Search | SciELO

ABSTRACT The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others. publications problem uptodate up date classifications context exception (CTFB http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/, httpfaunajbrjgovbr http //fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ , jbrj gov br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/) 2015 Brazil 80 specialists 1 2024 133691 133 691 133,69 125138 125 138 125,13 82.3%, 823 82 3 (82.3% 102000 102 000 102,00 7.69%, 769 7 69 (7.69% 11000 11 11,00 . 3,567 3567 567 (3,56 2,292 2292 2 292 (2,29 1,833 1833 833 (1,83 1,447 1447 447 (1,44 1000 1,00 831 (83 628 (62 606 (60 520 (52 50 users science health biology law anthropology education others http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ faunajbrjgovbr //fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ 201 8 202 13369 13 133,6 12513 12 125,1 82.3% (82.3 10200 10 00 102,0 7.69% 76 6 (7.69 1100 11,0 3,56 356 56 (3,5 2,29 229 29 (2,2 1,83 183 83 (1,8 1,44 144 44 (1,4 100 1,0 (8 62 (6 60 52 (5 5 http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br 20 1336 133, 1251 125, 82.3 (82. 1020 0 102, 7.69 (7.6 110 11, 3,5 35 (3, 2,2 22 (2, 1,8 18 (1, 1,4 14 4 ( 82. (82 7.6 (7. 3, (3 2, (2 (1 7. (7

Resumo O objetivo do presente artigo é analisar comparativamente os processos legais referentes a dois homicídios ocorridos em territórios tradicionais, Raposa Serra do Sol e Raposa Serra da Lua. Ambos os processos têm como réus pessoas indígenas, mas cada um apresenta um desenvolvimento processual distinto. O artigo busca analisar, a partir de teóricos decoloniais, a relação entre sistemas punitivos indígenas e a matriz ocidental, que nos legou dimensões do aparato punitivo autodeclarado moderno e racional. A perspectiva decolonial visa perceber alternativas ao modelo ocidental sustentado no dogma da pena, dimensão que valida um único método de resolução no campo penal, dificultando o reconhecimento de métodos alternativos como a transação penal e outras formas de responsabilização que não se reduzem à pena de prisão. tradicionais Lua distinto decoloniais racional prisão

Abstract The purpose of this article is to compare two homicide cases that occurred in traditional territories, Raposa Serra do Sol and Raposa serra da Lua. Both cases had indigenous defendants, and they had distinct procedural developments. This article seeks to analyze, from the perspective of decolonial theories, the relationship between indigenous punitive systems and the western matrix, which bequeathed us dimensions of the punitive apparatus constructed as modern and rational. The decolonial perspective posits alternatives to the Western model based on the dogma of the penalty, a dimension that validates a single method of resolution in the criminal field and hinders the recognition of alternative methods such as criminal transaction and other forms of accountability that are not reduced to the prison sentence. territories Lua defendants developments analyze theories matrix rational penalty sentence

Resumo No ano do centenário da Revolução Russa de 1917, o artigo procura revisitar os escritos de Vladimir Ilitch Uliánov (1870-1923), Lenin, sobre os camponeses e a questão agrária na Rússia ao longo dos acontecimentos que abalaram o mundo no ano de 1917. Em síntese, refletimos sobre as persistências e inflexões do pensamento lenineano que influenciaram a práxis do partido bolchevique em relação ao campesinato.

Index code	Element
ti	article title
au	author
kw	article keywords
subject	subject (title words, abstract and keywords)
ab	abstract
ta	journal short title (e.g. Cad. Saúde Pública)
journal_title	journal full title (e.g. Cadernos de Saúde Pública)
la	publication language code (e.g. pt - Portuguese, es - Spanish)
type	document type
pid	publication identifier
publication_year	publication year of publication
sponsor	sponsor
aff_country	country code of the author's affiliation
aff_institution	author affiliation institution
volume	article volume
issue	article issue
elocation	elocation
doi	DOI number
issn	journal ISSN
in	SciELO colection code (e.g. scl - Brasil, col - Colômbia)
use_license	article usage license code

No documents were found for your search