Resumo Tendo em vista que a universalização dos serviços de saneamento é uma das metas do Plano Nacional de Saneamento Básico (PLANSAB) e um dos objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável (ODS), esta pesquisa objetivou-se avaliar a cobertura do abastecimento e a qualidade da água distribuída no Brasil em 2019. Foram utilizados os dados do Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento (SNIS) e do Sistema de Informação de Vigilância da Qualidade da Água para Consumo Humano (Sisagua). Verificou-se que 82% da população foi atendida por serviços de água, sendo este percentual ainda menor considerando apenas a região Norte (58%) e Nordeste (74%). A maioria da população é atendida por Sistemas de Abastecimento de Água (SAA); entretanto, na região Norte, 6,6% da população é atendida por SAA e 7,2% por Solução Alternativa Coletiva (SAC) sem tratamentos. Para o parâmetro Coliformes totais, 21,9% das amostras de SAC da região Norte estavam fora do padrão de potabilidade, enquanto para o residual de agente desinfetante, 40,6% de SAA da região Nordeste encontravam-se fora do padrão, sendo que deste total 19% das amostras apresentavam concentração do agente desinfetante acima de 5,0 mg/L e 81% das amostras apresentavam concentrações menores que 0,2 mg/L. Conclui-se que parte da população pode estar vulnerável aos riscos relacionados à qualidade da água.

Abstract Bearing in mind that universal access to sanitation services is one of the objectives of the Brazilian Plan for Basic Sanitation and one of the sustainable development goals (SDG), this research sought to evaluate the coverage of supply and of the quality of water distributed in Brazil in 2019. Data from the National Sanitation Information System (SNIS) and Water Quality for Human Consumption Surveillance Information System (Sisagua) databases were evaluated. It was found that 82% of the population has access to Water Supply Systems (WSS), this percentage only being lower in the North (58%) and Northeast (74%) regions. Most of the population is served by WSS; however, in the North region, 6.6% of the population is served by WSS and 7.2% by Collective Alternative Solution (CAS) without treatment. For the Total Coliforms parameter, 21.9% of CAS samples from the North region were outside the potability standard, while for the residual disinfectant agent, 40.6% of WSS from the Northeast region was outside this standard (with 19% of the samples having a concentration of the disinfectant agent above 5.0 mg/L, and 81% of the samples presenting concentration lower than 0.2 mg/L. The conclusion drawn is that part of the population may be vulnerable to water quality-related risks.

Resumo Tendo em vista que a universalização dos serviços de saneamento é uma das metas do Plano Nacional de Saneamento Básico (PLANSAB) e um dos objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável (ODS), esta pesquisa objetivou-se avaliar a cobertura do abastecimento e a qualidade da água distribuída no Brasil em 2019. Foram utilizados os dados do Sistema Nacional de Informações sobre Saneamento (SNIS) e do Sistema de Informação de Vigilância da Qualidade da Água para Consumo Humano (Sisagua). Verificou-se que 82% da população foi atendida por serviços de água, sendo este percentual ainda menor considerando apenas a região Norte (58%) e Nordeste (74%). A maioria da população é atendida por Sistemas de Abastecimento de Água (SAA); entretanto, na região Norte, 6,6% da população é atendida por SAA e 7,2% por Solução Alternativa Coletiva (SAC) sem tratamentos. Para o parâmetro Coliformes totais, 21,9% das amostras de SAC da região Norte estavam fora do padrão de potabilidade, enquanto para o residual de agente desinfetante, 40,6% de SAA da região Nordeste encontravam-se fora do padrão, sendo que deste total 19% das amostras apresentavam concentração do agente desinfetante acima de 5,0 mg/L e 81% das amostras apresentavam concentrações menores que 0,2 mg/L. Conclui-se que parte da população pode estar vulnerável aos riscos relacionados à qualidade da água.

Abstract Bearing in mind that universal access to sanitation services is one of the objectives of the Brazilian Plan for Basic Sanitation and one of the sustainable development goals (SDG), this research sought to evaluate the coverage of supply and of the quality of water distributed in Brazil in 2019. Data from the National Sanitation Information System (SNIS) and Water Quality for Human Consumption Surveillance Information System (Sisagua) databases were evaluated. It was found that 82% of the population has access to Water Supply Systems (WSS), this percentage only being lower in the North (58%) and Northeast (74%) regions. Most of the population is served by WSS; however, in the North region, 6.6% of the population is served by WSS and 7.2% by Collective Alternative Solution (CAS) without treatment. For the Total Coliforms parameter, 21.9% of CAS samples from the North region were outside the potability standard, while for the residual disinfectant agent, 40.6% of WSS from the Northeast region was outside this standard (with 19% of the samples having a concentration of the disinfectant agent above 5.0 mg/L, and 81% of the samples presenting concentration lower than 0.2 mg/L. The conclusion drawn is that part of the population may be vulnerable to water quality-related risks.

The inhibition effect of limonene on the organisms involved in anaerobic reactors may affect obtaining H2 in this process. Rapid and precise limonene quantification is desirable to characterize wastewaters. The objective of this research was to develop a Gas Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) method to determine limonene concentration in liquid samples from batch reactors applied to H2 production at 30 ºC. Method validation was carried out through calibration curves (3 to 20 mg L-1of limonene), in addition to evaluating its precision (CV =0.1%), linearity (R2=0.979), limits of detection (1.7 mg L-1) and quantification (4.2 mg L-1). Its inhibitory effect was evaluated with increasing concentrations of limonene (without addition to 2000 mg L-1). Limonene affected the starting time of H2 production (λ), since λ was 8.7 h in control assays and 15 h with 2000 mg L-1 of limonene. The same was observed for obtaining H2, since 19.5 mmol H2 L-1 was obtained in control assays and 8.7 mmol H2 L-1 was obtained in assays with 2000 mg L-1 of limonene. This method was effective for limonene determination in liquid samples from batch reactors and could be used for characterization and control of anaerobic reactors.