Abstract This article aims to examine differences in suicidal narrative and suicide crisis syndrome symptoms, and suicidal ideation among those who maintained, lost, and gained employment or student status during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a cross-sectional study based on an online and anonymous self-report questionnaire. Participants were recruited through social media platforms between November 2020 and October 2021. Changes in occupational status were assessed in 2,259 individuals. The sample was divided into four groups according to work (full-time/part-time) and study status (1) maintained, (2) lost, (3) gained, and (4) unemployed. Suicide outcomes were investigated by the Suicidal Narrative Inventory, Suicide Crisis Inventory, and Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener version. Changes in occupational status influenced symptoms of the suicide crisis syndrome and suicidal narrative, but not suicidal ideation. Those who maintained their work, such as full-time/part-time scored lower on the total scores of the Suicidal Narrative Inventory and Suicide Crisis Inventory-2 compared to those who lost their employed status and unemployed. Our findings suggest that it is appropriate to consider changes in employed status as a mental health risk factor during pandemics.

Resumo O objetivo do artigo é examinar diferenças nos sintomas da narrativa suicida e da síndrome de crise de suicídio e ideação suicida entre aqueles que mantiveram, perderam e ganharam emprego ou status educacional durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Trata-se de um estudo transversal baseado em um questionário online. Os indivíduos foram recrutados por meio de plataformas de mídia social entre novembro de 2020 e outubro de 2021. As mudanças no status ocupacional foram avaliadas em 2.259 indivíduos. A amostra foi dividida em grupos de acordo com as mudanças do status ocupacional: (1) aqueles que mantiveram, (2) aqueles que perderam, (3) aqueles que ganharam e (4) desempregados. Desfechos suicidas foram avaliados através do Inventário da Narrativa Suicida, Inventário da Crise Suicida e Columbia - Escala de Classificação da Gravidade do Suicídio. Mudanças no status ocupacional influenciaram sintomas da síndrome de crise de suicídio e narrativa suicida, mas não a ideação suicida. Aqueles que mantiveram seu emprego apresentaram menos sintomas de narrativa suicida e síndrome de crise de suicídio, comparados aos que perderam o emprego e aos desempregados. Esses achados sugerem que é apropriado considerar mudanças no status ocupacional como fator de risco para saúde mental durante pandemias.

Resumo O objetivo do artigo é examinar diferenças nos sintomas da narrativa suicida e da síndrome de crise de suicídio e ideação suicida entre aqueles que mantiveram, perderam e ganharam emprego ou status educacional durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Trata-se de um estudo transversal baseado em um questionário online. Os indivíduos foram recrutados por meio de plataformas de mídia social entre novembro de 2020 e outubro de 2021. As mudanças no status ocupacional foram avaliadas em 2.259 indivíduos. A amostra foi dividida em grupos de acordo com as mudanças do status ocupacional: (1) aqueles que mantiveram, (2) aqueles que perderam, (3) aqueles que ganharam e (4) desempregados. Desfechos suicidas foram avaliados através do Inventário da Narrativa Suicida, Inventário da Crise Suicida e Columbia - Escala de Classificação da Gravidade do Suicídio. Mudanças no status ocupacional influenciaram sintomas da síndrome de crise de suicídio e narrativa suicida, mas não a ideação suicida. Aqueles que mantiveram seu emprego apresentaram menos sintomas de narrativa suicida e síndrome de crise de suicídio, comparados aos que perderam o emprego e aos desempregados. Esses achados sugerem que é apropriado considerar mudanças no status ocupacional como fator de risco para saúde mental durante pandemias. COVID19. COVID19 COVID 19. 19 COVID-19 Tratase Trata se online 202 2021 2259 2 259 2.25 1 (1 (2 3 (3 4 (4 desempregados Suicídio pandemias COVID1 COVID-1 20 225 25 2.2 ( COVID- 22 2.

