Abstract INTRODUCTION In Cuba, 29,939 deaths from ischemic heart disease were recorded in 2020. Myocardial revascularization surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention are well-established methods of treating patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. These methods can reduce overall deaths, but choosing the optimal strategy for treating left main coronary ischemia is a source of debate among specialists. OBJECTIVE Estimate survival and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention versus myocardial revascularization surgery and their relationships with pre-existing patients’ clinical and angiographic characteristics. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 41 patients; 35 men and 6 women aged 40–85 years who had been diagnosed with multivessel coronary artery disease and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 17) or myocardial revascularization surgery (n = 24) at the Medical–Surgical Research Center in Havana, Cuba, in 2016. The main variable under consideration was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events over a four-year period following these interventions. We collected clinical and angiographic characteristics, and used the Kaplan–Meier test to calculate survival curves. Survival probabilities were compared using the log-rank test. A value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio, with 95% confidence intervals used for both procedures. RESULTS There were a total of 20 major adverse cardiovascular events, 75% (15/20) of which occurred in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and 5% in patients who had myocardial revascularization surgery. The probability of survival was 70.6% in surgery and 37.5% in interventionism; p = 0.043; hazard ratio 1.58 (95% confidence interval 0.987–2.530), p = 0.047. The need to repeat a revascularization procedure was the only major cardiovascular event that showed significant differences between methods (log-rank p = 0.015), and was more frequent in percutaneous intervention. CONCLUSIONS Myocardial revascularization surgery offers a better chance of survival than percutaneous coronary intervention. Major adverse cardiovascular events are more frequent in patients with coronary interventionism, due to the need to repeat revascularization.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The restenosis of the paclitaxel-eluting stents used in Cuba has not been studied. Objective: To evaluate the restenosis of paclitaxel-eluting stents and conventional stents. Methods: 64 patients with stent restenosis were included, from a previous prospective study; in 318 patients followed up for 3 years after percutaneous coronary intervention; 25 with a paclitaxel-eluting stent and 39 conventional metal stent. Restenosis was considered as a new lesion ≥ 50 % of the vessel lumen with proven ischemia. The time to onset, angiographic pattern and alternative revascularization were described. Results: Restenosis in the group with paclitaxel-eluting stents was 15.7 % with a mean survival time without restenosis of 32.4 months vs. 24.5 % in conventional stents, with restenosis-free survival of 29.8 months, (p = 0.047). In the group with paclitaxel-eluting stents, the IB pattern predominated (30.3 %) and the conventional stent III (28.3 %). In 28.0 % of the paclitaxel-eluting stent group, revascularization surgery was used vs. 5.1 % in the conventional stent group. Conclusions: The paclitaxel-eluting stent achieves a superior and more durable restenosis-free survival than the conventional stent. Restenosis in paclitaxel-eluting stents is focal, with a higher frequency of revascularization by surgery, and in conventional stents it is mostly diffuse.

