Abstract Occlusal stabilization splints are the most common treatment for controlling the deleterious effects of sleep bruxism. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-cost, mixed occlusal splint (MOS) compared to that of a rigid splint. A randomized clinical trial was performed on 43 adults of both sexes with possible sleep bruxism and satisfactory dental conditions. They were divided into rigid occlusal splint (ROS) (n = 23) and MOS (n = 20) groups. Masticatory muscle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain intensity (visual analog scale), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), indentations in the oral mucosa, anxiety, and depression (HADS), number of days of splint use, and splint wear were evaluated. All variables were evaluated at baseline (T0), 6 months (T6), and 12 months (T12) after splint installation (T0), and splint wear was evaluated at T6 and T12. Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, non-parametric Friedman’s analysis of variance for paired samples and pairwise multiple comparisons, Pearson’s chi-square test, two-proportion z-test, non-parametric McNemar’s and Cochran’s Q, and Wilcoxon tests were used (p < 0.05). In both groups, there was a decrease in TMJ pain and pain intensity over time and improvements in the quality of life scores. At T6, there was a higher rate of splint wear in the MOS group than in the ROS group (p = 0.023). The MOS showed a higher rate of wear than the rigid splint but had similar results for the other variables. Therefore, the use of a mixed splint appears to be effective in controlling the signs and symptoms of sleep bruxism. lowcost, lowcost low cost, cost low-cost (MOS 4 conditions (ROS n 23 20 groups (TMJ visual scale, scale , scale) WHOQOLBREF, WHOQOLBREF WHOQOL BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) mucosa anxiety HADS, HADS (HADS) T0, T0 T (T0) (T6) 1 T12 (T12 Students Student s ttest, ttest t test t-test MannWhitney Mann Whitney nonparametric non parametric Friedmans Friedman comparisons Pearsons Pearson chisquare chi square twoproportion two proportion ztest, ztest z z-test McNemars McNemar Cochrans Cochran Q p 0.05. 005 0.05 . 0 05 0.05) scores 0.023. 0023 0.023 023 0.023) Therefore 2 (WHOQOL-BREF (HADS (T0 (T6 T1 (T1 00 0.0 002 0.02 02 (T 0.

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the effects of chronic use of fluoxetine on the amount of orthodontic tooth movement and tissue changes in rats. A total of 192 Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: S, 0.9% saline solution; F, 20 mg/kg of fluoxetine; SM, 0.9% saline solution with orthodontic movement; and FM, 20 mg/kg of fluoxetine with orthodontic movement. After 30 days of daily saline or fluoxetine administration, an orthodontic device (25cN) was used to mesially displace the first molar in animals of the groups SM and FM. The animals were euthanized 2, 7, 14, and 28 days after placement of the orthodontic appliances and animals of groups S and F were euthanized at the same time. The assessment of tooth movement was made in gypsum castings, the collagen neoformation was assessed by polarization microscopy, the number of osteoclasts and root resorption were evaluated using tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, and presence of hyalinized areas was assessed by hematoxylin-eosin staining. Fluoxetine did not affect the amount of tooth displacement, percentage of collagen, number of osteoclasts, and presence of hyalinized areas (P>0.05). There was a higher frequency of root resorption areas in the FM group than in the SM group only on the second day (P<0.05). The findings of this study show that chronic use of 20 mg/kg fluoxetine does not affect the amount of tooth movement, collagen neoformation, number of osteoclasts, or hyalinized areas and does not affect root resorption until the last day of orthodontic movement. 19 09 0 9 0.9 2 mgkg mg kg 3 administration 25cN cN (25cN 7 14 time castings microscopy tartrateresistant tartrate resistant phosphatase hematoxylineosin hematoxylin eosin staining displacement P>0.05. P005 P P>0.05 . 05 (P>0.05) P<0.05. P<0.05 (P<0.05) 1 0. P00 P>0.0 (P>0.05 P<0.0 (P<0.05 P0 P>0. (P>0.0 P<0. (P<0.0 P>0 (P>0. P<0 (P<0. P> (P>0 P< (P<0 (P> (P< (P