Resumo Estudo metodológico de criação, validação de conteúdo e avaliação da mensurabilidade de indicadores para o monitoramento dos serviços de saúde bucal na atenção primária à saúde (APS). Indicadores foram elaborados a partir de variáveis registradas nas fichas de atendimento odontológico individual e atividades coletivas do e-SUS APS. Um comitê de 46 painelistas avaliou os indicadores, obtendo-se o percentual de concordância entre eles quanto à relevância da medida, transparência do método de cálculo e se eles mediam a dimensão teórica. A mensurabilidade foi avaliada usando dados do Sistema de Informação em Saúde para a Atenção Básica (SISAB), para cada município brasileiro, em 2022. Foi obtido o percentual de municípios que apresentavam dados não nulos para o numerador e/ou denominador. Foram validados 68 indicadores (concordância > 75%) e demonstrada a mensurabilidade de 53, nas subdimensões “acesso aos serviços de saúde bucal” (9), “vigilância em saúde bucal” (5), “diagnóstico, tratamento e reabilitação em saúde bucal” (16), “promoção e prevenção” (14), “atuação intersetorial/participação popular” (4) e “processo de trabalho” (5). O percentual de municípios com indicadores calculados variou de 0,97 a 95,40%.

Resumen Estudio metodológico sobre la creación, validación de contenido y evaluación de mensurabilidad de indicadores para monitorear los servicios de salud bucal en la APS. Los indicadores, basados en datos del e-SUS APS, fueron evaluados por 46 expertos en términos de relevancia, transparencia y adecuación teórica. La mensurabilidad se analizó con datos del SISAB de 2022, considerando el porcentaje de municipios con datos válidos para numerador y/o denominador. Se validaron 68 indicadores (concordancia > 75%), y 53 resultaron mensurables, distribuidos en subdimensiones como acceso, vigilancia, diagnóstico y tratamiento, promoción y prevención, acción intersectorial y proceso de trabajo. El porcentaje de municipios con indicadores calculados varió entre 0,97% y 95,40%.

Abstract Methodological study for the development, content validation, and measurability assessment of indicators to monitor oral health services in Primary Health Care (PHC). Data from the e-SUS PHC system were used and evaluated by 46 experts regarding relevance, transparency, and theoretical alignment. Measurability was assessed using 2022 data from the Primary Care Health Information System (SISAB) for Brazilian municipalities. Sixty-eight indicators were validated (agreement > 75%), with 53 deemed measurable, covering subdimensions such as Access, Surveillance, Diagnosis and Treatment, Promotion and Prevention, Intersectoral Action, and Work Processes. The percentage of municipalities with calculated indicators ranged from 0.97% to 95.40%.

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pairs of antagonist teeth (epidemiological criterion) for defining pairs of teeth in occlusal contact (clinical criterion) and to estimate the agreement between the prevalence of “shortened dental arch” (SDA) and “functional dentition” (FD) when occlusal units (OUs) or posterior occluding pairs (POPs) are defined by the epidemiological or clinical criterion. Data were collected in an epidemiological oral health survey conducted in a municipality in Minas Gerais, Brazil. OUs and POPs were defined by the epidemiological criterion (dental crown status) or clinical criterion “gold standard” (carbon paper record of occlusal contacts during habitual maximum intercuspation). SDA corresponded to the presence of an intact anterior region and three to five OUs. FD was based on the concomitant presence of ≥ 1 tooth in each arch, 10 teeth in each arch, 12 anterior teeth, ≥ 3 premolar POPs, and ≥ 1 molar POP bilaterally. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the epidemiological criterion were calculated. The study included 197 adults. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 88.5, 87.9, 92.5, and 81.9%, respectively, and accuracy was 88.3%. The epidemiological criterion proved to be valid and could be used in epidemiological studies to calculate the prevalence of reduced dental configurations that consider POPs. The assessment of oral functionality is an aspect that should be included in the diagnosis of the clinical condition of patients, contributing to a more effective individual and collective oral health care plan. shortened arch (SDA functional dentition (FD (OUs (POPs Gerais Brazil status gold standard carbon intercuspation. intercuspation . intercuspation) bilaterally Sensitivity specificity PPV , (PPV) NPV, (NPV) calculated 19 adults 885 88 5 88.5 879 87 9 87.9 925 92 92.5 819 81 81.9% respectively 883 88.3% patients plan (PPV (NPV 8 88. 87. 92. 81.9 88.3 81.

