Search | SciELO

ABSTRACT The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others. publications problem uptodate up date classifications context exception (CTFB http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/, httpfaunajbrjgovbr http //fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ , jbrj gov br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/) 2015 Brazil 80 specialists 1 2024 133691 133 691 133,69 125138 125 138 125,13 82.3%, 823 82 3 (82.3% 102000 102 000 102,00 7.69%, 769 7 69 (7.69% 11000 11 11,00 . 3,567 3567 567 (3,56 2,292 2292 2 292 (2,29 1,833 1833 833 (1,83 1,447 1447 447 (1,44 1000 1,00 831 (83 628 (62 606 (60 520 (52 50 users science health biology law anthropology education others http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ faunajbrjgovbr //fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ 201 8 202 13369 13 133,6 12513 12 125,1 82.3% (82.3 10200 10 00 102,0 7.69% 76 6 (7.69 1100 11,0 3,56 356 56 (3,5 2,29 229 29 (2,2 1,83 183 83 (1,8 1,44 144 44 (1,4 100 1,0 (8 62 (6 60 52 (5 5 http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br 20 1336 133, 1251 125, 82.3 (82. 1020 0 102, 7.69 (7.6 110 11, 3,5 35 (3, 2,2 22 (2, 1,8 18 (1, 1,4 14 4 ( 82. (82 7.6 (7. 3, (3 2, (2 (1 7. (7

RESUMO: A questão da tecnologia pode abordar-se de múltiplos pontos de vista e em análises particulares, mas requer um enquadramento global do seu paradigma, na época civilizacional que lhe corresponde. Pertencendo-lhe, o homem contemporâneo desenvolve uma forma dominante e incontornável de relação com as coisas e com os outros, marcada pelo modelo que nela impera. Heidegger chamou Ge-stell ao projecto de mundo tecnológico, e procurou descrever e desconstruir a sua figura, defendendo a necessidade de aprender a pensar, como recuperação possível de uma relação livre ante ela, capaz de abrir um outro projecto de mundo, focado no habitar e vivido como um “passo atrás”. Partindo de aí, o presente texto procura mostrar o alcance da ideia heideggeriana do pensar e da sua repercussão em Arendt e Agamben, enquanto manifestação do ser em propriedade e como alternativa à banal imersão na cultura tecnológica.

ABSTRACT: The question of technology can be approached from multiple points of view and particular analysis, but it requires understanding of the global framework of its paradigm in our civilizational era. Belonging to this, contemporary man develops a dominant and unavoidable form of relationship with things and with other men, marked by the prevailing model. Heidegger called Ge-stell to the technological world project, and sought to describe and deconstruct its figure, defending that learning to think enables the retrieval of a free relationship, capable of opening another world project, focused on inhabiting and lived as a “step back”. Starting from there, this text seeks to show the scope of Heidegger’s idea of thinking and its repercussion in Arendt and Agamben, as a manifestation of authenticity and as an alternative to the banal immersion in technological culture.

Este texto pretende mostrar na noção heideggeriana de cuidado, analisada a partir das lições de 1925, o apoio fundamental para a ideia de uma democracia do cuidado de Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo, ainda que tal ideia, enunciada nos seus últimos trabalhos não esteja completamente desenvolvida.

Index code	Element
ti	article title
au	author
kw	article keywords
subject	subject (title words, abstract and keywords)
ab	abstract
ta	journal short title (e.g. Cad. Saúde Pública)
journal_title	journal full title (e.g. Cadernos de Saúde Pública)
la	publication language code (e.g. pt - Portuguese, es - Spanish)
type	document type
pid	publication identifier
publication_year	publication year of publication
sponsor	sponsor
aff_country	country code of the author's affiliation
aff_institution	author affiliation institution
volume	article volume
issue	article issue
elocation	elocation
doi	DOI number
issn	journal ISSN
in	SciELO colection code (e.g. scl - Brasil, col - Colômbia)
use_license	article usage license code

No documents were found for your search