Abstract This article aims to examine differences in suicidal narrative and suicide crisis syndrome symptoms, and suicidal ideation among those who maintained, lost, and gained employment or student status during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is a cross-sectional study based on an online and anonymous self-report questionnaire. Participants were recruited through social media platforms between November 2020 and October 2021. Changes in occupational status were assessed in 2,259 individuals. The sample was divided into four groups according to work (full-time/part-time) and study status (1) maintained, (2) lost, (3) gained, and (4) unemployed. Suicide outcomes were investigated by the Suicidal Narrative Inventory, Suicide Crisis Inventory, and Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener version. Changes in occupational status influenced symptoms of the suicide crisis syndrome and suicidal narrative, but not suicidal ideation. Those who maintained their work, such as full-time/part-time scored lower on the total scores of the Suicidal Narrative Inventory and Suicide Crisis Inventory-2 compared to those who lost their employed status and unemployed. Our findings suggest that it is appropriate to consider changes in employed status as a mental health risk factor during pandemics. COVID19 COVID 19 COVID-1 pandemic crosssectional cross sectional selfreport self report questionnaire 202 2021 2259 2 259 2,25 individuals fulltime/parttime fulltimeparttime full time/part time part (full-time/part-time 1 (1 (2 3 (3 4 (4 unemployed version Inventory2 Inventory- pandemics COVID1 COVID- 20 225 25 2,2 fulltime parttime timepart ( 22 2,

Objective: To evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Suicide Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) among Brazilian adults. Methods: The SCI-2 was cross-culturally adapted into Portuguese and administered to 2,265 Brazilian participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity by using measures such as suicidal narratives, stressful life events, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Results: The revised one-factor model of the SCI-2 demonstrated an adequate, although not optimal, model fit (χ2[1539] = 31,442.79, p < 0.001, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.09, standardized root mean residual [SRMR] = 0.05). The revised five-factor model, on the other hand, demonstrated good fit (χ2[1529] = 14,174.86, p < 0.001, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04). Comparison of these two models indicated that the five-factor model had a better fit than the one-factor model. Both the total and subscale scores of the SCI-2 showed strong internal consistency and good convergent and criterion validity in relation to stressful life events, suicidal narratives (excluding the goal disengagement subscale), suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the Brazilian version of the SCI-2 is a valid tool for assessing symptoms of suicidal crisis syndrome. Objective structure reliability Inventory2 Inventory 2 Inventory- SCI2 SCI (SCI-2 adults Methods SCI- crossculturally cross culturally 2265 265 2,26 participants CFA (CFA events ideation attempts Results onefactor one adequate optimal χ21539 χ χ2 1539 (χ2[1539 3144279 31 442 79 31,442.79 0001 0 001 0.001 [CFI 099 99 0.99 TuckerLewis Tucker Lewis [TLI [RMSEA 009 09 0.09 [SRMR 0.05. 005 0.05 . 05 0.05) fivefactor five hand χ21529 1529 (χ2[1529 1417486 14 174 86 14,174.86 100 1 00 1.00 006 06 0.06 0.04. 004 0.04 04 0.04) excluding subscale, , subscale) Conclusion syndrome (SCI- 226 26 2,2 χ2153 153 (χ2[153 314427 3 44 7 31,442.7 000 0.00 9 0.9 0.0 χ2152 152 (χ2[152 141748 17 8 14,174.8 10 1.0 (SCI 22 2, χ215 15 (χ2[15 31442 4 31,442. 0. 14174 14,174. 1. χ21 (χ2[1 3144 31,442 1417 14,174 (χ2[ 314 31,44 141 14,17 (χ2 31,4 14,1 (χ 31, 14,