RESUMEN Introducción: La reestenosis de los stents liberadores de paclitaxel utilizados en Cuba no ha sido estudiada. Objetivo: Evaluar la reestenosis de los stents liberadores de paclitaxel y los convencionales. Métodos: Se incluyeron 64 pacientes con reestenosis de stent, de un estudio prospectivo previo; en 318 pacientes seguidos por 3 años luego de intervención coronaria percutánea; 25 con stent liberador de paclitaxel y 39 stent metálico convencional. Se consideró reestenosis como nueva lesión ≥ 50 % de la luz del vaso con isquemia demostrada. Se describió el tiempo de aparición, patrón angiográfico y alternativa de revascularización. Resultados: La reestenosis en el grupo de stents liberadores de paclitaxel fue 15,7 % con tiempo medio de supervivencia sin reestenosis de 32,4 meses vs. 24,5 % en stents convencionales, con supervivencia sin reestenosis de 29,8 meses, (p= 0,047). En el grupo de stents liberadores de paclitaxel predominó el patrón IB, (30,3 %) y stent convencional el III (28,3 %). En el 28,0 % del grupo de stents liberadores de paclitaxel, se recurrió a la cirugía de revascularización vs. 5,1 % en el grupo de stent convencional. Conclusiones: El stent liberador de paclitaxel logra una supervivencia libre de reestenosis superior y más perdurable que el stent convencional. La reestenosis en los de stents liberadores de paclitaxel es focal, con mayor frecuencia de nueva revascularización por cirugía y en los stents convencionales es mayormente difusa.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are the top cause of death in Cuba as well as in most developed countries. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking (2D-ST) echocardiography is a recent technique in the evaluation of cardiac function. Objective: To determine the relationship between global circumferential strain (GCS) measured through 2D-ST echocardiography and the state of coronary circulation in patients with ischemic heart disease. Method: An analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out on 55 patients with indication of coronary angiography, who underwent echocardiography to measure the GCS through 2D-ST at the Centro de Investigaciones Medico Quirúrgicas (CIMEQ, Havana, Cuba), during one year. Two groups were created: with significant coronary artery disease (SCAD = 32) and non-significant coronary artery disease (NSCAD = 23). The statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) was used to analyze the results. Results: Mean age was higher in the SCAD group (55.6 ± 9.3 vs. 61.8± 8.8, p=0.014). Men with SCAD (47.3%), patients with high blood pressure (SCAD = 90.6% and NSCAD = 65.2%, p = 0.02) and smokers (SCAD = 59.4% and NSCAD = 17.4%, p = 0.002) predominated. The most frequent diagnosis was chronic stable angina (87%). Three-vessel disease predominated in the SCAD group (75%). The GCS was lower in the SCAD group [(-19.5.0 ± 3.8 vs. -25.2 ± 5.7, p = 0.033); area under the curve = 0.208]. There were no differences in GCS according to the number of significantly diseased vessels. Conclusions: The results found do not justify the use of GCS through 2D-ST echocardiography to discriminate the presence or nor of SCAD.

RESUMEN Introducción: Las enfermedades cardiovasculares constituyen la primera causa de muerte en Cuba y la mayoría de los países desarrollados. La ecocardiografía con rastreo de marcas o speckle-tracking bidimensional (ST-2D) es una técnica reciente en la evaluación de la función cardíaca. Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre la deformación miocárdica (strain) circunferencial (GCS) medida por ST-2D y el estado de la circulación coronaria, en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica. Método: Se realizó un estudio analítico, transversal, con 55 pacientes con indicación de coronariografía a los que se les realizó ecocardiograma para medir la GCS mediante ST-2D, en el Centro de Investigaciones Médico Quirúrgicas (CIMEQ, La Habana, Cuba), durante un año. Se crearon dos grupos: con enfermedad coronaria significativa (ECS=32) y no significativa (ECNS=23). Se utilizó SSPS para análisis de los resultados. Resultados: La edad promedio fue mayor en ECS (55,6 ±9,3 vs. 61,8±8,8; p=0,014). Predominaron los hombres con ECS (47,3%), los hipertensos (ECS=90,6% y ENCS=65,2%; p=0,02) y los fumadores (ECS=59,4% y ENCS=17,4%; p=0,002). El diagnóstico más frecuente fue la angina crónica estable (87%). En ECS predominó la enfermedad de tres vasos (75%). La GCS fue menor en ECS [(-19,5±3.8 vs. -25,2±5,7; p=0,033); área bajo la curva = 0,208]. No hubo diferencias en GCS, según el número de vasos significativamente enfermos. Conclusiones: Los resultados encontrados no justifican el empleo de la GCS por ST-2D para discriminar la presencia o no de ECS.