Resumo Introdução O controle da disseminação do coronavírus em Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos (ILPI) é considerado um desafio, uma vez que os idosos fazem parte do grupo de risco e apresentam prognóstico bastante desfavorável e também alta letalidade. Objetivo Conduzir uma rapid review para mapear e sintetizar a literatura sobre medidas de enfrentamento de Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) em ILPI. Método Foi realizada uma Rapid review, e as buscas foram conduzidas nas bases de dados eletrônicas Biblioteca Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, Scielo, Medline/Pubmed e Google Scholar. Foram incluídas publicações a partir de 2019, nos idiomas português, inglês ou espanhol. A seleção das publicações ocorreu em duas etapas: leitura dos títulos/resumos; e leitura na íntegra de todas as publicações selecionadas. As recomendações para enfrentamento da COVID-19 em Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos foram extraídas e agrupadas de acordo com o conteúdo. Resultados Foram selecionadas 59 publicações que descreviam recomendações referentes aos temas: controle da disseminação do vírus; formação / educação continuada dos trabalhadores responsáveis pelo cuidado ao idoso; bem como o cuidado no contexto da pandemia: residentes, trabalhadores e familiares, e planejamento e gerenciamento de ações para o enfrentamento. Conclusão As recomendações para o enfrentamento da COVID-19 demandam comportamentos para evitar a disseminação do vírus, adaptações nas dinâmicas de cuidado e de convivência nas instituições, planejamento de ações específicas e suporte familiar, institucional e do Estado para assegurar a proteção da saúde física e psicossocial dos idosos e trabalhadores.

Abstract Background Controlling the spread of the coronavirus in Long-Term Care Facilities for older adults is considered a challenge, since this group have a very unfavorable prognosis and also high lethality. Objective To conduct a rapid review of guidelines to manage COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities for older adults. Method A Rapid review was carried out, searches were conducted in the electronic databases Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Scielo and Medline/Pubmed. Publications from 2019 were included, in Portuguese, English, or Spanish. The selection of publications took place in two stages: reading the titles/abstracts and reading in full all selected publications by two independent researchers. Guidelines for managing COVID-19 in LCTFs were extracted and grouped according to content. Results 59 publications were selected describing guidelines regarding control of the spread of the virus; training/continuing education of staff responsible for caring for the elderly residents; care addressing residents, staff and family during the pandemic and planning and management of actions to manage the disease. Conclusion Guidelines for managing COVID-19 demand for behaviors to prevent the spread of the virus and adaptations in the dynamics of care and the coexistence inside facilities. They also require planning for specific actions that include family, institutional and State support so the protection of physical and psychosocial health of the elderly residents and staff is ensured.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the direct and oral impact-mediated association between reduced dentitions and the self-perceived need for complete dentures (CD) in dentate adults. Material and Methods: Data from the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (2010) were analyzed. The outcome was self-perceived need for CD. Functional dentition (FDClassV) was defined by the presence of the following criteria: level I - ≥1 tooth in each arch, level II - 10 teeth in each arch, level III - 12 anterior teeth, level IV - ≥ 3 posterior occluding pairs (POPs) of premolars and level V - ≥1 bilateral POPs of molars. Oral impacts were assessed with Oral Impacts on Daily Performances scale. Results: FDClassV was associated with a less self-perceived need for CD both directly and mediated by oral impacts. Dentitions without level V were associated with the outcome mediated by oral impacts. Between individuals with 10 teeth in each arch, self-perceived need for CD was similar for those who had or not anterior teeth and POPs. Individuals with <10 teeth in each arch and level III did not have a higher frequency of self-perceived need for CD compared to those with level II. Conclusion: Oral impacts mediated the association between reduced dentitions and self-perceived need for CD. Individuals with tooth loss may report need for CD, even when they have dental configurations compatible with functionality.

Abstract This study aimed to map evidence-based guidelines for oral care of the dependent elders and perform the cross-cultural adaptation to Brazilian Portuguese. Initially, a systematized review was conducted in Medline, Scielo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases without restrictions in search period or type of study. Articles in English, Spanish, and Brazilian Portuguese describing evidence-based guidelines for oral care, including oral hygiene recommendations, of institutionalized dependent elders were included as long as they presented an evaluation of evident quality. The guideline that met inclusion criteria was submitted to cross-cultural adaptation after obtaining permission from the original authors. Two hundred and nineteen references were found. Three selected articles described evidence-based guidelines for oral care, but the Oral Health Care Guideline for Older People in Long-term Care Institutions (OGOLI), originally developed and implemented in the Netherlands, was selected. It was based on evidence level A2 and consensus of experts and met the quality requirements of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE). This guideline presents oral care recommendations for elders with different levels of dependence in activities of daily living to be performed by caregivers and nursing staff. The adaptation of the OGOLI was mainly on the attributions of care providers, given the differences in professional regulations between Brazil and the Netherlands. The cross-cultural equivalence between OGOLI and its Brazilian Portuguese version was verified.