ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Specific types of violence such as intimate partner sexual violence and intimate partner homicide occur more frequently in rural areas. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the knowledge and attitudes of rural healthcare providers regarding cases of domestic violence against women. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review developed at Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of six databases, which only included observational studies, regardless of the year, language, or country of publication, except for studies that used secondary data and were exclusively qualitative. Two reviewers performed the selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using a specific Joanna Briggs Institute tool. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. All the studies had a low risk of bias. Approximately 38% of these professionals identified injuries caused by violence in patients. When asked about knowing the correct attitude to take in cases of confirmed violence, between 12% and 64% of rural healthcare providers answered positively; most of them would refer to specialized institutions and promote victim empowerment and counseling. The number of professionals with an educational background in the field ranged from 16% to 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The evident disparity across studies shows that some professionals have suboptimal knowledge and require training to adopt the correct attitude when identifying female victims of domestic violence in clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered in the Open Science Framework Database under the registration http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B7Q6S. BACKGROUND areas OBJECTIVE women SETTING Uberlândia METHODS databases year language publication qualitative selection extraction tool RESULTS criteria 38 patients 12 64 positively counseling 16 98 98% CONCLUSIONS practice REGISTRATION http//doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B7Q6S. httpdoiorg1017605OSFIOB7Q6S httpdoiorgOSFIOBQS http //doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B7Q6S. doi org 10 17605 OSF IO B7Q6S B Q S http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B7Q6S 3 1 6 9 http//doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B7Q6S httpdoiorg OSFIOB doiorg1017605OSFIOB7Q6S doiorgOSFIOBQS //doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B7Q6S 1760 BQS doiorg 176 17

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Adolescence is characterized by complex and dynamic changes, often involving experimentation, including the use of psychotropic substances. Although it is well-established that recreational psychotropic drugs are associated with suicide ideation in adults, evidence of this association in adolescents remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between suicide ideation and psychotropic recreational drug use among adolescents. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review with meta-analysis developed at Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) and Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil. METHODS: A search across eight electronic databases for observational studies, without language or publication year restrictions, was conducted. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses and odds ratios were used to measure the effects. RESULTS: The search yielded 19,732 studies, of which 78 were included in the qualitative synthesis and 32 in the meta-analysis. The findings indicated that suicidal ideation was 1.96 times more likely (95% confidence interval, CI = 1.47; 2.61) for adolescents who used some drug recurrently and 3.32 times more likely (95%CI = 1.86; 5.93) among those who abused drugs. Additionally, adolescents who used cannabis were 1.57 times more likely (95%CI = 1.34; 1.84) to experience suicide ideation compared with non-users, while cocaine users had 2.57 times higher odds (95%CI = 1.47; 4.50). CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic recreational drug use is associated with suicidal ideation among adolescents regardless of current or previous use, abuse, or type of substance used. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered in the PROSPERO database under the identification number CRD42021232360. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021232360. BACKGROUND changes experimentation substances wellestablished well established adults limited OBJECTIVE SETTING metaanalysis meta analysis UFU (UFU UNICAMP, UNICAMP , (UNICAMP) Brazil METHODS studies restrictions conducted bias Randomeffects Random effects metaanalyses analyses RESULTS 19732 19 732 19,73 7 3 metaanalysis. analysis. 196 1 96 1.9 95% 95 (95 interval 1.47 147 47 2.61 261 2 61 332 3.3 95%CI 95CI 1.86 186 86 5.93 593 5 93 Additionally 157 57 1.5 1.34 134 34 1.84 184 84 nonusers, nonusers non users, non-users 257 2.5 4.50. 450 4.50 . 4 50 4.50) CONCLUSIONS abuse REGISTRATION CRD42021232360 CRD https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD42021232360. httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD42021232360 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD https //www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php ID=CRD42021232360. www crd york ac uk prospero display record php ID https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021232360 (UNICAMP 1973 73 19,7 9 1. (9 1.4 14 2.6 26 6 33 3. 1.8 18 8 5.9 59 15 1.3 13 25 2. 45 4.5 CRD4202123236 phpID https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD42021232360 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD4202123236 wwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphp IDCRD42021232360 IDCRD ID=CRD42021232360 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD4202123236 197 19, ( 5. 4. CRD420212323 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD4202123236 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD420212323 IDCRD4202123236 ID=CRD4202123236 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420212323 CRD42021232 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD420212323 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD42021232 IDCRD420212323 ID=CRD420212323 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021232 CRD4202123 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD42021232 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD4202123 IDCRD42021232 ID=CRD42021232 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD4202123 CRD420212 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD4202123 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD420212 IDCRD4202123 ID=CRD4202123 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420212 CRD42021 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD420212 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD42021 IDCRD420212 ID=CRD420212 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021 CRD4202 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD42021 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD4202 IDCRD42021 ID=CRD42021 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD4202 CRD420 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD4202 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD420 IDCRD4202 ID=CRD4202 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420 CRD42 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD420 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD42 IDCRD420 ID=CRD420 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42 CRD4 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD42 httpswwwcrdyorkacukprosperodisplayrecordphpIDCRD4 IDCRD42 ID=CRD42 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD4 https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD4 IDCRD4 ID=CRD4 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.phpID=CRD ID=CRD

Abstract This study aimed to assess the potential association between perception malocclusion and school performance in children and adolescents. An electronic search was performed in ten databases. Based on the PECO acronym (Population, Exposition, Comparator, and Outcome), the eligibility criteria included observational studies that compared the school performance of children and adolescents with and without the perception of malocclusion. There were no restrictions on the language or year of publication. Two reviewers selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias by using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for cross-sectional studies. School performance was measured by analyzing student grades; levels of absenteeism; and child or adolescent self-perception and/or the perception of parents, guardians, close friends, and teachers regarding the impact of malocclusion on school performance. The data were described narratively/descriptively. The search resulted in 3,581 registers, of which eight were included in the qualitative synthesis. These studies were published between 2007 and 2021. Two studies concluded that there was no significant association between school performance and perception of malocclusion, five studies found that only some of the children with malocclusion had their school performance affected, and one study concluded that there was a significant association between perception of malocclusion and low school performance. Considering all variables and the very low certainty of evidence, the perception of malocclusion seems to negatively impact school performance when associated with external and subjective factors. Further studies using additional measurement standards are required. databases Population, Population (Population Exposition Comparator Outcome, Outcome , Outcome) publication crosssectional cross sectional grades absenteeism selfperception self andor parents guardians friends narrativelydescriptively narratively descriptively narratively/descriptively 3581 3 581 3,58 registers synthesis 200 2021 affected evidence factors required 358 58 3,5 20 202 35 5 3, 2