OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to monitor imatinib mesylate therapeutically in the Tumor Biology Laboratory, Department of Hematology and Hemotherapy, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP). A simple and sensitive method to quantify imatinib and its metabolite (CGP74588) in human serum was developed and fully validated in order to monitor treatment compliance. METHODS: The method used to quantify these compounds in serum included protein precipitation extraction followed by instrumental analysis using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The method was validated for several parameters, including selectivity, precision, accuracy, recovery and linearity. RESULTS: The parameters evaluated during the validation stage exhibited satisfactory results based on the Food and Drug Administration and the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) guidelines for validating bioanalytical methods. These parameters also showed a linear correlation greater than 0.99 for the concentration range between 0.500 µg/mL and 10.0 µg/mL and a total analysis time of 13 minutes per sample. This study includes results (imatinib serum concentrations) for 308 samples from patients being treated with imatinib mesylate. CONCLUSION: The method developed in this study was successfully validated and is being efficiently used to measure imatinib concentrations in samples from chronic myeloid leukemia patients to check treatment compliance. The imatinib serum levels of patients achieving a major molecular response were significantly higher than those of patients who did not achieve this result. These results are thus consistent with published reports concerning other populations.

Estudo retrospectivo que visa analisar a utilidade da biópsia de medula óssea (BMO) bilateral na infiltração de medula óssea (MO) por linfoma difuso de grandes células B (LDGCB). Nossos objetivos foram avaliar a incidência de infiltração unilateral de MO por LDGCB e comparar o comprimento dos fragmentos obtidos entre as amostras positivas e negativas para infiltração. Além disso, verificamos se houve diferença entre os casos com infiltração unilateral versus bilateral, correlacionando com desidrogenase láctica (DHL) e estadiamento tomográfico. Avaliamos 268 casos de LDGCB e observamos infiltração medular em 34 casos (13%). Não foi possível a avaliação de seis casos, restando 28 casos para análise. Foram revisados no total 70 fragmentos de MO sobre presença ou ausência de infiltração e comprimento. A média do número de fragmentos por casos foi 2,5; a média do comprimento dos fragmentos foi 11,01 mm (± 5,12 mm), e a média do comprimento dos fragmentos por caso foi 27,53 mm. Foi observado que em seis casos (21,4%) havia infiltração unilateral. Não foram evidenciadas diferenças nas médias do comprimento dos fragmentos em relação à presença versus ausência de infiltração 10,95 mm (± 5,1 mm) versus 11,57 mm (± 5,2 mm), p > 0,05, respectivamente. Não foram evidenciadas diferenças em 23 casos entre a comparação da infiltração medular unilateral versus bilateral com DHL e estadiamento tomográfico. Concluímos que a BMO bilateral foi superior à unilateral, pois pode aumentar a detecção de infiltração de MO em 21,4% dos casos.

This retrospective study aims to analyze the usefulness of bilateral bone marrow biopsy in bone marrow infiltration by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Our objectives were to assess the incidence of unilateral BM involvement by DLBCL and compare fragment length obtained from positive and negative samples for infiltration. Furthermore, we compared the differences between unilateral and bilateral infiltration correlating with lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) and computerized tomography (CT) staging. We evaluated 268 cases of DLBCL and observed medullary infiltration in 34 cases (13%). It was not possible to evaluate 6 out of 34 cases. 70 BM fragments were reviewed as to the presence or absence of infiltration and length. The mean number of fragments per case was 2.5; the mean BM fragment length was 11.01 mm (± 5.12 mm) and the mean BM fragment length per case was 27.53 mm. There was unilateral BM infiltration in six cases (21.4%). There were no differences in the mean fragment length as to the presence/absence of infiltration 10.95 mm (± 5.2 mm) versus 11.57 mm, p > 0.05, respectively. There were no differences in 23 cases between the comparison of unilateral medullary infiltration versus bilateral with lactic dehydrogenase and CT staging. We concluded that bilateral bone marrow biopsy was superior to unilateral because it may increase by 21.4% the detection of BM involvement by DLBCL.

