Resumo Este estudo investigou a prevalência e potenciais fatores de risco para ansiedade e depressão em fisioterapeutas durante a pandemia. Fisioterapeutas responderam a um questionário na web, incluindo: dados sociodemográficos, profissionais e clínicos; demandas psicossociais; e dois questionários validados para medir ansiedade e depressão. Regressão logística binária identificou fatores de risco para ansiedade e depressão por meio de odds ratio (OR) e intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC). Em 417 participantes houve alta prevalência de ansiedade (48,2%) e depressão (53%). Os fatores de risco para ansiedade foram: sexo feminino (OR 2,07; IC95% 1,01-4,24), piora nos padrões de sono (OR 3,78; IC95% 1,92-7,44), moderada (OR 2,24; IC95% 1,00-5,00) e extrema preocupação financeira (OR 3,47; IC95% 1,57-7,65) e extrema solidão (OR 3,47; IC95% 1,71-7,07). Os fatores de risco para depressão foram: sexo feminino (OR 2,16; IC95% 1,03-4,55), baixa renda familiar (OR 2,43; IC95% 1,21-4,89), piora nos padrões de sono (OR 5,97; IC95% 3,02-11,82), extrema preocupação financeira (OR 2,61; IC95% 1,15-5,94) e extrema solidão (OR 4,38; IC95% 2,00-9,63). Este estudo mostrou alta prevalência de ansiedade e depressão na população estudada e identificou fatores de risco para ambos. pandemia web incluindo sociodemográficos clínicos psicossociais OR 95 IC. IC . (IC) 41 48,2% 482 48 2 (48,2% 53%. 53 53% (53%) foram 2,07 207 07 IC95 1,014,24, 101424 1,01 4,24 , 1 01 4 24 1,01-4,24) 3,78 378 3 78 1,927,44, 192744 1,92 7,44 92 7 44 1,92-7,44) 2,24 224 1,005,00 100500 1,00 5,00 00 5 1,00-5,00 3,47 347 47 1,577,65 157765 1,57 7,65 57 65 1,57-7,65 1,717,07. 171707 1,71 7,07 71 1,71-7,07) 2,16 216 16 1,034,55, 103455 1,03 4,55 03 55 1,03-4,55) 2,43 243 43 1,214,89, 121489 1,21 4,89 21 89 1,21-4,89) 5,97 597 97 3,0211,82, 3021182 3,02 11,82 02 11 82 3,02-11,82) 2,61 261 61 1,155,94 115594 1,15 5,94 15 94 1,15-5,94 4,38 438 38 2,009,63. 200963 2,00 9,63 9 63 2,00-9,63) ambos (IC 48,2 (48,2 (53% 2,0 20 0 IC9 014 1,014,24 10142 101 1,0 424 4,2 1,01-4,24 3,7 37 927 1,927,44 19274 192 1,9 744 7,4 1,92-7,44 2,2 22 005 1,005,0 10050 100 500 5,0 1,00-5,0 3,4 34 577 1,577,6 15776 157 1,5 765 7,6 6 1,57-7,6 717 1,717,07 17170 171 1,7 707 7,0 1,71-7,07 2,1 034 1,034,55 10345 103 455 4,5 1,03-4,55 2,4 214 1,214,89 12148 121 1,2 489 4,8 8 1,21-4,89 5,9 59 0211 3,0211,82 302118 302 3,0 1182 11,8 3,02-11,82 2,6 26 155 1,155,9 11559 115 1,1 594 1,15-5,9 4,3 009 2,009,63 20096 200 963 9,6 2,00-9,63 48, (48, (53 2, 1,014,2 1014 10 1, 42 4, 1,01-4,2 3, 1,927,4 1927 19 74 7, 1,92-7,4 1,005, 1005 50 5, 1,00-5, 1,577, 1577 76 1,57-7, 1,717,0 1717 17 70 1,71-7,0 1,034,5 1034 45 1,03-4,5 1,214,8 1214 12 1,21-4,8 021 3,0211,8 30211 30 118 11, 3,02-11,8 1,155, 1155 1,15-5, 2,009,6 2009 96 9, 2,00-9,6 (48 (5 1,014, 1,01-4, 1,927, 1,92-7, 1,005 1,00-5 1,577 1,57-7 1,717, 1,71-7, 1,034, 1,03-4, 1,214, 1,21-4, 3,0211, 3021 3,02-11, 1,155 1,15-5 2,009, 2,00-9, (4 ( 1,014 1,01-4 1,927 1,92-7 1,00- 1,57- 1,717 1,71-7 1,034 1,03-4 1,214 1,21-4 3,0211 3,02-11 1,15- 2,009 2,00-9 1,01- 1,92- 1,71- 1,03- 1,21- 3,021 3,02-1 2,00- 3,02-

Abstract This study investigated the prevalence and the potential risk factors for anxiety and depression among physiotherapists during the pandemic. Physiotherapists answered a web-based questionnaire including 1) sociodemographic, professional and clinical information; 2) psychosocial demands; and 3) two validated questionnaires to measure anxiety and depression. Binary logistic regression identified the risk factors by means of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). In 417 participants, there was a high prevalence of anxiety (48.2%) and depression (53.0%). The risk factors for anxiety were female sex (OR 2.07; 95%CI 1.01-4.24), worsening in sleep patterns (OR 3.78; 95%CI 1.92-7.44), moderate (OR 2.24; 95%CI 1.00-5.00) and extreme concern about financial issues (OR 3.47; 95%CI 1.57-7.65), and extreme loneliness (OR 3.47; 95%CI 1.71-7.07). The risk factors for depression were female sex (OR 2.16; 95%CI 1.03-4.55), low family income (OR 2.43; 95%CI 1.21-4.89), worsening in sleep patterns (OR 5.97; 95%CI 3.02-11.82), extreme concern about financial issues (OR 2.61; 95%CI 1.15-5.94), and extreme loneliness (OR 4.38; 95%CI 2.00-9.63). This study found a high prevalence of anxiety and depression in the studied population and identified risk factors for both. pandemic webbased web based 1 sociodemographic information 2 demands 3 OR 95 CI. CI . (CI) 41 participants 48.2% 482 48 (48.2% 53.0%. 