Currently, sticky traps are regularly employed to assist in the surveillance of Aedes aegypti infestation. We tested two alternative procedures for specimen identification performed by local health agents: directly in the field, as recommended by certain manufacturers, or after transportation to the laboratory. A total of 384 sticky traps (MosquiTRAP) were monitored monthly during one year in four geographically representative Brazilian municipalities. When the same samples were inspected in the field and in the laboratory, large differences were noted in the total number of mosquitoes recorded and in the number of specimens identified as Ae. aegypti by both procedures. Although field identification has the potential to speed vector surveillance, these results point to uncertainties in the evaluated protocol.

The geographical distribution of Aedes albopictus in Brazil was updated according to the data recorded across the country over the last eight years. Countrywide house indexes (HI) for Ae. albopictus in urban and suburban areas were described for the first time using a sample of Brazilian municipalities. This mosquito is currently present in at least 59% of the Brazilian municipalities and in 24 of the 27 federal units (i.e., 26 states and the Federal District). In 34 Brazilian municipalities, the HI values for Ae. albopictus were higher than those recorded for Ae. aegypti, reaching figures as high as HI = 7.72 in the Southeast Region. Remarks regarding the current range of this mosquito species in the Americas are also presented. Nineteen American countries are currently infested and few mainland American countries have not confirmed the occurrence of Ae. albopictus. The large distribution and high frequency of Ae. albopictus in the Americas may become a critical factor in the spread of arboviruses like chikungunya in the new world.

Several Brazilian Aedes aegypti populations are resistant to the larvicidae temephos. Methoprene, that inhibits adult emergence, is one of the alternatives envisaged by the Brazilian Dengue Control Program (PNCD). However, at Brazil vector infestation rates are measured through larvae indexes and it has been claimed that methoprene use in the field could face operational problems. In order to define a standardized protocol, methoprene effect was evaluated in laboratory conditions after continuous exposure of larvae (Rockefeller strain) to a methoprene formulation available to the PNCD. Methoprene-derived mortality occurs mainly at the pupa stage and pupa development is inversely proportional to methoprene concentration. Number and viability of eggs laid by treated and control females are equivalent. A methoprene dose-dependent delay in the development was noted; however, b correlations were found for total mortality or adult emergence inhibition if data obtained when all control mosquitoes have emerged are compared to data obtained when methoprene-treated groups finish development. The cumulative record of total methoprene-induced mortality at the time control adults emerge is proposed for routine evaluation of field populations. Mortality of all specimens, but not of larva, could account for adult emergence inhibition, confirming the inadequacy of larvae indexes to evaluate methoprene effect.

For more than 30 years temephos, an organophosphate insecticide, has been the sole larvicide used in Brazil in the control of Aedes aegypti. Organophosphates were also used for adult control, being replaced by pyrethroids since l999. In this same year, the Brazilian Health Foundation started the coordination of the Ae. aegypti Insecticide Resistance Monitoring Program. In the context of this program, our group was responsible for the detection of temephos resistance in a total of 12 municipalities in the states of Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Alagoas (AL), and Sergipe (SE) during 2001. In each municipality, a pool of mosquitoes collected from different districts was used, with the exception of Rio de Janeiro city, where eight districts have been separately evaluated. Exposure of larvae to the diagnostic dose of temephos revealed resistance in all localities examined, with mortality levels ranging from 4% (Pilares district, Rio de Janeiro, RJ) to 61.9% (Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ). Quantification of mortality showed resistance ratios from 6.1 (Aracaju, SE) to 16.8 (São Gonçalo, RJ and Penha district, Rio de Janeiro, RJ). The national dengue control program is presently using these data to subside insecticide resistance management.

O estudo compara duas técnicas para a detecção da presença de Aedes aegypti: pesquisa de larva e armadilha de oviposição. Em duas áreas do município de Salvador, Bahia, foram investigadas 5.026 domicílios. As duas técnicas empregadas foram usadas simultaneamente nos mesmos domicílios. Diferentes níveis de positividade (larva e ou ovo) foram detectados entre e dentro das duas áreas. Contudo, apenas a armadilha de oviposição detectou uma diferença estatística significante entre as duas áreas (z = 9,520 p < 0,001). A comparação entre os Índices de Breteau, Índice Predial e Índice de Oviposição revelou o último método como o mais sensível poder de detecção da positividade para A. aegypti. A prevalência da razão de positividade para a armadilha de oviposição foi de 3,4 e 2,1 (para áreas 1 e 2 respectivamente), quando comparada com a pesquisa de larva. A armadilha de oviposição provou ser um método econômico e operacionalmente viável, sendo muito efetivo na vigilância de A. aegypti.

This study compares two techniques for detecting the presence of Aedes aegypti: larval surveys and the oviposition trap. 5,026 households in two areas of the municipality of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil were investigated. Larval surveys and oviposition traps were used simultaneously in these households. Different positivity levels (larvae and/or eggs) were detected between and within the two areas. However, only the use of the oviposition trap detected a significant statistical difference between the areas (z = 9,520, p < 0.001). Comparison of the Breteau, Household and Oviposition Indices reveals greater power of detection of positivity in the oviposition trap. There were prevalence ratios of positivity for ovipositision trap of 3.4 and 2.1 (for areas 1 and 2 respectively) when compared with larval surveys. The oviposition trap proved to be an economical and operationally viable method, and the most effective in the surveillance of this species.