INTRODUÇÃO: A esclerose nodular (EN), do tipo histológico freqüente do linfoma de Hodgkin (LH), apresenta grande variabilidade em sua composição celular. Na década de 80, pesquisadores do British National Lymphoma Investigation (BNLI) propuseram uma subclassificação histológica do LH EN. Eles identificaram dois graus histológicos - o LH EN grau I (LH EN I) e o LH EN grau II (LH EN II) - e demonstraram que os portadores de LH EN II apresentavam menor sobrevida em comparação aos portadores de LH EN I. Outros estudos, entretanto, não reproduziram esses achados. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o significado prognóstico da graduação histológica proposta pelo BNLI. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo que incluiu 69 casos de LH EN. Mais de 90% dos casos foram tratados com terapia combinada ou quimioterapia exclusiva, não havendo diferença no tipo de tratamento oferecido a depender do grau histológico. RESULTADOS: Trinta e cinco casos (51%) foram classificados com EN I e 34 (49%) como EN II. Não observamos diferenças na distribuição de outros fatores prognósticos entre os portadores dos dois graus. Remissão completa após o tratamento inicial foi obtida em 85,7% dos casos de EN I e em 82,4% dos casos de EN II (p = 0,75). A probabilidade estimada de sobrevida global em cinco anos foi de 67% para EN I e de 83,5% para EN II (p = 0,13) e a taxa de sobrevida livre de doença em cinco anos foi de 85,2% versus 87%, respectivamente (p = 0,72). CONCLUSÃO: Nesta população de pacientes uniformemente tratados a graduação histológica BNLI não esteve associada com o prognóstico do LH EN.

BACKGROUND: Nodular sclerosis (NS), a frequent histological subtype of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), presents great variability in its cellular composition. In the 80's, researchers of the British National Lymphoma Investigation (BNLI) proposed a histological-based subclassification for NS HL. They identified two histological grades - NS HL grade I (NS HL I) and NS HL grade II (NS HL II) - and reported that NS II patients had a lower survival rate in comparison with NS I patients. Others studies, however, did not reproduce these findings. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prognostic significance of the BNLI grading system. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We retrospectively studied 69 NS HL patients. More than 90% of the included cases were treated with combined modality therapy or exclusive chemotherapy, the treatment type was not different for NS I and NS II patients. RESULTS: Thirty-five cases (51%) were classified as NS I and 34 (49%) as NS II. We did not observe significant differences in the distribution of other prognostic factors between the two NS grades. The complete remission rate after initial therapy was 85.7% in the NS I group and 82.4% in the NS II group (p = 0.75). The predicted 5-year overall survival rate was 67% in the NS I patients and 83.5% in the NS II patients (p = 0.13). The predicted 5-year disease free survival rate for NSI and NSII patients was 85.2% and 87%, respectively (p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: The histological BNLI grading system was not associated with the prognosis of this uniformly treated NS LH population.

OBJETIVO: Infecção é a principal complicação relacionada ao uso de cateteres venosos de longa permanência em pacientes oncológicos e sua incidência pode variar a depender do tipo de cateter utilizado. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar a freqüência e risco de infecção entre dois tipos de dispositivos de longa permanência. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo com 96 pacientes onco-hematológicos portadores de cateteres parcialmente implantáveis (n=55) ou totalmente implantáveis (n=42). Dados demográficos e cuidados com o dispositivo foram similares entre os dois grupos. A comparação entre os dispositivos foi realizada através da avaliação da incidência de infecção e da sobrevida livre de infecção. RESULTADOS: Em uma mediana de acompanhamento de 210 dias, a incidência de infecção relacionada ao cateter foi de 0,2102/100 cateter-dias para os dispositivos parcialmente implantáveis e de 0,0045/100 cateter-dias para os totalmente implantáveis, com uma razão de incidência de 46,7 (IC 95% = 6,2 a 348,8). A taxa de sobrevida livre de primeira infecção em um ano foi de 45% versus 97% e a taxa de sobrevida livre de retirada por infecção foi de 42% versus 97%, respectivamente para cateter parcialmente ou totalmente implantável (p<0,001 para ambas comparações). Conclusão: No presente estudo, o risco de infecção foi menor nos dispositivos totalmente implantáveis do que nos parcialmente implantáveis.

PURPOSE: Infection is the leading complication of long-term central venous catheters, and its incidence may vary according to catheter type. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency and probability of infection between two types of long-term intravenous devices. METHODS: Retrospective study in 96 onco-hematology patients with partially implanted catheters (n = 55) or completely implanted ones (n = 42). Demographic data and catheter care were similar in both groups. Infection incidence and infection-free survival were used for the comparison of the two devices. RESULTS: In a median follow-up time of 210 days, the catheter-related infection incidence was 0.2102/100 catheter-days for the partially implanted devices and 0.0045/100 catheter-days for the completely implanted devices; the infection incidence rate was 46.7 (CI 95% = 6.2 to 348.8). The 1-year first infection-free survival ratio was 45% versus 97%, and the 1-year removal due to infection-free survival ratio was 42% versus 97% for partially and totally implanted catheters, respectively (P <.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: In the present study, the infection risk was lower in completely implanted devices than in partially implanted ones.