530 53.0% 53 0 (53.0%) 2.07 207 07 95CI 1.014.24, 101424 1.01 4.24 , 01 4 24 1.01-4.24) 3.78 378 78 1.927.44, 192744 1.92 7.44 92 7 44 1.92-7.44) 2.24 224 1.005.00 100500 1.00 5.00 00 5 1.00-5.00 3.47 347 47 1.577.65, 157765 1.57 7.65 57 65 1.57-7.65) 1.717.07. 171707 1.71 7.07 71 1.71-7.07) 2.16 216 16 1.034.55, 103455 1.03 4.55 03 55 1.03-4.55) 2.43 243 43 1.214.89, 121489 1.21 4.89 21 89 1.21-4.89) 5.97 597 97 3.0211.82, 3021182 3.02 11.82 02 11 82 3.02-11.82) 2.61 261 61 1.155.94, 115594 1.15 5.94 15 94 1.15-5.94) 4.38 438 38 2.009.63. 200963 2.00 9.63 9 63 2.00-9.63) both (CI 48.2 (48.2 53.0 (53.0% 2.0 20 014 1.014.24 10142 101 1.0 424 4.2 1.01-4.24 3.7 37 927 1.927.44 19274 192 1.9 744 7.4 1.92-7.44 2.2 22 005 1.005.0 10050 100 500 5.0 1.00-5.0 3.4 34 577 1.577.65 15776 157 1.5 765 7.6 6 1.57-7.65 717 1.717.07 17170 171 1.7 707 7.0 1.71-7.07 2.1 034 1.034.55 10345 103 455 4.5 1.03-4.55 2.4 214 1.214.89 12148 121 1.2 489 4.8 8 1.21-4.89 5.9 59 0211 3.0211.82 302118 302 3.0 1182 11.8 3.02-11.82 2.6 26 155 1.155.94 11559 115 1.1 594 1.15-5.94 4.3 009 2.009.63 20096 200 963 9.6 2.00-9.63 48. (48. 53. (53.0 2. 1.014.2 1014 10 1. 42 4. 1.01-4.2 3. 1.927.4 1927 19 74 7. 1.92-7.4 1.005. 1005 50 5. 1.00-5. 1.577.6 1577 76 1.57-7.6 1.717.0 1717 17 70 1.71-7.0 1.034.5 1034 45 1.03-4.5 1.214.8 1214 12 1.21-4.8 021 3.0211.8 30211 30 118 11. 3.02-11.8 1.155.9 1155 1.15-5.9 2.009.6 2009 96 9. 2.00-9.6 (48 (53. 1.014. 1.01-4. 1.927. 1.92-7. 1.005 1.00-5 1.577. 1.57-7. 1.717. 1.71-7. 1.034. 1.03-4. 1.214. 1.21-4. 3.0211. 3021 3.02-11. 1.155. 1.15-5. 2.009. 2.00-9. (4 (53 1.014 1.01-4 1.927 1.92-7 1.00- 1.577 1.57-7 1.717 1.71-7 1.034 1.03-4 1.214 1.21-4 3.0211 3.02-11 1.155 1.15-5 2.009 2.00-9 ( (5 1.01- 1.92- 1.57- 1.71- 1.03- 1.21- 3.021 3.02-1 1.15- 2.00- 3.02-

Resumo Este estudo investigou a prevalência e potenciais fatores de risco para ansiedade e depressão em fisioterapeutas durante a pandemia. Fisioterapeutas responderam a um questionário na web, incluindo: dados sociodemográficos, profissionais e clínicos; demandas psicossociais; e dois questionários validados para medir ansiedade e depressão. Regressão logística binária identificou fatores de risco para ansiedade e depressão por meio de odds ratio (OR) e intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC). Em 417 participantes houve alta prevalência de ansiedade (48,2%) e depressão (53%). Os fatores de risco para ansiedade foram: sexo feminino (OR 2,07; IC95% 1,01-4,24), piora nos padrões de sono (OR 3,78; IC95% 1,92-7,44), moderada (OR 2,24; IC95% 1,00-5,00) e extrema preocupação financeira (OR 3,47; IC95% 1,57-7,65) e extrema solidão (OR 3,47; IC95% 1,71-7,07). Os fatores de risco para depressão foram: sexo feminino (OR 2,16; IC95% 1,03-4,55), baixa renda familiar (OR 2,43; IC95% 1,21-4,89), piora nos padrões de sono (OR 5,97; IC95% 3,02-11,82), extrema preocupação financeira (OR 2,61; IC95% 1,15-5,94) e extrema solidão (OR 4,38; IC95% 2,00-9,63). Este estudo mostrou alta prevalência de ansiedade e depressão na população estudada e identificou fatores de risco para ambos.

Abstract This study investigated the prevalence and the potential risk factors for anxiety and depression among physiotherapists during the pandemic. Physiotherapists answered a web-based questionnaire including 1) sociodemographic, professional and clinical information; 2) psychosocial demands; and 3) two validated questionnaires to measure anxiety and depression. Binary logistic regression identified the risk factors by means of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). In 417 participants, there was a high prevalence of anxiety (48.2%) and depression (53.0%). The risk factors for anxiety were female sex (OR 2.07; 95%CI 1.01-4.24), worsening in sleep patterns (OR 3.78; 95%CI 1.92-7.44), moderate (OR 2.24; 95%CI 1.00-5.00) and extreme concern about financial issues (OR 3.47; 95%CI 1.57-7.65), and extreme loneliness (OR 3.47; 95%CI 1.71-7.07). The risk factors for depression were female sex (OR 2.16; 95%CI 1.03-4.55), low family income (OR 2.43; 95%CI 1.21-4.89), worsening in sleep patterns (OR 5.97; 95%CI 3.02-11.82), extreme concern about financial issues (OR 2.61; 95%CI 1.15-5.94), and extreme loneliness (OR 4.38; 95%CI 2.00-9.63). This study found a high prevalence of anxiety and depression in the studied population and identified risk factors for both.

