RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o nível de conhecimento dos acadêmicos de odontologia da UFES sobre o tratamento clareador caseiro. Métodos: Como metodologia, foi realizado um estudo descritivo e transversal por meio da aplicação de questionário a 109 estudantes contendo perguntas sobre o clareamento dental caseiro, cuidados técnicos e possíveis riscos do tratamento. Os dados foram tabulados e submetudos à estatística descritiva. Resultados: Do total de estudantes, 88,99% disse conhecer os fatores que limitam ou contraindicam o tratamento clareador; 16,51% dos estudantes reconhecem o peróxido de hidrogênio como possível indutor de câncer bucal; 30,27% dos estudantes realizaram o clareamento dental dentro da Universidade, 44,03% realizaram o clareamento dental fora da Universidade sem supervisão profissional. Além disso, 56,88% acreditam que são necessários anamnese e exame clínico antes de realizar o tratamento clareador. Conclusão: Conclui-se que os alunos têm conhecimento limitado sobre determinados pontos do clareamento dental caseiro. Os estudantes conhecem os fatores de risco do tratamento clareador, exceto a respeito do peróxido de hidrogênio ser um possível indutor de câncer bucal. Pode-se inferir que os acadêmicos relevam a importância da associação do exame clínico com a anamnese do paciente antes de se realizar o tratamento clareador. A maioria dos estudantes tem realizado o clareamento dental fora da Universidade, o que chama atenção para reforçar o conhecimento sobre as questões éticas da profissão. Objetivo caseiro Métodos metodologia 10 descritiva Resultados 8899 88 99 88,99 1651 16 51 16,51 bucal 3027 30 27 30,27 4403 44 03 44,03 profissional disso 5688 56 56,88 Conclusão Concluise Conclui Podese Pode profissão 1 889 8 9 88,9 165 5 16,5 302 3 2 30,2 440 4 0 44,0 568 56,8 88, 16, 30, 44, 56,

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge of UFES dental students about home bleaching treatment. Methods: As a methodology, a descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out through the application of practice to 109 students, containing questions about home tooth whitening, technical care and possible complications of the treatment. Data were tabulated and submitted to descriptive statistics. Results: Of the total number of students, 88.99% said they knew the factors that limit or contraindicate the bleaching treatment, 16.51% of students recognize hydrogen peroxide as a possible inducer of oral cancer, 30.27% of the students had their teeth whitened inside the University, 44.03% had their teeth whitened outside the University without professional supervision. In addition, 56.88% believe anamnesis and clinical examination are necessary before the bleaching treatment. Conclusion: It is concluded that students have limited knowledge about certain points of at-home tooth whitening. Students know the risk factors of bleaching treatment, except regarding hydrogen peroxide being a possible inducer of oral cancer. It can be inferred that academics highlight the importance of associating the clinical examination with the patient’s anamnesis before performing the bleaching treatment. Most students have had their teeth whitened outside the University, which calls attention to reinforce knowledge about the ethical issues of the profession. Objective treatment Methods methodology crosssectional cross sectional 10 whitening statistics Results 8899 88 99 88.99 1651 16 51 16.51 cancer 3027 30 27 30.27 4403 44 03 44.03 supervision addition 5688 56 56.88 Conclusion athome at patients patient s profession 1 889 8 9 88.9 165 5 16.5 302 3 2 30.2 440 4 0 44.0 568 56.8 88. 16. 30. 44. 56.

ABSTRACT Dental composites cured at high temperatures show improved properties and higher degrees of conversion; however, there is no information available about the effect of pre-heating on material degradation. Objectives This study evaluated the effect of pre-heating on the degradation of composites, based on the analysis of radiopacity and silver penetration using scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS). Material and Methods Thirty specimens were fabricated using a metallic matrix (2x8 mm) and the composites Durafill VS (Heraeus Kulzer), Z-250 (3M/ESPE), and Z-350 (3M/ESPE), cured at 25°C (no pre-heating) or 60°C (pre-heating). Specimens were stored sequentially in the following solutions: 1) water for 7 days (60°C), plus 0.1 N sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 14 days (60°C); 2) 50% silver nitrate (AgNO3) for 10 days (60°C). Specimens were radiographed at baseline and after each storage time, and the images were evaluated in gray scale. After the storage protocol, samples were analyzed using SEM/EDS to check the depth of silver penetration. Radiopacity and silver penetration data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (α=5%). Results Radiopacity levels were as follows: Durafill VS<Z-350<Z-250 (p<0.05). The depth of silver penetration into the composites ranked as follows: Durafill VS>Z-350>Z-250 (p<0.05). After storage in water/NaOH, pre-heated specimens presented higher radiopacity values than non-pre-heated specimens (p<0.05). There was a lower penetration of silver in pre-heated specimens (p<0.05). Conclusions Pre-heating at 60°C mitigated the degradation of composites based on analysis of radiopacity and silver penetration depth.

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of temperature and curing time on composite sorption and solubility. Material and Methods: Seventy five specimens (8×2 mm) were prepared using a commercial composite resin (ICE, SDI). Three temperatures (10°C, 25°C and 60°C) and five curing times (5 s, 10 s, 20 s, 40 s and 60 s) were evaluated. The specimens were weighed on an analytical balance three times: A: before storage (M1); B: 7 days after storage (M2); C: 7 days after storage plus 1 day of drying (M3). The storage solution consisted of 75% alcohol/25% water. Sorption and solubility were calculated using these three weights and specimen dimensions. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U Tests (α=5%). Results: The results showed that time, temperature and their interaction influenced the sorption and solubility of the composite (p<0.05). At 60°C, the composite sorption showed an inverse relationship with the curing time (p<0.05). The composite cured for 5 s showed higher sorption for the 40 s or 60 s curing times when compared with all temperatures (p<0.05). Curing times of 20 s and 40 s showed similar sorption data for all temperatures (p>0.05). The 60°C composite temperature led to lower values of sorption for all curing times when compared with the 10°C temperature (p<0.05). The same results were found when comparing 10°C and 25°C (p<0.05), except that the 20 s and 40 s curing times behaved similarly (p>0.05). Solubility was similar at 40 s and 60 s for all temperatures (p>0.05), but was higher at 10°C than at 60°C for all curing times (p<0.05). When the composite was cured at 25°C, similar solubility values were found when comparing the 5 s and 10 s or 20 s and 40 s curing times (p>0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, higher temperatures or longer curing times led to lower sorption and solubility values for the composite tested; however, this trend was only significant in specific combinations of temperature and curing times.