Foram examinados 440 soros bubalinos, selecionados em um outro exame de cerca de 1200 amostras sangüíneas. Utilizaram-se seis diferentes testes sorológicos para o exame dessas amostras: dois de aglutinação, dois de ELISA indireto e dois de ELISA competitivo. Os animais positivos no ELISA competitivo da FAO/IAEA foram considerados como infectados, e a comparação com os resultados dos outros testes aconteceu neste sentido. A sensibilidade relativa foi de 100%, 98,57%, 97,14%, 91,42% e 79,28%, e a especificidade relativa de 99,33%, 97,33%, 95,66%, 94,00% e 86,33% nas provas de ELISA competitivo, ELISA indireto com conjugado antibovino de cadeia leve (anticorpo monoclonal com HRPO), ELISA indireto com conjugado contra IgG bovino total, teste do antígeno acidificado tamponado e aglutinação rápida, respectivamente. Discute-se o valor dos diferentes testes sorológicos no diagnóstico da brucelose.

Four hundred and forty buffalo sera, selected from about 1,200 blood samples of another study, were examined. The samples were tested by six serological methods: two of agglutination, two of indirect ELISA and two of competitive ELISA. To determine the relative sensitivity and specificity of different tests, animals with a positive result to competitive ELISA of the FAO/IAEA were considered as infected. The relative sensitivity of competitive ELISA, indirect ELISA with conjugate anti-bovine light chain monoclonal antibody labelled with HRPO, indirect ELISA with anti-bovine IgG conjugate, rose Bengal test and rapid slide agglutination test was 100%, 98.57%, 97.14%, 91.42% and 79.28%, and the relative specificity 99.33%, 97.33%, 95.66%, 94.00% and 86.33%, respectively. The value of the different serological tests for the diagnosis of brucellosis is discussed.