Abstract Objective: To compare the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) obtained by the ventilometer and from mechanical ventilation parameters. Methods: Randomized crossover trial, including 33 intubated patients, on mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, undergoing spontaneous breathing test. Patients were submitted to the measurement of RSBI by four methods: disconnected from the ventilator through the ventilometer; in Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) mode at a pressure of 7 cm H2O; in Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) mode at a pressure of 5 cmH2O with flow trigger; in CPAP mode at a pressure of 5 cmH2O with pressure trigger. Results: No significant difference was detected between the RSBI obtained by the ventilometer and in the CPAP mode with flow and pressure triggers, however, in the PSV mode, the values were lower than in the other measurements (p < 0.001). By selecting patients from the sample with higher RSBI (≥ 80 cycles.min−1.L−1), the value of the index obtained by the ventilometer was higher than that obtained in the three options of ventilation methods. Conclusion: The RSBI obtained in the CPAP mode at a pressure of 5 cmH2O, in both triggers types, did not differ from that measured by the ventilometer; it is, therefore, an alternative when obtaining it from mechanical ventilation parameters is necessary. However, in the presence of borderline values, the RSBI measured by ventilometer is recommended, as in this method the values are significantly higher than in the three ventilation modalities investigated. Objective (RSBI Methods trial 3 2 hours test methods (PSV H2O HO H O (CPAP cmHO cmH trigger Results however p 0.001. 0001 0.001 . 0 001 0.001) ≥ ( 8 cycles.min−1.L−1, cyclesmin1L1 cyclesminL cycles.min−1.L−1 , cycles min 1 L cycles.min−1.L−1) Conclusion types therefore necessary However recommended investigated 000 0.00 00 cyclesmin cyclesmin1L cycles.min−1.L− 0.0 cycles.min−1.L 0.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: A cirrose hepática é uma doença altamente prevalente que, em estágio avançado, geralmente causa ascite e alterações respiratórias associadas. No entanto, existem poucos estudos avaliando e quantificando o impacto da ascite e do seu alívio através da paracentese na função pulmonar e em sintomas como fadiga e dispneia em pacientes cirróticos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar e quantificar o impacto da redução aguda do volume ascítico nos parâmetros respiratórios, sintomas de fadiga e dispneia em pacientes com cirrose hepática, bem como investigar possíveis correlações entre esses parâmetros. MÉTODOS: Trinta pacientes com cirrose hepática e ascite foram submetidos às seguintes avaliações pré e pós-paracentese: sinais vitais, padrão respiratório, mobilidade toracoabdominal (cirtometria), função pulmonar (ventilometria), grau de dispneia (escala numérica) e nível de fadiga (escala visual analógica). RESULTADOS: Houve maior prevalência de pacientes classificados como CHILD B e o escore MELD médio foi de 14,73±5,75. A comparação dos parâmetros pré e pós paracentese evidenciou após a paracentese: aumento do padrão respiratório predominantemente abdominal, melhora das variáveis ventilatórias, aumento das diferenças obtidas na cirtometria axilar e abdominal, redução do nível de dispneia e fadiga, redução da pressão arterial e aumento da saturação periférica de oxigênio. Correlações positivas encontradas: cirtometria xifoide com axilar, grau de dispneia com nível de fadiga, volume corrente com volume minuto, CHILD “C” com maior escore MELD, volume drenado na paracentese com maior escore MELD e com CHILD “C”. Também observamos uma correlação negativa entre volume corrente e a frequência respiratória. CONCLUSÃO: Uma vez que a drenagem da ascite em pacientes com cirrose hepática melhora os volumes pulmonares e a expansão torácica, além de reduzir sintomas como fadiga e dispneia, podemos concluir que a ascite tem um impacto respiratório e sintomatológico negativo nesses pacientes.