Abstract Objective: The authors investigated changes in vascular reactivity in rats following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Method: Male Wistar rats weighing between 250g and 300g were used. Status epilepticus was induced using 385 mg/kg i.p. pilocarpine. After 40 days the thoracic aorta was dissected and divided into 4 mm rings and the vascular smooth muscle reactivity to phenylephrine was evaluated. Results: Epilepsy decreased the contractile responses of the aortic rings to phenylephrine (0.1 nM–300 mM). To investigate if this reduction was induced by increasing NO production with/or hydrogen peroxide L-NAME and Catalase were used. L-NAME (N-nitro-L arginine methyl ester) increased vascular reactivity but the contractile response to phenylephrine increased in the epileptic group. Catalase administration decreased the contractile responses only in the rings of rats with epilepsy. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated for the first time that epilepsy is capable of causing a reduction of vascular reactivity in rat aortas. These results suggest that vascular reactivity reduction is associated with increased production of Nitric Oxide (NO) as an organic attempt to avoid hypertension produced by excessive sympathetic activation.

ABSTRACT There is increasing evidence that COVID-19 can be associated with ischemic stroke (COVID-stroke). The frequency and pathogenesis of COVID-stroke, however, remains largely unknown. This narrative review aimed at summarizing and discussing current knowledge about frequency and pathogenesis of COVID-stroke in 455 patients collected from the literature. COVID-stroke occurs in all age groups and predominantly in males. The anterior circulation is more frequently affected than the posterior circulation. COVID-stroke is most frequently embolic. The severity of COVID-stroke ranges from NIHSS 3 to 32. Cardiovascular risk factors are highly prevalent in patients with COVID-stroke. COVID-stroke occurs simultaneously with the onset of pulmonary manifestations or up to 40 days later. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 are most frequently mild or even absent. The majority of patients with COVID-stroke achieve complete or partial recovery, but in one-quarter of patients, the outcome is fatal. In conclusion, the frequency of ischemic stroke has not increased since the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. COVID-stroke predominantly affects males and the anterior circulation. COVID-stroke is multifactorial but predominantly embolic and more frequently attributable to cardiovascular risk factors than to coagulopathy.

RESUMO Introdução: A presente minirrevisão tem como objetivo resumir e discutir os avanços dos aspectos clínicos, fisiopatológicos, de diagnóstico, tratamento e evolução das neuropatias dos nervos periféricos associadas à COVID-19. Métodos: Revisão da literatura. Resultados: Foram avaliados 105 artigos sobre neuropatia associada à COVID-19. Nesses estudos, 261 pacientes apresentaram boa evolução. As neuropatias dos nervos periféricos em pacientes com COVID-19 são frequentes e se devem, principalmente, aos mecanismos immunológicos ou efeitos colaterais neurotóxicos dos medicamentos utilizados para o tratamento da COVID-19, a fatores de risco pré-existentes, como diabetes e, em menor parte, à compressão dos nervos periféricos nos leitos da UTI. A COVID-19 não causa neuropatia viral. Os medicamentos neurotóxicos, como daptomicina, linezolida, lopinavir, ritonavir, hidro-cloroquina, cisatracúrio, clindamicina e glicocorticoides devem ser administrados com cautela, e os pacientes deve ser adequadamente admitidos nos leitos da UTI para prevenir o desenvolvimento de neuropatia associada à COVID-19. Pacientes com síndrome de Guillain-Barré (GBS) se beneficiam de imunoglobulinas, plasmaférese e esteroides. Conclusões: As neuropatias dos nervos periféricos em pacientes com COVID-19 são raras e predominantemente devidas aos efeitos colaterais neurotóxicos das mecanismos immunológicos ou drogas utilizadas para o tratamento de COVID-19 e, em menor parte, devido à compressão dos nervos periféricos nos leitos da UTI. A COVID-19 não causa neuropatia infeciosa.

ABSTRACT Background: This mini-review aims to summarize and discuss previous and recent advances in the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of SARS-CoV-2-associated peripheral neuropathies. Methods: Literature review. Results: Altogether, 105 articles about SARS-CoV-2-associated neuropathy describing 261 patients were retrieved. Peripheral neuropathy in patients with COVID-19 is frequent and predominantly due to immune mechanisms or neurotoxic side effects of drugs used to treat the symptoms of COVID-19 and, to a lesser extent, due to the compression of peripheral nerves resulting from prolonged bedding in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and pre-existing risk factors such as diabetes. SARS-CoV-2 does not cause viral neuropathy. Neurotoxic drugs such as daptomycin, linezolid, lopinavir, ritonavir, hydro-chloroquine, cisatracurium, clindamycin, and glucocorticoids should be administered with caution and patients should be appropriately bedded in the ICU to prevent SARS-CoV-2-associated neuropathy. Patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) benefit from immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, and steroids. Conclusions: Neuropathies of peripheral nerves in patients with COVID-19 are frequent and mostly result from immune mechanisms or neurotoxic side effects of drugs used to treat the symptoms of COVID-19 and, to a lesser extent, from the compression of peripheral nerves due to prolonged bedding on the ICU. SARS-CoV-2 does not cause infectious neuropathy.

