Este estudio evalúa la percepción de docentes de una universidad pública brasileña sobre educación interprofesional (EIP). Profesores de Medicina, Odontología y Enfermería participaron en grupos focales on-line síncronos reflexionando sobre tópicos: (1) asignaturas en común, (2) proyectos interprofesionales de investigación y extensión, (3) atención a los factores determinantes sociales en los planes de tratamiento a los usuarios, y (4) prácticas colaborativas durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Se utilizó el análisis interpretativo descriptivo para evaluar cuatro grupos focales (n=10) utilizando instrumento estructurado con 17 ítems sobre los 4 tópicos mencionados. Según los docentes, no existen asignaturas comunes entre los cursos de la salud. Los proyectos de extensión y de investigación con abordaje interprofesional constituyen unas pocas iniciativas individuales de profesores. Según los participantes, los alumnos consideran los factores determinantes sociales en los planes de tratamiento. Hubo pocas prácticas colaborativas durante la pandemia. Se observó la necesidad de orientaciones sobre EIP para graduación.

This study evaluates the perception of professors on interprofessional education (IPE) from a public university in Brazil. Professors of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing participated in synchronous online focus groups reflecting on topics: (1) common disciplines, (2) interprofessional research and extension projects, (3) attention to social determinants in user treatment plans, and (4) collaborative practices during the Covid-19 pandemic. An accurate focus group transcription and interpretative descriptive analysis were used to assess four focus groups (n=10) using a structured instrument with 17 items about the 4 topics mentioned. According to professors, there are no common disciplines among health courses. Extension and research projects with an interprofessional approach are only individual initiatives by professors. According to participants, students consider social determinants in treatment plans. There were few collaborative practices during the pandemic. There was a need for IPE guidelines for graduation.

Este estudo avalia a percepção de docentes de uma universidade pública brasileira sobre educação interprofissional (EIP). Professores de Medicina, Odontologia e Enfermagem participaram de grupos focais on-line síncronos refletindo sobre os seguintes tópicos: (1) disciplinas em comum; (2) projetos interprofissionais de pesquisa e extensão; (3) atenção aos determinantes sociais nos planos de tratamento aos usuários; e (4) práticas colaborativas durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Foi usada análise interpretativa descritiva para avaliar quatro grupos focais (n = 10) utilizando instrumento estruturado com 17 itens acerca dos quatro tópicos mencionados. Segundo os docentes, não existem disciplinas comuns entre os cursos da Saúde. Projetos de extensão e de pesquisa com abordagem interprofissional acontecem somente por poucas iniciativas individuais de professores. Segundo os participantes, os alunos consideram os determinantes sociais nos planos de tratamento. Ocorreram poucas práticas colaborativas durante a pandemia. Observou-se a necessidade de orientações sobre EIP para graduação.

Este estudo avalia a percepção de docentes de uma universidade pública brasileira sobre educação interprofissional (EIP). Professores de Medicina, Odontologia e Enfermagem participaram de grupos focais on-line síncronos refletindo sobre os seguintes tópicos: (1) disciplinas em comum; (2) projetos interprofissionais de pesquisa e extensão; (3) atenção aos determinantes sociais nos planos de tratamento aos usuários; e (4) práticas colaborativas durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Foi usada análise interpretativa descritiva para avaliar quatro grupos focais (n = 10) utilizando instrumento estruturado com 17 itens acerca dos quatro tópicos mencionados. Segundo os docentes, não existem disciplinas comuns entre os cursos da Saúde. Projetos de extensão e de pesquisa com abordagem interprofissional acontecem somente por poucas iniciativas individuais de professores. Segundo os participantes, os alunos consideram os determinantes sociais nos planos de tratamento. Ocorreram poucas práticas colaborativas durante a pandemia. Observou-se a necessidade de orientações sobre EIP para graduação. EIP. . (EIP) Medicina online on line 1 (1 comum 2 (2 3 (3 usuários 4 (4 Covid19. Covid19 Covid 19. 19 Covid-19 n 10 mencionados Saúde professores participantes Observouse Observou se graduação (EIP ( Covid1 Covid-1 Covid-

