Search | SciELO

ABSTRACT The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others. publications problem uptodate up date classifications context exception (CTFB http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/, httpfaunajbrjgovbr http //fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ , jbrj gov br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/) 2015 Brazil 80 specialists 1 2024 133691 133 691 133,69 125138 125 138 125,13 82.3%, 823 82 3 (82.3% 102000 102 000 102,00 7.69%, 769 7 69 (7.69% 11000 11 11,00 . 3,567 3567 567 (3,56 2,292 2292 2 292 (2,29 1,833 1833 833 (1,83 1,447 1447 447 (1,44 1000 1,00 831 (83 628 (62 606 (60 520 (52 50 users science health biology law anthropology education others http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ faunajbrjgovbr //fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ 201 8 202 13369 13 133,6 12513 12 125,1 82.3% (82.3 10200 10 00 102,0 7.69% 76 6 (7.69 1100 11,0 3,56 356 56 (3,5 2,29 229 29 (2,2 1,83 183 83 (1,8 1,44 144 44 (1,4 100 1,0 (8 62 (6 60 52 (5 5 http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br 20 1336 133, 1251 125, 82.3 (82. 1020 0 102, 7.69 (7.6 110 11, 3,5 35 (3, 2,2 22 (2, 1,8 18 (1, 1,4 14 4 ( 82. (82 7.6 (7. 3, (3 2, (2 (1 7. (7

RESUMO: Este artigo aborda as licenças para tratamento de saúde dos professores da educação básica da Rede Estadual de Educação de Minas Gerais (REE/MG), por tipo de vínculo jurídico de trabalho (efetivo ou designado), no período compreendido entre 2016 e 2018. Trata-se de um estudo de caso, desenvolvido por meio de pesquisa documental, pesquisa quantitativa (análise descritiva de dados) e realização de entrevistas. Concluiu-se que, curiosamente, os professores designados apresentam um número de licenças menor do que os professores efetivos; entretanto, os seus afastamentos são significativamente mais duradouros. Uma análise apressada desse fato poderia deduzir que, contrariando a hipótese inicial do estudo, os professores efetivos adoecem mais do que os professores designados. Todavia, neste artigo, defende-se que esse é, na verdade, um forte indicativo de que os professores designados padecem de adoecimentos de maior gravidade do que os professores efetivos, o que corrobora a hipótese inicial deste estudo, em termos. Os resultados apontam para o adoecimento no exercício da função de magistério e apresentam um alerta importante a respeito da utilização do vínculo precário da designação, o qual teve recentemente sua inconstitucionalidade parcial declarada pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal.

ABSTRACT: This article tackles the health leaves from the basic education Teachers of the Public Education System of the State of Minas Gerais according to their legal employment contracts (either permanent or temporary designation), between 2016 and 2018. It is a study case carried out by means of document and quantitative research (descriptive analysis of data), as well as interviews. Curiously, the conclusion is that temporary teachers take fewer leaves than permanent teachers. However, their leaves are substantially longer. A fast analysis of this fact could deduce that, contrary to the early hypothesis of the study, the effective teachers fall ill more than the designated teachers. However, in this article, it is argued that this is, in fact, a strong indication that the designated teachers develop more severe illnesses than the effective teachers. In terms, this collaborates with the initial hypothesis of this study. The results indicate the development of illnesses in teachers performing their jobs and issue an important warning regarding the use of the temporary designation contracts, which was declared partially unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

RESÚMEN: Este artículo aborda las licencias para el tratamiento de la salud de los docentes de la Red de Educación del Estado de Minas Gerais, por tipo de relación laboral legal (efectiva o designada), en el período entre 2016 y 2018. Es un estudio de caso, desarrollado a través de investigación documental, investigación cuantitativa (análisis de datos descriptivos) y entrevistas. Se concluyó que, curiosamente, los maestros designados tienen un número menor de licencias que los maestros efectivos. sin embargo, sus ausencias son significativamente más largas. Un análisis apresurado de este hecho podría deducir que, contrariamente a la hipótesis inicial del estudio, los docentes efectivos enferman más que los docentes designados. Sin embargo, en este artículo se argumenta que esto es, de hecho, un fuerte indicio de que los docentes designados padecen enfermedades más graves que los docentes efectivos, lo que corrobora la hipótesis inicial de este estudio, en términos. Los resultados apuntan a la enfermedad en el ejercicio de la función docente y presentan una alerta importante sobre el uso del vínculo precario de la designación que recientemente tuvo su inconstitucionalidad parcial declarada por el Tribunal Supremo Federal.

Index code	Element
ti	article title
au	author
kw	article keywords
subject	subject (title words, abstract and keywords)
ab	abstract
ta	journal short title (e.g. Cad. Saúde Pública)
journal_title	journal full title (e.g. Cadernos de Saúde Pública)
la	publication language code (e.g. pt - Portuguese, es - Spanish)
type	document type
pid	publication identifier
publication_year	publication year of publication
sponsor	sponsor
aff_country	country code of the author's affiliation
aff_institution	author affiliation institution
volume	article volume
issue	article issue
elocation	elocation
doi	DOI number
issn	journal ISSN
in	SciELO colection code (e.g. scl - Brasil, col - Colômbia)
use_license	article usage license code

No documents were found for your search