RESUMO Objetivo Analisar a pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil, um país de dimensões continentais, considerado uma economia emergente, mas com inúmeras diferenças regionais, abordando a disponibilidade de recursos humanos, especialmente para unidades de terapia intensiva. Métodos Foi acessado o banco de dados do Cadastro Nacional de Estabelecimentos de Saúde. Os profissionais de saúde que atuavam nos cuidados para COVID-19 foram georreferenciados. O número de profissionais foi correlacionado com os parâmetros utilizados pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. De acordo com a Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira, correlacionaram-se os dados de leitos de terapia intensiva adulta em cada unidade federativa com o número de profissionais para cada dez leitos de terapia intensiva. Os números de profissionais, leitos e casos foram, então, organizados por unidade federativa. Resultados O número de médicos por 100 mil habitantes seguiu as recomendações da Organização Mundial da Saúde; mas não o número de enfermeiras. O número de intensivistas, enfermeiros, técnicos de enfermagem especializados em terapia intensiva e fisioterapeutas respiratórios, necessário a cada dez leitos de terapia intensiva, não foi suficiente para nenhuma dessas categorias profissionais. Uma equipe completa desses especialistas esteve disponível para 10% dos leitos de terapia intensiva do Brasil. Conclusão Há carência de profissionais para unidade de terapia intensiva, como demonstrado no Brasil. Os recursos físicos da terapia intensiva, para serem usados de forma eficiente, precisam de recursos humanos extremamente especializados; portanto, o planejamento de recursos humanos é tão crucial quanto o planejamento de recursos físicos e estruturais.

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil, a continental-sized country, considered as an emerging economy but with several regional nuances, focusing on the availability of human resources, especially for intensive care units. Methods The database of the National Registry of Health Facilities was accessed. Healthcare professionals in the care of COVID-19 were georeferenced. We correlated the number of professionals with the parameters used by the World Health Organization. According to the Brazilian Intensive Care Medicine Association, we correlated the data for adult intensive care unit beds in each state with the number of professionals for each ten intensive care unit beds. The number of professionals, beds, and cases were then organized by state. Results The number of physicians per 100 thousand inhabitants followed the World Health Organization recommendations; however, the number of nurses did not. The number of intensivists, registered nurses, nurse technicians specialized in intensive care, and respiratory therapists, necessary for every ten intensive care beds, was not enough for any of these professional categories. A complete team of critical care specialists was available for 10% of intensive care unit beds in Brazil. Conclusion There is a shortage of professionals for intensive care unit, as we demonstrated for Brazil. Intensive care physical resources to be efficiently used require extremely specialized human resources; therefore, planning human resources is just as crucial as planning physical and structural resources.

ABSTRACT Since the beginning of 2020, health authorities have been monitoring the cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has grown every day in Brazil and around the world, becoming pandemic. The new coronavirus, also called SARS-CoV-2 by scientists spreads rapidly, causing fear, deaths, and threats for the economy of several countries. This work aimed to describe the clinical characterization of the first cases of a new Brazilian variant of SARS-CoV-2 (P1) in the State of Alagoas, which occurred on February 16th, 2021. Two cases are described: first, a person infected in Amazonas State, where the new variant P1 was first described, who migrated to Alagoas State, and second, a case of probable community transmission within Alagoas, since the patient had no history of recent travel. In both confirmed cases the symptoms were mild. Further studies are necessary to better understand the clinical behavior of P1 SARS-CoV-2 variant and also the associated sequelae in the context of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is characterized by high contagiousness, as well as variable clinical manifestations and immune responses. The antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 is directly related to viral clearance and the antibodies' ability to neutralize the virus and confer long-term immunity. Nevertheless, the response can also be associated with disease severity and evolution. This study correlated the clinical characteristics of convalescent COVID-19 patients with immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. METHODS: This study included 51 COVID-19 health care professionals who were candidates for convalescent plasma donation from April to June 2020. The subjects had symptomatic COVID-19 with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed diagnosis. We measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG antibodies after symptom recovery, and the subjects were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe symptoms. RESULTS: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were positive in most patients (90.2%). The antibody indexes for IgA and IgG did not differ significantly between patients presenting with mild or moderate symptoms. However, they were significantly higher in patients with severe symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed an association between higher antibody indexes and severe COVID-19 cases, and several hypotheses regarding the association of the antibody dynamics and severity of the disease in SARS-CoV-2 infection have been raised, although many questions remain unanswered.