This study evaluates the perception of professors on interprofessional education (IPE) from a public university in Brazil. Professors of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing participated in synchronous online focus groups reflecting on topics: (1) common disciplines, (2) interprofessional research and extension projects, (3) attention to social determinants in user treatment plans, and (4) collaborative practices during the Covid-19 pandemic. An accurate focus group transcription and interpretative descriptive analysis were used to assess four focus groups (n=10) using a structured instrument with 17 items about the 4 topics mentioned. According to professors, there are no common disciplines among health courses. Extension and research projects with an interprofessional approach are only individual initiatives by professors. According to participants, students consider social determinants in treatment plans. There were few collaborative practices during the pandemic. There was a need for IPE guidelines for graduation. (IPE Brazil Medicine 1 (1 2 (2 3 (3 plans (4 Covid19 Covid 19 Covid-1 pandemic n=10 n10 n 10 (n=10 mentioned courses participants graduation ( Covid1 Covid- n=1 n1 (n=1 n= (n= (n

Este estudio evalúa la percepción de docentes de una universidad pública brasileña sobre educación interprofesional (EIP). Profesores de Medicina, Odontología y Enfermería participaron en grupos focales on-line síncronos reflexionando sobre tópicos: (1) asignaturas en común, (2) proyectos interprofesionales de investigación y extensión, (3) atención a los factores determinantes sociales en los planes de tratamiento a los usuarios, y (4) prácticas colaborativas durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Se utilizó el análisis interpretativo descriptivo para evaluar cuatro grupos focales (n=10) utilizando instrumento estructurado con 17 ítems sobre los 4 tópicos mencionados. Según los docentes, no existen asignaturas comunes entre los cursos de la salud. Los proyectos de extensión y de investigación con abordaje interprofesional constituyen unas pocas iniciativas individuales de profesores. Según los participantes, los alumnos consideran los factores determinantes sociales en los planes de tratamiento. Hubo pocas prácticas colaborativas durante la pandemia. Se observó la necesidad de orientaciones sobre EIP para graduación. EIP. . (EIP) Medicina online on line 1 (1 común 2 (2 3 (3 usuarios (4 Covid19. Covid19 Covid 19. 19 Covid-19 n=10 n10 n 10 (n=10 mencionados salud profesores participantes graduación (EIP ( Covid1 Covid-1 n=1 n1 (n=1 Covid- n= (n= (n

Abstract This systematic review aimed to answer the focused question: “What are the benefits of subgingival periodontal therapy on blood hematological and biochemical index, biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress, quality of life, and periodontal pathogen counts in patients with obesity and periodontitis?”. A systematic literature search was performed in six databases: PubMed, Embase, LILACS, Web of Science, Cochrane and SCOPUS and other sources, and a manual search was conducted as well. Inclusion criteria were randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, and before-and-after studies on patients with obesity subjected to periodontal therapy. The results were synthesized qualitatively. Risk of bias within studies was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. The certainty of evidence was evaluated following the GRADE approach. Three randomized controlled trials and 15 before-and-after studies were included. Randomized controlled trials were considered to have a low risk of bias, as compared to before-and-after studies assessed as having low, serious, and critical risks of bias. Non-surgical periodontal therapy plus azithromycin, chlorhexidine, and cetylpyridinium chloride reduced blood pressure and decreased serum levels of HbA1c, hsCRP, IL-1β, and TNF-α. Salivary resistin level also decreased in patients with obesity and periodontitis after therapy and chlorhexidine mouth rinse. Before-and-after data suggest an improvement in total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, insulin resistance, C3, GCF levels of TNF-α, chemerin, vaspin, omentin-1, visfatin, 8-OHdG, and periodontal pathogen counts after therapy. question What index stress life periodontitis. . periodontitis?” databases PubMed Embase LILACS Science sources well nonrandomized non beforeandafter before qualitatively ROBINSI ROBINS I tools approach 1 included serious Nonsurgical Non surgical azithromycin HbA1c HbAc HbA c hsCRP IL1β, IL1β ILβ IL 1β, 1β β IL-1β TNFα. TNFα TNF α. α TNF-α rinse Beforeandafter Before cholesterol LDL triglycerides resistance C3 C TNFα, α, chemerin vaspin omentin1, omentin1 omentin 1, omentin-1 visfatin 8OHdG, 8OHdG OHdG 8 OHdG, 8-OHdG periodontitis? omentin-