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis is a highly prevalent disease that, at an advanced stage, usually causes ascites and associated respiratory changes. However, there are few studies evaluating and quantifying the impact of ascites and its relief through paracentesis on lung function and symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnea in cirrhotic patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess and quantify the impact of acute reduction of ascitic volume on respiratory parameters, fatigue and dyspnea symptoms in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, as well as to investigate possible correlations between these parameters. METHODS: Thirty patients with hepatic cirrhosis and ascites who underwent the following pre and post paracentesis evaluations: vital signs, respiratory pattern, thoracoabdominal mobility (cirtometry), pulmonary function (ventilometry), degree of dyspnea (numerical scale) and fatigue level (visual analog scale). RESULTS: There was a higher prevalence of patients classified as CHILD B and the mean MELD score was 14.73±5.75. The comparison of pre and post paracentesis parameters evidenced after paracentesis: increase of predominantly abdominal breathing pattern, improvement of ventilatory variables, increase of the differences obtained in axillary and abdominal cirtometry, reduction of dyspnea and fatigue level, blood pressure reduction and increased peripheral oxygen saturation. Positive correlations found: xiphoid with axillary cirtometry, degree of dyspnea with fatigue level, tidal volume with minute volume, Child “C” with higher MELD score, volume drained in paracentesis with higher MELD score and with Child “C”. We also observed a negative correlation between tidal volume and respiratory rate. CONCLUSION: Since ascites drainage in patients with liver cirrhosis improves pulmonary volumes and thoracic expansion as well as reduces symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnea, we can conclude that ascites have a negative respiratory and symptomatological impact in these patients.

ABSTRACT Objective This study was designed to identify the major musculoskeletal symptoms of individuals with obesity, to assess their health-related quality of life, and to evaluate the correlation between the musculoskeletal symptoms and the individuals’ health-related quality of life. Materials and methods Cross-sectional study. Instruments used “Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire” and “The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)”. Results In total, 41 subjects were evaluated, of which 90.15% were female. The mean age of the subjects was 40.78 ± 9.85 years and their mean body-mass index was 46.87 ± 8.08. All subjects reported musculoskeletal pain in at least one anatomical region and 80.49% had pain in three or more regions. The activity limitations due to pain were reported by 75.61% of them. The most affected regions by pain were the ankles and/or feet, lower back, knees and wrists/hands/fingers. The most associated regions with activity limitations due to pain were the ankles and/or feet, knees and lower back. The presence of pain showed a negative correlation with the domains physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP) and body pain (BP). The activity limitations showed a negative correlation with the domains PF, BP, social functioning (SF) and role-emotional (RE). Conclusion Our data showed a high prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and limitation in activities due to pain in obese subjects. The musculoskeletal symptoms had negative correlations with physical and mental components of the health-related quality of life, highlighting the importance of ensuring that patients with obesity have access to interdisciplinary care, for the prevention and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders.