Abstract Introduction: Pre-tenure early career researchers within academic settings play an important role as catalysts for new research and methodological innovations. However, the tenure-track process can be a high-pressure experience for such faculty. Examining organic collaborations amongst new pre-tenured faculty can afford opportunities for internal capacity building. However, literature is lacking in the benefits of developing such partnerships among novice faculty members with other novice faculty members. Research Objectives: This study aimed to examine the research programs of three novice tenure-track nursing faculty members and the connections between such programs for current and future collaborations, advancement of the nursing profession and scholarship, and personal-professional growth. Methodology: Narrative Inquiry with a specific focus on self-study was utilized with participants who identify as tenure-track nursing faculty members and are also the three investigators on this study. Each participant underwent a self-reflection process directed by a question guide informed by the literature and theoretical lens of Creamer (2003), and an aspect of the Narrative Reflective Process. Participants reflections were analyzed against each other and with relevant literature for co-construction to occur, moving participants’ experiences from being an individual activity to one that can have social significance for others with diverse programs of research. Results: The study explored common narrative threads that emerged from the faculty members’ reflections: stakeholder collaboration and involvement; nursing policy, practice, and research leadership. Final Considerations: This study has demonstrated potential areas for future collaborations between novice faculty members leading to benefits for the nursing profession, nursing research and personal career growth.

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the configuration of power relations among the multiprofessional team in the bedside round process in the hospital. Methods: Qualitative research with data analyzed through discourse analysis, based on Michel Foucault’s theoretical framework. From September to December 2022, we conducted interviews and field observations with the multiprofessional team at a hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, as well as qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 37 professionals. Results: The participants pointed out that the experiences of the professionals involved in bedside rounds depend on how the physician conducts the process, and the physician-centered process makes it difficult for other professionals in the team to participate. Final considerations: The way hospitals organize bedside rounds does not promote knowledge articulation for their professionals. It hinders the circulation of power and harms interdisciplinary work in a process that maintains the physician as the main actor in clinical decisions. Objective Methods analysis Foucaults Foucault s framework 2022 Horizonte Gerais Brazil qualitative semistructured semi structured 3 Results physiciancentered centered participate considerations decisions 202 20 2

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a configuração das relações de poder entre a equipe multiprofissional no processo de ronda a beira leito hospitalar. Métodos: Pesquisa qualitativa com dados analisados por meio de análise de discurso, com base no referencial teórico de Michel Foucault. De setembro a dezembro de 2022, realizamos entrevistas e observações de campo com a equipe multiprofissional de um hospital em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, e entrevistas qualitativas semiestruturadas com 37 profissionais. Resultados: Os participantes relataram que as experiências dos profissionais envolvidos nas rondas à beira do leito dependem da forma como o médico conduz o processo, e o processo centrado no médico dificulta a participação dos demais profissionais da equipe. Considerações finais: A forma como os hospitais organizam as rondas à beira do leito não promove a articulação do conhecimento de seus profissionais. Além disso, ela dificulta a circulação de poder e prejudica o trabalho interdisciplinar em um processo que mantém o médico como o principal ator nas decisões clínicas. Objetivo hospitalar Métodos discurso Foucault 2022 Horizonte Gerais Brasil 3 Resultados finais disso clínicas 202 20 2

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar la configuración de las relaciones de poder entre el equipo multiprofesional en el proceso de rondas de cabecera en el hospital. Método: Investigación cualitativa con datos analizados a través del análisis del discurso, basado en el marco teórico de Michel Foucault. De septiembre a diciembre de 2022, realizamos entrevistas y observaciones de campo con el equipo multiprofesional de un hospital de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil, así como entrevistas cualitativas semiestructuradas con 37 profesionales. Resultados: Los participantes señalaron que las experiencias de los profesionales involucrados en las rondas de cabecera dependen de cómo el médico conduce el proceso, y el proceso centrado en el médico dificulta la participación de otros profesionales del equipo. Consideraciones finales: La forma en que los hospitales organizan las rondas de cabecera no promueve la articulación del conocimiento de sus profesionales. Además, dificulta la circulación del poder y perjudica el trabajo interdisciplinario en un proceso que mantiene al médico como actor principal de las decisiones clínicas. Objetivo Método discurso Foucault 2022 Horizonte Gerais Brasil 3 Resultados finales Además clínicas 202 20 2

RESUMEN Objetivo: analizar las características distintivas, incongruencias y armonía entre las características de los enfermeros de salud comunitaria canadiense-brasileños y sus prácticas. Método: estudio etnográfico realizado en centros de atención primaria (ciudad de João Pessoa, Brasil). La recolección de datos se desarrolló de julio a septiembre de 2018 e incluyó la observación participante directa y no estructurada de las interacciones sociales colectivas y profesional-clientela, con un registro digital personal estructurado e informes de las observaciones del investigador, así como la inmersión social en entornos comunitarios. El registro de trabajo de campo se analizó temáticamente para construir el significado de la práctica de enfermería comparada. Resultados: el análisis de los informes de observaciones identificó desafíos y oportunidades para promover cambios sostenibles y crear un entorno de apoyo. Las competencias de los enfermeros para promover la salud están en consonancia con las perspectivas conceptuales, políticas y éticas. Entre las prácticas distintivas observadas, la práctica de prescripción ha sido bien establecida en Brasil porque legalmente las enfermeras están autorizadas a prescribir dentro de los programas de atención primaria de salud. En Canadá, a las enfermeras se les ha otorgado autoridad para hacerlo al recibir capacitación específica y bajo cierto alcance de práctica avanzada. El análisis temático reveló singularidad de la información captada, incongruencia entre las prácticas de enfermería en salud comunitaria y armonía entre las prácticas contextuales de enfermería en salud comunitaria Brasil-Canadá que compusieron la evidencia empírica. Conclusiones: esta investigación demostró que existe compatibilidad entre las prácticas canadiense y brasileña, así como las características de la enfermería comunitaria brasileña. Incuestionablemente, la evidencia resume la consolidación de la cooperación bien establecida entre Brasil y Canadá en el campo de la salud primaria. Esta evidencia aborda la perspectiva política de la cooperación para la salud global. Objetivo canadiensebrasileños brasileños Método ciudad Pessoa Brasil. . Brasil) 201 profesionalclientela, profesionalclientela profesional clientela, clientela profesional-clientela investigador comunitarios comparada Resultados apoyo conceptuales éticas observadas avanzada captada BrasilCanadá empírica Conclusiones brasileña Incuestionablemente global 20 2

ABSTRACT Objective: to analyze the distinct features, incongruencies, and harmony between the features of Canadian-Brazilian community health nursing as well their practices. Method: ethnographic research conducted in primary healthcare clinics (city of João Pessoa, Brazil). Data collection unfolded from July to September 2018 and included direct, unstructured participant observation of collective social and professional-clientele interactions, with a structured personal digital log and reports of the researcher's observations, as well as social immersion in community settings. The fieldwork log was thematically analyzed to build the meaning of the comparative nursing practice. Results: analysis of observations’ reports identified challenges and opportunities to promote sustainable changes and create a supportive environment. Nurses’ competencies to promote health are in consonance with conceptual, political, and ethical sounding perspectives. Among the distinctive practices observed was that in Brazil, the prescribing practice has been well-established because legally the registered nurses are allowed to prescribe within the primary healthcare programs. In Canada, registered nurses have been granted authority to do so, upon receipt of specific training and under certain scope of advanced practice. Thematic analysis revealed uniqueness of the grasped information, incongruence between community health nursing practices and harmony between contextual practices of Brazil-Canada community health nursing composed the empirical evidence. Conclusions: this research uncovered the compatibility between Canadian and Brazilian practice as well as intricate features of Brazilian community health nurses. Unquestionably, the evidence sums up to the consolidation of the well-established Brazil-Canada cooperation in the field of primary health care. This evidence addresses the political perspective of cooperation for global health. Objective incongruencies CanadianBrazilian Method city Pessoa Brazil. Brazil . Brazil) 201 direct professionalclientele professional clientele interactions researchers researcher s observations settings Results environment Nurses conceptual perspectives wellestablished established programs Canada so information BrazilCanada Conclusions Unquestionably care 20 2

