Abstract: Objective: To describe the prevalence of hypertension (HBP) in adults with vulnerability, the percentage of them with previous diagnosis and the proportion that had adequate control. Materials and methods: Blood pressure was measured in 7 838 adults who participated in the Ensanut 100k. Those who self-reported the diagnosis of HBP or had systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥130mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥80mmHg were classified as hypertensive. Controlled blood pressure was considered when SBP was <130mmHg and TAD <80mmHg. Results: The prevalence of hypertension in adults with a vulnerability condition was 49.2%, of which 54.7% did not know had hypertension. Of the hypertensive patients who received pharmacological treatment (69.0%), 66.8% of them had blood pressure under control. Conclusions: Almost half of Mexican adults in vulnerable condition have HBP and of these more than half do not know that they have this disease. One third of hypertensive adults have inadequate control.

Resumen: Objetivo: Describir la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial (HTA) en adultos en condición de vulnerabilidad, el porcentaje de ellos con diagnóstico previo y la proporción con control adecuado. Material y métodos: Se midió la tensión arterial a 7 838 adultos participantes en la Ensanut 100k. Se clasificó como hipertensos a quienes autorreportaron el diagnóstico de HTA o presentaban tensión arterial sistólica (TAS) ≥130mmHg o tensión arterial diastólica (TAD) ≥80mmHg. Se consideró tensión arterial controlada cuando la TAS fue <130mmHg y la TAD <80mmHg. Resultados: La prevalencia de HTA en adultos en condición de vulnerabilidad fue de 49.2%, de los cuales 54.7% desconocía tener HTA. De los hipertensos que recibían tratamiento farmacológico (69.0%), el 66.8% tuvo tensión arterial controlada. Conclusiones: Casi la mitad de los adultos mexicanos en condición de vulnerabilidad tiene HTA y de ellos, más de la mitad desconoce que tiene esta enfermedad. Asimismo, un tercio de los adultos hipertensos tiene un inadecuado control de su enfermedad.

Abstract: Objective: To describe the prevalence of hypertension (HBP) in adults with vulnerability, the percentage of them with previous diagnosis and the proportion that had adequate control. Materials and methods: Blood pressure was measured in 7 838 adults who participated in the Ensanut 100k. Those who self-reported the diagnosis of HBP or had systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥130mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥80mmHg were classified as hypertensive. Controlled blood pressure was considered when SBP was <130mmHg and TAD <80mmHg. Results: The prevalence of hypertension in adults with a vulnerability condition was 49.2%, of which 54.7% did not know had hypertension. Of the hypertensive patients who received pharmacological treatment (69.0%), 66.8% of them had blood pressure under control. Conclusions: Almost half of Mexican adults in vulnerable condition have HBP and of these more than half do not know that they have this disease. One third of hypertensive adults have inadequate control.

Resumen: Objetivo: Describir la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial (HTA) en adultos en condición de vulnerabilidad, el porcentaje de ellos con diagnóstico previo y la proporción con control adecuado. Material y métodos: Se midió la tensión arterial a 7 838 adultos participantes en la Ensanut 100k. Se clasificó como hipertensos a quienes autorreportaron el diagnóstico de HTA o presentaban tensión arterial sistólica (TAS) ≥130mmHg o tensión arterial diastólica (TAD) ≥80mmHg. Se consideró tensión arterial controlada cuando la TAS fue <130mmHg y la TAD <80mmHg. Resultados: La prevalencia de HTA en adultos en condición de vulnerabilidad fue de 49.2%, de los cuales 54.7% desconocía tener HTA. De los hipertensos que recibían tratamiento farmacológico (69.0%), el 66.8% tuvo tensión arterial controlada. Conclusiones: Casi la mitad de los adultos mexicanos en condición de vulnerabilidad tiene HTA y de ellos, más de la mitad desconoce que tiene esta enfermedad. Asimismo, un tercio de los adultos hipertensos tiene un inadecuado control de su enfermedad.

OBJETIVO: Pulsos de metilprednisolona são usados em diversas doenças, tanto para tratamento agudo quanto crônico. Embora bem tolerados, eles aumentam os níveis de glicose em ambos os pacientes, não diabéticos e diabéticos. Eles também podem ser considerados um risco significativo para alterações metabólicas agudas. O propósito deste estudo é determinar as alterações metabólicas nos níveis de glicose no sangue de pacientes não diabéticos que recebem pulsos de metilprednisolona e identificar a presença de fatores preditivos para seu desenvolvimento. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional prospectivo em 50 pacientes não diabéticos que recebem pulsoterapia com 1 g de metilprednisolona intravenosa por três dias consecutivos como tratamento para diversas doenças autoimunes. Variáveis demográficas, antropométricas e metabólicas foram analisadas, e glicose, insulina e níveis de peptídeo C foram identificados após cada pulso de esteroide. Diferentes variáveis e a magnitude da hiperglicemia foram analisadas utilizando a correlação de Pearson. RESULTADOS: 50 pacientes foram incluídos, predominantemente mulheres (66%, n = 33). A idade média foi de 41 ± 14 anos com um IMC de 26 ± 3 kg/m². A glicose de base foi de 83 ± 10 mg/dL. Após cada pulso de esteroide, a glicose aumentou para 140 ± 28, 160 ± 38 e 183 ± 44, respectivamente (p < 0,001). Peptídeo C e concentrações de insulina aumentaram significativamente (p < 0,001). A prevalência de hiperglicemia em jejum após cada pulso foi de 68%, 94% e 98%, respectivamente. Não encontramos nenhuma correlação entre a magnitude da hiperglicemia e as variáveis estudadas. CONCLUSÃO: Os pulsos de metilprednisolona produziram aumentos significativos na glicemia de jejum na maioria dos pacientes sem diabetes. Mais estudos são necessários para definir o seu papel nas consequências em longo prazo.

OBJECTIVE: Methylprednisolone pulses are used in a variety of disease conditions, both for acute and chronic therapy. Although well tolerated, they increase glucose levels in both non-diabetic and diabetic patients. They may also be considered a significant risk for acute metabolic alterations. The purpose of this report is to determine the metabolic changes in blood glucose levels in non-diabetic patients receiving methylprednisolone pulses and identify the presence of predictive factors for its development. METHODS: Observational, prospective study in 50 non-diabetic patients receiving 1 g intravenous methylprednisolone pulses for three consecutive days as an indication for diverse autoimmune disorders. Demographic, anthropometric, and metabolic variables were analyzed, and glucose, insulin and C-peptide levels after each steroid pulse were identified. Different variables and the magnitude of hyperglycemia were analyzed using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: 50 patients were included, predominantly women (66%, n = 33). The average age was 41 ± 14 years with a BMI of 26 ± 3 kg/m². Baseline glucose was 83 ± 10 mg/dL. After each steroid pulse, glucose increased to 140 ± 28, 160 ± 38 and 183 ± 44, respectively (p < 0.001). C-peptide and insulin concentrations increased significantly (p < 0.001). The prevalence of fasting hyperglycemia after each pulse was 68%, 94% and 98%, respectively. We found no correlation between the magnitude of hyperglycemia and the studied variables. CONCLUSION: Methylprednisolone pulses produced significant increases in fasting glucose in most patients without diabetes. Further studies are needed to define its role in long-term consequences.