Objective: To test the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Abbreviated Suicidal Narrative Inventory (SNI-38). Methods: We used an anonymous online questionnaire of the SNI-38 and self-report measures administered between November 2020 and October 2021 in the Brazilian community. Participants were recruited through social media advertisements. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to test the factor structure of the SNI-38. In addition, we assessed internal consistency and convergent validity against stressful life events, suicide crisis syndrome, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Results: A total of 2,660 participants were included. The eight-factor model of the SNI-38 had a good model fit (χ2[637] = 7,473.98, p < 0.001, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.99, root mean squared error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07, standardized root mean residual [SRMR] = 0.06). Notably, all items were significantly and positively loaded onto their respective factors (factor loadings ≥ 0.45). The reliability of all subscales except for goal disengagement ranged from good to high. Furthermore, all subscales except goal disengagement showed positive correlations with variables such as suicide crisis syndrome, stressful life events, lifetime/past month suicidal ideation, and lifetime suicide attempts. Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary support for the validity of the Brazilian version of the SNI-38 as an appropriate, valid instrument for measuring suicidal narratives in Brazilian individuals. Objective SNI38. SNI38 SNI 38 . (SNI-38) Methods SNI-3 selfreport self report 202 community advertisements CFA (CFA 38. addition events syndrome ideation attempts Results 2660 2 660 2,66 included eightfactor eight χ2637 χ χ2 637 (χ2[637 747398 7 473 98 7,473.98 0001 0 001 0.001 CFI [CFI 099 99 0.99 TuckerLewis Tucker Lewis TLI [TLI RMSEA [RMSEA 007 07 0.07 SRMR [SRMR 0.06. 006 0.06 06 0.06) Notably 0.45. 045 0.45 45 0.45) high Furthermore lifetimepast past Conclusion appropriate individuals SNI3 3 (SNI-38 SNI- 20 266 66 2,6 χ263 63 (χ2[63 74739 47 9 7,473.9 000 00 0.00 09 0.9 0.0 04 0.4 4 (SNI-3 26 6 2, χ26 (χ2[6 7473 7,473. 0. (SNI- (χ2[ 747 7,473 (SNI (χ2 74 7,47 (χ 7,4 7,

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a prevalência de transtornos ansiosos e fatores associados em uma amostra populacional de idosos do Sul de Santa Catarina. Métodos Estudo transversal com base em dados populacionais, que avaliou 1.021 indivíduos idosos entre 60 e 79 anos. Foram realizadas entrevistas domiciliares para aferição de variáveis sobre transtornos ansiosos, por meio do questionário MINI, dados sociodemográficos, hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS), infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM) e dosagem de colesterol. Resultados As prevalências entre os transtornos ansiosos foram de 22,0% para o transtorno de ansiedade generalizada (TAG); 14,8% para fobia social (FS); 10,5% para transtorno do pânico (TP); e 8,5% para o transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo (TOC). Além disso, 40,5% dos indivíduos apresentaram pelo menos um transtorno de ansiedade. A distribuição dos transtornos foi semelhante nos dois gêneros; TAG foi mais prevalente nos indivíduos de menor escolaridade; TOC foi mais presente em indivíduos casados ou em união estável. Em relação às variáveis clínicas, HAS foi associada à presença de TOC; FS foi associada com IAM; TOC e FS foram associados com HDL > 40 mg/dL. Conclusão Os dados demonstram que os quadros de ansiedade são muito frequentes em idosos da comunidade, se sobrepõem de forma significativa e estão associados a algumas variáveis clínicas cardiovasculares.

ABSTRACT Objective This study evaluated the prevalence of anxiety disorders and associated factors in a population sample of elderly from South of Santa Catarina. Methods Cross-sectional study based on population data, which evaluated 1,021 elderly individuals, between 60 and 79 years. Home interviews were conducted to measure the variables of anxiety disorders, through of the MINI questionnaire, sociodemographic data, systemic arterial hypertension (SAH), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and serum cholesterol measurements. Results The prevalence among anxiety disorders were 22.0% for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), 14.8% for social phobia (FS); 10.5% for panic disorder (PD); 8.5% for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and with only, at least one disorder 40.5%. The distribution of the disorders were similar in both genders, GAD was more prevalent among those with lower education; OCD was more prevalent in individuals who were married or in union stable. In relation to clinical variables, SAH was associated with the presence of OCD; FS was associated with AMI; FS and OCD were associated with HDL > 40 mg/dL. Conclusion The data demonstrate that anxiety conditions are very common in older adults, significantly overlap and are associated with cardiovascular clinical variables.

Objective: To assess the presence of anxiety disorders and quality of life in patients with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes. Methods: Case-control study of 996 patients with type 2 diabetes and 2,145 individuals without diabetes. The sole inclusion criterion for the case group was insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes. We compared the case and control groups for sociodemographic variables, laboratory and clinical data, and presence of anxiety disorders. Quality of life was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF instrument, and the prevalence of anxiety disorder was evaluated by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Results: Patients with diabetes had a higher prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The presence of these disorders in combination with type 2 diabetes was associated with worse quality of life in the physical, social, psychological, and environmental domains. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the importance of diagnosing and treating anxiety disorders in patients with diabetes, so as to prevent more serious complications associated with these comorbidities.