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar as características distintas, as incongruências e a harmonia entre as características da Enfermagem de saúde comunitária canadense e brasileira bem como suas respectivas práticas. Método: pesquisa etnográfica realizada em unidades básicas de saúde (cidade de João Pessoa, Brasil). A coleta de dados ocorreu no período de julho a setembro de 2018 e incluiu observação participante direta, não estruturada de interações sociais coletivas e entre profissionais e clientela. Houve registro digital estruturado de relatos das observações de campo pela pesquisadora, assim como imersão social em ambientes comunitários. O diário de campo foi analisado tematicamente para construir o significado da prática comparativa de Enfermagem. Resultados: a análise dos relatos das observações identificou desafios e oportunidades para promover mudanças sustentáveis e criar um ambiente de apoio. As competências dos enfermeiros para a promoção da saúde estão em consonância com perspectivas conceituais, políticas e éticas. Entre as práticas diferenciadas observadas destaca-se que, no Brasil, a prática de prescrição tem sido bem estabelecida, pois, legalmente, os enfermeiros estão autorizados a prescrever dentro dos programas de atenção primária à saúde. No Canadá, os enfermeiros receberam autorização para fazê-lo, após um treinamento específico e sob certo escopo da prática avançada. A análise temática revelou singularidades nas informações apreendidas, incongruência entre as práticas de Enfermagem de saúde comunitária Brasil-Canadá e harmonia entre tais práticas contextuais que compuseram as evidências empíricas. Conclusões: esta pesquisa revelou a compatibilidade entre a prática canadense e brasileira, assim como características próprias dos enfermeiros brasileiros nessa prática. Inquestionavelmente, as evidências resumem-se à consolidação da bem estabelecida cooperação Brasil-Canadá no campo da atenção primária à saúde. Essas evidências abordam a perspectiva política de cooperação para a saúde global. Objetivo distintas Método cidade Pessoa Brasil. Brasil . Brasil) 201 direta clientela pesquisadora comunitários Resultados apoio conceituais éticas destacase destaca se pois legalmente Canadá fazêlo, fazêlo fazê lo, lo fazê-lo avançada apreendidas BrasilCanadá empíricas Conclusões Inquestionavelmente resumemse resumem global 20 2

Abstract: In the context of the need for the production of knowledge in low-and middle-income countries, as well as in high-income countries with their socially vulnerable populations and the concomitant, minimal availability of funding for international research, university researchers should innovate. This paper discusses critical methodological issues in the process of designing and implementing international online survey research. This is done in the context of responding to the need for innovation in the research methodology and research design in the field of global health. The focus is on data collection instrumentation to expand their responsiveness to the international field and the participants’ characteristics. The chapter is organized with the presentation of online international research, first presenting insights for an alternative and innovative design, then formulating questions to remotely collect international data highlighting survey methods, renewing a dialogue setting, and exploring issues of recruitment, attrition, and participation. It also reports successful experiences of the internationalization of research, intellectual partnerships, and shared successes in the process of creating, exchanging, and translating knowledge in the context of global health and the democratization of knowledge. The experiences are related to qualitative inspired research implemented in the continental sphere (Africa, South and North America, and Europe) with the creation of survey questionnaires for an exploration of narratives, experiences, and decisions. The mobilization of researchers’ social and professional networks, in addition to the constant reformulation of intellectual partnerships in research, is today the most common strategies to face the current challenges in academia. Innovation for methodological advances in audacious design for unpredictable fieldwork may require the revisiting of epistemological grounds. Emerging issues in this type of research, such as “research fatigue, should be considered.