% of 16 were successful. The values semen samples variables were as follows for volume - 10.56 ± 0.4 vs 8.88 ± 0.5 mL, motility - 171.67 ± 0.79 vs 49.77 ± 3.45%, vigor – 4.1 ± 0.03 vs 3.10 ± 0.1 and concentration - 3.24 ± 0.19 vs 2.15 ± 0.13 ×109 sperm/mL respectively for medetomidine and detomidine group. The failure in semen collections with detomidine was mainly due to azoospermic samples, poor urethral relaxation, insufficient volume, or contamination of urine. The sperm concentration was also lower in the detomidine group (P <0.05) when compared to medetomidine. However, when the volume of semen collected was compared, we found no statistical differences. Despite its low performance in collecting semen from cats, detomidine may be an alternative when medetomidine is not accessible.

Abstract Twin birth is a complex condition observed in most livestock animals, when the female gives birth to two or more offspring, generally out of the same mating. In cattle, it is a rare condition (3 to 5%) and depends on the genetic background and environmental factors. Twin birth is a result of multiple ovulations, being more common in dairy rather than in beef cattle. Calves could be monozygous or dizygous, with the same or of different sexes. When twins are born with different sexes, a sexual condition called Freemartinism occurs in between 90 to 97% of pregnancies, causing infertility in the female calf. Knowing that the twin rate is rare in commercial beef cattle, here we present an even rarer case of twin birth from two different sires after natural mating, also called heteropaternal superfecundation.