CONTEXTO: A adolescência e a gestação são consideradas fatores de risco para a infecção pelo papilomavírus humano (HPV). A relação entre essa infecção no colo do útero e na boca num mesmo paciente é controversa. RELATO DE CASO: Descrever o caso de uma adolescente grávida de 16 anos que apresentou a infecção pelo HPV no colo do útero e na boca. Esfregaços foram realizados no colo do útero e em língua/palato. Amostras de biofilme dental também foram coletadas. Para detectar o HPV, foi utilizada a técnica do microarranjo. O HPV 56 foi o subtipo encontrado no esfregaço cervical e o tipo HPV 6 no biofilme dental. CONCLUSÕES: Observamos, nessa adolescente grávida, a presença do HPV na boca e no colo do útero, mas os subtipos virais que infectavam essas duas regiões eram distintos.

CONTEXT: Adolescence and pregnancy are considered to be risk factors for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The relationship between this infection in the uterine cervix and oral HPV infection is controversial. CASE REPORT: This report describes a case of a pregnant 16-year-old adolescent who presented HPV infection in the uterine cervix and the mouth. Smears were collected from the cervix and the tongue/palate. Dental biofilm samples were also collected. The microarray technique was used to detect HPV. The HPV 56 subtype was observed in the cervical smear and HPV 6 in dental biofilm. CONCLUSION: In this pregnant adolescent, HPV infection was present in both the cervix and the mouth, but the HPV subtypes infecting these two areas were different.

This study investigated the effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy on the composition of subgingival microbiota of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Sixteen CKD pre-dialysis individuals (CKD) and 14 individuals without clinical evidence of kidney disease (C) presenting chronic periodontitis were treated by scaling and root planing. Subgingival samples were collected from each patient and analyzed for their composition by checkerboard at baseline and 3 months post-therapy. Significant differences between groups at baseline were sought by the Mann-Whitney and χ² tests. Changes over time were examined by the Wilcoxon test. At baseline, the CKD group had significantly lower counts of E. faecalis compared to the C group (p < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of a greater number of species were reduced in the C group. Higher levels of A. israelii, C. rectus, F. periodonticum, P. micra, P. nigrescens, T. forsythia, N. mucosa, and S. anginosus (p < 0.05) were found in the CKD group compared to the C group. Also, non-responsive sites in CKD individuals harbored significantly higher levels of pathogenic species (T. forsythia, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, Fusobacterium spp., D. pneumosintes, E. faecalis and S. aureus; p < 0.05) than sites that responded to therapy, as well as non-responsive sites in the C group. The periodontitis-associated subgingival microbiota of CKD and systemically healthy individuals was similar in composition. However, high levels of pathogenic species persisted in the subgingival microbiota of patients with CKD after treatment.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a debilitating systemic condition. Our working hypothesis is that CKD predialysis patients with periodontitis would respond poorly to periodontal treatment owing to immunologic compromise. Twenty-one predialysis patients (group 1) and 19 individuals without clinical evidence of kidney disease (group 2) with chronic periodontitis were subjected to non-surgical periodontal treatment with no antibiotics. Clinical periodontal and systemic parameters were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Both groups showed significant and similar post-treatment improvements in all periodontal parameters examined. Most interestingly, periodontal treatment had a statistically significant positive effect on the glomerular filtration rate of each individual (group 1, p = 0.04; group 2, p = 0.002). Our results indicate that chronic periodontitis in predialysis kidney disease patients improved similarly in patients with chronic periodontitis and no history of CKD after receiving non-surgical periodontal therapy. This study demonstrates that CKD predialysis patients show a good response to non-surgical periodontal treatment.