Abstract Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in Cuba and most of the developed countries. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D ST) is a recent technique in the evaluation of cardiac function. Objectives: To determine the relationship between myocardial deformation measured by 2D ST and coronary circulation in patients with ischemic heart disease, in the CIMEQ, for 1 year. Material and method: An analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out with 55 patients with an indication for coronary angiography who underwent 2D echocardiography and 2D ST study with longitudinal strain measurement (LSM). Two groups significant coronary disease (SCD = 32) and not significant (NSCD = 23) were created. SSPS was used to analyze the results. Results: The average age was higher in SCD (55.6 ± 9.3 vs. 61.8 ± 8.8, p = 0.014). Men with SCD (47.3%), hypertensive (SCD = 90.6% and NSCD = 65.2%, p = 0.02) and smokers (SCD = 59.4% and NSCD = 17.4%, p = 0.002) predominated. The most frequent diagnosis was chronic stable angina (87%). Three-vessel disease (75%) prevailed in SCD. The LMS was lower in SCD ([−20.0 ± 3.2 vs. −22.1 ± 3.6, p = 0.035]; AUC = 0.458). There were no differences in LSM according to the number of significantly diseased vessels. Conclusions: The results found do not justify the use of 2D ST to discriminate SCD.

Resumen Introducción: Las enfermedades cardiovasculares constituyen la primera causa de muerte en Cuba y la mayoría de los países desarrollados. La ecocardiografía con speckle tracking bidimensional (ST 2D) es una técnica reciente en la evaluación de la función cardíaca. Objetivos: Determinar la relación entre la deformación miocárdica medida por ST 2D y el estado de la circulación coronaria en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica, en el CIMEQ, durante un año. Material y método: Se realizó un estudio analítico y transversal con 55 pacientes con indicación de coronariografía sometidos a ecocardiograma bidimensional y estudio de ST 2D con medición de la deformación longitudinal (DLG). Se crearon dos grupos: enfermedad coronaria significativa (ECS = 32) y no significativa (ECNS = 23). Se utilizó SSPS para análisis de los resultados. Resultados: La edad promedio fue mayor en la ECS (55.6 ± 9.3 vs. 61.8 ± 8.8; p = 0.014). Predominaron los hombres con ECS (47.3%), los hipertensos (ECS = 90.6% y ENCS = 65.2%; p = 0.02) y los fumadores (ECS = 59.4% y ENCS = 17.4%; p = 0.002). El diagnóstico más frecuente fue la angina crónica estable (87%). En la ECS predominó la enfermedad de tres vasos (75%). La DLG fue menor en la ECS [(-20.0 ± 3.2 vs. -22.1 ± 3.6; p = 0.035); AUC = 0.458]. No hubo diferencias en la DLG según el número de vasos significativamente afectados. Conclusiones: Los resultados encontrados no justifican el empleo del ST 2D para diferenciar la ECS.

ABSTRACT The number of coronary procedures in patients, who have suffered myocardial revascularization, increases as time passes by as a result a higher life expectancy. Repeating a myocardial revascularization procedure, either as a surgery or as an intervention is noticeably different. The high risk profile, added to the technical complexity demanded and the complex coronary structure and graft degeneration makes the procedure a challenge. A case of a 60 year old woman is presented with antecedent of hypertension and a type 2 diabetes mellitus of a 25 and 10 years progress respectively who underwent a coronary revascularization with early and late failure of graft.

RESUMEN El número de procedimientos coronarios en los pacientes que han sufrido anteriormente de revascularización miocárdica, aumentan con el paso de tiempo a consecuencia de un incremento de la esperanza de vida. Repetir un procedimiento de revascularización miocárdica, ya sea quirúrgico o intervencionista, es notablemente diferente. El perfil de alto riesgo, la complejidad técnica exigida unido a la comorbilidades, además de la compleja anatomía coronaria y degeneración de injertos, hacen del procedimiento todo un reto. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 60 años de edad, con antecedentes de hipertensión arterial de 25 años y diabetes mellitus tipo 2 de 10 años de evolución respectivamente, sometida a cirugía de revascularización coronaria con fallo precoz y tardío de los injertos.